Hey everyone-
So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons are
varied - internal sponsors have moved to other projects, the Big Tent has
drastically increased the # of cores, and the upcoming summit format change
creates quite a bit of uncertainty on everything surrounding t
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Michael Krotscheck
wrote:
> Hey everyone-
>
> So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons are
> varied - internal sponsors have moved to other projects, the Big Tent has
> drastically increased the # of cores, and the upcoming summit format
Michael Krotscheck wrote:
So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons are
varied - internal sponsors have moved to other projects, the Big Tent
has drastically increased the # of cores, and the upcoming summit format
change creates quite a bit of uncertainty on everything
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
I think it's inappropriate because it gives a wrong incentive to become
a core reviewer. Core reviewing should just be a duty you sign up to,
not necessarily a way to get into a cool party. It was also a bit
exclusive of other types of contributions.
Apparently in Aus
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-04-21 18:22:53 +0200:
> Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> > So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons are
> > varied - internal sponsors have moved to other projects, the Big Tent
> > has drastically increased the # of cores, and th
On 2016-04-21 13:40:15 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
[...]
> I didn't realize the tag was being used that way. I agree it's
> completely inappropriate, and I wish someone had asked.
[...]
It's likely seen by some as a big-tent proxy for the old integrated
vs. incubated distinction.
--
Jerem
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2016-04-21 17:54:37 +:
> On 2016-04-21 13:40:15 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> [...]
> > I didn't realize the tag was being used that way. I agree it's
> > completely inappropriate, and I wish someone had asked.
> [...]
>
> It's likely seen by s
On 21/04/16 19:40, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-04-21 18:22:53 +0200:
>> Michael Krotscheck wrote:
>>
>>
>> So.. while I understand the need for calmer parties during the week, I
>> think the general trends is to have less parties and more small group
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
> On 21/04/16 19:40, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>
> >Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-04-21 18:22:53 +0200:
> >> Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> So.. while I understand the need for calmer parties during the week, I
> >> think
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Michael Krotscheck
wrote:
> Hey everyone-
>
> So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons are
> varied - internal sponsors have moved to other projects, the Big Tent has
> drastically increased the # of cores, and the upcoming summit format
On 04/21/2016 02:08 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Michael Krotscheck
mailto:krotsch...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hey everyone-
So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons
are varied - internal sponsors have moved to other project
On 04/21/2016 04:04 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 02:08 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
>> The first cross-project design summit tracks were held at the following
>> summit, in Atlanta, though I recall it lacking the necessary
>> participation to be successful. Today, we have many more
On 21/04/16 13:40 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-04-21 18:22:53 +0200:
Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons are
> varied - internal sponsors have moved to other projects, the Big Tent
> has dra
Message-
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:12 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Core Party after Austin
>
> On 04/21/2016 04:04 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > On 04/21/2016 02:08
On 18:57 Apr 21, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >[...]
> >I think it's inappropriate because it gives a wrong incentive to become
> >a core reviewer. Core reviewing should just be a duty you sign up to,
> >not necessarily a way to get into a cool party. It was also a bit
> >exclusi
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2016-04-21 09:22:53 -0700:
> Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> > So, HPE is seeking sponsors to continue the core party. The reasons are
> > varied - internal sponsors have moved to other projects, the Big Tent
> > has drastically increased the # of cores, and th
The Vancouver core party was a fantastic opportunity to meet some very smart
people and learn a lot about the projects they worked on. It was probably one
of the most useful parts of the summit, certainly more so than the greasy
marketing party, and arguably a much better use of developer time.
Excerpts from Chivers, Doug's message of 2016-04-22 10:17:45 -0700:
> The Vancouver core party was a fantastic opportunity to meet some very smart
> people and learn a lot about the projects they worked on. It was probably one
> of the most useful parts of the summit, certainly more so than the g
Hi all,
On 22/04/16 16:40, Clint Byrum wrote:
But in the mean time, maybe we can just send this message
to party planners: Provide us with interesting spaces to converse and
bond in, and we will be happier.
Spoke with the party planners and got the inside gossip :)
The good news: for the Aust
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 22/04/16 16:40, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> But in the mean time, maybe we can just send this message
>> to party planners: Provide us with interesting spaces to converse and
>> bond in, and we will be happier.
>>
>
> Spoke with the
Many thanks Tom!
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Fifield [mailto:t...@openstack.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 5:59 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Core Party after Austin
>
> Hi all,
>
> On 22/04/
Amrith Kumar wrote:
To all who have said the Core Party was a bad thing, let me echo Sean's
feelings, and add that I actually liked the core parties more than any of the
others, and actually found them to be a very good thing. I too got to meet
people who I would normally not have had a chance
On 4/22/2016 4:58 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
Hi all,
On 22/04/16 16:40, Clint Byrum wrote:
But in the mean time, maybe we can just send this message
to party planners: Provide us with interesting spaces to converse and
bond in, and we will be happier.
Spoke with the party planners and got the ins
23 matches
Mail list logo