On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On 09/13/2012 01:45 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > That would be option B2 ("single user/general list, named openstack"):
> > openst...@lists.openstack.org
> > openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org
> > openstack-...@lists.openstack.org
> >
I like these two penneth.
d
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Kevin Jackson
wrote:
> My two penneth worth:
>
> I'd be confused as to what the difference between "general" and "operators"
> would be and would result in people posting to both - so that goes for
> openstack@... openstack-general@...
New subject line, to catch the attention of those who might have dozed
off during this thread...
See the announcement below!
Thanks, Thierry!
d
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> We (the election officials) are still checking if we'll be able to ge
/me waits for http://vishfacts.com/ ...
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> Vish doesn't sleep. He waits.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Blake Yeager
> wrote:
>>
>> He also lives vicariously through himself.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ravi Jagannathan
>>
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> I must admit even I was unaware of the requirement to be a individual
> foundation member in order to vote in PTL elections (I personally
> happen to be a member already). There are definitely at least a few
> people on the list below that I
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Project Technical Lead of Nova
> for the Grizzly Release cycle.
>
> Qualifications
> --
>
> I was part of the original Anso Labs Team that created Nova at NASA
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>> Now, the main question is still open: where should the General mailing
>> list go? Anybody disagrees that we should merge this list into 'Operators'?
>
> I think there are two options:
>
> Option A1:
> openstack-gen
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
> Good news, everyone!
>
> I'd like to officially announce my candidacy for the Project Technical Lead
> of Glance for the Grizzly release cycle.
>
> Since I am the current Glance PTL, I have had a chance to figure out what
> being a PTL means
-- Forwarded message --
From: Duncan McGreggor
Date: Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Running for Quantum PTL
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm really exci
Hey everyone!
It's that time again :-)
Anyone who would like to be a candidate for the forth-coming elections
for the OpenStack Project Technical Leads may now submit their names!
Valid candidates must currently be an Active Technical Contributor
(within the 6 months prior to 23:59 PST August 29,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Assuming that the *-paste.ini files always need to be there, is there
>> > some way we could avoid requiring admins to edit these files, and instead
>> > make it more l
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 08:37 AM, Rick Clark wrote:
>> Who is the election official, running this election. Nomination
>> should be an open process, similar to the core dev process.
>
> Speaking of that process, it's broken and needs to be fixed AS
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>> I the future, I'd like to suggest Condorcet voting for future polls.
>> It's a more comprehensive voting mechanism than the polling done on
>> Launchpad. It's also easy t
I the future, I'd like to suggest Condorcet voting for future polls.
It's a more comprehensive voting mechanism than the polling done on
Launchpad. It's also easy to use (both in creating polls and in voting
on favorites).
Here's an example set of results (favorite programming language poll):
h
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>
> Thanks to Duncan McGreggor, James E. Blair and Antony Messerly, we now
> have a new mailing list server.
Don't forget Barry Warsaw! He helped us find a last-minute corrupted
pickle file issue right at the very end of o
#x27;t you
imagine loss of inertia?
This is the sort of thing that encourages private forks and community
abandonment. It might be worth reviewing the comments over the last
few days -- in detail -- and doing so in that light ...
> we should have a
> discussion on the ML and update HACK
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 12:48 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>> +1 :-)
>
> In all seriousness - Mark made two separate points. Which one are you
> top-posting a +1 to?
Ah, sorry -- I'll be more explicit. Condensing m
+1 :-)
d
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Mark Washenberger
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Please forgive the top-posting! I always get way too wordy with
> inline replies.
>
> Regarding configuration, I think there is another option I'd like us
> to adopt. We should implement the code as in your option
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 10:48 -0400, Mark Washenberger wrote:
>>
>> "Jay Pipes" said:
>> > On 05/29/2012 04:04 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> >> Adopting this pattern across all projects will actually help
>> >> openstack-common
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Mark Washenberger
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jay Pipes" said:
>> > On 05/29/2012 04:04 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> >> Adopting this pattern across all projects will actually help
>> >> openstack-common mo
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>> On Tue 29 May 2012 10:36:05 AM PDT, James E. Blair wrote:
>>> Someone pointed out that since the security announcements _haven't_ been
>>> going to the announce list, but the main mailing list instead, that they
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I had the chance to discuss the "global conf" issue with a good number
> of folks at the design summit and the conclusion I came away with was
> that opinions range from "meh, it's fairly inelegant but I don't care
> much either wa
-- Forwarded message --
From: Monty Taylor
Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: administration of new mailinglists
To: Stefano Maffulli
Cc: Thierry Carrez , Duncan McGreggor
, Michael Tietz , Christian
Berendt , "James E. Blair"
On 05/29/2012 11:13 A
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stefano Maffulli
Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: administration of new mailinglists
To: Thierry Carrez
Cc: Monty Taylor , Duncan McGreggor
, Michael Tietz , Christian
Berendt , "James E. Blair"
On 05/26/2012 11:38 A
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thierry Carrez
Date: Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: administration of new mailinglists
To: Monty Taylor
Cc: Stefano Maffulli , Duncan McGreggor
, Michael Tietz , Christian
Berendt , "James E. Blair"
Monty Taylor wrote:
>
Oh, one more thing:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Duncan McGreggor writes:
[snip]
>> We need to talk about migrating data:
>> * from the old host to the new one
>> * from LP archives (don't know if that's possible)
>
> Do y
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Duncan McGreggor writes:
>
>> I want to wait on creating openstack-dev until we've got Exim setup
>> properly. Someone else will need to do that. I'm not sure if the
>> mailman Ubuntu package updates
Re-sending to the list...
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>
> On Fri 04 May 2012 12:38:16 PM PDT, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh, gmane is fine, I just said the first thing that came into my head.
>>> Now that I think about it, I&#x
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> Hey everyone!
>>
>> On 04/27/2012 05:04 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>
>>> To avoid Launchpad list slowness, we would run the new openstack-dev
>
Hey guys,
Just wanted to say that I'm deep, deep into some Keystone right now
(auth'ing against DreamHost's existing infrastructure and granting
access to tenants, etc.) and this email just saved me about a week of
work :-)
Thanks!
d
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
>
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The number of blueprints for nova has gotten entirely out-of-hand. I've
> obsoleted about 40 blueprints and there are still about 150 blueprints for
> nova. Many of these are old, or represent features that are cool i
: 22
>
> Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
> Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0010
>
>
>
> On May 4, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>
>> Update:
>>
>> Jeremy Hanmer said that "it looks like it's a port lookup t
Update:
Jeremy Hanmer said that "it looks like it's a port lookup that's
failing and taking cfprefsd with it."
He's gone over my head, but I'm sure that's meaningful to someone out there ;-)
d
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>
; Lorin Hochstein
> Lead Architect - Cloud Services
> Nimbis Services, Inc.
> www.nimbisservices.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 4, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>
> Updates:
>
> * Doug Hellmann narrowed this down to the network access that was
> hap
012 at 12:40 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> We're really pressed for time right now, so there are certain rabbit
> holes we can't dive down, but I wanted to bring this up in case it
> hasn't been seen yet.
>
> On Mac OS X 10.6 and 10.7, when running
Hey folks,
We're really pressed for time right now, so there are certain rabbit
holes we can't dive down, but I wanted to bring this up in case it
hasn't been seen yet.
On Mac OS X 10.6 and 10.7, when running a 12.04 Ubuntu VM and setting
up the dev env for Keystone, we get some madness.
10.6: V
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> The Ubuntu IS team is setting up their famous infrastructure for UDS on
> Sunday from 9am-6pm. This may be a good chance for people that are
> already in the San Francisco/Oakland to learn a few tricks from the experts.
>
>
cc'ing openstack list
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Igor Laskovy wrote:
> Privet all from sunny Kiev!
>
> I have playing with Quantum with Quantum Linux Bridge plugin on Ubuntu
> 12.04 and have installed these packages:
>
> i quantum-server
> i quantum-plugin-linuxbridge-agent
> i A quantum
cc'ing openstack list
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am following this wonderful doc:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_started_with_OpenStack_EPEL#Launch_an_Instance
>
> When I launch an image the vm status is error and the image seems to be
> running in an
cc'ing openstack list
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Richard Raseley wrote:
> I am trying to figure out the best way to see view the distribution of a
> file or files across my test swift setup. I want to basically upload a file
> or files to containers and then be able to run a command or scrip
oposed
could be part of a solution like that. I doesn't have to be, but it
could be. Making sure that we don't limit our options in the future
would be a good thing :-)
d
> The APIs are handling the permission checks after all.
>
> -Matt
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Du
You make some fair points.
But consider the large class of cloud users that will never need to
bring up OpenStack from scratch, but rather maintain them. These users
will need to be able to easily identify the commands that pertain to
their daily maintenance, troubleshooting, and reporting tasks.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> There are a couple of ways to handle that:
>
> 1. A separate "openstackadmin" CLI that looks for commands using a different
> plugin namespace, and therefore only loads the admin commands.
>
> 2. Prefix admin-related commands in the unified cl
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> I was replying to Duncan's email, not Thierry's. I'm all for the new
> openstack-dev list.
>
> It was Duncan's proposal that the other lists be split as so.
>
> 1. openstack-dev = Dev
> 2. openstack = Ops
> 3. openstack-operat
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
> I like this idea but what happens to the openstack-operators list in this
> scenario?
>
> I don't think we'd want to have the openstack and openstack-operators list
> going along in parallel since it sounds like they would overlap. I propose
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 04/27/2012 09:44 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> Hey everyone!
>>>
>>> On 04/27/2012 05:04 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>>
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hey everyone!
>
> On 04/27/2012 05:04 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> To avoid Launchpad list slowness, we would run the new openstack-dev
>> list off lists.openstack.org. Given the potential hassle of dealing with
>> spam and delivery issues o
A side note:
On the DevOpsTeam session etherpad, I've added a new section for
post-event additions, comments, etc., hopefully encouraging
responsible after-the-fact contributions :-)
d
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for an awesome design summit! I've b
Robbie, this is just as awesome as AWESOME and has as much mass as
MAAS. With this support, you may have solved one of DreamHost's
long-standing logistical issues around our cloud efforts.
Thanks, Ubuntu and Canonical!
d
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Robbie Williamson wrote:
> For those of
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>
> The following channels have been created on Freenode and are registered.
>
> #osds-ballroom
> #osds-seacliff-a-b
> #osds-seacliff-c
> #osds-seacliff-d
> #osds-marina
> #osds-bayview-a
> #osds-bayview-b
&
io: the better the support gets, the more folks will have a
great experience, and those that aren't able to attend in person will
feel less left out and more a part of things, thus increasing the
numbers... so yeah, pretty important stuff for the health of the
community :-)
d
>
> -
gt; and select current meeting.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hitesh
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Duncan McGreggor
>> mailto:dun...@dreamhost.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Pinging Stef on this...
>>
>> d
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 20
Pinging Stef on this...
d
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Mark Gius wrote:
> All of the WebEx sessoins appear to be expired. Probably because the
> meeting was scheduled to end last night. Is somebody able to recreate them?
>
> Mark
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:19 AM
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:13 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>>> The following channels have been created on Freenode and are
>>> registered.
&g
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Duncan McGreggor
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stefano Maffulli
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:03 -0700, Matt Joyce wrote:
>>>
>>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stefano Maffulli
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:03 -0700, Matt Joyce wrote:
>>
>> Ballroom: Intro Plenary, Breakout tables, Lightning Talks
>>
>>
Ugh... did anyone take pictures of the "easel work"? Or take (less old
fashioned) notes?
d
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Mark A Carlson wrote:
> It was old fashioned marker on easel
>
> -- mark
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2012, at 6:45 PM, "Ahn, Jaesuk" wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know if there is an
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:13 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>>> The following channels have been created on Freenode and are
>>> registered.
&g
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:13 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>> The following channels have been created on Freenode and are
>> registered.
>>
>> #osds-ballroom
>> #osds-seacliff-a-b
>> #osds-seaclif
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Duncan McGreggor
> wrote:
>>
>> What about running on a LiveCD? You should be able to install Webex,
>> as long as the file system is mounted.
>>
>> Jorge, is that c
cc'ing Jorge Castro from Canonical (who will be at the conference...
and maybe the summit?).
Jorge, question below on how to deal with Webex on Ubuntu and limited
time/people resources.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 02:52 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>>
Lyle replied "yes" -- sadly, we can't edit the sessions anymore.
Fortunately, there's the wiki :-) I've updated the session to point to
these blueprints:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Summit/Folsom/DevOps
d
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> L
er it's 500 USD to attend.
>
> There will be over 400 people at the summit, not all of them are
> developers. I expect lots of operators/users have a representation
> there. Will there be enough to justify having this discussion there? I
> don't know but we can try.
>
> O
er it's 500 USD to attend.
>
> There will be over 400 people at the summit, not all of them are
> developers. I expect lots of operators/users have a representation
> there. Will there be enough to justify having this discussion there? I
> don't know but we can try.
>
> O
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> Problem of course is many operators aren't on the design summit
> contributor list ( ala don't have codes to get into it ) and if it's
> later it's 500 USD to attend.
>
> Maybe not the best means of collaborating on something that effects them
Resharing with the Operators list...
d
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Wilkinson, Lyle wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> We’ve created a set of 3 blueprints on the topics of health and monitoring,
> metrics data collection, and cloud inventory maintenance.
>
>
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova
Lyle, would you mind if I add these to the "Instrumenting OpenStack" session?
http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/edit/163
d
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Wilkinson, Lyle wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> We’ve created a set of 3 blueprints on the topics of health and monitoring,
> metrics data c
Lurking on the thread, but love what I'm seeing :-)
Nice work, guys!
d
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Very cool, glad to see that is being worked on, it looks pretty similar to
> what I was thinking of.
> I’m all for open dialogues.
> In fact.
> I was thinking of what
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
> EC2 is strategically important. I don't believe that building "gold images"
> is the right focus for OpenStack.
Indeed. Amazon drives a huge portion of the IaaS market today, and has
an enormous impact on non-Amazon IaaS implementations/dep
Hey folks,
I've listed all the DevOps sessions for the summit in the following wiki page:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Summit/Folsom/DevOps
We got such an overwhelmingly awesome set of inputs for the "Input
from the Wild" session that we'll be splitting that into several new
sessions (that's ttx!)
For anyone interested in DevOps, Ops, cloud hosting management, etc.,
there's a proposed session we could use your feedback on for topics of
discussion:
http://summit.openstack.org/sessions/view/57
Respond with your thoughts and ideas, and I'll be sure to add them to the list.
Thanks!
d
_
Nicely done!
Congratulations, everyone!!!
d
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm very happy to announce the immediate release of OpenStack 2012.1
> (code-named "Essex"). This coordinated release contains 5 components:
>
> OpenStack Compute ("Nova") 20
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 08:20 AM, Lillie Ross-CDSR11 wrote:
>>
>> My question is, should I base our new installation directly off the Essex
>> branch in the git repository, or use the packages that will be deployed as
>> part of the associated Ubuntu 1
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 09:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Everyone,
>>
>> As we get ready to release Essex, I should move all Essex blueprints and
>> bugs (for Nova, Glance, Horizon and Keystone) to target the release
>> milestone, in an effort to pr
+1
Thanks for exploring this, Russell!
Next step: getting a common REST API abstraction in place that all the
projects can use... ;-)
d
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> There was a thread on this list a little while ago about moving the
> notification driv
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Joshua Harlow (harlo...@yahoo-inc.com) wrote:
>> https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-DevstackPy
>>
>> Its our chance to make it right :-)
>
> Hopefully your session, or a joint session will make the Common
> development track so we can at lea
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 13, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Joe Gordon wrote:
>> I have noticed that some Gerrit branches get approved very quickly,
>> sometimes in a matter of minutes. While most of the time these
>> branches are vetted properly, the window for reviewing can be
+1 :-)
d
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ziad Sawalha
wrote:
> Really cool! Thanks, Syed.
>
> We should have these running at the keynote at the conference while everyone
> is waiting to get started :-)
>
> From: Armaan
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:21:54 +0530
> To:
> Subject: [Openstack] OpenS
No kidding... that was amazing to watch :-)
Thanks for doing it and sharing it!!
d
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Devin Carlen wrote:
> Seriously awesome!
>
> On Sunday, March 4, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Armaan wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have created few videos visualising the development history of v
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Monsyne Dragon wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On 03/02/2012 05:34 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
>>> In our experience (running clusters of several hundred nodes) the DB
>>> performance is not generally the significant factor, so making its call
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Caitlin Bestler
wrote:
> Duncan McGregor wrote:
>
>>Like so many things that are aesthetic in nature, the statement above is
>>misleading. Using a callback, event-based, deferred/promise oriented system
>>is hard for *some*. It is far, far easier for >others (myse
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012, Armando Migliaccio
> wrote:
>> I agree, but then the whole assumption of adopting eventlet to simplify
>> the programming model is hindered by the fact that one has to think
>> harder to what is doing...Nova could've
ibe to the Int'l User Groups.
>
> -dave
>
> http://meetup.com/OpenStack-Colorado/
>
>
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 10:51 -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 19:29 -0500, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>> > DreamHost is starting up a new office on the E
LLoyd and others,
The blog post announcement for this event [1] mentions "working on
resolving high priority bugs" -- I'm assuming that the following list
is what identifies them? (I have filtered on essex-4 and rc1)
http://goo.gl/Qe17g
That includes "In Progress" ones. This one excludes those,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 19:29 -0500, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>> DreamHost is starting up a new office on the East Coast of the US in
>> Atlanta... and one of the first things we did was create an Atlanta
>> OpenStack me
Hey folks,
DreamHost is starting up a new office on the East Coast of the US in
Atlanta... and one of the first things we did was create an Atlanta
OpenStack meetup group:
http://www.meetup.com/openstack-atlanta/
If you're in the greater Atlanta area, be sure to join us :-)
We're working with
Adam, you've outdone yourself :-) That was a phenomenal reply with
tons of good information.
You've provided our team with all the info we need now -- thanks!
d
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 09:22 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>&
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
> As promised for anyone who was interested when we announced to the last last
> week, here is a blog post James Page and I put together describing our
> Openstack testing efforts and infrastructure in greater detail:
>
> http://javacruft.wordp
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> I've put my name on the ballot for Nova PTL, and I'd like to explain
> what I expect to do (my platform, if you will).
>
> Nova is facing many separate, but related problems.
>
> * Nova is too big.
> Very few (if any) core developers are com
Nice one, Sandy! I was planning creating a tool exactly like this -- thanks so
much! Can't wait to try it out...
d
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Last week I started on a little debugging tool for OpenStack based on
> AMQP events that I've been
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Michael Pittaro
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Duncan McGreggor
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Duncan McGreggor
>> wrote:
>>> I just found out that PyCon 2012 registration opened up:
>>> ht
I'm always amazed, Chuck, that a guy this busy:
http://goo.gl/xXLqn
gets so much done...
d
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Chuck Short wrote:
> You are welcome :)
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:33:18 -0800
> Joshua Harlow wrote:
>
>> Thx chuck short :-P
>>
>> On 2/16/12 2:27 PM, "Andy Smith
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> I just found out that PyCon 2012 registration opened up:
> https://us.pycon.org/2012/registration/
>
> and was wondering:
> * are there any OpenStack sprints planned for March 12 through Thursday
> March 15?
> *
*high fives* to Anne and everyone else involved!
d
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> I'm pleased to point you to http://api.openstack.org.
>
> Collecting OpenStack APIs on one page, built with an API developer in mind.
>
> This design implementation fulfills a blueprint for t
On 06 Feb 2012 - 10:29, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Over the weekend I was thinking (I know a first, haha).
>
> I was wondering if the community could elevate devstack to a
> "official" openstack project, instead of being a "unofficial project".
> Since it seems like pretty much every develo
Nicely done, guys!
Very, very cool.
d
On 26 Jan 2012 - 13:22, Robbie Williamson wrote:
> http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Precise%20OpenStack%20Testing/
>
> James Page[1] has setup the jobs in the Ubuntu OpenStack QA Lab to start
> publishing to our public Jenkins QA instance this morning. We n
Under specific architectures, 0MQ can process millions of messages per
second vs. RabbitMQ's many thousands.
RabbitMQ is a messaging system; 0MQ is a messaging framework. There's a
pretty good write-up on some of the basic differences here:
http://www.zeromq.org/docs:welcome-from-amqp
Note that
FWIW, I'd love to see this land in E3...
d
On 24 Jan 2012 - 16:08, Eric Windisch wrote:
> Per today's meeting, I am proposing the ZeroMQ RPC driver for a
> feature-freeze exception.
>
> I am making good progress on this blueprint, it adds a new optional
> module and service without modifying any
On 12 Jan 2012 - 10:52, Diego Parrilla Santamar?a wrote:
> Just listening Johnny Cash's 'Folsom Prison Blues'!
>
> ... so my vote goes to...
Besides, it just *sounds* good: "the folsom release"
Rolls of the tongue quite well.
And serious bonus points for the Cash connection ;-)
d
> --
> Diego
On 01 Jan 2012 - 03:23, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
> > [mailto:openstack-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net]
> > On Behalf Of Richard W.M. Jones
> > Sent: 21 December 2011 10:56
> > To: Sco
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
