As the maintainer of an alternative JavaVM I can confirm that we
absolutely had to support library unloading because one customer was using
it heavily - and that was quite a few years ago. Early Sun VMs didn't
support library unloading, but then those VMs also did not garbage-collect
obsolete
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] on
behalf of Dr. Stephen Henson [st...@openssl.org]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 1:40 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Small memory leak on multithreaded server
On Fri
On 21-11-2014 23:23, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 04:13:58PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
A fixed amount of memory that is not deallocated and is independent
of the number of operations performed, is NOT a memory leak.
Languages like Java and C# can continuously load and
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:56:41PM +0100, Jakob Bohm wrote:
Unloading of shared libraries is generally unsafe. Loading and
unloading of pure of Java packages may work well enough, but I
would [not] expect a Java runtime that unloads native libraries to stay
running for very long.
That is
: Re: Small memory leak on multithreaded server
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:19:32PM +, Barbe, Charles wrote:
I can do any combination of steps 2,3 and 4 above (ie. leave some
of them out) and I always get the same amount of memory left over
after I shut down my application. I believe this means
...@openssl.org [owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] on
behalf of Jeffrey Walton [noloa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:03 PM
To: OpenSSL Users List
Subject: Re: Small memory leak on multithreaded server
Any help would be appreciated.
This could be one of two problems. First
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 02:26:45PM +, Barbe, Charles wrote:
static void
openSslShutdown ()
{
You could try adding:
ENGINE_cleanup();
if that helps.
CONF_modules_free();
ERR_remove_state(0);
CONF_modules_unload(1);
ERR_free_strings();
).
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] on
behalf of Jeffrey Walton [noloa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:03 PM
To: OpenSSL Users List
Subject: Re: Small memory leak on multithreaded server
Any help would be appreciated
...@openssl.org] on
behalf of Dr. Stephen Henson [st...@openssl.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:50 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Small memory leak on multithreaded server
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014, Barbe, Charles wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed a small and consistent memory leak
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:21:47PM +, Barbe, Charles wrote:
What looks suspicious to me is the calls to x509v3_cache_extensions
that are in the traces below. This implies to me that openssl is
caching something. How do I ask it to clear that cache? If i need
to augment the library to do
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014, Barbe, Charles wrote:
Thanks for the response... here is the code that runs when my connection
closes:
void OpensslConnection::cleanup()
{
if(ssl != NULL)
{
if(isConnected)
{
while(SSL_shutdown(ssl) == 0)
;
leak on multithreaded server
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014, Barbe, Charles wrote:
Thanks for the response... here is the code that runs when my connection
closes:
void OpensslConnection::cleanup()
{
if(ssl != NULL)
{
if(isConnected)
{
while(SSL_shutdown(ssl
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014, Barbe, Charles wrote:
Yes... sorry, forgot to include this part of my shutdown sequence. One thing
I am noticing is that I do not call X409_free on my certs. I even have a
comment in my code saying that I am not freeing them because I think they
will be freed when the
A fixed amount of memory that is not deallocated and is independent
of the number of operations performed, is NOT a memory leak.
Languages like Java and C# can continuously load and unload a library.
You will see a growth in memory usage because the memory is not
reclaimed.
Librariers to
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 04:13:58PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
A fixed amount of memory that is not deallocated and is independent
of the number of operations performed, is NOT a memory leak.
Languages like Java and C# can continuously load and unload a library.
You will see a growth in
, November 21, 2014 1:40 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Small memory leak on multithreaded server
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014, Barbe, Charles wrote:
Yes... sorry, forgot to include this part of my shutdown sequence. One thing
I am noticing is that I do not call X409_free on my certs. I even
Hello,
I have noticed a small and consistent memory leak in my multithreaded openssl
server and am wondering if somebody can help me figure out what I need to do to
free it when my application closes. I am on OpenSSL version 1.0.1j. Here's how
I reproduce the leak:
1) Start up my server
2)
Any help would be appreciated.
This could be one of two problems. First, it could be an issue with
your code and the way you handle cleanup. To help diagnose this,
please show us your cleanup code.
Second, it could be the memory leak from the compression methods. This
is a well known problem
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:19:32PM +, Barbe, Charles wrote:
I can do any combination of steps 2,3 and 4 above (ie. leave some
of them out) and I always get the same amount of memory left over
after I shut down my application. I believe this means that this
is some sort of global
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014, Barbe, Charles wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed a small and consistent memory leak in my multithreaded openssl
server and am wondering if somebody can help me figure out what I need to do
to free it when my application closes. I am on OpenSSL version 1.0.1j. Here's
how
20 matches
Mail list logo
