Hi,
Could someone from the infra team check what's happening to Jenkins here
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92477/? It keeps re-verifying the change
over and over for no apparent reason.
Thanks,
Carlos Goncalves
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02:04 Tue 29 Apr , Bohai (ricky) wrote:
Hi stackers,
I found there are two policy.json files in cinder project.
One is for source code(cinder/etc/policy.json), another is for the unit
-- Forwarded message --
From: OpenStack Infra hud...@openstack.org
Date: 2014-05-18 10:29 GMT+08:00
Subject: [Blueprint thunderboost] new Blueprint: Accelerate the booting
process of a number of vms via VMThunder
Intro:
Currently, Nova boots vms by directly copying images
Hi, All :
Ironic is a project for us to control bare metal better. Is there
any horizon implementation for ironic to use ironic api and function easyly?
*Best Regards！*
*Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727
https://twitter.com/yanchao727*
*My
Hi, guys
I've uploaded my slide related to More Efficient Replication
in Juno Swift Design Summit to slideshare. Its URL is here.
http://www.slideshare.net/tsuyuzaki/open-stacks-ummitjuno
If anyone has questions or comments, please let me know by e-mail.
Regards,
Kota
Good day.
Could someone, please, review backport of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1240849 to stable/havana.
I've checked it on my laboratory and it fixes problem with 'no network
after soft reboot', but I've done some invasive changes to the logic, so
if someone with good neutron
It seems the nova team decided in Atlanta that v3 as currently
understood is never going to exist:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-v3-api.
There are a number of patches in flight that tweak how we handle
supporting both v2/v3 in tempest to reduce duplication.
We need to decide what
I was able to broke the loop by uploading a new patchset to Gerrit.
Infra team, could you please clean the mess caused by Jenkins on Gerrit, please?
Thanks,
Carlos Goncalves
On 19 May 2014, at 07:54, Carlos Gonçalves m...@cgoncalves.pt wrote:
Hi,
Could someone from the infra team check
Thanks for bringing this up.
We won't be testing v3 in Juno, but we'll need coverage for v2.1.
In my understanding will be a v2 compatible API - so including proxy to
glance cinder and neutron - but with micro-versions to bring in v3 features
such as CamelCase and Tasks.
So we should be able to
On 05/19/2014 01:24 PM, Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud) wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up.
We won't be testing v3 in Juno, but we'll need coverage for v2.1.
In my understanding will be a v2 compatible API - so including proxy to
glance cinder and neutron - but with micro-versions to bring in v3
*@Victor:*
six.text_type(exc): always use Unicode. It may raise unicode error
depending
on the exception, be careful. Example of such error in python 2:
unicode(Exception(nonascii:\xe9)).
It's very rare situation. Actually, it's no sense since we know nothing
about exception's encoding.
My suggestion is that we stop merging new Nova v3 tests from here
forward. However I think until we see the fruits of the v2.1 effort I
don't want to start ripping stuff out.
The path to removing is going to be disable Nova v3 in devstack-gate,
when the Nova team decides it's right to do that.
Hi Stackers-
Since, the Juno summit is completed, when can we have the JUNO Blueprints
reviews and approvals getting started.
Kindly help me the J-1 deadlines for Blueprint approval and Code merge.
Thanks in advance
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
Hello everybody interested in UX,
for one more time, I am reminding that there is ongoing survey for times
which will work for you regarding regular OpenStack UX IRC meetings:
http://doodle.com/3m29dkn3ef2em5in
Cheers
-- Jarda
On 2014/06/05 17:27, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hello UX folks,
I
Hi David,
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 6:49 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Status of v3 tests in tempest
It seems the nova team decided in Atlanta that v3 as currently
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:12 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/19/2014 01:24 PM, Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud) wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up.
We won't be testing v3 in Juno, but we'll need coverage for v2.1.
In my understanding will be a v2 compatible API - so including
Hi. This is a follow up mail of the design summit.
The next IRC meeting will be held on
June 2nd, 2014 Tuesdays 5:00(AM)UTC-
on #openstack-meeting
(May 20, 27 will be skipped).
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/servicevm
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceVM
thanks,
--
Isaku Yamahata
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
While we are waiting to see if the Nova specs process works out, I have
started a personal copy of the repo and tailored it to Keystone:
https://github.com/admiyo/keystone-specs/
I've made use of it for a Blueprint
Trevor, congrats!
welcome to the sahara-core.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/12/2014 05:31 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Hey folks,
I'd like to nominate Trevor McKay (tmckay) for sahara-core.
He is among the top reviewers of Sahara
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:58 AM, 严超 yanchao...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All :
Ironic is a project for us to control bare metal better. Is there
any horizon implementation for ironic to use ironic api and function easyly?
Best Regards！
Chao Yan
The Tuskar UI team is working on a UI for
Removing [nova]
On 05/19/2014 02:55 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
My suggestion is that we stop merging new Nova v3 tests from here
forward. However I think until we see the fruits of the v2.1 effort I
don't want to start ripping stuff out.
Fair enough but we need to revert, or at least stop taking
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:00 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com
trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Stackers-
Since, the Juno summit is completed, when can we have the JUNO Blueprints
reviews and approvals getting started.
Kindly help me the J-1 deadlines for Blueprint approval and
Nilakhya, We discussed this a bit at the summit and I think the consensus was
that this would be a good thing to do by passing a flag to resource-list that
would flatten the structure of nested stacks in the call. Tim Schnell brought
this up as well and may be interested in helping define the
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:32 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com
trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Kyle
Thanks a lot for the comment and BP review.
Can you also kindly comment on the proposed deadlines for Code Review/merge.
Also I feel, Adding these important dates in the openstack
I was looking through this timeout bug [1] this morning and am able to
correlate that around the time of the image snapshot timeout, ceilometer
was really hammering CPU on the host. There are already threads on
ceilometer performance and how that needs to be improved for Tempest
runs so I
On 5/19/2014 10:53 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I was looking through this timeout bug [1] this morning and am able to
correlate that around the time of the image snapshot timeout, ceilometer
was really hammering CPU on the host. There are already threads on
ceilometer performance and how that
We're seeing the spread of various *-specs projects now, which is great
to see. Some of these (nova, neutron and tripleo) include a Python unit
test (tests/test_titles.py) to check the specs follow the template. The
test has been copy-pasted between projects and it's diverging already.
Nova has a
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2014-05-19 08:26:22 -0700:
Hi Nilakhya,
As Randall mentioned we did discuss this exact issue at the summit. I was
planning on putting a blueprint together today to continue the discussion.
The Stack Preview call is already doing the necessary recursion
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday May 20th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone interested in
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:26:22PM +, Tim Schnell wrote:
Hi Nilakhya,
As Randall mentioned we did discuss this exact issue at the summit. I was
planning on putting a blueprint together today to continue the discussion.
The Stack Preview call is already doing the necessary recursion to
Sean Dague said on Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:20:42AM -0400:
Based on some of my blog posts on gerrit queries, I've built and gotten
integrated a custom inbox zero dashboard which is per project in gerrit.
Hi Sean,
I've been looking for something like this! Very nice.
Only one problem - if all
I have uploaded it using the given link but I can't seem to find where people
can find it.
Thanks.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More info, I add a follow up comment on an old change set, and then it
happened.
Yi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Carlos Gonçalves m...@cgoncalves.ptwrote:
I was able to broke the loop by uploading a new patchset to Gerrit.
Infra team, could you please clean the mess caused by Jenkins on
Ryota,
Thanks for your invitation. Unfortunately I did not join the summit. Wish
you had a good time and enjoy the summit ;). However I am really interested
in your baremetal + SDN solution. Would you mind elaborate a bit more about
the architecture and design of the solution?
Anthony,
Agree. I
Hello,
As promised during the second BoF session (thanks a lot to Chris Wright for
leading this), here is a first try at defining the purpose of our special
interest group.
---
Mission statement for the OpenStack NFV Special Interest Group:
The SIG aims to define and prioritize the use cases
Stackers,
On Friday in Atlanta, I had the pleasure of moderating the database
session at the Ops Meetup track. We had lots of good discussions and
heard important feedback from operators on DB topics.
For the record, I would not bring this point up so publicly unless I
believed it was a
On May 19, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:26:22PM +, Tim Schnell wrote:
Hi Nilakhya,
As Randall mentioned we did discuss this exact issue at the summit. I was
planning on putting a blueprint together today to continue the discussion.
On 5/19/2014 11:33 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 5/19/2014 10:53 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I was looking through this timeout bug [1] this morning and am able to
correlate that around the time of the image snapshot timeout, ceilometer
was really hammering CPU on the host. There are already
On 05/19/2014 02:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 5/19/2014 11:33 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 5/19/2014 10:53 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I was looking through this timeout bug [1] this morning and am able to
correlate that around the time of the image snapshot timeout, ceilometer
was
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Stackers,
On Friday in Atlanta, I had the pleasure of moderating the database
session at the Ops Meetup track. We had lots of good discussions and heard
important feedback from operators on DB topics.
For the record, I
On 05/19/2014 01:03 PM, Alexis Lee wrote:
Sean Dague said on Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:20:42AM -0400:
Based on some of my blog posts on gerrit queries, I've built and gotten
integrated a custom inbox zero dashboard which is per project in gerrit.
Hi Sean,
I've been looking for something
I think the Service VM discussion resolved itself in a way that reduces the
problem to a form of NFV - there are standing issues using VMs for
services, orchestration is probably not a responsibility that lies in
Neutron, and as such the importance is in identifying the problems with the
plumbing
Barbicaneers,
Many of us are just getting back into the swing of things so we are going
to go ahead and cancel the meeting today. The main topic to be discussed
is our switch to using Gerrit for blueprints. The process is mostly
derived from Nova and is documented here:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
I think the Service VM discussion resolved itself in a way that reduces the
problem to a form of NFV - there are standing issues using VMs for services,
orchestration is probably not a responsibility that lies in Neutron,
This is still a partially formed idea, but one of the ways I've thought of
solving the timeout issue is by using aggregate data from previous results. Any
of the event systems (Ceilometer, StackTach) should allow you to create models
of what an inbounds server build (or any action) time per
I would go with 'define the use cases and identify and prioritise the
requirements', personally, but that's a nit. We seem to have absolved our
members from actually providing the implementation, which is a bit cheeky...
--
Ian.
On 19 May 2014 10:19, Nicolas Barcet nico...@barcet.com wrote:
On 5/19/14 12:35 PM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On May 19, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:26:22PM +, Tim Schnell wrote:
Hi Nilakhya,
As Randall mentioned we did discuss this exact issue at the summit. I
was
Seems to be the way most people are going, I noticed Ironic announcing the
same today.
On 19/05/2014 19:46, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.com wrote:
Barbicaneers,
Many of us are just getting back into the swing of things so we are going
to go ahead and cancel the meeting today. The main
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_May_20th
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I've also put up the following which is based on a tool that has been use
in taskflow.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/doc8
And inclusion into stackforge (getting it off my github repo).
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94236/
Seems like we can do some of these rules in it.
Its pluggable via
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/explode-nested-resources
Spec: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/explode-resource-list
Tim
On 5/19/14 1:53 PM, Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 5/19/14 12:35 PM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On May
Hi Aaron,
In OVS and ML2 plugins, on port-update, there is a check to make sure that
allowed-address-pairs and fixed-ips don't overlap. Can you please explain
why that is needed?
- icehouse final: neutron/plugins/ml2/plugin.py
677 elif changed_fixed_ips:
Hi,
Sure, if you look at this method:
def _check_fixed_ips_and_address_pairs_no_overlap(self, context, port):
address_pairs = self.get_allowed_address_pairs(context, port['id'])
for fixed_ip in port['fixed_ips']:
for address_pair in address_pairs:
Hi Nick,
* Nicolas Barcet (nico...@barcet.com) wrote:
As promised during the second BoF session (thanks a lot to Chris Wright for
leading this), here is a first try at defining the purpose of our special
interest group.
Thank you for doing this.
---
Mission statement for the OpenStack NFV
Better send to infra's list too.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
More info, I add a follow up comment on an old change set, and then it
happened.
Yi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Carlos Gonçalves m...@cgoncalves.ptwrote:
I was able to broke the loop
Jerry Xinyu Zhao xyzje...@gmail.com writes:
Better send to infra's list too.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
More info, I add a follow up comment on an old change set, and then it
happened.
Yi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Carlos Gonçalves
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:44:05PM EDT, Henrique Truta wrote:
Hello, everyone!
I've been trying to install a multinode Devstack on CentOS. I ran stack.sh
on both controller and compute node. The controller works fine, but the
compute node is not working properly as a host. Looks like it's
Hello, everyone!
I've been trying to install a multinode Devstack on CentOS. I ran stack.sh
on both controller and compute node. The controller works fine, but the
compute node is not working properly as a host. Looks like it's just
pointing to the controller, once I run nova host-list and I only
Yes, I am.
Controller localrc: http://paste.openstack.org/show/80953/
Compute node localrc: http://paste.openstack.org/show/80955/
2014-05-19 17:51 GMT-03:00 Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:44:05PM EDT, Henrique Truta wrote:
Hello, everyone!
Great summit!! fantastic to meeting you all in person.
We now have agreement on the Object model. How do we turn that into
blueprints and also how do we start making progress on the rest of the
items we agree upon at the summit?
Susanne
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Brandon Logan
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:00:26PM EDT, Henrique Truta wrote:
Controller localrc: http://paste.openstack.org/show/80953/
Compute node localrc: http://paste.openstack.org/show/80955/
These look backwards. The first pastebin link has no enabled services,
while the pastebin you say is the
Thanks Susanne, and was great meeting many of you. Actually I was trying to
find an updated version of the object model that was presented at the summit
but couldn’t find it. Is there a link online?
Youcef
From: Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:07 PM
There was a question during my summit session on Friday at 4:00 about
providing diagrams. There are diagrams in the specification [2] that
show where IP addresses are used in the various external network
schemes. The first diagram, almost half-way down, shows the current
method which uses public
Added -
https://github.com/devananda/ironic-specs/commit/7f34f353332ad5b26830dadc8c9f870df399feb7
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
I'd like to suggest two things.
Firstly a section on scale (as opposed to performance).
Secondly, I'd like to
Thanks, James!
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.orgwrote:
Jerry Xinyu Zhao xyzje...@gmail.com writes:
Better send to infra's list too.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
More info, I add a follow up comment on an
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 19 May 2014 20:32, sridhar basam sridhar.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Stackers,
On Friday in Atlanta, I had the pleasure of moderating the database
session at the Ops Meetup track. We had
On 05/16/2014 09:11 AM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
six.text_type(exc) is the recommended solution.
+1
--
John
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Please lets not disregard zookeeper (zab based) or etc.d or other raft[1] based
projects.
I'd also not rather bet on concoord (which seems to be maintained as a
university project by 2 people @ cornell).
Even if zookeeper is java the constructs provided by kazoo[3] should be
directly usable
On a side note, I'm rather ignorant on python frameworks for distributed
coordination... concoord?
Is zookeper something that should be ruled out because of language
restrictions?
I have not used zookeeper, so there might be reasons to use it where we
have to write java code,
but as long as
Hello,
I am working on an extension for neutron to allow external attachment point
information to be stored and used by backend plugins/drivers to place
switch ports into neutron networks[1].
One of the primary use cases is to integrate ironic with neutron. The basic
workflow is that ironic will
+1 to this process, and I think the template is pretty reasonable.
One thing to call out maybe, is are there any known failure scenarios? If
so, why shouldn't they block the spec?
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Added -
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for the prompt response.
If the overlap does not have any negative effect, can we please just remove
this check? It creates confusion as there are certain code paths where we
do not perform this check. For example, the current code does NOT perform
this check when we are
The patch in question is doing an invasive runtime check [1] to determine
whether arp header modification is supported by ovs. I seem to remember a lack
of consensus on whether invasive runtime checks were acceptable around vxlan
detection, and I would appreciate confirmation from other cores
Another question for the group:
Would it be helpful to go ahead and update the API google doc we've also
been using in discussing API / object model changes?
(Also, I'd eventually like to see this become part of the standard
documentation, so pointers on how to get started making that happen
Hi Stephen,
If it is possible, can you please annotate the fields to distinguish the
required ones from the optional ones?
Thanks,
Praveen
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netwrote:
Hi folks,
Ok, I've attached a newly-updated object diagram (and its
These are the ARBAC documents that came up in our meeting with Shawn
McKinney at Summit:
1. OpenStack RBAC proposal slide deck
http://people.redhat.com/jlennox/OpenStackRbacProposal2014.pdf
2. ANSI RBAC (INCITS 359-2004) Specification document:
Hi folks
As per neutron discussion, we agreed there is really important to distribute
core-reviewer loads.
so we got an idea to specify primary/secondary reviewers for each reviews.
IMO, this is almost impossible without some helper tool.
so, I wrote it.
Hey everyone, it was great to see many of you at the summit - if you
were there and we didn't get time to say hello, then hopefully in
Paris we can do that ;)
I'd like everyone that ran a TripleO session to make sure the outcomes
of the session are captured into a spec in the specs repo - getting
Hi Nachi,
Sorry for question, but did you try stackalytics?
E.g. this page http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/neutron/30
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi folks
As per neutron discussion, we agreed there is
Hi Eduard,
Hopefully diagrams in following page can clear things up.
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/under_the_hood_openvswitch.html
Terms explained below based on my understanding
- qvo: veth pair openvswitch side
- qvb: veth pair bridge side
- qbr: bridge
- qr: l3 agent
In the API meeting at the summit, Mark McClain mentioned that the
existing API should be supported, but deprecated so as not to interrupt
those using the existing API. To me, that sounds like the object model
can change but there needs to be some kind of adapter/translation layer
that modifies
On 05/12/2014 10:25 PM, Dmitri Zimine wrote:
The problem: Keystone authentication on MAC works from command line,
but fails when run from PyCharm. And I want to run PyCharm to debug!
The root cause: Keystone uses openssl cms which is only available in
new openssl. I installed openssl via
On 05/16/2014 05:08 AM, Tizy Ninan wrote:
Hi,
We have an openstack Havana deployment on CentOS 6.4 and nova-network
network service installed using Mirantis Fuel v4.0.
We are trying to integrate the openstack setup with the Microsoft
Active Directory(LDAP server). I only have a read access
Guys,
I did a few changes on my environment (OpenStack IceHouse on IPv6),
everything seems to be working smoothly now...
Just deployed Heat on IPv6 too...
I didn't tested Ceilomenter and Cinder Volume (iSCSI traffic) with IPv6
yet...
I'm writing a new Multinode Quick Guide to deploy OpenStack
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Stackers,
On Friday in Atlanta, I had the pleasure of moderating the database
session at the Ops Meetup track. We had lots of good discussions and heard
important feedback from operators on DB topics.
For the record, I
I see this as the result of two unrelated issues.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
I was looking through this timeout bug [1] this morning and am able to
correlate that around the time of the image snapshot timeout, ceilometer
was really
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Alexis Lee alex...@hp.com wrote:
We're seeing the spread of various *-specs projects now, which is great
to see. Some of these (nova, neutron and tripleo) include a Python unit
test (tests/test_titles.py) to check the specs follow the template. The
test has
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
I'd like to get some more discussion going for the nova-spec on adding DB2
support [1] especially since we didn't get to the topic for non-virt driver
3rd party CI in the nova design summit session this morning.
Hi Boris
Ya, I know this stats.
The primary usecase for this patch is helping reviewer assignment for
each patch.
2014-05-19 18:50 GMT-07:00 Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me:
Hi Nachi,
Sorry for question, but did you try stackalytics?
E.g. this page
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:19 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Ian
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:58 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
Removing [nova]
On 05/19/2014 02:55 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
My suggestion is that we stop merging new Nova v3 tests from here
forward. However I think until we see the fruits of the v2.1 effort I
don't want to start
Hi,
I am Vinay, working with Ericsson.
I am interested in the following blueprint regarding port mirroring
extension in neutron:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/port-mirroring
I am close to finishing an implementation for this extension in OVS plugin
and would be
Hi everyone,
I've been looking at two reviews that Ann Kamyshnikova has proposed
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82073/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80518/
I think the changes are fundamentally a Good Thing™ - they appear to reduce
the differences between the database models and their
1) Summit recap
Forklift, no-db scheduler, simultaneous scheduling for server groups, hints for
VM life cycle
2) Opens
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On Tue, May 20, 2014, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
I've been looking at two reviews that Ann Kamyshnikova has proposed
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82073/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80518/
I think the changes are fundamentally a Good Thing™ - they
Vinay's proposal was based on OVS's mirroring feature.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:11 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi yamam...@valinux.co.jpwrote:
Hi,
I am Vinay, working with Ericsson.
I am interested in the following blueprint regarding port mirroring
extension in neutron:
Hi, Nick,
For “have a test case which can be verified using a an OpenSource
implementation ….. ensure that tests can be done without any special hardware
or proprietary software”, I totally agree the requirement for without
proprietary software, however, I’m not sure about your exact meaing of
97 matches
Mail list logo
