That requires ssh (or some tunnel/other RPC?) connections from-to all
hypervisors to work correct??
Is that allowed in your organization (headless ssh keys from-to all
hypervisors)?
Isn't that a huge security problem if someone manages to break out of a VM
and get access to those keys?
If I was
+1 for yaml instead of shoving all kinds of package metadata in comments.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Feb 17, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Honestly, if we are going to track this, we should probably do the set
of things that reviewers tend to do when running
+1
Mentoring and devoted mentors and not demotivating new folks (but instead
growing and fostering them) is IMHO 10x more important than a badge program.
Badges seem nice and all but I think it's not the biggest win for the buck.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Feb 13, 2014, at 6:06
An honest question,
U are mentioning what appears to be the basis for a full programming language
(variables, calling other workflows - similar to functions) but then u mention
this is being stuffed into yaml.
Why?
It appears like u might as well spend the effort and define a grammar and
In taskflow we've done something like the following.
Its not perfect, but it is what currently works (willing to take suggestions on
better).
We have three different requirements files.
1. Required to work in any manner @
https://github.com/openstack/taskflow/blob/master/requirements.txt
2.
seems to do what you want:
SQLAlchemy=0.7.99,=0.9.99 [SQLAlchemyPersistence]
alembic=0.4.1 [SQLAlchemyPersistence]
...
[1] http://www.pip-installer.org/en/1.1/requirements.html
--
Koo
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 02:37:44 +
Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
In taskflow we've
Is murano python3.x compatible, from what I understand oslo.messaging isn't
(yet). If murano is supporting python3.x then brining in oslo.messaging might
make it hard for murano to be 3.x compatible. Maybe not a problem (I'm not sure
of muranos python version support).
From: Serg Melikyan
+1 thanks guys!
From: Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.commailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, February 7, 2014 at 1:02 PM
To:
Has there been any investigation into heat.
Heat has already used parts of the coroutine approach (for better or
worse).
An example:
https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/heat/engine/scheduler.py#L230
Decorator for a task that needs to drive a subtask.
This is essentially a
Its a good question, I see openstack as mostly like the following 2 groups of
applications.
Group 1:
API entrypoints using [apache/nginx]+wsgi (nova-api, glance-api…)
In this group we can just let the underlying framework/app deal with the
scaling and just use native wsgi as it was intended.
Hi alex,
I think u are referring to the following:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/glance-snapshot-tasks
Can u describe the #2 part in more detail. Do some of the drivers already
implement these new steps?
The goal I think u are having is to make the snapshot functionality resume
+1 lots of respect for zane in doing this :)
I'm still very much interested in seeing how we can connect taskflow in to
your model.
I think the features that you guys were wanting (remote workers) are
showing up and hopefully will be all they can be!
It helps (imho) that taskflow doesn't
library.
- Discuss about any other ideas, reviews needing help, questions and
answers (and more!).
Any other topics are welcome :-)
See you all soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
It's openstack, relax... | harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Any mysql DB drivers (I think the majority of openstack deployments use
mysql?).
How about sqlalchemy (what would possibly need to change there for it to
work)? The pain that I see is that to connect all these libraries into
asyncio they have to invert how they work (sqlalchemy would have to
A follow up kind of question,
Why not just create a eventlet micro version that underneath uses asyncio?
Then code isn't riddled with yield from or Return() or similar. It seems
possible (maybe?) to replace the eventlet hub with one that uses asyncio? This
is then a nice change for all those
I was just thinking that openstack would be better to slowly get off
eventlet (avoids the large amount of changes this new mostly
untested/unproven tulip/trollius framework introduces). A first step could
be to replace the greenlet layer with asyncio (or similar). Then the
eventlet layer still
Hi all,
After talking with john g. about taskflow in cinder and seeing more and
more reviews showing up I wanted to start a thread to gather all our
lessons learned and how we can improve a little before continuing to add
too many more refactoring and more reviews (making sure everyone is
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder + taskflow
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Hi all,
After talking with john g. about taskflow in cinder and seeing more and
more
wrote:
+1 intel use cases. It would be nice to avoid our current custom
patches.
On Sunday, February 2, 2014, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
+1 yahoo use case(s) would also benefit from not having to patch the
+code
+1 yahoo use case(s) would also benefit from not having to patch the code to
achieve similar results.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Feb 2, 2014, at 12:12 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
It would be interesting to have a formal exit inside OpenStack nova at VM
creation for
I think depending on use-case it can be accomplished.
The steps we have been thinking at Y!
1. Take offline APIs nova-compute (so new/existing VMs can't be
scheduled/modified) -- existing running VMs will not be affected.
2. Save/dump nova database.
3. Translate nova database entries into
library.
- Discuss about any other ideas, questions and answers (and more!).
Any other topics are welcome :-)
See you all soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
It's openstack, relax... | harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
Hi all,
In order to encourage further discussion off IRC and more in public I'd like to
share a etherpad that was worked on during a 'meetup' with some of the mistral
folks and me.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/taskflow-mistral-jan-meetup
It was more of a (mini) in-person meetup but I
+1 I've never understood this either personally.
From what I know most all (correct me if I am wrong) open source projects
don't translate log messages; so it seems odd to be the special snowflake
project/s.
Do people find this type of translation useful?
It'd be nice to know how many people
PoC is not using TaskFlow but moving forward we we’d like to try to
marry these two technologies to be more aligned in terms of APIs and feature
sets.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 27 Jan 2014, at 13:21, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi all
Hi all,
I have had in my ~/bin for a while a little script that I finally got around to
tuning up and I thought others might be interested in it/find it useful.
The concept is similar to https://pypi.python.org/pypi/autopep8 but does a
really simple action to start.
As many of u know the
Doesn't nova already have logic for creating N virtual machines (similar to a
group) in the same request? I thought it did (maybe it doesn't anymore in the
v3 API), creating N bare metal machines seems like it would comply to that api?
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Jan 22, 2014, at
, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 27 January 2014 08:04, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Doesn't nova already have logic for creating N virtual machines (similar to
a group) in the same request? I thought it did (maybe it doesn't anymore in
the v3 API
good to know we have options if we overflow available meeting rooms or suchlike
:)
Cheers,
--
Chris Jones
On 25 Jan 2014, at 03:22, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Yahoo! is right in the middle of sunnyvale; and probably has enough free space
to handle
Cloud-init 0.7.5 (not yet released) will have the ability to read from an
ec2-metadata server using SSL.
In a recent change I did we now use requests which correctly does SSL for
the ec2-metadata/ec2-userdata reading.
- http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cloud-init-dev/cloud-init/trunk/revision/910
Also just to note; file-injection seems unneeded when cloud-init can use
this:
http://cloudinit.readthedocs.org/en/latest/topics/examples.html#writing-out
-arbitrary-files
That I believe is in most modern versions of cloud-init (forgot when I
implemented that).
Just FYI :)
-Josh
On 1/24/14,
Yahoo! is right in the middle of sunnyvale; and probably has enough free space
to handle all u folks (some rooms are quite big really).
I can talk with some folks here about hosting all of this here if that’s
desired (depending on how big).
-Josh
From: Roman Alekseenkov
So to me memoizing is typically a premature optimization in a lot of cases. And
doing it incorrectly leads to overfilling the python processes memory (your
global dict will have objects in it that can't be garbage collected, and with
enough keys+values being stored will act just like a memory
at any type of scale).
-Josh
On 1/23/14, 1:35 PM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote:
On 23 Jan 2014, at 08:41, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
So to me memoizing is typically a premature optimization in a lot of
cases. And doing it incorrectly leads to overfilling
for all to use.
--Morgan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Sure, no cancelling cases of conscious usage, but we need to be careful
here and make sure its really appropriate. Caching and invalidation
techniques are right up
you all soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
It's openstack, relax... | harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Also with:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66051/
On 1/16/14, 10:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-01-12 07:27:11 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote:
With the taskflow update, the only thing between upping our sqla
requirement to 0.8.99 is pbr's requirements integration
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Changbin Liu[1] to the taskflow-core team[2].
Changbin has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in
helping develop code and helping with the review load. He has provided
quality reviews and is doing an awesome job with the
Very nice write up +1
A question, many modules are pulling in oslo.log as seen from the dependency
graph which itself then pulls in oslo.config. Is the plan to just have all
these modules use the regular python logging and have oslo.log be a
plugin/formatter/adapter to python logging?
Likely
, feedback...)
- Any other ongoing taskflow work (questions, comments, feedback...)
- Discuss about any other potential new use-cases for said library.
- Discuss about any other ideas, questions and answers (and more!).
Any other topics are welcome :-)
See you all soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
And my ring, my precious.
Count me in!
On 1/9/14, 6:06 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
I'm hopefully that if we can get everyone looking at this one a single
day,
we can start to dislodge the log jam that exists.
I will help you bear
are welcome :-)
See you all soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
It's openstack, relax... | harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Was the history filtered out using something like
http://git-scm.com/docs/git-filter-branch??
There seems to be a lot of commit history that isn't related to gantt files
(baremetal…)
Was the plan to figure out which files to keep, then cleanup that commit
history?
I wouldn't expect
With regards to the futures module it should just work fine with the packaging
of https://pypi.python.org/pypi/futures which is a backport of the 3.2
concurrent futures package into 2.6,2.7, so that's the package there.
Feel free to bug me on irc if u want any other help with dependencies, the
Agreed, we are going to expand it and work on figuring out how to test against
multiple versions. It does work with 0.8 and it seems even like 0.9 works fine
also. But all compatible also means I can't guarantee 0.10 (if it comes out)
will work since afaik semver means sqlalchemy could still
Such a bad state seems like FUD.
Taskflow was just syncing its requirements with the same requirements that
everyone else is... Those global requirements have 0.7.99 in them as we speak
(which is why taskflow picked up that version).
The issue here will be worked through and fixed, it won't
I was more of referring to general dependency issues, sqlalchemy hopefully
never again but one never knows :P
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Jan 4, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 01/05/2014 12:12 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
it won't
be the last time
So taskflow was tested with the version of sqlalchemy that was available and in
the requirements at the time of its 0.1 release (taskflow syncs it's
requirements from the same global requirements). From what I remember this is
the same requirement that everyone else is bound to:
even more of these types of new 3rd party libraries to
appear on pypi (and therefore causing similar issues of transitive
dependencies as taskflow).
Will bug u on #openstack-infra soon :-)
On 1/3/14, 9:05 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/03/2014 11:37 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
So
Sounds good to me.
Talked on #openstack-infra with some folks there and just awaiting next
steps.
Doesn't seem like should be anything to hard to adjust/move/...
-Josh
On 1/3/14, 11:27 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/03/2014 12:45 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Ok, I think I'm fine
really need to I can push out a 0.1.2 with the unpinned version (one of
the above reviews).
-Josh
From: Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.commailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
Date: Friday, January 3, 2014 at 11:44 AM
To: Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
Cc
Since the library model is what most everyone else uses outside of
openstack (I assume?) what can we do to get there so that this model works
as well?
Expanding dependencies recursively seems like it could help? This could
then detect transitive dependency issues (and doesn't seem so hard to do).
, but
sometimes u just work with what u got :-P
On 1/3/14, 3:32 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/03/2014 06:14 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Since the library model is what most everyone else uses outside of
openstack (I assume?) what can we do to get there so that this model
works
as well
:09 PM, Neependra Khare wrote:
Hi Joshua,
On 12/20/2013 01:34 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Awesome i will see if I can make it, maybe u guys can send out a summary
afterwards? Glad to see performance work (and the associated tooling) get the
attention it deserves!
We had a meeting yesterday. Etherpad
If u want to try an alternate: http://anvil.readthedocs.org/
It goes through various stages:
1. Downloading preparing the components (git cloning...)
2. Building components rpms (and component dependencies to rpms)
a. This creates 2 yum repositories that can be used for other installs
3.
Agreed taskflow doesn't currently provide scheduling as it was thought that
reliable execution that can be restarted and resumed is the foundation that
someone using taskflow can easily provide scheduling ontop of... Better IMHO to
have a project doing this foundation well (since openstack
Any reason to not use taskflow (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow) to
help u here??
I think it could be easily adapted to do what u want, and would save u from
having to recreate the same task execution logic that everyone seems to rebuild…
-Josh
From: Greg Hill
in different way.
Shall any VM use distributed(for eg. RAM from the different host) resources at
the same time?
or
Shall any VM use two cores(that lies on different hosts) at the same time?, in
the distributed fashion.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@yahoo
Since its xmas in most of the world lets skip the IRC meeting this week
(normally on thursdays).
See you all soon and have a great vacation!
P.S. #openstack-state-management if u feel the need to chat :-)
--
Joshua Harlow
It's openstack, relax... | harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
Nope, u can over provision on most all of the resources (CPU, ram, disk) u
described there. Ram is the tricky one as the Linux oom killer may start to get
involved when u push the ram limits to high. But there is nothing stopping u
from running 8 or more vms on a box, depending on the over
8 virtual cores in compute node with 2
cores. The same is valid for using swap as memory to reach the desired
12gb.
Of course, if you don't plan on using that machine for any real work,
you can do it.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Nope, u can over
plan on using that machine for any real work,
you can do it.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Nope, u can over provision on most all of the resources (CPU, ram,
disk) u
described there. Ram is the tricky one as the Linux oom killer may
start to
get
For the state problem:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow
Presentation I did at the HK summit:
http://www.slideshare.net/harlowja/taskflow-27820295http://www.slideshare.net/mobile/harlowja/taskflow-27820295
It was designed to help with this and other issues, including saving state
And another related project that is just getting started, around break/fix like
tooling.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Entropy
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Dec 22, 2013, at 7:04 AM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
For the state problem
...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/17/2013 05:19 PM, Neependra Khare wrote:
On 12/17/2013 12:48 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Another thing that u might consider.
The rally project[1] has been using a tool called tomograph[2] and making
tomograph better and it has been collecting some similar use-cases and
test-cases
/TaskFlow
## Agenda (30-60 mins):
- Discuss any action items from last meeting.
- Discuss about any other potential new use-cases for said library.
- Discuss about any other ideas, questions and answers (and more!).
Any other topics are welcome :-)
See you all soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
to child processes and then starting them? I know
this is the hard way of achieving the objective and SIGHUP approach will handle
it more gracefully. As you mentioned it is a major change, tentatively can we
use SIGTERM to achieve the objective?
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Joshua Harlow
this is the hard way of achieving the objective and SIGHUP approach will handle
it more gracefully. As you mentioned it is a major change, tentatively can we
use SIGTERM to achieve the objective?
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote
Maybe time to revive something like:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/12759/
From experience, all sites (and those internal to yahoo) provide a /status
(or equivalent) that is used for all sorts of things (from basic
load-balancing up/down) to other things like actually introspecting the
state
topics are welcome :-)
See you all soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
It's openstack, relax... | harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Sounds like a pretty neat idea.
I like it!
Another idea: instead of saying pushing for one agent to rule them all why
don't we come up with a desired reference spec (maybe including a reference
implementation?) that the salt, chef, mcollective, (other...) can base theres
off of. In a way this
I really have to agree with this. It's especially important if oslo.messaging
is also used in libraries like taskflow. If oslo.messaging imposes that users
of it must use oslo.config then by using it in taskflow, taskflow then imposes
the same oslo.config usage. This makes all libraries that
Previous not precious, ha, durn autocorrect, lol.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Dec 6, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Forgive me for not understanding your precious email (which I guess was
confusing for me to understand). This one clears that up
+, Joshua Harlow wrote:
I really have to agree with this. It's especially important if
oslo.messaging is also used in libraries like taskflow. If
oslo.messaging imposes that users of it must use oslo.config then by
using it in taskflow, taskflow then imposes the same oslo.config
usage.
You
Could jsonschema[1] be used here to do the options schema part? It works on
dictionaries (and really isn't tied to json). But maybe I am missing some
greater context/understanding (see other emails).
[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsonschema
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Dec 6,
Another idea that I'll put up for consideration (since I work with the
cloud-init codebase also).
Cloud-init[1] which currently does lots of little useful initialization
types of activities (similar to the racker agents activities) has been
going through some of the same questions[2] as to should
Agreed,
Chatting earlier today on #cloud-init about all of this I think scott convinced
me that maybe we (the joint we in the community at large) should think about
asking ourselves what do we really want a guest agent for/to do?
If it's for software installation or user management then aren't
soon!
--
Joshua Harlow
It's openstack, relax... | harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Why not just make it a pypi party library from the start?
Call it 'super-objects' or something. Why does it have to be connected to
oslo.incubator?
Process for process sake imho has been a problem for oslo.
Why not just go straight to building a library (does it matter if it's in
oslo?) that
for
oslo.messaging (so maybe it can be adjusted to work with things other than
eventlet to make it python33 compat).
On 12/3/13 2:01 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Thanks for writing this up, looking forward to seeing this happen so
Sure, no one has said it. But it seems to be implied, otherwise these
types of discussions wouldn't occur. Right?
On 12/3/13 2:25 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 22:07 +, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Process for process sake imho has been a problem for oslo
mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 22:31 +, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Sure, no one has said it. But it seems to be implied, otherwise these
types of discussions wouldn't occur. Right?
You're assuming the Nova objects API is at a point where the maintainers
of it feel ready to commit
Thanks for writing this up, looking forward to seeing this happen so that
oslo.messaging can be used outside of the core openstack projects (and be
used in libraries that do not want to force a oslo.cfg model onto users of
said libraries).
Any idea of a timeline as to when this would be reflected
+2
Turnstile seems to be a good middle ground (other companies I know have
solutions for this problem via other software), does anyone have operational
knowledge they can share about how turnstile has worked out for them?
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Nov 25, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Kevin
+2
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Nov 25, 2013, at 5:02 AM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks to everyone who helped with the many fixes. Kudos to
Joe/Clark for spear heading the effort!
-- dims
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Joe Gordon
+2
This kind of confusion is actually very bad from an external perspective and
from a user perspective.
Should this just get resolved by the TC once and for all? I remember this same
project vs tenant question happening like 2 years ago (maybe less) and it makes
us all look sort if mad if
I'm not a user but is there any more details on why it was removed, seems like
it would be nice to know more reasoning than it doesn't fit our
(internal/unknown) strategic goals at IBM. Seems rather sad that a driver can
be removed with more detail around why.
Sent from my really tiny
Agreed I like the idea.
It reminds me of the blog the solum team is setting up. I think I asked then
when they announced that blog if there was plans to make it easy for other
projects to also have there own supported blog.
is important for me from point of cancelling with using taskflow.
So, let me help you to impl taskflow to API.
Sincerely, Haruka Tanizawa
2013/11/20 Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
Sweet!
Feel free to ask lots of questions and jump on both irc channels
(#openstack
.
All right.
I found reminder mail from you just now.
I will probably join 'State management' IRC meeting.
( If I could get up early:) or join 'Cinder' IRC meeting)
Haruka Tanizawa
2013/11/21 Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
Howdy!
My guess is there is very much
Sweet!
Feel free to ask lots of questions and jump on both irc channels
(#openstack-state-management and #openstack-cinder) if u need any help that can
be better solved in real time chat.
Thanks for helping getting this ball rolling :-)
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Nov 19, 2013, at
If you start adding these states you might really want to consider the
following work that is going on in other projects.
It surely appears that everyone is starting to hit the same problem (and
joining efforts would produce a more beneficial result).
Relevant icehouse etherpads:
-
And also of course, nearly forgot a similar situation/review in heat.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49440/
Except theres was/is dealing with stack locking (a heat concept).
On 11/19/13 10:33 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
If you start adding these states you might really
Sorry that was I prefer #3 (not #2) at the end there. Keyboard failure ;)
On 11/19/13 10:27 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Personally I would prefer #3 from the below. #2 I think will still have to
deal with consistency issues, just switching away from a DB doesn't make
magical
Cc: Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com,
Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.commailto:isaku.yamah...@gmail.com,
Robert Kukura rkuk...@redhat.commailto:rkuk...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Race condition between DB layer and
plugin back-end
At yahoo at least 50+ simultaneous will be the common case (maybe we are
special).
Think of what happens on www.yahoo.com say on the olympics, news.yahoo.com
could need 50+ very very quickly (especially if say a gold medal is won by
some famous person). So I wouldn't discount those being the
Hmmm at yahoo cloudinit works on rhel 5.6, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 so my guess there
could be some bug. U shouldn't need your own custom script to set the
networking setting.
It hopefully should just work.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Nov 19, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Cristian Falcas
was referring to cloud init and config drive specifically, no dhcp ip.
Is it working in thi scenario?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Hmmm at yahoo cloudinit works on rhel 5.6, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 so my guess there
could be some bug. U shouldn't need
Greetings all stackers,
I propose that we add Anastasia Karpinska to the taskflow-core team [1].
Anastasia has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in
code and reviews. She provides high quality reviews and is doing an awesome job
with the various taskflow concepts (and
I see it as important (and not theoretical).
I'd like to use oslo.messaging (and oslo.messaging.rpc) in taskflow (to
prototype how a distributed engine would work using it) and bringing in a
library which requires global configuration is almost a non-starter for
me. Although taskflow is targeted
901 - 1000 of 1131 matches
Mail list logo
