Re: How small in codesize and ramsize can openssl be cut down to?

2004-10-12 Thread Tan Eng Ten
Maybe this is what you're actually looking for: www.matrixssl.com Jon Bendtsen wrote: i'm working on an embedded micro computer, and i would like to have a webservice. However the data needs to be encrypted. I was thinking of using SSL for that, but i only have 32K for everything. OS, tcp/ip,

How small in codesize and ramsize can openssl be cut down to?

2004-10-11 Thread Jon Bendtsen
i'm working on an embedded micro computer, and i would like to have a webservice. However the data needs to be encrypted. I was thinking of using SSL for that, but i only have 32K for everything. OS, tcp/ip, devicedriver, webserver, and ssl. Can i make any hope of trimming openSSL down to

Re: How small in codesize and ramsize can openssl be cut down to?

2004-10-11 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Hartmann?=
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think think it's hardly possible to strip openssl down to less than 32K and keep full SSL functionality. You might have more luck in writing your own SSL implementation. That will be tough enough assuming you got only a fraction of the 32K left for the encryption part.

Re: How small in codesize and ramsize can openssl be cut down to?

2004-10-11 Thread Jon Bendtsen
Den 11. okt 2004, kl. 13:54, skrev Jörn Hartmann: Maybe I'm wrong, but I think think it's hardly possible to strip openssl down to less than 32K and keep full SSL functionality. You might have more luck in writing your own SSL implementation. That will be tough enough assuming you got only a

Re: How small in codesize and ramsize can openssl be cut down to?

2004-10-11 Thread Mathias Brossard
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 14:19, Jon Bendtsen wrote: Den 11. okt 2004, kl. 13:54, skrev Jörn Hartmann: Maybe I'm wrong, but I think think it's hardly possible to strip openssl down to less than 32K and keep full SSL functionality. You might have more luck in writing your own SSL