On 11/15/2016 06:50 PM, melanie witt wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:10:40 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
I'm in favor of your change, since the existing behaviour doesn't make
sense.
But at some point I guess consistency trumps correctness, and if a new
microversion is necessary to mark the new
On 11/15/2016 02:02 AM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote:
Hello,
IMHO receiving multiple uuids is not related to bug which I want to
resolve somehow but if Chris wrote it I thought that it is maybe somehow
related to "spawn multiple instances" feature.
So can You maybe review my p
for reading
Chris
--
Chris Morgan <mihali...@gmail.com>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
raised
2) the partial completion issue I raised
3) returning the uuids of all instances booted as a result of the multiboot API
call
Since it means a spec, probably nothing will happen in Ocata...we could maybe
see about Pike.
Chris
have anything to add or have
questions please post a response.
--
Chris Dent ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Deve
such a drag and a bad thing. I
know more now than I did before I read your message. Surely that's
a good thing? I'm not sure why you should feel terrible. Did you
tell the truth as you see it? Great. Good on you. I'm grateful. And
I'm glad you feel relieved.
Thank you.
--
Chris Dent
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Heads up, we are a GO for neutron by default in Ocata jobs:
This. Is. Awesome.
Nice work by everyone involved.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
nstack.org/meetings/api_wg/
[6]: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-11-09 11:14:32 +:
Let's just get on with making stuff and work out the problems (and of
course there will be many, there always are) as they happen. That's
what we do.
Apologies for the stretched analogy
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Chris Friesen wrote:
That said, I don't know that there's an easy solution to this in nova due to
the fact that it's a distributed system with a central shared data store.
Enhancing a sched filter might require new data, which means modifying the DB
model and the DB
in trust. We've got people who want to build stuff.
Isn't that the important part?
Let's just get on with making stuff and work out the problems (and of
course there will be many, there always are) as they happen. That's
what we do.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org
to request additional attrs, and it might have implications for
upgrade, etc.
Chris
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
see you on IRC in ~1/2 hour!
Chris
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote:
> By my clock, this is in about an hour from now.
>
>
> On 05/11/16 08:26, Chris Morgan wrote:
>
>> You're right, my mistake. 9am Tuesday (for me)! See you then
to no preallocation, the real
increased disk consumption should be minimal.
Chris
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
You're right, my mistake. 9am Tuesday (for me)! See you then
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 8:07 PM, Saverio Proto <ziopr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Chris,
>
> Thanks for clarify the meeting is Tuesday :)
>
> I have a doubt about the ti
for
Tuesday 8th? What time? It is normally 10AM my time which will be 13:00 UTC
on the 8th.
By the way, the Barcelona hosting offer has been updated with possible week
day slots, see
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetup-venue-discuss-spring-2017
Regards
Chris
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:45 AM
/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Mellanox_CI
[2] nova/pci
If the CI system has the bandwidth, it might make sense for it to also run for
nova/objects/pci*, nova/scheduler/filters/numa_topology_filter.py, and
nova/scheduler/filters/pci_passthrough_filter.py
Chris
_Summit.21
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
to
essentially clean up the state of claimed resources over time, and as Chris
points out in review comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244489/, this
leads to the scheduler operating on stale data and can lead to an increase in
retry operations.
It's worse than that. For pinned instances
bug
report).
Yes, except the booting new instance, other claims won't trigger allocation
request to the placement API.
We should normally go through the scheduler for
resize/migration/live-migration/evacuate, so wouldn't it make sense to do some
sort of allocation requ
of the different type drivers, I think this can
be fixed by creating availability zones/aggregates.
With this information it sounds doable. Anything we are missing?
Cheers
Chris
From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 03:19
To: Neil Jerram &l
plugin.
Question is it possible to mix two network setups like described above? We
don't use regions could this be a possible solution?
Any help and answer appreciated.
Cheers
Chris
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
.
Almost certainly, yes.
Chris
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
ll use 'host-model',
and any instances started on Broadwell can't be live-migrated onto Haswell.
In your case you probably want to set both computes to have:
[libvirt]
cpu_mode = custom
cpu_model = Haswell
This will cause nova to start guests with the "Haswell" model on bo
0.
16/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nova/virt/libvirt/storage/rbd_utils.py",
line 117, in __init__
Chris
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 at 13:19 Grant Morley <gr...@absolutedevops.io> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a openstack-ansible setup and have ceph installed for the backend.
> Howeve
have said has been convincing, I've
updated the code at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388115/
Jay's review of that has raised a new issue: which is should we even
bother with the decorator style?
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
at the chosen time.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-climb
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack
ic service catalogs in the face of different
contexts
* whatever else I'm forgetting right now because the coffee is weak
but I'm sure someone else remembers
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
to the non-existent handler just be removed?
If the discovery doc is for discovering stuff, it shouldn't list stuff
that doesn't exist. That's pretty simple and straightforward, right?
How could it be anything else?
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode
was eventually
was decided to be in NYC) was :
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetup-venue-discuss
--
Chris Morgan <mihali...@gmail.com>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/c
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote:
If the requested microversion is greater than the maximum, a 404 still
makes some sense (no mapping _now_), but a 406 could as well because it
provides a signal that if you used a different microversion the
situation could be different and the time
could, if one wanted, hosted a pecan based application with
gunicorn. Or uwsgi. Or apache+mod_wsgi. Or nginx+uwsgi. Or a bunch
of other stuff.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
but I
can't remember the details of the outcome.
(Of course one way to avoid this conundrum is to not allow it either
by crook or convention, but that seems to limit the power of
microversions to turn things off. A power that is important to
have.)
thanks
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ
accumulate some plans,
and also linked a doodle poll in there to figure out some good ideas
for when. If I should put more day time slots into the poll, let me
know.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-climb
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode
is dangerous. If
you choose to climb, it is at your own risk.
(Sharma's people will take care of that in the registration.)
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
cares to email me ideas
on what we should discuss in response to this email.
For those of you going, see you in Spain!
Chris
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There have been some schedule updates for the Ops design summit sess
It turns out that summit this year will be just down the road from
Chris Sharma's relatively new indoor climbing gym in Barcelona:
http://www.sharmaclimbingbcn.com/
If the fun, frisson and frustration of summit sessions leaves you with
the energy or need to pull down, maybe we should
on query parameters across the entire breadth of
OpenStack isn't being considerate of the differents contexts of use
and users.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-WG#Agenda
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
doing real things with OpenStack.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
power their
corporate patrons are willing to wield for them. And finally it
feels like we are making it harder for more people to be engaged in
cross project work.
I'm certain that none of these things are the desired outcomes.
What can we do to clarify the situation and remedy the issues?
--
Chris
in the code is bad in the long term,
but I guess it is good that it has started somewhere.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
realistic way to go. I
mention it more as a way jumping off point for further thinking than
a concrete proposal.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
s it needs to be formalized?
* [your idea here please]
[1]
http://governance.openstack.org/reference/principles.html#changes-in-leadership-are-good
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
On Sun, 2 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote:
I'm posting this as it would be great to get some feedback on:
* which of these things matter
* what is missing from the list
* how (or if) we should formalize the doing of the work
* who would like to help out in the doing (getting some help is the main
/meetings/api_wg/
[6]: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z
[7]: Thread starting at
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105198.html
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
in it but are concerned about
Nova to feel excluded.
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-newton-retrospective
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
we should either have
TC elections every week or come up with some other catalysts.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
(and to some extent transforming) parts are the only
parts of ceilometer that are particularly unique so it would be good
for those to be preserved.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
issues you'd like the TC address
in the coming year?
I ended up getting overly excited in my response to Clay and answering
over there. So by the power of hypertext:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105000.html
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ
tact
community engagement" is *needed* and how much it's *lacking* with the
current set of representatives ->
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/103223.html -
not surprisingly it took someone from "the outside" to make it happen!
--
Chris Dent
This can also be done with IPv4 address as well. Not quite the flexibility
that comes with v6, but workable for all but the very largest environments.
This is the approach that is embodied in the Romana (http://romana.io/) project
(I am part of this effort).
If you run all your OpenStack VMs on
the necessary replicas
The user will accept that swift is not a real time replication and it’s based
on the concept of eventual consistency, but does this exclude visibility about
the internal processes and metrics.
Cheers
Chris
From: Clay Gerrard [mailto:clay.gerr...@gmail.com
evaluate success of resource tracker +
placement api by lack of smoke, no real details)
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
in the file view
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Chris
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
.
If you have more questions:
My employer (Bloomberg L.P.) sponsored the most recent mid-cycle meet up. I
will be happy to answer questions relating to the process for hosting one
of these events or you can simply join us on IRC (#openstack-operators on
chat.freenode.net)!
Thanks for reading
Chris
, that sounds good. Please keep me involved.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
t
log, are something to consider for TC activity.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
ays be more of those). We
need to keep looking and pushing forward.
To that end I'm nominating myself to be a member of the Technical
Committee.
If you have specific questions about my goals, my background or anything
else, please feel free to ask. I'm on IRC as cdent or send some email.
Thank you for
need some way of copying the XML file from the
source to the dest, and then modifying the appropriate segments to adjust things
like CPU/NUMA pinning?
Chris
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
and tell
- Interesting new features of openstack related technologies
Please consider doing one and sign up!
Chris
--
Chris Morgan <mihali...@gmail.com>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.opensta
://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/
[6]: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z
[7]: Thread starting at
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/103988.html
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
blog post.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: ope
If you do have contributions, also please "sign-in" to the ether pad top
left and pick a color. It helps a bit to know who liked what. Thanks!
Chris
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Matt Van Winkle <mvanw...@rackspace.com>
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The etherpad to
off the top of my head.
Chris,
Were you still able to act as my contact?
Yes. Unfortunately, of the three api-wg cores, I'm the only one who
has been able to make plans to go to summit.
I’ve created an etherpad to begin planning the study:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osux-api-oct2016
I'll happily stand in again if/when necessary, although it seems Matt has
the reins now!
Chris
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Matt Van Winkle <mvanw...@rackspace.com>
wrote:
> Hey, Tom!
> I am happy to run next Tuesday's meeting.
>
> Thanks!
> VW
>
> Sent from my
while
maintaining nova (bug and security fixes)?
(If you're gonna ask, may as well throw a hail mary.)
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
t. Because of the ordering of the process and the
presumption of the document they will simply choose to ignore it and
carry on with whatever other important things they've got going on.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
in the past, not a summary of an open
discussion in the present day.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack
links to pending reviews.
Sean, Dan, Jay: You have updates? Comments?
[1] Here is is again: http://p.anticdent.org/2f7K
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
I'll rebase it all again so we can
start observing whether behavior has improved in local and gate
devstack and tempest runs.
That stack at 365068 is where the bulk of the resource providers
action is at the moment, so if you have some review time, please
have at.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º
we should
consider them for now, if possible. The first one is a cleanup.
[1] I used this to do some of my testing:
https://github.com/cdent/placement-exercise
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
required when upgradability is
making it impossible to fix a big problem. We should probably
consider it more often.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw
, there is a delay until the heal periodic job does its
thing.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing
isplay what the
DVS names the vmware API is returning.
Thanks,
Chris.
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
.
Meanwhile several people are involved in related clean up patches in
both nova and devstack to smooth off rough edges while we pushed a
lot of code.
Thanks to everyone today for pushing so hard. We look pretty close to
getting the must haves happening.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote:
2. Chris is going to cleanup the devstack change that adds the placement
service:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342362/
The main issue is there isn't a separate placement database, at least not by
default, so Chris has to take that into account
Thanks for the kind words. I am so glad it worked out. I want to repeat
that Tom still did a lot of the work despite us attempting to pull the
organizing of these events more into the general community.
I hope to make it to Barcelona and see you there!
Cheers,
Chris
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3
Thanks for joining us. I agree it was a very good session. I am far more
likely to get in touch direct on IRC than the old rigmarole of "escalate to
business sponsor, have him formally talk to canonical", based on your
advice. i'm sure that's going to work better.
Cheers
Chris
On M
-term flavors should be a piece of UI furniture that is present in a
human-oriented-non-nova UI/API that provides raw information to the
computers-talking-to-computers API that is provided by nova.
But that's very long term.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org
ional configuration" do you mean "add more
things to nova.conf"? If so, then please don't do that. There is far
too much of that.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
ional configuration" do you mean "add more
things to nova.conf"? If so, then please don't do that. There is far
too much of that.
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
log_address = /dev/log
[object-replicator]
concurrency = 24
[object-updater]
concurrency = 24
[object-auditor]
Cheers
Chris
From: Hamza Nissoul [mailto:mon240...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 21:32
To: Chris <cont...@progbau.de>
Subject: Re: [Ope
7820.44503.data.rP7WEO: Invalid Timestamp value in filename
'.1472017820.44503.data.rP7WEO'
Any help appreciated!
Cheers
Chris
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack
this out.
Chris
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:43 PM, John Starmer <j...@kumul.us> wrote:
> Hi Chris-
> I just noticed that two of the sessions I'm meant to be moderating are at
> the same time. The Non-Ubuntu Packaging and the User Enablement are both
> 14:10 on Monday. I realize th
There are two +1s on this now on the ether pad. It seems like it might flow
nicely from the AUC session at 1.30 - 2.10 so I put it in Reception from
2.10 - 2:50 in your name. I think this is about the last change we can make
and still allow time for the agenda to be designed and printed.
Chris
. Please let me know if you would like to
moderate either session!
Thanks!
Chris
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetup_team/2016/ops_meetup_team.2016-08-16-14.00.html
11:00 AM Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetup_team/2016/ops_meetup_team.2016-08-16
. This isn't easy, we need model the dependence in
the placement engine. This sounds like Chris will hate this way :)
If you're talking about me here, "hate" is probably a bit too strong
of a term. Maybe "get sad"?
In any case my dislike is not with the idea of putting the capabi
am=20160816T22=241
>
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team#Meeting_Information
>
> [3] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/201
> 6/ops_meetups_team.2016-08-09-14.00.html
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing lis
endpoint to use is by providing the region
to keystone?
Eg. 5 regions in Swift equals 5 regions in keystone for the swift service?
I did some more research and found that the mamcache service used by swift
also saves the auth token.
Thanks in advance!
Cheers
Chris
-Original Message
that idea before we get too late, is that difference
worth the work and syntax change in how the client requests a network when
creating a server?
I like the idea...having magic values for 'uuid' that aren't actually uuids and
magically don't work with other parameters is sort of gros
broken, we just weren't hitting it in the
testcases.
Chris
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/c
org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team#Meeting_Information
>
> [3] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/201
> 6/ops_meetups_team.2016-08-09-14.00.html
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@l
DONE
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Matt Fischer <m...@mattfischer.com> wrote:
> I was the one who proposed the session and It's okay with me to move it.
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Chris Morgan <mihali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have no problem wit
Kumar <amr...@tesora.com> wrote:
> Hi, I’d definitely like to attend the Trove session. Would it be possible
> to advance it to the morning (pre-lunch) on Friday, or Thursday please.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> -amrith
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Morgan [mailt
upper-constraints.txt.
In the case above, if the deployer had done this then bringing in Z would likely
not have resulted in a need to upgrade any requirements.
Chris
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
namespaces
to describe constraints on their contents? Annotate individual entries
to describe their friends or enemies?
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ) http://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent
analogous to Cinder.
Chris
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
ok so for now I remove database cleanup and added Sean Dague/Nova to that
slot
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Chris Morgan <mihali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah we dropped that in but colored it orange meaning not many +1s and
> quite a narrow topic in context
>
> On Tue, Aug
it something that works for me.
>
> On Aug 9, 2016 12:29 PM, "Chris Morgan" <mihali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> WG6, day one? That's 40 minutes. Would run alongside Large Deployment.
>> Currently that has the main room. Would nova be more universal to operators?
>
801 - 900 of 2002 matches
Mail list logo
