Re: Is a certificate required for an SSL client?

2002-01-25 Thread Rob Beckers
--On Friday, January 25, 2002 8:12 AM +0100 Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:14:04PM -0500, Rob Beckers wrote: >> > From what I understand of the SSL/TLS protocol only the server's >> > public key >> (from the ser

Is a certificate required for an SSL client?

2002-01-24 Thread Rob Beckers
>From what I understand of the SSL/TLS protocol only the server's public key (from the server cert) is used during the handshake. Therefore, do I *have* to set a cert with SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file() (and a password callback function) if all I want to do is have an SSL client connect using a

Re: Problems re-using SSL connections with 0.9.6c...

2002-01-13 Thread Rob Beckers
--On Sunday, January 13, 2002 7:06 PM +0100 Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:59:20AM -0500, Rob Beckers wrote: >> Either way, even when re-compiling the server using the header files of >> 0.9.6c (that being the only thing of the SSL

Re: Problems re-using SSL connections with 0.9.6c...

2002-01-11 Thread Rob Beckers
--On Friday, January 11, 2002 3:23 PM +0100 Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just switched from 0.9.6 to 0.9.6c on Win32. The same server code worked >> fine when it came to re-using SSL sessions with 0.9.6. Now, with 0.9.6c, >> it's no longer capable of re-using. I'm linking dynam

Problems re-using SSL connections with 0.9.6c...

2002-01-10 Thread Rob Beckers
Just switched from 0.9.6 to 0.9.6c on Win32. The same server code worked fine when it came to re-using SSL sessions with 0.9.6. Now, with 0.9.6c, it's no longer capable of re-using. I'm linking dynamically to the lib DLLs and simply swapping old for new (and vice versa) makes re-use stop workin