We've migrated our OST platform from qpid to rabbitmq. After this
migration, we don't receive any notification from nova/neutron in
designate-sink (so there is no DNS registration for new VMs or floating
IPs). However, designate is correctly integrated with rabbitmq because
designate-api replies
Hello, guys, I have a question
We now have OS Kilo + KVM+ Ubuntu 14.04
Nova-compute.conf:
[libvirt]
virt_type=kvm
images_type = lvm
images_volume_group =openstack-controller01-ky01-vg
volume_clear = none
the problem is when nova boots a new instance it's SUPER slow
exactly this step:
Running cmd
On 08/05/2015 01:30 AM, Lance Haig wrote:
Hi All,
We have an icehouse install that uses a default domain and tennant list
What has been requested is that we create a new Domain with new
projects etcc within that domain.
I tried creating the domain in horizon and it seems to complete just
Do you have any other service running that may consume the messages like
Ceilometer? Can you check in your rabbit that Designate is the consumer in
the queue you are sending the notifications to?
If you have more than one consumer (other than Designate), then may be you
can try configuring a
Hi,
Yes, IP forwarding is enabled.
Regards,
Dhvanan Shah
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:55 AM, nithish B bestofnith...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is IP Forwarding enabled on your host?
Regards,
Nitish B.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dhvanan Shah dhva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have
Hi, i'm using openstack (icehouse) with virt-manager (ubuntu 15.04 64bit on
the physical server) and 3 vms (controller, compute and network with
neutron and gre - centos 6.5 64bit on each vm). When I try to launch a new
cirros 0.3.4 image, i have an error on the compute node:
DEBUG
Hello all,
I have deployed the master branch of devstack on Ubuntu 15.04 and am having
problems with ceilometer. The same symptoms showed up on Ubunutu 14.04 also.
I have tested with both Xen/Libvirt and the default hypervisor.
The problem is that ceilometer doesn't seem to get any meters. The
Hi, Lance,
May we store the keys in Barbican, can the key rotation be done upon Barbican?
And if we use Barican as the repository, then it’s easier for Key distribution
and rotation in multiple KeyStone deployment scenario, the database replication
(sync. or async.) capability could be
Thanks Amir. This will be a step forward in that direction
Extending my question to Henry and Kyle, as they are driving the
decomposition phase II.
Hello Henry/Kyle,
With devref [1] for Neutron sub-projects getting in and sub-projects owners
working towards completing the phase II, the Neutron
Hi,
I would like to request a FFE for the following BP
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vif-driver-ib-passthrough
The BP has one patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/187052/ which had +2 but
lost in the rebase.
The neutron code it already merged
I think this is happening because the last session created was based off
of trustee_auth. Try creating 2 sessions, one for each user (trustor and
trustee). Maybe Jamie will chime in.
Thanks,
Steve Martinelli
OpenStack Keystone Core
michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote on 2015/08/03 07:11:34 PM:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Morgan Fainberg
morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:47:44AM +1000, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
On Aug 4, 2015, at 01:42, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Hi,
In the Kilo cycle a Neutron driver was added for supporting the Vmware NSXv
plugin. This required patches in Nova to enable the plugin to work with Nova.
These patches finally landed yesterday. I have back ported them to stable/kilo
as the Neutron driver is unable to work without these in
On 04/08/15 23:39 -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Morgan Fainberg
morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:47:44AM +1000, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
On Aug 4, 2015, at 01:42,
Well, is it already decided that Pacemaker would be chosen to provide HA in
Openstack? There's been a talk Pacemaker: the PID 1 of Openstack IIRC.
I know that Pacemaker's been pushed aside in an earlier ML post, but IMO
there's already *so much* been done for HA in Pacemaker that Openstack
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:42:20AM EDT, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
We discussed this in ML2 sub-team meeting last week and felt the best
approach is to implement this agent in a separate repo.
There is already an on-going effort/plan for modular L2 agent. This agent
would be a perfect candidate to
Hi All,
Currently, when using command: nova server-group-list, server groups'
project id will not be displayed. As the admin user can use option
--all-projects to list server groups in all projects, it will be really
difficult to identify which serer group belongs to which project. It will
be
Hi Fawad,
If I understood your question correctly , here some ways to do
[1] you want to extend your client side packages . you can include entry
point in “setup.cfg”
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200065/1/setup.cfg
[2] To extend python-neutronclient base packages , you can add in
Hi, I believe that Barbican keystore for signing keys was discussed earlier.
I'm not sure if that's best idea since Barbican relies on Keystone
authN/authZ.
That's why this mechanism should be considered rather as out of band to
Keystone/OS API and is rather devops task.
regards,
Adam
On
Sukhdev,
last week I spent some time to figure out the current state of modular
l2 agent design and discussion. I got the impression it's not in a good
shape! So I personally don't think that it makes any sense to start with
a modular l2 agent prototype and in the worst case throw it all away, as
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:30:17AM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 3 August 2015 at 20:53, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
mailto:cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03
08:53:21 -0700:
Also on a side note, I think
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:40:13AM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message
Thanks Mohankumar. Option #1 is exactly what I was looking for and that
should work.
Thanks a lot!
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Mohankumar N mohankuma...@huawei.com
wrote:
Hi Fawad,
If I understood your question correctly , here some ways to do
[1] you want to extend
Hi Jamie
On 05/08/2015 00:46, Jamie Lennox wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com To: OpenStack
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015
3:59:34 AM Subject: Re:
Hi Gary,
While I do understand the interest to get this functionality included, I really
fail to see how it would comply with the Stable Branch Policy:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Stable_branch_policy
Obviously the last say is on stable-maint-core, but normally new features are
Hi Ramy,
Thanks for your patience.
I have tried your suggestion, but it did not work for me.
According to the log, this element has already ran in the chroot before the pip
commands are executed.
So, in theory, the pip command would run behind this proxy, but the connection
errors are still
On 04/08/2015 18:59, Steve Martinelli wrote:
Right, but that API is/should be protected. If we want to list IdPs
*before* authenticating a user, we either need: 1) a new API for listing
public IdPs or 2) a new policy that doesn't protect that API.
Hi Steve
yes this was my understanding of
Hi,
Thanks for the comments. I agree with you that this does not comply with the
policy. I wanted to raise the issue as whoever is going to use the Neutron
driver with stable/kilo will need these patches.
I will update the plugin wiki indicating that these two patches are required to
get it
On 04/08/2015 17:51, Lin Hua Cheng wrote:
Hi David,
There was a similar effort in Kilo to design the flow in the login page
for federated login[1]. WebSSO feature[2] was implemented in Kilo, it
allows the user to perform federated login by selecting an IdP
protocol. This have tested
Thanks Dmitri!
From: Dmitri Zimine
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 22:14
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] BPMN support
Hi Noy,
The short answer is No,
Hello,
I would like to request feature freeze exception for the
implementation of Nested Quota Driver for Nova, which does the quota
management of nested projects.
Blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api
Hi,
We're in the process of rebuilding the Jenkins CI for Cinder and i'm stuck
at testing the noop job.
I've setup using the latest changes from os-ext-testing and
os-ext-testing-data using project-config, jjb and dib and i have a jenkins
running which has the 2 jobs defined and i have 3 slaves
While working on trust provider for the Keystone (V3) puppet module, a
question about using domain names came up.
Shall we allow or not to use names without specifying the domain name in
the resource call?
I have this trust case involving a trustor user, a trustee user and a
project.
For each
On 2015-08-05 09:10:30 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote:
[...]
Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack.
[...]
Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's
part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest
it's released and distributed completely separately from
[...]
Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack.
[...]
Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's
part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest
it's released and distributed completely separately from the kernel.
If you read Linux as GNU/Linux or Linux
Hi Team,
As usual we will have weekly meeting today starting UTC1300. The agenda
today is to address the AIs left in the last meeting:
1. update the doc for how to work with KeyStone, joehuang
2. gampel check what mistral supports and which taskflow we want in the
reference
Hi,
If you are now developing a plugin for Fuel, please feel free to use
DriverLog
to add an entry for your plugin.
You can find details instructions on how to do that here [1].
If something seems unclear to you, feel free to request more details.
Thanks.
[1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I think Erno made a valid point here. If that would touch only vmware
code, that could be an option to consider. But it looks like both
patches are very invasive, and they are not just enabling features
that are already in the tree, but
Hi,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted.
Bugs (dtantsur)
As of Mon, Aug 3 (diff with July 27)
- Open: 142 (-5). 8 new (+2), 48 in progress (-5), 0 critical, 11 high and
8 incomplete
- Nova bugs
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Adam Heczko ahec...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi, I believe that Barbican keystore for signing keys was discussed
earlier.
I'm not sure if that's best idea since Barbican relies on Keystone
authN/authZ.
Correct. Once we find a solution for that problem it would be
On 21:14 Aug 04, Joshua Harlow wrote:
I can start a cross-project spec tomorrow if people feel that is
useful, it may be slightly opinionated (I am one of the cores that
works on https://kazoo.readthedocs.org/ so I am going be slightly
biased for obvious reasons).
On 17:03 Aug 05, Flavio Percoco wrote:
snip
That said, you may want to sync with Joshua since he's going to work
on a cross-project spec as well (as he mentioned in the other
thread).[0]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/071441.html
--
Mike Perez
Hi,
Was there an ironic meeting yesterday (August 4, 2015 at 0500 UTC)? I don't
see any meeting logs from then.
--ruby
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
(Merging thread from security ML)
Bandit probably isn¹t the correct integration point for this - cve-check
has its own analysis procedures while
Bandit uses Python AST. Also I see the use workflows being different.
For Bandit a developer/gate wants to
check a specific code snippet whereas for
On 2015-08-05 14:36:37 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote:
[...]
Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack.
[...]
Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's
part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest
it's released and distributed completely
On 08/05/2015 02:34 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote:
I think this is happening because the last session created was based
off of trustee_auth. Try creating 2 sessions, one for each user (trustor
and trustee). Maybe Jamie will chime in.
thanks for the reply Steve, i will give that a try. my
Trove changes on the stable branches are blocked on bug 1479358 [1]
because a change was made to fix trove-integration on master for liberty
but didn't take into account that those scripts are branchless and
therefore need to work on stable/kilo and stable/juno as well, where we
have capped
Hi all!
Thank you Mike for proposing the revert of the revert. Today I prepared a
change that tackles the docstring issues. As being new to the OpenStack
development process, I didn't manage to upload it to Gerrit today. Most
likely I'll get it uploaded tomorrow.
Best regards,
Robert Doebbelin
[...]
Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack.
[...]
Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's
part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest
it's released and distributed completely separately from the kernel.
If you read Linux as
Matt,
Nikhil was working on it late into the night last night. I'll continue to work
with him today and try and get this wrestled to the ground.
-amrith
-Original Message-
From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 6:57 PM
To: OpenStack
Only a few people turned up (including me who was late) so no meeting was
held.
Hope this helps,
Michael...
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Was there an ironic meeting yesterday (August 4, 2015 at 0500 UTC)? I
don't see any meeting logs from then.
There wasn't one. Some of us waited in the meeting room to see if someone
turns up, but I just got very very few (almost none) responses.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Michael Davies mich...@the-davies.net
wrote:
Only a few people turned up (including me who was late) so no meeting was
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:13:18AM -0400, Ruby Loo wrote:
Hi,
Was there an ironic meeting yesterday (August 4, 2015 at 0500 UTC)? I don't
see any meeting logs from then.
There was not.
As I saw heat`s ec2tokens can work only with keystone v2 URL.
It happens because keystone has different responses for v2 and v3 versions
for token request by ec2 credentials.
I found same problem in our ec2api project and keystonemiddleware project.
For example:
Patch for our ec2api project will
On 08/05/2015 02:34 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote:
I think this is happening because the last session created was based
off of trustee_auth. Try creating 2 sessions, one for each user (trustor
and trustee). Maybe Jamie will chime in.
just as a followup, i tried creating new Session objects for
On 2015-08-05 15:31:03 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote:
[...]
Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack.
[...]
Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's
part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest
it's released and distributed
I definitely don't think this work should start in a new repository. As
Sean and Andreas have said, I think the changes should be done in-tree
rather than creating another repository for this work.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Andreas Scheuring
scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Sukhdev,
Well, SUSE and Redhat (7) use Pacemaker by default, Debian/Ubuntu have it
(along with others)...
That gives it quite some market share, wouldn't you think?
Yes, I guess the most popular meaning is a good match here.
I see, so in the same way that nano is *the* Linux text editor
On 2015-08-05 13:14:40 + (+), McPeak, Travis wrote:
[...]
The only concern that I have is the requisite database.
Downloading a 500MB + CVE database for the jobs could become
painful. We could either keep the CVE database on each node in
the test pool or download it at the start of
Hi Eduard,
There seems to be a bug regarding running jobs on master [1]. Try running it on
a slave instead.
Ramy
[1]
https://github.com/rasselin/os-ext-testing/blob/master/README.md#running-jobs-on-jenkins-master
From: Eduard Matei [mailto:eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
To give you an idea, if we enabled that for Kilo we'd be at Nova
11.0.80
(kilo) and Nova 10.0.218 (juno).
I am not a fan of doing this second option at all. We would be polluting
the ref space of our repos with redundant information making the output
of `git tag` unusable to
HI Xiexs,
“Also, I’ve found some of the infra project-config elements don’t work in my
environment and aren’t needed as they’re specific to infra. For those, simply
comment out the portions that don’t work. I didn’t notice any negative
side-effects.”
This one you need to skip because you don’t
On 2015-08-05 15:48:52 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote:
[...]
How many cluster stack alternatives can you see in SUSE?
How many cluster stack alternatives are available in _every_ major
distribution?
I think it depends a lot on how you define cluster stack and
whether the solution to the
Thanks for everyone attending the meeting, minutes could be found here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle/2015/tricircle.2015-08-05-13.00.html
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
As usual we will have weekly meeting today
Hello! Our next OpenStack App Catalog meeting will take place this
Thursday August 6th at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog
Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to discuss.
Please
Excerpts from Philipp Marek's message of 2015-08-05 00:10:30 -0700:
Well, is it already decided that Pacemaker would be chosen to provide HA in
Openstack? There's been a talk Pacemaker: the PID 1 of Openstack IIRC.
I know that Pacemaker's been pushed aside in an earlier ML post, but IMO
On 8/5/15, 08:14, McPeak, Travis travis.mcp...@hp.com wrote:
(Merging thread from security ML)
Bandit probably isn¹t the correct integration point for this - cve-check
has its own analysis procedures while
Bandit uses Python AST. Also I see the use workflows being different.
For Bandit a
On 08/05/2015 08:16 AM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote:
While working on trust provider for the Keystone (V3) puppet module, a
question about using domain names came up.
Shall we allow or not to use names without specifying the domain name in
the resource call?
I have this trust case involving a
hey all,
the recent discussions[1] on updating resources through the rest api has
got me thinking that it might be worthwhile to convert the few methods
we have implemented to use PATCH instead of PUT.
we are starting to create a bifurcation in the api regarding updates.
the new
On 2015-08-05 15:04:15 + (+), Ian Cordasco wrote:
One point of clarification. Not every project has to opt into
global-requirements so this isn't necessarily true. Also with the
merging of the stackforge and openstack namespaces, it'll be
harder to distinguish when a project is or
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015, at 08:22 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-08-05 15:04:15 + (+), Ian Cordasco wrote:
One point of clarification. Not every project has to opt into
global-requirements so this isn't necessarily true. Also with the
merging of the stackforge and openstack
On 5 August 2015 at 09:35, Jim Rollenhagen j...@jimrollenhagen.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:13:18AM -0400, Ruby Loo wrote:
Hi,
Was there an ironic meeting yesterday (August 4, 2015 at 0500 UTC)? I
don't
see any meeting logs from then.
There was not.
Hi,
Oops, my bad. To be clear, there was no ironic meeting this week. But if
there had been, this is what the subteams would have reported :)
--ruby
On 5 August 2015 at 09:05, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
Hi Kyle,
First of all, sorry for the late response.
We are working on the design and implementation, the first patches are planned
to be up by the end of this week.
We could surely use more hands as it is quite a large amount of work that this
blueprint requires. If there are any Neutron
The only concern that I have is the requisite database. Downloading a
500MB + CVE database for the jobs could become painful. We could either
keep the CVE database on each node in the test pool or download it at the
start of each cve-check job. I¹d be curious what the infra wizards have to
On 2015-08-05 08:28:27 -0700 (-0700), Clark Boylan wrote:
We already track it in the requirements repo itself [0]. Not sure if we
need an additional tracking method.
[0]
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/projects.txt
That tracks repos which get reqs sync proposals
On 14:37 Aug 03, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I guess there isn't a quobyte connector in os-brick yet, but just a
reminder that there is a libvirt volume driver in nova for talking to
quobyte [1]. It'd be good to get a heads up on the nova side when
the cinder team is removing drivers so that we can
On 2015-08-05 16:08:16 + (+), Reshetova, Elena wrote:
[...]
Actually the database is downloaded only once ( thefirst time) and
then only database diffs are downloaded, which is much faster. I
don't know enough about your node setup (do you fully clean up
each node between the builds?)
Excerpts from Reshetova, Elena's message of 2015-08-05 09:08:16 -0700:
The only concern that I have is the requisite database. Downloading a
500MB + CVE database for the jobs could become painful. We could either
keep the CVE database on each node in the test pool or download it at the
On 2015-08-05 15:22:29 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[...]
Now that we've dissolved more of those arbitrary distinctions, this
seems like a great opportunity for tracking with a governance tag.
I'll go ahead and propose one later today if I get a spare moment.
Actually, I take that
On 2015-08-05 09:54:52 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
Doesn't this feel like a job for AFS? Maintain the db there, and let the
nodes access it as-needed?
I guess it depends on whether the tool needs to read the entire
database to perform its queries (in which case using AFS would be
On 4 August 2015 at 21:23, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 8/4/2015 8:47 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
John Garbutt wrote:
[...]
Personally I find a mix of coding and reviewing good to keep a decent
On Wednesday 05 of August 2015 11:14:13 michael mccune wrote:
hey all,
the recent discussions[1] on updating resources through the rest api has
got me thinking that it might be worthwhile to convert the few methods
we have implemented to use PATCH instead of PUT.
we are starting to create
Sounds good. As long as proper due-diligence is done and there are is no
duplication of effort, it make sense.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Andreas Scheuring
scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Sukhdev,
last week I spent some time to figure out the current state of
Hey Kyle,
A concern was raised that this may create issue of breakages/instability in
other agents at the late stage of the release cycle - hence I proposed a
separate repo. But, if a proper due-diligence is done and the core team has
a plan to deal with this, sounds like a good plan to me.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:39 AM, David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk
wrote:
On 04/08/2015 18:59, Steve Martinelli wrote:
Right, but that API is/should be protected. If we want to list IdPs
*before* authenticating a user, we either need: 1) a new API for listing
public IdPs or 2) a new
On 31 July 2015 at 11:05, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 09:56, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
Hi,
Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze
What does this mean? Well...
* bug fixes:
Well we can always develop the new framework and wait until the start of
the next cycle to swap over the existing agents if it doesn't look stable
enough.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey Kyle,
A concern was raised that this may create issue of
Some folks said that they'd prefer not to list all associated idps, which i
can understand.
Actually, I like jamie's suggestion of just making horizon a bit smarter,
and expecting the values in the horizon settings (idp+protocol)
Thanks,
Steve Martinelli
OpenStack Keystone Core
From:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com
wrote:
Some folks said that they'd prefer not to list all associated idps, which
i can understand.
Actually, I like jamie's suggestion of just making horizon a bit smarter,
and expecting the values in the horizon settings
Hi,
There is a lot of interest in getting support for container based
deployment within TripleO and many different ideas and opinions on how
to go about doing that.
One idea on the table is to use Heat to help orchestrate the deployment
of docker containers. This would work similar to our
text/html; charset=UTF-8: Unrecognized
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Tagging kolla so the kolla community also sees it.
Pardon the top posting.
-Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:29:13 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Puppet] Deploying
Today we released Bandit version 0.13.0 which includes the following
features and enhancements:
Plugins now registered as entry points
Improved Bandit run speed
Added a confidence filter option
Added timestamp to JSON report
New plugin to detect Try, Except, Pass
Improved detection for hardcoded
On 08/05/2015 01:31 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
Isn't this an API change, which would require an API bump?
A reason more to keep it working as it is with 1.x and go fast to 2.0.
thanks Luigi, that's fair. i'll hold off on this until we can bump to
2.0. it also means i need to get a move on with
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com
wrote:
Some folks said that they'd prefer not to list all associated idps, which
i can understand.
Why?
Actually, I like jamie's suggestion of just making horizon a bit smarter,
and expecting the values in the horizon
Hi all,
During testing of Neutron upgrades, I have found that restarting the L3 agent
in DVR mode is causing the VM network downtime for configured floating IP.
The lockdown is visible when pinging the VM from external network, 2-3 pings
are lost.
The responsible place in code is:
DVR: destroy
Forcing Horizon to duplicate Keystone settings just makes everything much
harder to configure and much more fragile. Exposing whitelisted, or all,
IdPs makes much more sense.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Steve
Thats troubling... We are considering using DVR soon, and we have to restart
neutron-openvswitch-agent and openstack-nova-compute periodically go get them
to talk to rabbit again
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Korzeniewski, Artur [artur.korzeniew...@intel.com]
Sent:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 04/08/15 21:14 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Morgan Fainberg wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
mailto:harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/08/15 19:48 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
