On 06/12/2017 03:53 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 12/06/17 16:21, Steven Hardy wrote:
I think we wanted to move to convergence anyway so I don't see a problem
with this. I know there was some discussion about starting to test with
convergence in tripleo-ci, does anyone know what, if anything,
On 12/06/17 16:21, Steven Hardy wrote:
I think we wanted to move to convergence anyway so I don't see a problem
with this. I know there was some discussion about starting to test with
convergence in tripleo-ci, does anyone know what, if anything, happened with
that?
There's an experimental job
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/2017 03:10 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>
>> History lesson: a long, long time ago we made a very big mistake. We
>> treated stack outputs as things that would be resolved dynamically when
>> you requested them,
On 06/09/2017 03:10 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
History lesson: a long, long time ago we made a very big mistake. We
treated stack outputs as things that would be resolved dynamically when
you requested them, instead of having values fixed at the time the
template was created or updated. This makes
History lesson: a long, long time ago we made a very big mistake. We
treated stack outputs as things that would be resolved dynamically when
you requested them, instead of having values fixed at the time the
template was created or updated. This makes performance of reading
outputs slow,