Winson, nice job!
Now it totally makes sense to me. You’re good to go with this unless others
have objections.
Just one technical dummy question (sorry, I’m not yet familiar with
oslo.messaging): at your picture you have “Transport”, so what can be
specifically except RabbitMQ?
Renat Akhmero
I'm not sure how well it would work here, but I've used Pagerduty.com for
something similar before.
The big up side of pagerduty is that it is pretty good at contacting people who
aren't at their computers.
It supports email notifications and webhooks for people who want to lots of
control ov
Hi Renat,
for me just unclear the following syntacsis:
$.image_id
what is $ in this case? It will be more clear if we can replace $ to
something - any instance with readable name, like global.image_id or
context.image_id.
looks like $ can be the different in different name spaces.
it will be uncl
Hi, Renat!
*Suggestions*
> *1*. Define "input" and "output" at task level like this:
> createVM:
>input:
> image_id: $.image_id
>output: vm_id
> Where "output: vm_id" is basically a replacement for "store-as: vm_id" at
> action level, i.e. it's a hint to Mistral to
Timur, '$' here is mean referrence to context at stage which it has been
given to.
'$.image_id' takes 'image_id' from current workflow execution context
variable
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Nikolay Makhotkin wrote:
> Hi, Renat!
>
>
>
> *Suggestions*
>> *1*. Define "input" and "output" at
Hi Ben-
Can you give a guess of the problem.
I feel that there might be some error with devstack-gate which brings down the
things from git and configure it in the system.
The first error started at “openstack role add: error: argument –user: expected
one argument”
Do I need to check or verif
Agree, I don't see any thing that makes sense with words 'REST' and 'API'
too.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm proposing to rename these two action types REST_API and
> MISTRAL_REST_API to HTTP and MISTRAL_HTTP. Words "REST" and "API" don't
> look correct
Hi, SUSE OpenStack developers,
After install OpenStack Havana on SLES 11 SP3 following the
openstack-manuals' guide, I find that the
ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py has implemented the metaquey
functionality. However, the upstream, which means
github.com/openstack/ceilometer stable/havana br
Hi stackers,
I am very interested in setting QOS dynamically(such as CPU/memory) which is
noted in previously [1].
In some case we need to set QOS of a running instance to advoid interruptting
the instance instead of using flavor extra specs.
I found it is in discussion.I just want to know wha
Hi,
you can get inspired by the L2-population MD, which call new functions
in the agents (like add_fdb_entries) through AMQP.
Does your work relate to an existing blueprint?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trinath, this presentation I saw before You send m
My understanding, correct me if I'm missing the intention:
Action are defined as code, aka REST_API or SEND_EMAIL.
These are base actions, they are analogous to function definitions.
Tasks is a set of parameters for the action.
Actions can be also defined declaratively, under Services, based
+1
Should we use VERB_NOUN pattern? Or relax it for some obvious? I can't figure a
good VERB_NOUN for HTTP. REQUEST_HTTP is dull.
BTW it's interesting that we assume that a service can contain only actions of
the same type.
DZ>
On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Nikolay Makhotkin wrote:
> Agre
Hello,
This email is triggered by the comments I received in my patch [1] when
trying to fix bug [2].
The problem I was trying to fix is that current firewall remains in status
"ACTIVE" after admin state is changed to "DOWN". My plan is to change the
status of firewall from ACTIVE to DOWN when ad
Hi Clark,
>>> I think we can safely GRANT ALL on *.* to openstack_citest@localhost and
>>> call that good enough
Works for me.
Thanks,
Roman
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Roman Podoliaka
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> [1] made it possible f
Hm.. I see your point. Generally, I like short names but expressive enough to
understand what it is. VERB_NOUN would be good but nothing decent comes to my
mind regarding HTTP :)
If you guys have any suggestions you’re welcome.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 26 Feb 2014, at 16:33, Dmitri
On 26 Feb 2014, at 15:18, Timur Nurlygayanov wrote:
> for me just unclear the following syntacsis:
> $.image_id
> what is $ in this case? It will be more clear if we can replace $ to
> something - any instance with readable name, like global.image_id or
> context.image_id.
> looks like $ can b
Hi Morgan,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:47:43AM -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple LDAP, mix
> of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keystone is planning to increase the maximum
> size of the USER_ID field from an upper limit of 64 to an u
Hi,
FYI setting the vxlan UDP doesn't work properly for the moment :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1241561
May be your kernel has the vxlan module already loaded, which bind the
udp port 8472. that a reason why the vxlan port can't be created by
ovs. Check your ovs-vswitchd.log
On Tue,
Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
>> From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:[email protected]]
>> So the problem here is what we consider a "bug" becomes a feature from
>> a user of the API point of view. Eg they really shouldn't be passing
>> some data in a request, but its ignored and doesn't cause any issues
>> an
Hi,
For LBaaS the background is simple: it uses statuses from
neutron/plugins/common/constants.py and INACTIVE was there initially while
DOWN
appeared later (with VPNaaS first commit). So LBaaS doesn't use DOWN at all.
As for INACTIVE, it is currently used only for members that stop responding
to
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 14:38 +0700, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I’m proposing to rename these two action types REST_API and
> MISTRAL_REST_API to HTTP and MISTRAL_HTTP. Words “REST” and “API”
> don’t look correct to me, if you look at
>
>
> Services:
> Nova:
> type: REST_API
> pa
Hey Ruslan,
thanks for catching this. So, the plan for updating this docs is to
make it during the i3 - rc1 time range, no FFE needed for docs.
Thanks
P.S. I'm taking tempest tests section.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov
wrote:
> As it was decided on our latest meeting I've
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 22:15:42 -0800
Joe Gordon wrote:
> So it turns out nova isn't the only OpenStack project to attempt a
> full API revision.
>
> Keystone v3 - Grizzly
> Glancev2 - Folsom
> Cinder v2 - Grizzly
>
> Out of those 3, nova doesn't use any of them! (Although there are
> blue
On 02/25/2014 05:47 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> Yeah, so objects is the big one here.
>
> Objects, and everything else. With no-db-compute we did it for a couple
> cycles, then objects, next it will be retooling flows to conductor, then
> dealing with tasks, talking to gantt, etc. It's not going to en
Hi Jay-
Rather than March 3rd
Can you kindly make it on Feb 28th if possible.
I'm interested in attending the meeting.
I have doubts to get clarified regarding setp, configuration and CI system.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
[email protected] | extn: 4048
-Original Mess
A couple of notes:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>
> neutron l7-policy-create --type="uri-regex-matching" \
> --attr=URIRegex="static\.example\.com.*"
>
> Presume above returns an ID for the policy $L7_POLICY_ID. We could then
> assign that policy to operate on the front
Hi Sukhdev-
Really a good document to go with.
In the ‘System flow’ section of the document, where do this testRunner script
come from ??
And the below actions are specified to be run with the testRunner script.
Can you elaborate that part.
Also, I’m looking into the document in a way to setu
Hi,
>
> I assume then the validation in horizon to force the VIP ip from this pool
> subnet is incorrect. i.e VIP address can be from a different subnet.
>
Right, existing horizon code is bound to reference LBaaS implementation.
Thanks,
Eugene.
___
Ope
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:11 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Jay Pipes
> wrote:
> neutron l7-policy-create --type="uri-regex-matching" \
> --attr=URIRegex="static\.example\.com.*"
>
> Presume above returns an ID for the policy $
Hi
I uploaded a minor fix recently, so it needs re-reviewing. Much obliged,
thanks. :)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72751/
Alex
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Jones"
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 February, 2014 4:12:16 PM
> Subject: git
Hi Adam,
I have created this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/tenant-expiration-dates
Thanks
Cristian
From: Adam Young mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: m
Hi,
Le mercredi 26 février 2014, à 17:20 +0800, ZhiQiang Fan a écrit :
> Hi, SUSE OpenStack developers,
>
> After install OpenStack Havana on SLES 11 SP3 following the
> openstack-manuals' guide, I find that the
> ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py has implemented the metaquey
> functionality.
Due to the comment to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75888/1 there is a
quiestion:
Do we use term DSL or something else?
I think the word 'DSL' is more fit thing that we call 'workbook
definition', some text describing workflows, services, tasks and actions.
And processing module for this also h
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Marco Fargetta
wrote:
> Hi Morgan,
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:47:43AM -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> > For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple
> LDAP, mix
> > of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keystone is planning to increase the
>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 11:47 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> > For purposes of supporting multiple backends for Identity (multiple
> > LDAP, mix of LDAP and SQL, federation, etc) Keystone is planning to
> > increase the maximum size of the USER_I
Hello,
i went through the CLI way of deploying overcloud, so if you're
interested what's the workflow, here it is:
https://gist.github.com/jistr/9228638
I'd say it's still an open question whether we'll want to give better UX
than that ^^ and at what cost (this is very much tied to the bene
Hi,
I am trying to deploy the proprietary application made in my company on the
cloud. The pre requisite for this is to have a IAAS which can be either a
public cloud or private cloud (openstack is an option for a private IAAS).
The first prototype I made was based on a homemade python orchestr
To more precise, the kernel will listen on udp port 8472 as soon as
you create a vxlan port, with ip_route2. I doubt it's your case, but i
can't figure out why you want to change the vxlan port? please tell us
about that, it could be interesting.
In your case, your config doesn't seem to be a mult
Thanks Jay.
Regarding underscore naming. If you meant using underscore naming for
“createVM” and “novaURL” then yes, “createVM” is just a task name and it’s a
user preference. The same about “novaURL” which will be defined by users. As
for keywords, seemingly we follow underscore naming.
Renat
Ooh, I was wrong. Sorry. We use dash naming. We have “on-success”, “on-error”
and so forth.
Please let us know if you see other inconsistencies.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 26 Feb 2014, at 21:00, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> Thanks Jay.
>
> Regarding underscore naming. If you mean
On 02/26/2014 06:47 AM, Charles Walker wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to deploy the proprietary application made in my company
on the cloud. The pre requisite for this is to have a IAAS which can
be either a public cloud or private cloud (openstack is an option for
a private IAAS).
The first pro
Oleg,
Thanks a lot for your quick response! I will open a bug to address that
soon. For the LBaaS part, probably I will just make the fix dependent on
the code review you mentioned.
Xu Han
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Oleg Bondarev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For LBaaS the background is simple: it use
Hi Folks,
I could do with some pointers on config value deprecation.
All of the examples in the code and documentation seem to deal with the case
of "old_opt" being replaced by "new_opt" but still returning the same value
Here using deprecated_name and / or deprecated_opts in the definition of
Here what oslo.config documentation says.
Represents a Deprecated option. Here's how you can use it
oldopts = [cfg.DeprecatedOpt('oldfoo', group='oldgroup'),
cfg.DeprecatedOpt('oldfoo2', group='oldgroup2')]
cfg.CONF.register_group(cfg.OptGroup('blaa'))
c
> So I was thinking about this and Ken'ichi has basically said pretty
> much the same thing in his reply to this thread. I don't think it
> makes client moves any easier though - this is all about lowering our
> maintenance costs.
So, in the other fork of this thread, I think you said we can't im
On Feb 25, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Ziad Sawalha
> wrote:
>> Seeking some clarification on the OpenStack hacking guidelines for
>> multi-string docstrings.
>>
>> Q: In OpenStack projects, is a blank line before the triple closing quotes
>> recommen
On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 00:56 +, Ziad Sawalha wrote:
>> Seeking some clarification on the OpenStack hacking guidelines for
>> multi-string docstrings.
>>
>>
>> Q: In OpenStack projects, is a blank line before the triple closing
>> quo
> We may need to differentiate between breaking the API and breaking
> corner-case behavior.
Totally agreed.
> In one case you force everyone in the ecosystem to
> adapt (the libraries, the end user code). In the other you only
> (potentially) affect those that were not following the API correctl
Hi team,
The next subteam meeting is on Thursday, 27 at 14-00 UTC.
We'll try to finalize object model discussion.
So far we tend to move towards model #3 as shown here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance/Discussion
With some minor adjustments.
Picture #4 which Ste
Hi,
The following two Work In Progress patches are available for end-to-end SR-IOV
networking:
nova client: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67503/
nova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67500/
Please check the commit messages for how to use them.
Neutron changes required to support SR-IOV have
I don’t see any issues with term DSL (Domain Specific Language). This is really
a language which 'workbook definitions’ are written in.
Dmitri, could you please provide more details on why you question it?
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 26 Feb 2014, at 20:12, Nikolay Makhotkin wro
2014-02-25 19:48 GMT+08:00 Salvatore Orlando :
> I understand the fact that resources with invalid tenant_ids can be
> created (only with admin rights at least for Neutron) can be annoying.
>
> However, I support Jay's point on cross-project interactions. If tenant_id
> validation (and orphaned re
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:12 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Sukhdev-
>
>
>
> Really a good document to go with.
>
>
>
> In the ‘System flow’ section of the document, where do this testRunner
> script come from ??
>
>
This is a very simple python s
I'll be honest, after reading your proposal Denis and looking over
what Kaleb has it feels like you both are calling 2 different things
"capabilities". Denis, your proposal provides a way of blocking or
enabling api paths to the users. Kaleb's proposal is more about
informing consumers of the api
We do use the term DSL, I invite you guys to clarify, how exactly.
Based on the terminology from [1], it's not part of the model, but the language
that describes the model in the file. And theoretically this may be not the
only language to express the workflow. Once the file is parsed, we opera
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> I think that the blueprint to add live migrations support to
>> Horizon[0] was incorrectly labeled as a duplicate of the earlier
>> migrate-instance blueprint[1].
>>
>> [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/live-migration
>> [1
I'd like to release a new version of sqlalchemy-migrate in the next
couple of days. The only major new feature is DB2 support. If anyone
thinks this is a bad time, please let me know.
--
David Ripton Red Hat [email protected]
___
OpenStack-dev
Hi,
There was some discussion a while back around the VPC implementation in
Openstack. There is a proposal to implement the AWS VPC features in Nova EC2
APIs, but this makes sense for the EC2 compatible API only and may not be
appropriate for an Openstack specify one.
I would like to know w
I just pushed a new novaclient release. It contains several bug fixes
and new features made over the last 4-5 months. I expect another
release closer to the release of Icehouse to capture any last fixes and
features that get merged for Icehouse.
Please report any issues to our bug tracker:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Ziad Sawalha
wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 00:56 +, Ziad Sawalha wrote:
>>> Seeking some clarification on the OpenStack hacking guidelines for
>>> multi-string docstrings.
>>>
>>>
>>> Q: In OpenS
Greetings!
We (the websockify/noVNC team) have released a new version of websockify
(0.6.0). It contains several fixes and features relating to OpenStack (a
couple of bugs were fixed, and native support for the `logging` module was
added). Unfortunately, to integrate it into OpenStack, a patc
- Original Message -
> A thread [1] was also initiated on the ML by Syvlain but no answers/comment
> for the moment.
>
> [1] http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/qy6ikldtq2o4imzl
>
> Édouard.
>
IMHO admin_state_up = false should bring the network down and the traffic needs
to be stop
On 02/26/2014 11:40 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
This is missing the point about manually enforcing style. If you pass
the 'pep8' job there is no need to change any style.
In a perfect world, yes.
In the real world, there are several things in PEP8 or our project
guidelines that the tools don't enf
Hi,
I have added to the wiki page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance/Discussion#1.1_Turning_existing_model_to_logical_model
that points to a document that includes the current model + L7 + SSL.
Please review.
Regards,
-Sam.
From: Samuel Bercovi
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> So is there some git magic that also keeps the repos in sync, or do you
> have to commit/pull/restart service every time you make changes? I ask
> because experience tells me I would inevitably forget one of those steps at
> some point and be
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> We may need to differentiate between breaking the API and breaking
>> corner-case behavior.
>
> Totally agreed.
>
>> In one case you force everyone in the ecosystem to
>> adapt (the libraries, the end user code). In the other you only
>> (potent
Hi,
While working on unification of clients code we try to unify various
exceptions in different client projects.
We have module apiclient.exceptions in oslo-incubator[1]. Since our
apiclient is an oslo-inclubator library and not a standalone lib this
doesn't help in case we need to process except
> Users actually care about the latter. If the API accepts 'red' as a
> valid UUID then that is part of the implicit contract.
Yeah, but right now, many of those things are "would fail on postgres
and succeed on mysql" (not uuids necessarily, but others). Since we
can't honor them in all cases, I
On 02/26/2014 11:24 AM, David Ripton wrote:
> I'd like to release a new version of sqlalchemy-migrate in the next
> couple of days. The only major new feature is DB2 support. If anyone
> thinks this is a bad time, please let me know.
>
So it would be nice if someone could actually work through
On 2/26/14 5:47 AM, Mathieu Rohon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI setting the vxlan UDP doesn't work properly for the moment :
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1241561
So I checked this again by going back to 13.10, still no luck.
>
> May be your kernel has the vxlan module already loaded, which bi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, David Ripton wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 11:40 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>> This is missing the point about manually enforcing style. If you pass
>> the 'pep8' job there is no need to change any style.
>
>
> In a perfect world, yes.
While there are exceptions to this, t
Hi Jay and Sylvain,
The solver-scheduler sounds like a good fit to me as well. It clearly
provisions resources in accordance with policy. Does it monitor those
resources and adjust them if the system falls out of compliance with the policy?
I mentioned Congress for two reasons. (i) It does mo
While trying to track down why Jenkins was handing out -1's in a Neutron patch,
I was seeing errors in the devstack tests it runs. When I dug deeper it looked
like it wasn't properly determining that Neutron was enabled - ENABLED_SERVICES
had multiple "q-*" entries, but 'is_service_enabled neutron
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> (I added some tags in the subject line, probably should have been there
> from the start.)
>
> Thanks guys, for an informative discussion. I have updated
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow and
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote:
> While working on unification of clients code we try to unify various
> exceptions in different client projects.
> We have module apiclient.exceptions in oslo-incubator[1]. Since our
> apiclient is an oslo-inclubator library and not a standa
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Brian Haley wrote:
> While trying to track down why Jenkins was handing out -1's in a Neutron
> patch,
> I was seeing errors in the devstack tests it runs. When I dug deeper it
> looked
> like it wasn't properly determining that Neutron was enabled -
> ENABLED_S
Hi,
I am wondering what is the OpenStack way of returning json from
apiclient.
I have got 2 different JSON response examples from http://api.openstack.org/:
json output with namespace:
{
"volume":
{
"status":"available",
"availability_zone":"nova",
"id":"5aa119a8-d25b-45a7-8d1b-8
Thanks. I'll start making the changes. The other transport currently
implemented at oslo.messaging is located at
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/master/oslo/messaging/_drivers,
prefixed with impl. There are quid and zmq.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Thanks Doug for replying,
>
>
>
> 2014-02-25 23:10 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Do you have any idea on how I could get my goal, ie. having a static
>>> input plus some extra variable inputs ? I was also thinking about playing
>>>
TL;DR: Are enterprise needed features (HA, scalability, resource management,
etc) on this project's roadmap. If so, how much of a priority is it?
I've been doing some research on Neutron LBaaS to determine the viability and
what needs to be done to allow for it to become an enterprise ready sol
Hi folks,
I'd like to follow-up Savanna graduation status. All requirements
listed in the [0] has been solved. You can find details in [1].
So, I'd like to ask for Savanna graduation review topic addition to
the TC meetings backlog. :)
All questions raised on the incubation review were covered o
Dean Troyer wrote on 02/26/2014 12:53:31 PM:
> Thanks for the updates, but I've massaged the project bits and
> restored/expanded the reasons to consider one or the other option.
Thanks for the further updates. I have just one question about those. One
way to do both unit testing and system (
This is a new concept to me in JSON, I've never heard of a wrapper
element like that being called a namespace.
My first impression is that is looks like cruft. If there's nothing else
at the root of the JSON document besides the namespace, all it means is
that every time I go to access relevan
Hi folks
I wrote an bookmarklet for neutron gerrit review.
This bookmarklet make the comment title for 3rd party ci as gray.
javascript:(function(){list =
document.querySelectorAll('td.GJEA35ODGC'); for(i in
list){if(!list[i].innerHTML){continue;};if(list[i].innerHTML &&
list[i].innerHTML.search(
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:46:22AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2014 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>
Hi, I'm writing to call for some core-reviewers to give any eye to
some rbd related reviews that are open.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
^parent https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
^^parent https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/
Thanks,
Andrew W.
Mirantis.
___
Hello,
i went through the CLI way of deploying overcloud, so if you're
interested what's the workflow, here it is:
https://gist.github.com/jistr/9228638
This is excellent to see it all laid out like this, thanks for writing
it up.
I'd say it's still an open question whether we'll want to g
Assaf,
It would be helpful if these notes were on the reviews [1]. I think
there are concerns in this email that I have not noticed in the
review. Maybe I missed them.
Carl
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-high-availability
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Assaf Muller
So this design is starting to look pretty familiar to a what we have in
taskflow.
Any reason why it can't just be used instead?
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TaskFlowWorkerBasedEngine
This code is in a functional state right now, using kombu (for the moment,
until oslo.messaging becomes py3
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Savanna team meeting as usual in
#openstack-meeting-alt channel.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_February.2C_27
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Savanna+Meeting&iso=20140227T18
The main topics are p
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> Thanks for the further updates. I have just one question about those.
> One way to do both unit testing and system (integration) testing is to:
> git clone your favorite project to make a working local repo somewhere on
> your testing mac
hi,
just so this issue doesn't get lost again. Mehdi's bp seems like a good
place to track this issue:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/usage-data-in-notification.
Joe, i agree with you that it's too late for this iteration... maybe it's
something we should mark > low priority for J
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
>
> I like the notion of OpenStackClient. I'll talk ideals for a second. If we
> had a standard framework and each project provided a command abstraction
> that plugged in, we could pick and choose what we included under the Tuskar
> umbrella. Adv
2014-02-26 19:40 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann :
>
> So you're not segregating the dynamic part of the API at all from the
> static part?
>
> Doug
>
>
No, you're right, at least with API V1 (Flask). As per our discussion, it
seems our use-case hasn't yet been implemented in WSME, so I'll provide a
diffe
Please look at my last reply. Do you have several compute nodes? If
you have only one node, you won't have any vxlan port on br-tun.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Varadhan, Sowmini
wrote:
> On 2/26/14 5:47 AM, Mathieu Rohon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FYI setting the vxlan UDP doesn't work properly fo
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, February 27th at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting
channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome to add an item
On 02/26/2014 03:33 PM, Gordon Chung wrote:
> hi,
>
> just so this issue doesn't get lost again. Mehdi's bp seems like a good
> place to track this issue:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/usage-data-in-notification.
>
> Joe, i agree with you that it's too late for this iteration... m
On 02/26/2014 01:36 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Brian Haley mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
While trying to track down why Jenkins was handing out -1's in a
Neutron patch,
I was seeing errors in the devstack tests it runs. When I dug
deeper it loo
Hi Sam,
I've looked over the document, couple of notes:
1) In order to allow real multiple 'vips' per pool feature, we need the
listener concept.
It's not just a different tcp port, but also a protocol, so session
persistence and all ssl-related parameters should move to listener.
2) ProviderRes
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-02-26 19:40 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>> So you're not segregating the dynamic part of the API at all from the
>> static part?
>>
>> Doug
>>
>>
> No, you're right, at least with API V1 (Flask). As per our discussion, it
> seems
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
