On 18/09/14 16:03, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
>> On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote:
>>> On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there w
Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
> On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
>>> This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
>>>
>>> As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
>>> [1] I do not see whe
On 17/09/2014 23:12, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
>> This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
>>
>> As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
>> [1] I do not see where this fits into the current plan
On 09/17/2014 04:01 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
> This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
>
> As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
> [1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that
> has been posted.
> I woul
This looks great - but I am afraid that something might be missing.
As part of the Design summit in Atlanta there was an Ops Meetup track.
[1] I do not see where this fits into the current planning process that
has been posted.
I would like to assume that part of the purpose of the summit is to al
On 09/12/2014 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Anita Kuno wrote:
>> My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least
>> Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party
>> ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am
>> wondering about th
On Sep 12, 2014 10:05 AM, "Russell Bryant" wrote:
>
> On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion"
> > website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs
> > really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'l
On 09/12/2014 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Anita Kuno wrote:
>> My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least
>> Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party
>> ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am
>> wondering about th
Anita Kuno wrote:
> My question involves third party discussions. Now I know at least
> Neutron is going to have a chat about drivers which involves third party
> ci accounts as a supportive aspect of that discussion, but I am
> wondering about the framework for a discussion which I can recommend
>
Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion"
>> website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs
>> really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin
>> up a limi
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion"
>> website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs
>> really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin
>> up a limited instance.
>
> +1 on a collaborative schedulin
On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it
> should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have
> per-program "contributors meetups" on the Friday. The schedule would go
> as follows:
>
> T
On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion"
> website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs
> really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin
> up a limited instance.
I think this
> I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it
> should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have
> per-program "contributors meetups" on the Friday. The schedule would go
> as follows:
>
> Tuesday: cross-project workshops
> Wednesday, Thursday: traditi
On 12/09/14 07:37, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it
should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have
per-program "contributors meetups" on the Friday. The schedule would go
as follows:
Tuesday: cross-proje
Hi everyone,
I visited the Paris Design Summit space on Monday and confirmed that it
should be possible to split it in a way that would allow to have
per-program "contributors meetups" on the Friday. The schedule would go
as follows:
Tuesday: cross-project workshops
Wednesday, Thursday: tradition
16 matches
Mail list logo
