Excerpts from Alexander Tivelkov's message of 2014-02-28 03:52:52 -0800:
Hi Charles,
If you are looking for the analogues of Juju in OpenStack, you probably may
take a look at Murano Project [1]. It is an application catalog backed with
a powerful workflow execution engine, which is built on
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-02-28 14:26:26 -0800:
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 13:10 -0800, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Henry Nash
hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
So we would not modify any existing
Since picking up Heat and trying to think about how to express clusters
of things, I've been troubled by how poorly the CFN language supports
using lists. There has always been the Fn::Select function for
dereferencing arrays and maps, and recently we added a nice enhancement
to HOT to allow
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-02-15 06:05:30 -0800:
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-02-15 13:02:36 -0800:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
Option B is we make our job easy by strong arming everyone into the same
Excerpts from Alexander Tivelkov's message of 2014-02-14 18:17:10 -0800:
Hi folks,
Murano matures, and we are getting more and more feedback from our early
adopters. The overall reception is very positive, but at the same time
there are some complaints as well. By now the most significant
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-02-13 13:27:20 -0800:
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
:)
So far:
- some packages use
Excerpts from Julien Vey's message of 2014-02-13 05:18:19 -0800:
Hi,
I have some concerns about using Zuul in Solum
I agree gating is a great feature but it is not useful for every project
and as Adrian said, not understood by everyone.
I think many Solum users, and PaaS users in general,
Excerpts from David Kranz's message of 2014-02-13 06:38:52 -0800:
I was recently bitten by a case where some defaults in keystone.conf
were not appropriate for real deployment, and our puppet modules were
not providing better values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064061.
Just
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-02-12 05:18:31 -0800:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Hi, so in the previous thread about rolling updates it became clear that
having in-instance control over updates is a more fundamental idea than
I had
Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2014-02-11 00:38:53 -0800:
Hi Clint,
thanks for writing this down. This is a really interesting use case and
feature, also in relation to what was recently discussed on rolling
updates.
I have a couple of thoughts and questions:
1) The overall
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2014-02-11 07:19:19 -0800:
On 02/10/2014 10:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi, so in the previous thread about rolling updates it became clear that
having in-instance control over updates is a more fundamental idea than
I had previously believed. During
Excerpts from Andrey Danin's message of 2014-02-11 08:42:46 -0800:
Hi Openstackers,
We are working on link aggregation support in Fuel. We wonder what are the
most desirable types of bonding now in datacenters. We had some issues (see
below) with OVS bond in LACP mode, and it turned out that
be a long long time.
* Destroy or update the node
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:13 AM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] in-instance update hooks
Excerpts from Steven Dake's
Hi, so in the previous thread about rolling updates it became clear that
having in-instance control over updates is a more fundamental idea than
I had previously believed. During an update, Heat does things to servers
that may interrupt the server's purpose, and that may cause it to fail
Curse you Randall for taking first post!
+1
Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2014-02-09 14:47:39 -0800:
Very +1
Original message
From: Steve Baker
Date:02/09/2014 4:41 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate
, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/14/2014 09:27 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-14 18:41:46 -0800:
Steve
I did not mean to have custom solution at all. In fact that would be
terrible. I think Heat model of software config and deployment
All due respect to Zane who created the scheduler. We simply could not
do what we do without it (and I think one of the first things I asked
for was parallel create ;).
IMO it is the single most confusing thing in Heat whenever one has to
deal with it. If we could stick to a threading model
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-02-04 16:14:09 -0800:
On 03/02/14 17:09, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-02-03 12:46:05 -0800:
So, I wrote the original rolling updates spec about a year ago, and the
time has come to get serious about
Excerpts from Greg Hill's message of 2014-02-05 08:29:20 -0800:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it bizarre
that we have to put the same license into every single file of source code in
our projects. In my past experience, a single LICENSE file at the
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2014-02-05 07:35:37 -0800:
On 02/04/2014 06:34 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 5 February 2014 13:14, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
That's not a great example, because one DB server depends on the other,
forcing them into updating serially
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2014-02-05 14:57:33 -0800:
On 01/27/2014 11:02 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: 24 January 2014 21:09
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: discovery
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2014-01-27 03:02:17 -0800:
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: 24 January 2014 21:09
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: discovery of peer instances
through metadata service
Excerpts from Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services)'s message of 2014-01-27 04:14:44
-0800:
Hi Justin,
My though process is to go back to basics. To perform discovery there is no
getting away from the fact that you have to start with a well-known address
that your peers can access on the
Excerpts from Jesse Noller's message of 2014-02-04 11:55:57 -0800:
On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/05/2014 01:50 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Feb 4, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/05/2014 01:09 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
On
So, I wrote the original rolling updates spec about a year ago, and the
time has come to get serious about implementation. I went through it and
basically rewrote the entire thing to reflect the knowledge I have
gained from a year of working with Heat.
Any and all comments are welcome. I intend
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-02-03 10:47:06 -0800:
Quick thoughts:
- I'd like to be able to express a minimum service percentage: e.g. I
know I need 80% of my capacity available at anyone time, so an
additional constraint to the unit counts, is to stay below 20% down at
a
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-02-03 12:46:05 -0800:
So, I wrote the original rolling updates spec about a year ago, and the
time has come to get serious about implementation. I went through it and
basically rewrote the entire thing to reflect the knowledge I have
gained from
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-02-02 11:19:25 -0800:
On 2014/30/01 23:33, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
I was responding based on Treat similar hardware configuration as
equal. When there is a very minor difference in hardware (eg, 1TB vs
1.1TB disks), enrolling them with
Excerpts from Hugh Brock's message of 2014-01-31 04:53:11 -0800:
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:30 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-01-30 19:30:40 -0800:
On 30/01/14 16:54, Clint Byrum wrote:
I'm pretty sure it is useful to model images in Heat
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-01-30 03:01:38 -0800:
Hi all,
While talking to Zane yesterday, he raised an interesting question about
whether or not we want to keep a LaunchConfiguration object for the native
autoscaling resources.
The LaunchConfiguration object basically
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-01-30 07:38:38 -0800:
On 30/01/14 06:01, Thomas Herve wrote:
Hi all,
While talking to Zane yesterday, he raised an interesting question about
whether or not we want to keep a LaunchConfiguration object for the native
autoscaling resources.
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-01-30 11:08:44 -0800:
On 2014-01-30 09:28, James Slagle wrote:
devtest, our TripleO setup, has been rapidly evolving. We've added a
fair amount of configuration options for stuff like using actual
baremetal, and (soon) HA deployments by default.
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-30 07:28:01 -0800:
devtest, our TripleO setup, has been rapidly evolving. We've added a
fair amount of configuration options for stuff like using actual
baremetal, and (soon) HA deployments by default. Also, the scripts
(which the docs are
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-01-30 19:30:40 -0800:
On 30/01/14 16:54, Clint Byrum wrote:
I'm pretty sure it is useful to model images in Heat.
Consider this scenario:
resources:
build_done_handle:
type: AWS::CloudFormation::WaitConditionHandle
Excerpts from Richard Su's message of 2014-01-27 17:59:34 -0800:
Hi,
I have been looking into how to add process/service monitoring to
tripleo. Here I want to be able to detect when an openstack dependent
component that is deployed on an instance has failed. And when a failure
has occurred
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-01-27 09:22:21 -0800:
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 3:30:22 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev]
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-26 10:27:36 -0800:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-25 02:47:42 -0800:
On 25 January 2014 19:42, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-25 02:47:42 -0800:
On 25 January 2014 19:42, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-24 18:48:41 -0800:
However, in looking at how Ironic works and interacts with Nova, it
doesn't seem like
Excerpts from Vishvananda Ishaya's message of 2014-01-21 12:16:12 -0800:
On Jan 19, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-01-19 01:52:56 -0800:
Hi,
I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so
Excerpts from Alexander Tivelkov's message of 2014-01-21 11:55:34 -0800:
Hi folks,
As we are moving towards incubation application, I took a closer look at
what is going on with our repositories.
An here is what I found. We currently have 11 repositories at stackforge:
- murano-api
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-24 00:21:06 -0800:
I have a question on agent as part of cfninit that communicates with heat
about config done state indication or config tool agent such as chef or
puppet communicating with chef server.
Since the VM resides on the data
Excerpts from Justin Santa Barbara's message of 2014-01-24 07:43:23 -0800:
Good points - thank you. For arbitrary operations, I agree that it would
be better to expose a token in the metadata service, rather than allowing
the metadata service to expose unbounded amounts of API functionality.
Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2014-01-24 10:32:26 -0800:
We are reviewing options between MySQL and MariaDB. RHEL 7 beta seems to have
MariaDB as the default MySQL-like DB.
Can someone summarise the status of the OpenStack in terms of
-What MySQL-flavor is/are currently
Excerpts from Steven Dake's message of 2014-01-24 11:05:25 -0800:
On 01/24/2014 11:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2014-01-24 10:32:26 -0800:
We are reviewing options between MySQL and MariaDB. RHEL 7 beta seems to
have MariaDB as the default MySQL-like DB
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-24 06:15:12 -0800:
In going through the bug list, I spotted this one and would like to discuss
it:
can't disable file injection for bare metal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1178103
There's a #TODO in Ironic's PXE driver to
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2014-01-24 04:39:10 -0800:
On 01/22/2014 12:17 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
I've been thinking a bit more about how TripleO updates are developing
specifically with regards to compute nodes. What is commonly called the
update story I think.
As I
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2014-01-24 04:24:11 -0800:
Cool. I like this a good bit better as it avoids the reboot. Still, this
is a rather
large amount of data to copy around if I'm only changing a single file in
Nova.
I think in most cases transfer cost is worth
Excerpts from Chuck Short's message of 2014-01-24 11:46:47 -0800:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/24/2014 11:47 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2014-01-24 10:32:26 -0800:
We are reviewing options between MySQL
Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2014-01-24 11:55:02 -0800:
This is exactly my worry... at what point can I consider moving to MariaDB
with the expectation that the testing confidence is equivalent to that which
is currently available from MySQL ?
The on-disk format is not so much a
Excerpts from Justin Santa Barbara's message of 2014-01-24 12:29:49 -0800:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Heat has been working hard to be able to do per-instance limited access
in Keystone for a while. A trust might work just fine for what you want.
I wasn't actually aware
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-01-24 14:17:38 -0800:
Cloud-init 0.7.5 (not yet released) will have the ability to read from an
ec2-metadata server using SSL.
In a recent change I did we now use requests which correctly does SSL for
the ec2-metadata/ec2-userdata reading.
-
Veen's message of 2014-01-24 14:41:44 -0800:
Awesome! But, Ironic will still need a way to inject the SSL cert into the
instance, eg. config-drive over virtual media, or something.
-D
On Jan 24, 2014 2:32 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01 -0800:
1: physical vs. logical grouping
- Some hardware is logically, but not strictly physically, grouped. Eg, 1U
servers in the same rack. There is some grouping, such as failure domain,
but operations on discrete nodes
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-24 18:48:41 -0800:
On 25 Jan 2014 15:11, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2014-01-22 16:44:01
-0800:
What Tuskar wants to do is layer workloads on top of logical and physical
Excerpts from Angus Thomas's message of 2014-01-23 04:57:20 -0800:
On 22/01/14 20:54, Clint Byrum wrote:
I don't understand the aversion to using existing, well-known tools to
handle this?
These tools are of course available to users and nobody is stopping them
from using them. We
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-01-22 09:17:24 -0800:
I've been thinking a bit more about how TripleO updates are developing
specifically with regards to compute nodes. What is commonly called the
update story I think.
As I understand it we expect people to actually have to reboot
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-01-22 10:15:20 -0800:
- Original Message -
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:45:45 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] our update story: can
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] our update story: can people live
with it?
- Original Message -
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:45:45 PM
Subject: Re
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-22 10:53:14 -0800:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 13:15 -0500, Dan Prince wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:45:45 PM
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-22 12:19:56 -0800:
I think most of the time taken to reboot is spent in bringing down/up the
services though, so I'm not sure what it really buys you if you do it all. It
may let you skip the crazy long bootup time on enterprise hardware, but
Excerpts from Keith Basil's message of 2014-01-22 12:27:50 -0800:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 13:15 -0500, Dan Prince wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-22 13:43:41 -0800:
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
snip
==
Executive Summary
==
To summarize, the effects of these changes will be:
- 1) Decrease the impact of
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2014-01-21 09:30:17 -0800:
Hello folks,
At the end of the previous discussion on the topic [1] I've decided to make
a PoC based on oslo.messaging. Clint suggested and I agreed to make it for
os-collect-config. Actually I've made a PoC for
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-01-19 01:52:56 -0800:
Hi,
I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so replying
quickly) but given the dates the planning phases for Quantum/Neutron LBaaS
and Libra LBaaS were at the same time.
There was an
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-18 11:02:12 -0800:
Cutting to the chase... have there been any discussions about the
long-term direction of Libra and Neutron LBaaS. I see little point
having two OpenStack endpoints that implement the same basic load
balancing functionality.
Is
tl;dr: You're right, it would be useful. Points on what is blocking it
below:
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-17 05:18:01 -0800:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Note that tripleo-incubator is special and should not be released
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-16 09:29:14 -0800:
Yeah, I think the evil firmware issue is separate and should be solved
separately.
Ideally, there should be a mode you can set the bare metal server into where
firmware updates are not allowed. This is useful to more folks
Excerpts from CARVER, PAUL's message of 2014-01-16 05:21:24 -0800:
Alan Kavanagh wrote:
I posted a query to Ironic which is related to this discussion. My thinking
was I want to ensure the case you note here (1) a tenant can not read
another tenants disk.. the next (2) was where in
Note that tripleo-incubator is special and should not be released. It
is intentionally kept unfrozen and unreleased to make sure there is no
illusion of stability.
If there are components in it that need releasing, they should be moved
into relevant projects or forked into their own projects.
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-12 11:40:41 -0800:
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:28 -0500, Jay Dobies wrote:
So, it's not as simple as it may initially seem :)
Ah, I should have been clearer in my statement - my understanding is that
we're scrapping concepts like Rack
Excerpts from Alan Kavanagh's message of 2014-01-16 20:28:05 -0800:
+1makes sense to me. I will write up a Blueprint for this for review in
Ironic and we take it from their.
I don't see this as evil firmware, more a good process we need to automate as
part of sanity checks before
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-01-15 02:05:52 -0800:
1) Check for an already deleted server before deleting any. This is
related to stack convergence:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-convergence
This will allow users to just delete a server they want
Excerpts from Walls, Jeffrey Joel (Cloud OS RD)'s message of 2014-01-15
07:04:48 -0800:
-Original Message-
From: James Slagle [mailto:james.sla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:52 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re:
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-15 05:07:08 -0800:
I'll start by laying out how I see editing or updating nodes working
in TripleO without Tuskar:
To do my initial deployment:
1. I build a set of images for my deployment for different roles. The
images are different based
Hi Chris. Your thread may have gone unnoticed as it lacked the Nova tag.
I've added it to the subject of this reply... that might attract them. :)
Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2014-01-15 12:32:36 -0800:
When we create a new instance via _build_instance() or
Excerpts from Alan Kavanagh's message of 2014-01-15 19:11:03 -0800:
Hi Paul
I posted a query to Ironic which is related to this discussion. My thinking
was I want to ensure the case you note here (1) a tenant can not read
another tenants disk.. the next (2) was where in Ironic you
Hey Steve, it has taken me about a month to get enough time to go
through this. Thanks for doing it, comments in-line.
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2013-12-13 15:46:48 -0800:
I've been working on a POC in heat for resources which perform software
configuration, with the aim of
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-13 23:23:15 -0800:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
that
Steve
Thanks for detailed email. Apologize for the delayed response but we have
been thinking about how does software config fit into
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-14 18:41:46 -0800:
Steve
I did not mean to have custom solution at all. In fact that would be
terrible. I think Heat model of software config and deployment is really
good. That allows configurators such as Chef, Puppet, Salt or Ansible to
Excerpts from Vitaly Kramskikh's message of 2014-01-14 12:35:43 -0800:
Hi Jaromir,
2014/1/13 Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com
So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify which
node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in the end...
at least.
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2014-01-13 09:10:27 -0800:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Bhuvan Arumugam bhu...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
Where are we doing those sorts of operations?
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-13 10:35:07 -0800:
Hi Clint
2014/1/10 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com:
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-10 13:42:30 -0700:
Hi Flavio, Clint
I agree with you guys.
sorry, may be, I wasn't clear. My opinion is to remove every
Excerpts from Walls, Jeffrey Joel (Cloud OS RD)'s message of 2014-01-13
06:54:11 -0800:
From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com]
On 2014/10/01 19:02, Dougal Matthews wrote:
- If I remove some instances, do I as the administrator need to care
which are removed? Do we need to
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2014-01-12 14:45:11 -0800:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com
wrote:
So I have 25 patches that I need to push to backport changes that have
been made to the nova tree that apply to the gantt tree. The
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-10 13:42:30 -0700:
Hi Flavio, Clint
I agree with you guys.
sorry, may be, I wasn't clear. My opinion is to remove every
configuration in the node,
and every configuration should be done by API from central resource
manager. (nova-api or neturon
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2014-01-09 12:21:05 -0700:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi folks
Thank you for your input.
The key difference from external configuration system (Chef, puppet
etc) is integration with
openstack services.
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2014-01-09 06:13:53 -0700:
It looks like we have some duplication and inconsistencies on the 3
os-*-config elements in the tripleo repositories
os-apply-config (duplication) :
We have two elements that install this
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-01-09 11:56:16 -0700:
- Original Message -
From: Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 8:13:53 AM
Subject: [openstack-dev] os-*-config in
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-01-07 21:26:44 -0800:
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 17:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 January 2014 12:18, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, the crux of the problem was likely that versions in the distro
were too old and they needed to
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2014-01-08 02:11:09 -0800:
On 08/01/14 05:07, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-07 16:27:35 -0800:
Another piece to the conversation I think is update philosophy. If
you are always going to require a new image
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-08 07:03:39 -0800:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 8 January 2014 12:18, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, the crux of the problem was likely that versions in the distro
were
Excerpts from Jay Dobies's message of 2014-01-08 08:09:51 -0800:
There were so many places in this thread that I wanted to jump in on as
I caught up, it makes sense to just summarize things in once place
instead of a half dozen quoted replies.
I agree with the sentiments about flexibility.
Excerpts from Jan Provaznik's message of 2014-01-08 03:00:19 -0800:
On 01/07/2014 09:01 PM, James Slagle wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss some possible ways we could install the OpenStack
components from packages in tripleo-image-elements. As most folks are
probably aware, there is a
We're in agreement. What little entry there might be in a system of such
a small size would be entirely manageable by a single administrator...
I care about that deployment, deeply, as that is how things like OpenStack
take root in IT departments.. with somebody playing around. However, what
I
I'd say it isn't so much cloud-init that you need, but some kind
of bootstrapper. The point of hot-software-config is to help with
in-instance orchestration. That's not going to happen without some way
to push the desired configuration into the instance.
Excerpts from Susaant Kondapaneni's
What would be the benefit of using packages?
We've specifically avoided packages because they complect[1] configuration
and system state management with software delivery. The recent friction
we've seen with MySQL is an example where the packages are not actually
helping us, they're hurting us
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-07 12:53:57 -0800:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
What would be the benefit of using packages?
We're building images on top of different distributions of Linux.
Those distributions themselves offer packaged
Excerpts from Chris Jones's message of 2014-01-07 14:43:31 -0800:
Hi
On 7 Jan 2014, at 22:18, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Packages do the opposite,
and encourage entropy by promising to try and update software
Building with packages doesn't require updating running systems
Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-07 13:11:13 -0800:
I was going to stay silent on this one, but since you asked...
/me puts his customer hat on
We source OpenStack from RDO for the packages and additional integration
testing that comes from the project instead of using
901 - 1000 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
