> Hi Bob,
>
> Judging from what you wrote you might want to implement a
> 'content timestamp', which is added to the authenticated
> attributes and contains a timestamp over the encapsulated
> content info. This will not give a proof of the signing
> time, just the existence of the data at a pa
sage -
From: "Bob Steele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Zoltán Glózik'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Is it possible/appropriate to add a timestamp (RFC 3161) to a
PKCS#7?
>
> > You a
Hi Bob,
You are on the right track - it should be possible to attach a time stamp token to a
PKCS7 token. However, there are several options depending on what you want to time
stamp. The two most obvious ones being:
- if you want to prove the existence of the orignal content at a particular ti
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:17:48PM -0700, Bob Steele wrote:
>
> This might be a nonsensical question, and if so it
> wouldn't be my first foolish question here:
>
> Is it possible or appropriate to add a timestamp object
> (RFC 3161) to a PKCS#7 signature during the signature's
> creation?
Th
