Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] Is there a sandbox project how to use tempest test plugin interface?

2015-09-14 Thread Marc Koderer
Am 14.09.2015 um 10:01 schrieb Lajos Katona : > Hi Matthew, > > Finally I made it working, so now I have a dummy plugin. > > Few questions, remarks: > - For me it was little hard to merge my weak knowledge from python packaging > with the documentation for tempest plugins, do you mind if I pus

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [kolla] Possible to support multiple compute drivers?

2015-09-14 Thread Kevin Benton
>I'm no Neutron expert, but I suspect that one could use either the LinuxBridge *or* the OVS ML2 mechanism driver for the L2 agent, along with a single flat provider network for your baremetal nodes. If it's a baremetal node, it wouldn't be running an agent at all, would it? On Mon, Sep 14, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Somanchi Trinath
Kyle – I see a Good and a Sad things here, The Good one being, you lighted the path for new PTL to come up. The Sad thing is we are missing your leadership. Hope you still lead the team in dotted line. ☺ - Trinath From: Irena Berezovsky [mailto:irenab@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 13,

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] How to enable devstack plugins

2015-09-14 Thread Zhai, Edwin
All, I saw some patches from Chris Dent to enable functions in devstack/*. But it conflicts with devstack upstream so that start each ceilometer service twice. Is there any official way to setup ceilometer as devstack plugin? Best Rgds, Edwin __

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][compass] Support of Offline Install

2015-09-14 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/14/2015 11:36 PM, Weidong Shao wrote: > Hi osad team, > > Compass, an openstack deployment project, is in process of using osad > project in the openstack deployment. We need to support a use case where > there is no Internet connection. The way we handle this is to split the > deployment in

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][compass] Support of Offline Install

2015-09-14 Thread Weidong Shao
Hi osad team, Compass, an openstack deployment project, is in process of using osad project in the openstack deployment. We need to support a use case where there is no Internet connection. The way we handle this is to split the deployment into "build" and "install" phase. In Build phase, the Comp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Denis Dmitriev for fuel-qa(devops) core

2015-09-14 Thread Sebastian Kalinowski
+1 2015-09-14 22:37 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kliuk : > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Anastasia Urlapova < > aurlap...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Folks, >> I would like to nominate Denis Dmitriev[1] for fuel-qa/fuel-devops core. >> >> Dennis spent three months in Fuel BugFix team, his velocity was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread hao wang
Thanks Sean, Vote +1. 2015-09-14 22:49 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis : > Hello everyone, > > I'm announcing my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Mitaka release. > > The Cinder team has made great progress. We've not only grown the > number of supported backend drivers, but we've made significant > improv

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] There is a function to display the VGA emulation screen of BMC in the baremetal node on the Horizon?

2015-09-14 Thread Shinya Hoshino
Thanks Kevin, And, can I understand that this answer means that there is no such capability in the recent Ironic? At present, my mission is to simply to check whether there is a capability. Based on its result, I think the handling later. I might be make something, or replace by other ways, or so

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Maintaining cluster API in upgrades

2015-09-14 Thread Hongbin Lu
Hi Ryan, I think pushing python k8sclient out of magnum tree (option 3) is the decision, which was made in Vancouver Summit (if I remembered correctly). It definitely helps for solving the k8s versioning problems. Best regards, Hongbin From: Ryan Rossiter [mailto:rlros...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] S

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-14 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Is there a documentation which records step by step? What is Neutron-LBaaS tenant? Is it the tenant who is configuring the listener? *OR* is it some tenant which is created for lbaas plugin that is the having all secrets for all tenants configuring lbaas. >>You need to set up ACLs on the Barbi

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread hao wang
Thanks Mike ! Your help is very important to me to get started in cinder and we do a lot of proud work with your leadership. 2015-09-15 6:36 GMT+08:00 John Griffith : > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Sean McGinnis > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Robert Collins
On 15 September 2015 at 00:10, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a > few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads > related to glance, glance-store, the client, and the API, I spent > last week contacting a few of you indi

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [plugin] Release tagging

2015-09-14 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > John, > > per ACL in project-config: > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/gerrit/acls/stackforge/fuel-plugin-solidfire-cinder.config#n9 > > you are already in that group: > https://review.openstack.org/#/a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][SR-IOV] Hardware changes and shifting PCI addresses

2015-09-14 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/10/2015 05:23 PM, Brent Eagles wrote: Hi, I was recently informed of a situation that came up when an engineer added an SR-IOV nic to a compute node that was hosting some guests that had VFs attached. Unfortunately, adding the card shuffled the PCI addresses causing some degree of havoc. B

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [plugin] Release tagging

2015-09-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
John, per ACL in project-config: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/gerrit/acls/stackforge/fuel-plugin-solidfire-cinder.config#n9 you are already in that group: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/956,members The release team would be in charge *if* that li

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] [zuul] Can not vote +/-1 verified into gerrit server

2015-09-14 Thread Watanabe, Isao
Hello, Ramy Thank you for your help very much. Best regards, Watanabe.isao > -Original Message- > From: Asselin, Ramy [mailto:ramy.asse...@hp.com] > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 8:56 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

2015-09-14 Thread Alex Xu
Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held Tuesday UTC1200. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST 08:00 (Tue) Japan 21:00 (Tue) China 20:00 (Tue) United Kingdom 13:00 (Tue) The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meet

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

2015-09-14 Thread Gilles Dubreuil
On 15/09/15 06:53, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Gilles Dubreuil writes: >> >>> A. The 'composite namevar' approach: >>> >>> keystone_tenant {'projectX::domainY': ... } >>> B. The 'meaningless name' approach: >>> >>>keystone_tena

[openstack-dev] [fuel] [plugin] Release tagging

2015-09-14 Thread John Griffith
Hey All, I was trying to tag a release for v 1.0.1 on [1] today and noticed I don't have permissions to do so. Is there, a release team/process for this? [1] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-plugin-solidfire-cinder Thanks, John _

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Monty Taylor
On 09/15/2015 02:06 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 13:46:16 -0700: Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-09-14 13:25:43 -0700: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700: Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09

[openstack-dev] [oslo] PTL candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Hi, It's been a great privilege to be the Oslo PTL for Liberty and getting to know and learn a whole lot of things. I hope i have helped move the Oslo project along its path in the process. Things we should be proud about include the fact that oslo-incubator is almost empty. We have a whole bunch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] API response on k8s failure

2015-09-14 Thread Adrian Otto
Ryan, Thanks for sharing this. Sorry you got out to a bumpy start. I suggest you do file a bug for this against magnum and we can decide how best to handle it. I can not tell from your email what the kubectl would do with the same input. We might have an opportunity to make both better. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 13:46:16 -0700: > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-09-14 13:25:43 -0700: > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700: > > > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09-14 14:41:00 +0200: > > > > On 14/09

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Maintaining cluster API in upgrades

2015-09-14 Thread Ryan Rossiter
I have some food for thought with regards to upgrades that was provoked by some incorrect usage of Magnum which led me to finding [1]. Let's say we're running a cloud with Liberty Magnum, which works with Kubernetes API v1. During the Mitaka release, Kubernetes released v2, so now Magnum condu

[openstack-dev] [oslo] PTL candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Joshua Harlow
Howdy folks, I'd like to propose myself for oslo PTL for the mitaka cycle, For those that don't know me I've been involved in openstack for ~4 years, Have worked at yahoo! for ~7 years, ~4 of the last years have been getting openstack adopted in yahoo! (where it is now used by everyone, and i

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > > was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our > > accompli

[openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Candidancy

2015-09-14 Thread Ryan Moats
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Mitaka cycle as Neutron PTL. While not currently a Neutron core, I've been looking at hard at Neutron for several cycles now and I feel that while we've accomplished a great deal, more consolidation at this point will be desirable. Therefore, if elected

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bugs which we should accept in 7.0 after Hard Code Freeze

2015-09-14 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Thanks Andrew. Team, if there are any disagreements - let's discuss it. Otherwise, I think we should be just strict and follow defined process. We can deliver high priority bugfixes in updates channel later if needed. I hope that reasoning is clear for everything. Every bugfix has a potential to b

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] API response on k8s failure

2015-09-14 Thread Ryan Rossiter
I was giving a devstacked version of Magnum a try last week, and from a new user standpoint, I hit a big roadblock that caused me a lot of confusion. Here's my story: I was attempting to create a pod in a k8s bay, and I provided it with an sample manifest from the Kubernetes repo. The Magnum A

[openstack-dev] Cross-Project meeting, Tue Sept 15th, 21:00 UTC

2015-09-14 Thread Mike Perez
Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested, We'll have a cross-project meeting tomorrow at 21:00 UTC, with the following agenda: * Review past action items * Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) * Centralized Code Coverage Index/Stats -- https://review.openstack.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] monasca,murano,mistral governance

2015-09-14 Thread Matt Fischer
Emilien, I've discussed this with some of the Monasca puppet guys here who are doing most of the work. I think it probably makes sense to move to that model now, especially since the pace of development has slowed substantially. One blocker before to having it "big tent" was the lack of test cover

[openstack-dev] [neutron][L3][QA] DVR job failure rate and maintainability

2015-09-14 Thread Sean M. Collins
[adding neutron tag to subject and resending] Hi, Carl Baldwin, Doug Wiegley, Matt Kassawara, Ryan Moats, and myself are at the QA sprint in Fort Collins. Earlier today there was a discussion about the failure rate about the DVR job, and the possible impact that it is having on the gate. Ryan ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

2015-09-14 Thread Sofer Athlan-Guyot
Morgan Fainberg writes: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Rich Megginson > wrote: > > > On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > > Hi, > > Gilles Dubreuil writes: > > A. The 'composite namevar' approach: > >

[openstack-dev] [puppet] monasca,murano,mistral governance

2015-09-14 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi, As a reminder, Puppet modules that are part of OpenStack are documented here [1]. I can see puppet-murano & puppet-mistral Gerrit permissions different from other modules, because Mirantis helped to bootstrap the module a few months ago. I think [2] the modules should be consistent in govern

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO Updates & Upgrades [was: Upgrade plans for RDO Manager - Brainstorming]

2015-09-14 Thread Steven Hardy
Firstly thanks Emilien for starting this discussion, I revised the subject in an effort to get wider feedback, apologies for my delay responding; On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:34:26AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 24/08/15 15:12, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >Hi, > > > >So I've been working on OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

2015-09-14 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/14/2015 03:26 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Rich Megginson writes: I think we could support both. I don't see it as an either/or situation. +1 A. I think it's the B: meaningless approach here. Pros - Easier names That's subjective, creating unique and meaningful name do

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-14 Thread Adam Harwell
You need to set up ACLs on the Barbican side for that container, to make it readable to the Neutron-LBaaS tenant. For now, the tenant-id should just be documented, but we are looking into making an API call that would expose the admin tenant-id to the user so they can make an API call to discove

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

2015-09-14 Thread Sofer Athlan-Guyot
Rich Megginson writes: > I think we could support both. I don't see it as an either/or > situation. +1 >>> A. >> I think it's the B: meaningless approach here. >> >>>Pros >>> - Easier names >> That's subjective, creating unique and meaningful name don't look easy >> to me. > > The poin

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

2015-09-14 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Gilles Dubreuil writes: >> >> A. The 'composite namevar' approach: >>> >>> keystone_tenant {'projectX::domainY': ... } >>> B. The 'meaningless name' approach: >>> >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Nominating Dave Mccowan for Barbican core

2015-09-14 Thread Douglas Mendizábal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 As described in the Barbican Core Team wiki [1] Dave has gotten the requierd +1s and no objections, so I'm happy to welcome him to the Barbican Core reviewer team. Douglas Mendizábal On 9/9/15 11:33 AM, John Wood wrote: > AgreedŠ+1 > > On 9/9/15,

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Kevin Carter
Hello Everyone, TL;DR - I'm sending this out to announce that I won't be running for PTL of the OpenStack-Ansible project in the upcoming cycle. Although I won't be running for PTL, with community support, I intend to remain an active contributor just with more time spent more cross project and

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

2015-09-14 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Hi, Gilles Dubreuil writes: A. The 'composite namevar' approach: keystone_tenant {'projectX::domainY': ... } B. The 'meaningless name' approach: keystone_tenant {'myproject': name='projectX', domain=>'domainY', ...} Notes: - Actu

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-09-14 13:25:43 -0700: > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700: > > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09-14 14:41:00 +0200: > > > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > > > >After having some conve

[openstack-dev] [L3][QA] DVR job failure rate and maintainability

2015-09-14 Thread Sean M. Collins
Hi, Carl Baldwin, Doug Wiegley, Matt Kassawara, Ryan Moats, and myself are at the QA sprint in Fort Collins. Earlier today there was a discussion about the failure rate about the DVR job, and the possible impact that it is having on the gate. Ryan has a good patch up that shows the failure rates

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Denis Dmitriev for fuel-qa(devops) core

2015-09-14 Thread Ivan Kliuk
+1 On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > Folks, > I would like to nominate Denis Dmitriev[1] for fuel-qa/fuel-devops core. > > Dennis spent three months in Fuel BugFix team, his velocity was between > 150-200% per week. Thanks to his efforts we have won these old issues w

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

2015-09-14 Thread Sofer Athlan-Guyot
Hi, Gilles Dubreuil writes: > A. The 'composite namevar' approach: > >keystone_tenant {'projectX::domainY': ... } > B. The 'meaningless name' approach: > > keystone_tenant {'myproject': name='projectX', domain=>'domainY', ...} > > Notes: > - Actually using both combined should work too w

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700: > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09-14 14:41:00 +0200: > > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > >After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a > > >few weeks ago, and observing

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] tasks (following "proposed priorities for Mitaka")

2015-09-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2015-09-14 20:41:38 +0200: > On 09/14/2015 04:58 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > > Apologies for forking the thread, but there was way too much in Doug's > > email (and Flavio's response) and I only want to make a few points about > > tasks. Please read Doug's o

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09-14 14:41:00 +0200: > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > >After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a > >few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads > >related to glance, glance-store, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread James E. Blair
Thierry Carrez writes: > Doug Hellmann wrote: >> [...] >> 1. Resolve the situation preventing the DefCore committee from >>including image upload capabilities in the tests used for trademark >>and interoperability validation. >> >> 2. Follow through on the original commitment of the proj

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Denis Dmitriev for fuel-qa(devops) core

2015-09-14 Thread Andrey Sledzinskiy
+1 On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > Folks, > I would like to nominate Denis Dmitriev[1] for fuel-qa/fuel-devops core. > > Dennis spent three months in Fuel BugFix team, his velocity was between > 150-200% per week. Thanks to his efforts we have won these old issues w

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Denis Dmitriev for fuel-qa(devops) core

2015-09-14 Thread Anastasia Urlapova
Folks, I would like to nominate Denis Dmitriev[1] for fuel-qa/fuel-devops core. Dennis spent three months in Fuel BugFix team, his velocity was between 150-200% per week. Thanks to his efforts we have won these old issues with time sync and ceph's clock skew. Dennis's ideas constantly help us to i

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread D'Angelo, Scott
Thanks Mike. You've done a great job, including making contributors feel welcome. -Original Message- From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:16 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy Hello all

Re: [openstack-dev] [congress] IRC hangout

2015-09-14 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi Shiv, Our IRC is #congress. Tim On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:45 AM Shiv Haris wrote: > Hi, > > > > What is the IRC channel where congress folks hangout. I tried > #openstack-congress on freenode but is seems not correct. > > > > -Shiv > > > > > > > > *From:* Su Zhang [mailto:westlif...@gmail

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] tasks (following "proposed priorities for Mitaka")

2015-09-14 Thread Monty Taylor
On 09/14/2015 04:58 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: Apologies for forking the thread, but there was way too much in Doug's email (and Flavio's response) and I only want to make a few points about tasks. Please read Doug's original email and Flavio's reply at some point, preferably before you read this

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/09/15 19:06 +0200, Monty Taylor wrote: On 09/14/2015 02:41 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: [snip] The task API is also not widely deployed, so its adoption for DefCore is problematic. If we provide a clear technical direction that this API is prefe

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Martin, Kurt Frederick (ESSN Storage MSDU)
Thanks Mike for the great leadership over the last few cycles. The Cinder community made great strides forward with your guidance and contributions. ~Kurt -Original Message- From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 9:16 AM To: OpenStack Development Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Mike, Thank you for doing this hard work! Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Patrick East wrote: > Mike, you've been an awesome help for me getting started in Cinder. Thanks > for all your hard work as PTL! > > -Patrick > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Walter A. B

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

2015-09-14 Thread Ruby Loo
Hi, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) As of Mon, Sep 14 (diff with Sep 7) - Open: 142 (+4). 11 new (+1), 48 in progress, 0 critical, 11 high and 8 incomplete (-1) - Nova bugs with

[openstack-dev] [oslo] mitaka summit planning/ideas

2015-09-14 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hi all oslo-fans (and others), Just thought I'd let everyone interested know about: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-oslo-summit-planning Please feel free to add any thoughts/ideas for sessions on there! :-) -Josh ___

[openstack-dev] [congress] IRC hangout

2015-09-14 Thread Shiv Haris
Hi, What is the IRC channel where congress folks hangout. I tried #openstack-congress on freenode but is seems not correct. -Shiv From: Su Zhang [mailto:westlif...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 5:17 PM To: openstack-dev Subject: [openstack-dev] [congress] simulation example in th

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On 09/14/2015 11:27 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Doug Hellmann wrote: >> [...] >> 1. Resolve the situation preventing the DefCore committee from >>including image upload capabilities in the tests used for trademark >>and interoperability validation. >> >> 2. Follow through on the original co

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Patrick East
Mike, you've been an awesome help for me getting started in Cinder. Thanks for all your hard work as PTL! -Patrick On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > Thanks for your leadership and service Mike. You've done a great job! > > Walt > >> Hello all, >> >> I will not be

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Mike Perez
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a > few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads > related to glance, glance-store, the client, and the API, I spent > last week contacting a few of you in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
Thanks for your leadership and service Mike. You've done a great job! Walt Hello all, I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our accomplishments: * Spearheading the Oslo work to allow *all* Open

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Tom Barron
On 9/14/15 12:15 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Thanks for helping make me feel welcome as I started up, for your example of gutsy and consistent leadership, and for some really good coffee! -- Tom

[openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #51

2015-09-14 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hello, Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, tomorrow at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150915 Tomorrow we will make our Sprint Retrospective, please share your experience on the etherpad [1]. Also, feel free to ad

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Monty Taylor
On 09/14/2015 02:41 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads related to glance, glance-store, the client, and the API, I spent last

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our > accomplishments: Thanks for a couple of awesome cycles Mike! _

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes/log

2015-09-14 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Thanks for joining us for the meeting today. Meeting minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-09-14-16.00.html Meeting log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/201

[openstack-dev] [sahara] hadoop-openstack.jar and proxy users

2015-09-14 Thread michael mccune
hey all, in doing some work recently with proxy users and hadoop deployments, i am noticing that the modified version of the hadoop-openstack.jar we package from the sahara-extras repo is not being used in our current images. this jar file adds support for keystone v3 to the swift interface i

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread David Medberry
Thanks Mike. Enjoy a break (albeit thin and brief.) I've appreciated your guiding the Cinder cats. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should fee

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Dulko, Michal
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 6:16 PM > > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was > for a > reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our > accomplishme

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/14/2015 12:15 PM, Mike Perez wrote: Hello all, I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our accomplishments: * Spearheading the Oslo work to allow *all* OpenStack projects to have their databas

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Security hardening

2015-09-14 Thread Major Hayden
On 09/14/2015 03:28 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > I agree with Clint that this is a good approach. > > If there is an automated way that we can verify the security of an > installation at a reasonable/standardised level then I think we should add a > gate check for it too. Here's a rough draft o

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2015-09-14 15:02:59 +: > > -Original Message- > > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:41 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [g

[openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Mike Perez
Hello all, I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our accomplishments: * Spearheading the Oslo work to allow *all* OpenStack projects to have their database being independent of services during upgra

[openstack-dev] Call for mentors Outreachy Dec-March 2016

2015-09-14 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
Hi everyone, OpenStack will join next round of the Outreachy internships and we need you help: we are looking for full-time contributors willing to share some of their time, knowledge and experience to make our open-source organization more diverse and have the opportunity to meet new talents. *W

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Followup to review in gerrit relating to RHOS + RDO types

2015-09-14 Thread Jeff Peeler
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Sam Yaple wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Paul Bourke >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 13/09/15 18:34, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >>> Response inline. From: Sam Yaple mail

[openstack-dev] Angular Directives / Tables

2015-09-14 Thread Donald Hansen
I'm curious about the status of work on creating Angular Directives that mimic the functionality in the non Angular code. Specifically in relation to Tables. I need to create a custom panel and I was debating on doing it in Angular or not. The panel needs a table and much of the functionality that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

2015-09-14 Thread Fox, Kevin M
This might encourage companies to create new projects rather then support existing ones to get their name on something. That would be horrible. Thanks, Kevin From: Dolph Mathews [dolph.math...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:50 AM To: OpenStack Devel

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

2015-09-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-09-14 08:41:37 -0700: > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> I believe it is the TC job (in part) to help make the community better, > >> and not via tags like this that IMHO actually make it worse; > > > > I think it's important to see t

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bugs which we should accept in 7.0 after Hard Code Freeze

2015-09-14 Thread Andrew Maksimov
Hi Everyone! I would like to reiterate the bugfix process after Hard Code Freeze. According to our HCF definition [1] we should only merge fixes for *Critical* bugs to *stable/7.0* branch, High and lower priority bugs should NOT be accepted to *stable/7.0* branch anymore. Also we should accept pat

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

2015-09-14 Thread Fox, Kevin M
OpenSSL is a recent case. Everyone relied upon it in production but it just wasn't getting the support it needed to be healthy, and everyone suffered. An event shone light on the problem and its getting better. But it was an unfortunate event that caused people to look at it. It would be better

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

2015-09-14 Thread Dolph Mathews
Perhaps gamify the tagging process? By inverting the tagging convention from something negative to something positive like "sponsored-by-company-x", you're offering bragging rights to companies that are the sole sponsors of projects. "Here's a list of projects that Company X directly supports, excl

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE for Ambari plugin

2015-09-14 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Approved. This code is scoped into the new Ambari plugin, so, no possible issues with existing functionality. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-liberty-ffes updated. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak wrote: > Hello > > I would like to request FFE for Ambari plugin. > > C

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

2015-09-14 Thread Joshua Harlow
Thierry Carrez wrote: Joshua Harlow wrote: I believe it is the TC job (in part) to help make the community better, and not via tags like this that IMHO actually make it worse; I think it's important to see the intent of the tag, rather than only judge on its current proposed name. The big tent

[openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Some update on Grafana support

2015-09-14 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi folks, I've just published a little blog post about the job we've been working on with the rest of the Gnocchi team: adding support for Gnocchi¹ in Grafana². As Gordon pointed out, that might be of some interest for some of you, so I'll leave that here: https://julien.danjou.info/blog/2015/o

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > 1. Resolve the situation preventing the DefCore committee from >including image upload capabilities in the tests used for trademark >and interoperability validation. > > 2. Follow through on the original commitment of the project to >provide an image API

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [kolla] Possible to support multiple compute drivers?

2015-09-14 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/10/2015 12:00 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Steve Gordon mailto:sgor...@redhat.com>> wrote: - Original Message - > From: "Jeff Peeler" mailto:jpee...@redhat.com>> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:open

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

2015-09-14 Thread Kuvaja, Erno
> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:41 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka > > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hell

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] format/pep8 checks for translations?

2015-09-14 Thread Douglas Fish
Right now translations can't be merged into Horizon because of a formatting error: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-i18n/+bug/1494914   Daisy and the i18n team have been responsive and are actively working to fix this. Thanks for your efforts!   I'm sharing here because this seems to me to be a

[openstack-dev] [glance] tasks (following "proposed priorities for Mitaka")

2015-09-14 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Apologies for forking the thread, but there was way too much in Doug's email (and Flavio's response) and I only want to make a few points about tasks. Please read Doug's original email and Flavio's reply at some point, preferably before you read this. I'm going to limit myself to 4 points. We'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Suggestion to split install guide

2015-09-14 Thread Sam Betts (sambetts)
Looking at what they¹re building for Neutron, http://docs.openstack.org/networking-guide, they have a quite fine grain splitting of their guide with a large contents page that helps find things easily. My personal issues with the current ironic guide all comes down to navigation, the current Table

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
Hello everyone, I'm announcing my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Mitaka release. The Cinder team has made great progress. We've not only grown the number of supported backend drivers, but we've made significant improvements to the core code and raised the quality of existing and incoming code c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] There is a function to display the VGA emulation screen of BMC in the baremetal node on the Horizon?

2015-09-14 Thread Fox, Kevin M
I dont believe the ipmi specification standardizes vga consoles. Only serial consoles. So it may be possible to get it to work for specific models, but not generically. Thanks, Kevin From: Shinya Hoshino Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 8:48:57 PM To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog] PTL Candidacy

2015-09-14 Thread Alec Hothan (ahothan)
+1 Great job leading the app catalog and looking forward for all these new features! On 9/11/15, 12:23 PM, "Christopher Aedo" wrote: >It's time for the Community App Catalog to go through an official >election cycle, and I'm putting my name in for PTL. I've been filling >that role provisio

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 09/14/2015

2015-09-14 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi Mistral team (and not only), This is a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC. The agenda is: * Review action items * Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) * Scoping RC releases * Open discussion Add your own items by editing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][release] final liberty cycle client library releases needed

2015-09-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 08:46:02 -0400: > PTLs and release liaisons, > > In order to keep the rest of our schedule for the end-of-cycle release > tasks, we need to have final releases for all client libraries in the > next day or two. > > If you have not already submit

  1   2   >