See my comments inline
From: Sam Stoelinga [mailto:sammiest...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 10:37 AM
To: Moshe Levi
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Neutron][SRIOV][docs] Enabling SRIOV on OpenStack
Juno step-by-step guide
I think it was not fair to say it's
Hi Ramy,
Thanks for the suggestion but since I am not including the neutron project,
so downloading and including it will require any additional configuration
in devstack-gate or not?
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote:
We ran into this issue as well. I
I think it was not fair to say it's not up to date. It seems it's up to
date, but current downsides of existing OpenStack wikis on SRIOV are
missing info, many different Wikis and hard to consume the info:
1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/SR-IOV-Passthrough-For-Networking
2.
Hi Sam,
Can you explain why you think that the
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/SR-IOV-Passthrough-For-Networking is out of
date?
Moreover you blog explain how to configure SR-IOV on Intel NIC, but keep in
mind Neutron SRIOV is generic and can support any other vendors such as
Mellanox.
Hi Jeremy,
thanks for quickly accepting the venv patch. When I wake up in the morning,
I checked the ask-staging host and see no sign of the changes by the new
puppet module, nor on the host and the puppet board logs. That was a bit
strange, because the patch was applied several hours before.
On 2015-07-19 06:58:17 + (+), Marton Kiss wrote:
[...]
Do you think that the puppet-agent was disabled on that host due the
smartcn failure? The last update was on July 15. I put back the agent into
disabled state, until we resolve this issue.
[...]
Nope, as I explained in IRC last
Hi Neutron folk!
I'd like to give an update on and encourage wide review of my work on
a type of network that connects VMs through IP routing instead of
through bridging and tunneling at L2. I believe the core Neutron
pieces of this are now complete and ready for detailed review and
potential
This could start another topic on which is better but now the fact is rhel and
ubuntu are ahead of SUSE.
Inviato da iPhone
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 3:49 PM -0700, Cameron Seader csea...@suse.com
wrote:
Hi Peter,
You really should take a look at SUSE. SUSE Has a strong Linux
Yeap, it is an open issue, because a patch is required for vamsee-solr, my
pull request was accepted there, and I asked the maintainer to make a 0.0.8
release of solr module. It will solve this issue.
M.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:09 PM Jeremy Stanley jer...@openstack.org wrote:
On 2015-07-19
Hi,
Did you check/set instance migration config options ?
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/section_configuring-compute-migrations.html
If you have a default setup without doing any migration settings I'm pretty
sure it will fail.
BTW which version of openstack are you
Thanks Jay.
Hongbin, yes, it will be a scheduling system, either swarm, k8s or mesos. I
just think bay isn't a must in this case, and we don't need nova to provision
BM hosts, which makes things more complicated imo.
Peng
-- Original --
From: Jay
I have a Kilo install w/the base components: Keystone, Nova, Neutron,
Glance and Cinder. Cinder is running on a seperate host from the Nova
compute servers using the LVM plugin. I have about 12 vm's started and
I noticed that on the System summary page its showing local storage in
use,
Hi Jay,
My idea is that if someone wants an IaaS solution, go Nova+Cinder+Neutron. For
private CaaS solution, K8S/Mesos+Cinder+Neutron(libnetwork?)+Docker, for public
CaaS, go K8S/Mesos+Cinder+Neutron+Hyper.
By doing this, we could clearly deliver the message to the community and
market.
So this has come up a few times. My question is, does having one node
serving several backends really form multiple AZs? Not really, the c-vol
node becomes a single point of failure.
There might be value in moving the AZ setting into the per-backend
configurables, if it doesn't work there
Currently random mock objects are created inside of spec files to make writing
unit tests easier. This approach works but has some drawback:
* mocks are not sharable between specs.
* mocks are usually too simple.
* mocks may not be consistent between spec files.
* mocks are not
Nathan,
From the description, RDO Juno and Ceph, it sounds like you should just
hire Red Hat consultants as that is their stack.
Alternatively, you could just ask your questions here and or in ask
Openstack and maybe skip the whole consultancy step.
On Jul 19, 2015 11:34 AM, Nathan Stratton
Don't include the curly brackets on the script arguments. The documentation is
just using them to indicate that those are placeholders for real values.
John Vrbanac
From: Asha Seshagiri asha.seshag...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 2:15 PM
To: OpenStack
My thoughts:
I think we'd better check what google will do after such official
announcement. As community changes fast, and we'd really welcome someone to
contributing it consistently and actively.
Thanks
Best Wishes,
Hi Peng,
As @Adrian pointed it out:
My fist suggestion is to find a way to make a nova virt driver for Hyper,
which could allow it to be used with all of our current Bay types in
Magnum.
I remembered you or other guys in your company proposed one bp about nova
virt driver for Hyper. What's the
Hi all,
I think we are missing a category for plugins. I was thinking to following
plugins
-TLS plugin related to security. For example everything related to tls
access to the dashboard/vnc and apis
-Plugin to deploy freezer with fuel in order to achieve abckup and restore
(on going)
-plugin to
On 07/16/2015 05:13 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
anyone with a stake in the game and their cat will upvote or
downvote for no reason
I think we are overloaded on skewed information already and I'm not in
support of a structure that would likely offer gamed information.
Thanks,
Anita.
On Jul 16, 2015, at 4:13 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
I don't really like the idea of a popularity contest to define HA or
scales -- anyone with a stake in the game and their cat will upvote or
downvote for no reason. I prefer to define HA in clear terms and have
some group
I'm currently in holidays but I could not resist to take some time and
reply.
On 07/18/2015 06:32 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
It has been 5 weeks since Emilien has asked Fuel developers to
contribute more
actively to Puppet OpenStack project [0]. We had a lively discussion on
openstack-dev,
What you need to know about Google joining OpenStack
http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/what-you-need-to-know-about-google-joining-openstack
In the search for the next big thing, Google has joined the OpenStack
Foundation. The Mountain View, California-based colossus announced
Hi Lyz,
The third party testing doc recommends that 3rd party CI accounts should
be added to the Third Party CI mail filter list
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/270 by contacting
coordinators. Is there a group email address for those coordinators or
should I just send an email to all
Hi Ramy,
Thanks for the suggestion. One more thing I need to ask, as I have have
setup one more CI so is there any way that we can decide that only required
projects should get downloaded and installed during devstack installation
dynamically. As I see no such things that can be done to
There are two ways that I know of to customize what services are run:
1. Setup your own feature matrix [1]
2. Override enabled services [2]
Option 2 is probably what you’re looking for.
[1]
Peng,
You are not the first to think this way, and it's one of the reasons we did not
integrate Containers with OpenStack in a meaningful way a full year earlier.
Please pay attention closely.
1) OpenStack's key influences care about two personas: 1.1) Cloud Operators
1.2) Cloud Consumers. If
Matt Riedemann wrote:
I think we're good now, let the rechecks begin!
Thanks so much for driving this, Matt. Don't burn out working on
weekends on it, though :)
(yes I realize the irony of posting that on a Sunday)
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
On 07/15/2015 03:27 PM, John Griffith wrote:
It's relatively limited right now I think, and part of the reason for
that is we've tried to ensure that the information that we put on tags
is subjective
I think you mean objective here, and throughout this, not
subjective. We try as much as
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 08:39:23PM +0800, Sam Stoelinga wrote:
+1 on Kevin Benton's comments.
Ironic should have integration with switches where the switches are SDN
compatible. The individual bare metal node should not care which vlan,
vxlan or other translation is programmed at the switch.
Hi John ,
Thanks for pointing me to the right script.
I appreciate your help .
I tried running the script with the following command :
[root@HSM-Client bin]# python pkcs11-key-generation --library-path
{/usr/lib/libCryptoki2_64.so} --passphrase {test123} --slot-id 1 mkek
--length 32 --label
Just the export I mentioned:
export DEVSTACK_GATE_NEUTRON=1
Devstack-gate scripts will do the right thing when it sees that set. You can
see plenty of examples here [1].
Ramy
[1]
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/jenkins/jobs/devstack-gate.yaml#n467
From:
The nova guys propose move Hyper to Magnum but not Nova as Hyper cannot fit
into nova virt driver well.
As Hyper is now integrating with Kubernetes, I think that the integration
point may be creating a kubernetes hyper bay with ironic driver.
Thanks
2015-07-20 10:00 GMT+08:00 Kai Qiang Wu
As exciting as these emails are, I find them a bit unexciting. They don't
give me any context to let me know whether this was a one-off or if
something has been broken for a while.
Long term, having a dashboard (see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192253/
for the spec) will help us get better
As discussed at the last meeting we'll cancel this week (blame it on travel for
the mid-cycle meetup).
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
Adrian,
Let's say someone creates a Hyper bay. The bay will be sth. like
BM+Hyper+Cinder+Neutron+k8s/mesos/swarm. This is exactly a mini HyperStack.
What nova does in this scenario is to provision the Hyper+BM hosts. Things like
LiveMigration, Multi-tenancy, Billing, VPC, Volume, etc., are
Hi Asselin, Abhishek,
Thanks for the reply. :)
On 07/19/2015 02:41 AM, Asselin, Ramy wrote:
HI Abhi Tang,
Sorry I missed this thread. Let me know if you've resolved your issues.
My repo is undergoing migrations to reuse components in
openstack-infra/puppet-openstackci.
For
It looks like that Nova team has no plan to accept either nova-docker driver or
nova-hyper. The focus of Nova is Server-like instance, not App-centric
container. That is fine. It's the best to let Nova be Nova, and build sth. else
for container. After all, different use cases, different needs,
Hi ,
Could anyone please check the bug below?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1467791
This bug description:
When the created network contains one ipv4 subnet and an ipv6 subnet which
turned on slaac or stateless.
When I create a port use cmd like:
neutron port-create --fixed-ip
Adrian,
Let's say someone creates a Hyper bay. The bay will be sth. like
BM+Hyper+Cinder+Neutron+k8s/mesos/swarm. This is exactly a mini HyperStack.
What nova does in this scenario is to provision the Hyper+BM hosts. Things like
LiveMigration, Multi-tenancy, Billing, VPC, Volume, etc., are
Hi, Jay, Adrian and Wu,
I have some problems with my mail server to reply Adrian's message. So let me
write here.
Let's say someone creates a Hyper bay. The bay will be sth. like
BM+Hyper+Cinder+Neutron+k8s/mesos/swarm. This is exactly a mini HyperStack.
What nova does in this scenario is
Adrian,
Let's say someone creates a Hyper bay. The bay will be sth. like
BM+Hyper+Cinder+Neutron+k8s/mesos/swarm. This is exactly a mini HyperStack.
What nova does in this scenario is to provision the Hyper+BM hosts. Things like
LiveMigration, Multi-tenancy, Billing, etc., are handled by
This is ok for the services it will install, but how can we also restrict
the downloading of all the projects(i.e; downloading only required
projects) ?
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote:
There are two ways that I know of to customize what services are
Hi,
I want to add a new user other than the demo user in openstack juno. But
I want the same external network to be used by its VM for internet
connectivity. How can I do this?
Thanks ,
Priyanka
___
Mailing list:
I had some problem with my email server today, so you may see several identical
messages from me in the ML. Please ignore and sorry about that.
Peng
-- Original --
From: Peng Zhaop...@hyper.sh;
Date: Mon, Jul 20, 2015 11:41 AM
To: OpenStack Development
Adrian,
Let's say someone creates a Hyper bay. The bay will be sth. like
BM+Hyper+Cinder+Neutron+k8s/mesos/swarm. This is exactly a mini HyperStack.
What nova does in this scenario is to provision the Hyper+BM hosts. Things like
LiveMigration, Multi-tenancy, Billing, VPC, Volume, etc., are
47 matches
Mail list logo
