Re: [Openstack] [Openstack :: Folsom] Quantum DHCP Agent in Compute HOST

Hi Salvatore, Just want to understand more on Network Node in the below given app_demo page. As i see in the setup, it looks like there will be one Quantum Network Node for one Data centre setup. Please correct me if my assumptions are wrong. This Quantum Network Node will have all the virtual r

Re: [Openstack] Troubleshooting Swift 1.7.4 on mini servers

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:16:52 -0700 Nathan Trueblood wrote: > Definitely NOT a problem with the filesystem, but something is causing the > object-server to think there is a problem with the filesystem. If you are willing to go all-out, you can probably catch the error with strace, if it works on

Re: [Openstack] Troubleshooting Swift 1.7.4 on mini servers

There are any error about disk in the kern.log? 2012/10/30 Nathan Trueblood > Still no further clues. I re-created all the volumes I'm using for > Swift. Plenty of Inodes free: > > lab@data02:~$ df -i > FilesystemInodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on > /dev/sda2 12214272 39290

[Openstack] Action Required: Use DocImpact flag when commits might impact docs

TL;DR - If anything you submit could have an impact on documentation, just add "DocImpact" to a line in your commit message. Developers, We need your help. In the face of the 500 contributors to the code base, those small handful of us working on documentation are losing the war. One of the wo

Re: [Openstack] Troubleshooting Swift 1.7.4 on mini servers

Still no further clues. I re-created all the volumes I'm using for Swift. Plenty of Inodes free: lab@data02:~$ df -i FilesystemInodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/sda2 12214272 39290 121749821% / none 107979 4821074971% /dev none 1

Re: [Openstack] Instance provisioning taking more time for all the instances

Hi Nagaraju, apologies for long delay in replying. Answer inline. On 09/29/2012 05:40 AM, Nagaraju Bingi wrote: > Hi, > > We have deployed Openstack on VMware and we could able to provision > Instances but image is not getting cached on compute/ESX server and for > every provisioning of instances

Re: [Openstack] Quotas in folsom

+1 for Boson ... this is a key area for CERN too. When you have a fixed budget and no credit cards, quota management is a strong requirement! Tim > -Original Message- > From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern...@lists.launc

Re: [Openstack] Finding/Making Windows 7 Images for OpenStack

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Mark Lehrer wrote: >>> for OpenStack? I know it's supposed to be as easy as using kvm to >>> install it initially (as per the OpenStack docs) then importing that >>> image into glance, but there are some subtle things that I might be > > > Nope, it is indeed that s

Re: [Openstack] Quotas in folsom

On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 18:01 +, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > It's also worth noting that we are now in territory where quotas are > controlled by multiple projects: volumes and gigabytes have quotas in > both Nova and Cinder; network quotas are in both Nova and Quantum... > > While I don't think it

[Openstack] Looking for a mailman administrator

Hello folks, We need a new administrator for the mailman installation on lists.openstack.org. Duncan McGreggor has helped the community a lot in the past months, setting up the new machine, configuring and testing mailman's upgrades from the old servers and running the setup since June. I'm v

Re: [Openstack] quantum: two ips one vif

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Carl Bolterstein wrote: > For the curiosity sake - > > After some trial and error. It appears we have solved one half of our > conundrum. Using the driver below, there is no ip data inserted into > libvirt.xml which allows any ip to be used. It works for our u

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

> subscribe to the Nova topic at the link above. When I write a message > about nova I have to add '[Nova]' (or 'Nova') anywhere in the subject (Sidenote: does 'Nova' actually work? Looks to me like the regex in mailman requires the square braces...) Personally I'm fine with either model, but ju

Re: [Openstack] Quotas in folsom

It's also worth noting that we are now in territory where quotas are controlled by multiple projects: volumes and gigabytes have quotas in both Nova and Cinder; network quotas are in both Nova and Quantum... While I don't think it makes sense to try and centralize these things, I think the proj

Re: [Openstack] Local vlan id number is less than virtual network numbers

this was answered in LP questions: https://answers.launchpad.net/quantum/+question/212613 dan On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:45 AM, 吉海 wrote: > Hello, i am a new quantum fun. I have a question about provision local > vlan of ovs plugin. > Plugin ovs agent can provide 4094 local vlan for local vlan ma

Re: [Openstack] Instrumentation Monitoring Next Step - quick meet up

np ... I realize it's tricky to change this stuff. I'll see if I can jump on remote. -S From: Annie Cheng [ann...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 1:44 PM To: 'doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com'; Sandy Walsh Cc: 'openstack@lists.launchpad.net' Subject: Re:

Re: [Openstack] Instrumentation Monitoring Next Step - quick meet up

We also have to stick with the schedule on our end. Sandy, all discussion will be tracked in IRC log. We can also have follow up discussion via mailing list or more meetings. Annie From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 09:37 AM To: Sandy Walsh

Re: [Openstack] Instrumentation Monitoring Next Step - quick meet up

I can't meet later than that tonight. Doug On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote: > Ugh, I just realized I have a conflict. Can we push it an hour later? > (sorry!) > > -S > > -- > *From:* > openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.

Re: [Openstack] Quotas in folsom

On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 10:53 -0400, Mitchell Broome wrote: > I'm running into quota problems trying to increase the number of > security groups and rules within security groups per tenant. Setting > quota_security_groups and quota_security_group_rules in nova.conf seem > to have no effect. There a

[Openstack] Allocate specific floating IP to an instance

Hi Stacker, I know OpenStack is not designed that way and I don't think it's possible (or maybe I misses something :)) but I was wondering if there is any simple workaround to choose a specific floating IP to allocate. In other words, don't give me a random or N+1 next floating IP available but le

Re: [Openstack] Troubleshooting Swift 1.7.4 on mini servers

Also check the number of inodes used: `df -i` --John On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:31 AM, Nathan Trueblood wrote: > Yeah, I read about the 507 error.However, when the error occurs on my I > can see with 'df' that the drive is only 1% full and is definitely not > unmounted. I can write files t

Re: [Openstack] Troubleshooting Swift 1.7.4 on mini servers

Yeah, I read about the 507 error.However, when the error occurs on my I can see with 'df' that the drive is only 1% full and is definitely not unmounted. I can write files to the mounted filesystem directly before, during, and after the Swift error occurs. So the problem must be some kind o

Re: [Openstack] Retrieve Endpoints

It's hard to say without docs, as the openstack.identity.endpoint shown there is just throwing errors for me, and the openstack.endpoint is raising 401. However, the port used for the identity endpoint is typically used for the administrative/management identity endpoint (keystone), and the openst

[Openstack] Nova different sr

Good afternoon, Is it possible for Nova to deploy vm in different storages?? rather than just use the storage which matches sr_matching_filter parameter?? Best regards, ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.l

[Openstack] Quotas in folsom

I'm running into quota problems trying to increase the number of security groups and rules within security groups per tenant. Setting quota_security_groups and quota_security_group_rules in nova.conf seem to have no effect. There also doesn't seem to be any way to change the quota limits for secu

Re: [Openstack] Instrumentation Monitoring Next Step - quick meet up

Ugh, I just realized I have a conflict. Can we push it an hour later? (sorry!) -S From: openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net [openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Annie Cheng [ann...@yahoo-inc.c

Re: [Openstack] Instrumentation Monitoring Next Step - quick meet up

Apologize .. Correction Time: Monday (10/29/2012) 2200 UTC – 2300 UTC (3pm PDT if you are in California) Location: IRC #openstack-meeting From: Annie Cheng mailto:ann...@yahoo-inc.com>> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:14:08 -0700 To: "openstack@lists.launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] Instrumentation Monitoring Next Step - quick meet up

Reminder: Time: Monday (10/29/2012) 2200 UTC – 2300 UTC (2pm PDT if you are in California) Location: IRC #openstack-meeting Thanks! Annie From: Annie Cheng mailto:ann...@yahoo-inc.com>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:17:09 -0700 To: "openstack@lists.launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote: I agree that subject prefix is a way. There are pros and cons of either approach. However, when I asked a few of the people who showed interest in bare-metal discussion, a new mailing list was preferred by them. And we thought a separate mailing list

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

On 10/29/2012 12:32 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: We really shouldn't go in that direction: the openstack-dev list is already an aggregator of topics, since we use "mailman topics" on it. Indeed, mailman topics are very powerful. The current topics for openstack-dev are listed on each subscriber's

[Openstack] How can I specify which filesystem to use for ephemeral storage per image?

Hi! I'm running a nova cloud (essex) with both linux and windows instances. I want the windows images to boot with an ephemeral pre-formatted ntfs drive. I've tried setting: virt_mkfs="windows=mkfs.ntfs --force --fast --label %(fs_label)s %(target)s" in nova.conf and I've also set the os_type me

Re: [Openstack] Failed to get metadata for ip x.x.x.x

If you are using XenServer I automatically install the tools shipped with the product. It is a free download, so that might be your best bet for getting started right now. I will follow up with the XCP guys to see what we should be doing long term. Thank you for the heads up! John From: Afef

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

Sam Stoelinga wrote: > If mailing list gets separated, it would be good to have an aggregate > mailing list we can subscribe to which has all nova related mailing lists. We really shouldn't go in that direction: the openstack-dev list is already an aggregator of topics, since we use "mailman topic

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

If mailing list gets separated, it would be good to have an aggregate mailing list we can subscribe to which has all nova related mailing lists. On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > On 10/29/2012 02:59 AM, Asher Newcomer wrote: > > +1 > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Russel

Re: [Openstack] Failed to get metadata for ip x.x.x.x

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:34 PM, John Garbutt wrote: > I was fairly sure trunk has been fixed now, just about the sametime his > patch was uploaded, that had other issues. > > Are you still seeing the problem? I reproduced it on the baremetal branch we've been hacking on, which isn't completely u

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

On 10/29/2012 02:59 AM, Asher Newcomer wrote: +1 On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Russell Bryant > wrote: On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote: > > I agree that subject prefix is a way. > There are pros and cons of either approach. > However,

Re: [Openstack] Failed to get metadata for ip x.x.x.x

Hi, The folsom release solves the problem! However, I noticed that the url used by devstack to download xe-guest-utilities ( http://images.ansolabs.com/xen/xe-guest-utilities_5.6.100-651_amd64.deb) does not work any more. For me, I just used my last downloads. But, a new devstack user will not be

Re: [Openstack] Failed to get metadata for ip x.x.x.x

I was fairly sure trunk has been fixed now, just about the sametime his patch was uploaded, that had other issues. Are you still seeing the problem? I will double check the bug has been updated when I get online. Thanks, John Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:56 AM, John Garbutt