some nice pictures how the bug works: http://www.xkcd.com/1354/
HIH
matthias
--
Sent from my FreeBSD netbook
Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2
El dÃa Wednesday, April 09, 2014 a las 01:05:22AM -0700, monloi perez
escribió:
True. Thanks for the quick reply.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 3:33 PM, Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk
wrote:
https://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html
1.0.1 introduced the heartbeat support.
On 12 Apr 2014, at 17:43, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El dÃa Wednesday, April 09, 2014 a las 01:05:22AM -0700, monloi perez
escribió:
True. Thanks for the quick reply.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 3:33 PM, Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk
wrote:
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen escribió:
What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first
source version having the bug?
http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=4817504d069b4c5082161b02a22116ad75f822b1
Hi,
Thanks
On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:30, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen
escribió:
What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first
source version having the bug?
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:30:22PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen
escribió:
What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first
source version having the bug?
On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de
wrote:
I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two
different things, right?
I don't have any direct knowledge of what goes on in the
NSA, but if they don't have a
On 12/04/14 21:30, Matthias Apitz wrote:
http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=4817504d069b4c5082161b02a22116ad75f822b1
Thanks for the git diff (and the other statements). Could you please be
so kind and point to the exact place of the offending statement (or
missing
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 03:43:29PM -0400, Michael Smith escribió:
On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote:
I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two
different things, right?
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 03:43:29PM -0400, Michael Smith escribió:
On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote:
I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two
different things, right?
On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:43, Michael Smith m...@smithbowen.net wrote:
On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote:
I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two
different things, right?
My statement was
On Apr 12, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de
wrote:
Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two
different things, right?
My statement was referring to the Introduced with intend.
Understood. I'm personally quite sure it *wasn't* introduced
with
12 matches
Mail list logo
