I agree whole-heartedly with johnsom's assessment of diltram's
contributions. +1 from me!
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Michael Johnson
wrote:
> Greetings Octavia and developer mailing list folks,
>
> I propose that we add Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as an OpenStack Octavia
Jay--
If this is a production install, it's very unlikely that the admin user's
password is "password". The neutron_lbaas.conf file will need to be
updated with the admin user's actual password, and the neutron services
daemon restarted.
Stephen
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Jayanthi
Miguel--
There have been a number of tempest patches in the review queue for a long
time now, but I think the reason they're not getting attention is that we
don't want to have to import a massive amount of tempest code into our
repository (which will become stale and need hot-fixing, as has
Hey Sergey,
In-line comments below:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Sergey Guenender <sgs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen, please find my reply next to your points below.
>
> Thank you,
> -Sergey.
>
>
> On 01/06/2016 20:23, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
>
Hey Sergey--
Apologies for the delay in my response. I'm still wrapping my head around
your option 2 suggestion and the implications it might have for the code
base moving forward. I think, though, that I'm against your option 2
proposal and in favor of option 1 (which, yes, is more work
Hello Yong Sheng Gong!
Apologies for the lateness of my reply (I've been intermittently available
over the last month and am now just catching up on ML threads). Anyway, did
you get your question answered elsewhere? It looks like you've discovered a
bug in the behavior here-- when you created the
Hi Akshay!
In response to your questions: The Mitaka release of Octavia is version
0.8. It's got most of the features of 1.0, but since the development path
didn't exactly follow the road map (since nobody is prescient 18 months in
advance) most of us felt more comfortable calling this release
sted how-to guides, should someone decide to write them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stephen
> >
> > P.S. I still have no idea how I go about updating the manual for the
> major
> > features that we added to neutron-lbaas and Octavia in this cycle.
>
> Your automat
ease note that it is offensive to accuse a
team of not stepping up when what I am doing in this very e-mail should be
pretty good evidence that we are trying to step up.
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Principal Technologist
Blue Box, An IBM Company
www.blueboxcloud.com
sbaluk...@blueboxcloud.com
P.S. I still have no idea how I go about updating the manual for the major
features that we added to neutron-lbaas and Octavia in this cycle.
--
Stephen Balukoff
Principal Technologist
Blue Box, An IBM Company
www.blueboxcloud.com
sbaluk...@blueboxcloud.com
206-607-0660 x807
gt; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> __
tack.org openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
> > Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 12:26 AM
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >>
> >
eel that the subnet should be mandatory as there are too many
> > > ambiguity issues due to overlapping subnets and multiple routes.
> > > In the case of an IP being outside of the tenant networks, the user
> > > would specify an external network that has the appropriat
_
> >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ope
; > Unsubscribe:
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>
s. Any help/pointers/links
> would be great.
>
> thanks
> Sri
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.o
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
- LinuxJedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
be held), but I was assured by
the usual participants in these meetings that I would probably be the only
one attending them. As such, the next Octavia meeting we'll be holding will
happen on January 7th.
In the mean time, let's bang out some code and get it reviewed!
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen
what is “ACTIVE-ACTIVE topology of load balancing VMs”.
What is the scenario is it Service-VM (of NFV) or Tennant VM ?
Curious to know the background of this thoughts .
keshava
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 7:18 AM
, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.com
wrote:
+1
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
*Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 7:59 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Shared
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group
german.eichber...@hp.com
wrote:
Hi Brandon + Stephen,
Having all those permutations (and potentially testing them) made us lean
against the sharing case in the first place. It’s just a lot of extra work
for only a small number of our customers.
German
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk
as it will
make horizon's (or any other UI tool's) job easier to show statuses.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 12:43 -0800, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
Hi Samuel,
We've actually been avoiding having a deeper discussion about status
in Neutron LBaaS since this can get pretty hairy
as logical.
2. The 3rd use case bellow will not be reasonable without pool
sharing between different policies. Specifying different pools which are
the same for each policy make it non-started to me.
-Sam.
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
*Sent:* Friday, November
their employees a half day off on this day
... we are cancelling Wednesday's Octavia meeting. See y'all again on Dec.
3rd at 20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (and keep working on those
gerrit reviews!)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
wrote:
I can probably make it up there to attend.
--Adam
https://keybase.io/rm_you
From: Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 3:46 AM
for the ideas I had mentioned. I'll also
bring it up in today's meeting.
Cheers,
--Jorge
From:
Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014
talking about a 5 day Hackathon or 3 day with 2 days (Mon Fri)
for travel?
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Any chance it could actually be the week AFTER? Or is that to close to
the holidays? _
On Nov 6, 2014 7:21 AM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk
Howdy, folks!
We are planning to have a mid-cycle hack-a-thon in Seattle from the 8th
through the 12th of December. This will be at the HP corporate offices
located in the Seattle convention center.
During this week we will be concentrating on Octavia code and hope to make
significant progress
/8a0b7c1d64883c08286e4446e163f1a6#.VEq66HWx3UY
Thanks,
Brandon
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/octavia-weekly-standup
Beyond that, this is your friendly reminder that the Octavia team meets on
Wednesdays at 20:00UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
24, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Hi folks!
First off-- thanks to Brandon for running yesterday's Octavia meeting when
I had to step out for an emergency at the last minute.
Anyway, it's clear to me from the transcripts of the meeting that I've
done a poor
meets on
Wednesdays at 20:00UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
,
Brandon
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
in the past if new knowledge, ideas, or a better understanding
warrants it, eh. We just need to make sure we keep moving *mostly* forward,
eh. :)
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack
to understand what exactly it is about shipping
rendered configuration files from the driver to the amphora that's so
distasteful to y'all.
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
gerrit review and was
approved (by yourself even!) This discussion was originally about where to
render the haproxy configs, but it really seems like y'all are against the
idea of having an amphora driver interface at all. :/
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
/ controller.
Thoughts?
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
around Neutron incubation
graduation: Having a functional driver. And it also allows for the
driver to continue to live on next to the API.
What do people think about this?
Thanks,
Kyle
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
in #openstack-lbaas on the usual (Freenode)
IRC network.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
flexibility in
deployment
and topologies, especially when it potentially impacts the costs for large
operators. I simply come to the exact opposite conclusion than you do when
using the above justifications. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
with your vote
to be counted on this matter. (I would love to see newcomers showing up in
our IRC channel or responding to the various mailing list discussions we
have or will have going shortly, eh!)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
the operator's
options, eh.
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
I've put the agenda for tomorrow's Octavia meeting on the wiki:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Octavia/Weekly_Meeting_Agenda#Agenda
Please feel free to edit it there and/or respond to this e-mail with
additional items if you would rather not edit the wiki.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
-0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
Hi Brandon,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Brandon Logan
brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote:
Comments in-line
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 17:18 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
Hi folks
can have two listeners share the same VIP. Hope that makes sense.
German
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 1:39 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Object
that.
German
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2014 2:43 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Object Model and DB Structure
German--
By 'VIP' do you mean something
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
Hi Brandon,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Comments in-line
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 17:18 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm OK with going with no shareable child entities (Listeners, Pools,
Members, TLS
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
and Neutron LBaaS. Susanne
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Susanne,
Are you asking in the context of Load Balancer services in general, or in
terms of the Neutron LBaaS project or the Octavia project?
Stephen
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM
we're presently using for these meetings.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
to IRC?
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 15:30 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
Action items from today's Octavia meeting:
1. We're going to hold off for a couple days on merging the
constitution and preliminary road map to give people (and in
particular Ebay) a chance to review and comment.
2
, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Wow, Trevor! Thanks for capturing all that!
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Trevor Vardeman
trevor.varde...@rackspace.com wrote:
Agenda items are numbered, and topics, as discussed, are described
beneath in list format.
1) Octavia Constitution
actually meet the needs of the operators
developing it.
Thanks,
Stephen
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Hello!
We plan on resuming weekly meetings to discuss things related to the
Octavia project starting tomorrow: August 6th at 13:00PDT (20
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev
to collect and share their data as well! I'm looking at
you, Ebay. ;) )
Please feel free to respond with additional agenda items!
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
!
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Just saw this thread after responding to the other:
I'm in favor of Evgeny's proposal. It sounds like it should resolve most
(if not all) of the operators', vendors' and users' concerns with regard to
handling TLS
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Vijay--
I'm confused: If NetScaler doesn't actually look at the SAN, isn't it not
actually following the SNI standard? (RFC2818 page 4, paragraph 2, as I
think Carlos pointed out in another thread.) Or at least, isn't
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Hi Vijay,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam
vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote:
Do you know if the SSL/SNI IETF spec details about conflict resolution. I
am assuming not.
Because
with no intention of host name
validation. Excample
(dirName, 'cn=john.garza,ou=people,o=somecompany)
dNSName and DirName encodings are mentioned in RFC2459. if you want a more
formal definition.
On Jul 17, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Ok, folks!
Per the IRC
on the library and that it should be ubiquitously used.
I will wait for Vijay to speak for himself in this regard…
-Sam.
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:35 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
to resolve name
conflicts.
B. Includes a ubiquitous library for extracting SCN and SAN that any driver
may use if they don't use the 'order' attribute?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
in this regard...
-Sam.
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:35 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] TLS capability - SNI -
Extracting SubjectCommonName
to me like a good
first step toward multi-service_type flavors, if we as a group decide
that's where we want to go.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
that applies to more than one service
type?
Let's see if we can come to some conclusions on this so that we can get
flavors into Juno, please!
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
revision.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
to get people's ideas on this.
Thanks,
Brandon
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
and who else wants to contribute.
Regards Susanne
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
, please also do us the
courtesy of explaining how we're supposed to merge code using the gerrit
system without having a PTL or core reviewers.
Anyway, this is the list of folks we agreed upon:
Interim PTL: Stephen Balukoff
Interim core reviewers: Vivek Jain, Brandon Logan, German Eichberger
Thanks
settings apart from listener can be done when
needed, if needed.
Thanks,
Evg
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net
sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:26 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack
/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 12:15 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
The separate entity makes sense for certificates participating in an
SNI configuration, but probably not so much for the 'default'
certificate used when TLS is being terminated.
Vijay: You're also right that other TLS-related
relationship? Putting that in a new table
sounds like premature optimization to me; design the database change for
the future feature when you can see the spec for it.
Thanks,
Doug
From: Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
to
spend much energy on something so minor right now.)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Ok, so we've got opinions on both sides of the argument here. I'm actually
pretty ambivalent about it. Do others have strong opinions on this?
On Mon, Jun 23
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
-obsolete TODO file
- DOC: update roadmap
- DOC: minor updates to the README
- DOC: mention the maxconn limitations with the select poller
- DOC: commit a few old design thoughts files
--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
read from the certificate and not
managed by the end user.
-Sam.
*From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
*Sent:* Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:44 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] TLS
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo