> On Oct 8, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Anne Bertucio writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have had a fantastic time getting to work on the Release Management
>> team and getting to know you all through the release marketing work,
>> however, it is time for me to step down from my rol
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Sean Dague wrote:
>> I'd like to announce that after 4 years serving on the OpenStack
>> Technical Committee, I will not be running in this fall's
>> election. Over the last 4 years we've navigated some rough seas
>> together, including th
Hi,
We have made it to the next stage of the topic selection process for the
Forum in Sydney!
At the Forum the entire OpenStack community (users and developers) gathers
to brainstorm the requirements for the next release, gather feedback on the
past version and have strategic discussions that go
Hi Forum Brainstormers,
Wow! Some great topics in the etherpads so far. This event is going to be
amazing.
We're less than a week away now from opening the "formal submission" part
of the process.
If you haven't already, please start prioritizing the top sessions from
your list of ideas. Startin
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Shamail Tahir wrote:
> > In the past, governance has helped (on the UC WG side) to reduce
> > overlaps/duplication in WGs chartered for similar objectives. I would
> > like to understand how we will handle this (if
/file/d/0B_yCSDGnhIbzS3V1b1lpZGpIaHBmc29S
aUdiYzJtX21BWkl3/
Thanks,
Shamail
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > How does the re-branding or re-categorization of these groups solve the
> > actual feedback problem? If the pro
ton-2017/summit-schedule/events/18802/high-availability-in-openstack>
Cloud-Native Design/Refactoring across OpenStack
<https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18767/cloud-native-designrefactoring-across-openstack>
Thanks,
Doug, Emilien, Melvin, Mike,
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600:
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
>>> understood space and the mailman fil
Thanks Clint!
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500:
> > Hi Clint,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> > > Excerpts from Matt Riedema
s about each project on
> the list. But there's obvious stuff that is just logistics about an
> established project team's business, and a complete waste of time to
> even have to filter by thread. We've gotten _really_ wide over the
> years. So if you ha
Hi,
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 3:39 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Shamail Tahir wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Thierry Carrez > <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote:
>>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>Piet recently reached out to me to exp
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
___
... because I'm lazy and haven't brought my bouncer back online:
j #openstack-meeting-alt
Yes, I like to remind 'j' often that there is a channel called
openstack-meeting-alt instead of actually joining it myself.
> On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 a
we determine a
time. I will be closing the poll on Feb. 9th, 2017 @ 23:59 UTC.
Poll: http://doodle.com/poll/76bnere6ztdg7hgd
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109622.html
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 2017-02-03 17:07:51 -0500 (-0500), Shamail wrote:
>> [...]
>> I'll send a doodle poll next week to determine a new meeting time
>> and who's interested in participating.
>
> I was o
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Shamail wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>>
>>> Shamail wrote:
>>>>> Sorry for not noticing this thread and replying earli
Hi Thierry,
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Shamail wrote:
>>> Sorry for not noticing this thread and replying earlier.
>>>
>>> I've now reviewed the minutes from the meeting, and I support thingee's
>>> sugges
user stories and I also participated in the Personas workshop
with the UX team.
Thanks,
Shamail
>
> Thanks,
> Lana
>
>> On 05/01/17 00:43, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Piet recently reached out to me to explain that he won't be abl
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 11:18 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:07:21PM -0500, Shamail wrote:
>>
>> Do we know how many of the project level rooms currently have bots? I know I
>> ran into an issue that one of the bots was at its maximum (1
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 9:47 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:35:05AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> There has been a bit of tension lately around creating IRC meetings.
>> I've been busy[1] cleaning up unused slots and defragmenting biweekly
>> ones to o
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 4:09 AM, Qiming Teng wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39:11PM -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> I must say I think this is bad news - especially for projects like
>> Kolla - ops centric.
>> One of reasons we created PTG in the first place is that
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
>
> Gordon,
>
> Thanks for brining this to our attention. We pull data from many different
> sources for the Navigator. Most of the attributions for that data can be
> found under "Tag Details" or various "?" modal links on the page. For
/tags/
[2] https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/tree/master/descriptions
Thanks,
Shamail
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Kenny Johnston wrote:
>
> OpenStackers,
>
> What is the best way to understand the past discussion, and perhaps start a
> new conversation about the matu
Hi Tom,
I'll help with that. :)
Thanks,
Shamail
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
>> On 廿十六年九月九日 朝 11:45, Hayes, Graham wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2016 08:44, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 廿十六年九月八日 暮 08:36, Jeremy
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 2016-09-09 11:06:21 -0500 (-0500), Tom Fifield wrote:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368114/
> [...]
>
> Thanks! I had already written almost the exact same change, applied
> it in production and tested it with a non-admin accou
Thanks Doug,
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2016-08-01 09:49:35 -0500:
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2016-0
or changes
pending based on feedback) in the Product WG repo. We are currently
working with the infra team to get a visualization tool deployed that shows
the status for each artifact and provides links so that people can get more
details as necessary. Could something similar be (re)us
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases
>> simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. Thi
the location
is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current
release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us
to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently
have names for N, N+1, and N+2.
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Calum Loudon"
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> ,
>> "openstack-operators"
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 6:09:16 AM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] T
Hi everyone,
I would like to announce my candidacy for OpenStack Technical Committee
member for the upcoming term.
I am currently an offering manager for OpenStack initiatives at IBM and I
have been involved in the OpenStack community since 2013. I spend most of
my time[1] in our working groups
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Matt Jarvis
> wrote:
>
> +1 for custom T-shirts or hoodies. Actual medals/trophies would also be a
> nice idea ;)
+1
>
>> On 1 March 2016 at 15:30, Tom Fifield wrote:
>> Excellent, excellent.
>>
>> What's the best place to buy Raspberry Pis these days?
>>
>>
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>
>> On 22/02/16 18:35, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>>
>> Clayton O'Neill wrote:
>>> Is the expectation that the ops mid-cycle would continue separately,
>>> or be held with the meeting formerly known as the Design Summit?
>>>
>>> Personally I’d
at a future cross-project meeting and decide where to go from there.
Regards,
Shamail
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject
e people who have worked on the
upstream training before each summit... Did you experience any issues finding
available items for the people to work on? How do you guide the new
contributors to help them discover low-
Hi,
> On Nov 25, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2015-11-25 09:15:54 -0500:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Andrew Mitry recently shared a medium post[1] by Kent C. Dobbs which
>> discusses how one open-source p
one (in the U.S.) have a Happy Thanksgiving,
>
> anthony.
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing
>> wrote:
>> This is an awesome idea!!!
>>
>>> On 11/25/15 16:15, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> An
et/
[4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bug_Tags
[5] http://docs.openstack.org/upstream-training/
--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Uns
Hi Steve,
> On Nov 18, 2015, at 6:39 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Back in Vancouver [1] we began discussing the growing overlap between OPNFV
> requirements projects and the current mission of the telco working group.
> During this period the product working group, also in part foc
environment and IDs.
Once you have done a few of these... you can find projects of interest and
start attending their IRC meetings to identify future contributions that align
with your interests.
All the best!
Thanks,
Shamail
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack/+bugs?field.tag=low
Hi Anne,
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Anne Gentle
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to write up some of the discussion points from a cross-project
> session here at the Tokyo Summit about cross-project communications. The
> etherpad is here:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cros
your insights on lifecycle management
tremendously. Please help by posting comments to our existing user story[2].
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam
[2]
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/user-stories/draft/lifecycle_management.html
Thanks,
Shamail
>
Sure. Thanks.
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Makes sense to me. Care to propose such a change to the repo?
>
>> On 14 October 2015 at 11:53, Shamail Tahir wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the older integrated release model we used to hav
to add an "official-since" into projects.yaml? The
value could tie to when the TC approves a project (since not all projects
have to adhere with the 6-month release itself).
[1]
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml
--
Thanks,
Shamail Ta
et diluted on the next 6 months)
Finally, as mentioned by Clint, consul does provide DNS-SD (but not
DNS-TXT) interface so using it as a backend allows us to focus on REST but
set ground work for DNS too.
>
> -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
>
>
> ___
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>> On 10/09/2015 11:21 AM, Shamail wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks like some great conversation got going on the service catalog
>
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> It looks like some great conversation got going on the service catalog
> standardization spec / discussion at the last cross project meeting.
> Sorry I wasn't there to participate.
>
Apologize if this is a question that has already been addr
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:49 AM, John Griffith wrote:
>
> Great idea Thierry, great to promote some positive things! Thanks for
> putting this together.
+1
Great indeed... thanks Thierry.
Regards,
Shamail
> On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:50 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
>
>> On 16:16 Sep 16, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Anne Gentle wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> What are some of the problems with each layer?
>>>
>>> 1. weekly meeting: time zones, global reach, size of cross-project
>>> concerns due to multiple projects bein
)
>>
>> ______
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org
rse-affiliation matters, amongst other
things, is because it shows that the project can potentially survive a
single contributor changing their involvement then wouldn't that achieve
the same purpose of showing stability/mindshare/collaboratio
://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/user-stories/draft/capacity_management.html
Thanks,
Shamail
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 01/09/2015 15:46, Nikolay Starodubtsev a écrit :
>> Also, if we decided to continue development we s
53 matches
Mail list logo
