Dr. Henson,
Looks like the check on the >0 and not just != -1 did
the trick! Thank you for helping me!
Cheers!
--- "Dr. Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005, M G wrote:
>
> > Hi Dr. Henson,
> >
> > You were wondering what code I used to produce the
> > digest: I
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005, M G wrote:
> Hi Dr. Henson,
>
> You were wondering what code I used to produce the
> digest: I used my X509 certificate to get the
> fingerprint with GetSHAFingerprint() - then I wrote
> the X509 to PEM, then I read it back and called
> GetSHAFingerprint() again and receive
Hi Dr. Henson,
You were wondering what code I used to produce the
digest: I used my X509 certificate to get the
fingerprint with GetSHAFingerprint() - then I wrote
the X509 to PEM, then I read it back and called
GetSHAFingerprint() again and received a different
fingerprint. Is this supposed to
This is the code I used:
(after the generate function code shown earlier in this thread - I have an m_pX509) - this is what I do with it:
m_strPEMText = X509ToPEM(m_pX509); m_strFingerprint = GetSHAFingerprint(m_pX509); ::MessageBox(NULL, m_strFingerprint, "ORIGINAL FINGERPRINT", MB_OK);
// cr
If there is a difference as small as one bit then the digests should be
different.
/r$
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
This address will be going away; please use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005, M G wrote:
> Hi Dr. Henson,
>
> Thanks in advance for taking a look: Here is my code that creates the
> certificate (I removed the checks on return values - they were fine)
>
> m_pX509 = X509_new();
>
> X509_set_version(m_pX509, 2);
> X509_gmtime_adj(X509_get_notBefor
Hi Dr. Henson,
Thanks in advance for taking a look: Here is my code that creates the certificate (I removed the checks on return values - they were fine)
m_pX509 = X509_new();
X509_set_version(m_pX509, 2);
X509_gmtime_adj(X509_get_notBefore(m_pX509),0);
X509_gmtime_adj(X509_get_notAfter(m_pX
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005, M G wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I noticed that the DER string representation was very very similar (longer by
> one byte) and only different by very few bytes... i.e., they are almost
> exactly the same thing I am trying to get to the cause of why the digest
> differs bet
Hi list,
I noticed that the DER string representation was very very similar (longer by one byte) and only different by very few bytes... i.e., they are almost exactly the same thing I am trying to get to the cause of why the digest differs between them
Any ideas?
Find your next car at Y
