-1 for upgrading it in 6.1. Known devil is better than unknown angel :)
In 7.0 we can try 3.5.0 with updated Erlang.
~thanks
--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Davanum Srinivas dsrini...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Bogdan,
Pacemaker,
I’m -1 for it.
Considering how much time we needed to troubleshoot the problems already, I
don’t think we have time to properly test the upgrade.
On 29 Apr 2015, at 12:37, Sergii Golovatiuk sgolovat...@mirantis.com wrote:
-1 for upgrading it in 6.1. Known devil is better than unknown angel
Hi, Sylwester,
Fuel-plugin-mellanox is in development stage now, so no one can use it.
I think, a longer MAC field may be helpful for other plugin developers in
future.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Sylwester Brzeczkowski
sbrzeczkow...@mirantis.com wrote:
We have a bug in fuel [1] which
Great news!!! Welcome.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote:
On 29/04/15 00:57, David Lyle wrote:
Thank you all for your contributions and welcome to the team!
David
Yes! Thanks a lot. You'll all make a great addition to the team.
Matthias
On 04/29/2015 12:57 AM, David Lyle wrote:
I am pleased to announce the addition of Doug Fish, Rob Cresswell and
Travis Tripp to the Horizon Core Reviewer team.
Doug Fish has been an active reviewer and participant in Horizon for a
few releases now. He represents a strong customer focus and
On 28 April 2015 at 21:59, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
The concern is that having broken drivers out there that claim to work
with an OpenStack project end up making the project look bad. It's similar
to a first time Linux user experiencing frequent kernel panics because they
are
Alexei,
actually we do not insist this should b done for the MOS 6.1. That was the
question to the audience if someone is having other idea. All these
discussions have roots in the bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1447619 - we have found the issue with
RabbitMQ cluster behaviour under the
Hi!
Thank you very much Vladimir and Bogdan! Thanks for the fast respond and
rich information.
I backported MySQL and RabbitMQ ocf patches from stable/6.0 and tested
again. A full reassemble takes about 5mins, this improves a lot. Adding
the force_load trick I mentioned in the previous email, it
The CI is now looking healthy, thanks.
On 28 April 2015 at 21:59, Diem Tran diem.t...@oracle.com wrote:
Dear Cinder team,
A patchset has been uploaded to request re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA
iSCSI Cinder driver to 2 branches: master and stable/kilo:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178319
Hey folks:
There's not much to discuss on the agenda for this week [1] , so I'm
going to go ahead and cancel the Trove weekly meeting for this
week.
We will have the Trove meeting next week on Wednesday, May 6th.
Thanks,
Nikhil
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TroveMeeting
Hello.
There are several concerns why we have to upgrade RabbitMQ to 3.4.0 [0]:
1) At least two bugfixes related to the current high-load issue with MQ [1]:
- 26404 prevent queue synchronisation from hanging if there is a very
short partition just as it starts (since 3.1.0)
- 26368 prevent
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
I've long come to the conclusion that it is what it is: at the size
we're at, we can't expect every voter to be fully informed about all the
issues.
Better titles and a sort of TL;DR first paragraph in blog posts are very
helpful. But in order to write those, the
On Wed, Apr 29 2015, ZhiQiang Fan wrote:
However, current ceilometer only provide time constraint alarm, which will
only evaluate but not guarantee it will be triggered. And heat cannot
provide something like timer, but just can wait for the signal.
So I propose to add a new type of alarm,
On 29/04/15 00:57, David Lyle wrote:
Thank you all for your contributions and welcome to the team!
David
Yes! Thanks a lot. You'll all make a great addition to the team.
Matthias
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
Sonal,
According for this guide
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/glance/statuses.html smthg should be
wrong with uploading. Try to check your glance or ping glance team.
Nikolay Starodubtsev
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
Skype: dark_harlequine1
2015-04-28 17:16 GMT+03:00 Nikolay
After changed the system time from 4-20 to 4-5, upload file to swift returned
409 conflict, this file had been uploaded to swift at 4-20, the 409 conflict is
caused by the fact that swift compares the request time against the disk_file's
X-Timestamp, if the request time is older than the file's
On 04/29/2015 12:57 AM, David Lyle wrote:
I am pleased to announce the addition of Doug Fish, Rob Cresswell and
Travis Tripp to the Horizon Core Reviewer team.
Doug Fish has been an active reviewer and participant in Horizon for a
few releases now. He represents a strong customer focus and
Hello
We are facing an issue with Congress devstack installation in our gate
job testing murano-congress integration (policy enforcement) [1] .
Congress devstack scripts install stevedore==1.4.0 as a dependency of
python-muranoclient without specified version [2]. However heat
requirement
Hi,
I have some questions on devstack, can anyone answer it.
* Why devstack didn't start services automatically when openstack nodes
reboots.
* How to re-create the devstack, suchthat whenever nodes reboot , it
'll configured as previous configuration (i.e bringing up all the
Hi Filip,
In thirdparty-requirements for stable/kilo python-muranoclient should have
following version: python-muranoclient=0.5.6,0.6.0. But I am not sure
that this will fix the issue, since we don't clearly know why stevedore==1.4.0
is installed.
I see that python-keystoneclient does not have
I am 100% against the upgrade, folks. We need to ensure that user can use
different network for GRE segmentation for high-load cases and mention this
in Installation and Operations Guides - there is no time for it.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Tomasz Napierala tnapier...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Kilo is closed to everything but critical bugs at this point.
Going forward, this change probably counts as a new feature and is
forbidden as a backport to Kilo too. So Liberty is the earliest
opportunity.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Appropriate_Fixes
Trev
On Wed, 2015-04-29
All,
I changed the topic of firewall plugin and configured the agent to
listen on same topic. But i am getting this error while publishing the
message.
2015-04-29 18:12:55.464 31761 ERROR oslo.messaging._drivers.impl_rabbit
[req-97302491-1a34-45c1-931c-1115fc1b0674 ] Failed to publish message
Agree with Vova and Tomasz. It's too late and risky for 6.1, in my opinion.
Best,
-jay
On 04/29/2015 07:55 AM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote:
I am 100% against the upgrade, folks. We need to ensure that user can
use different network for GRE segmentation for high-load cases and
mention this in
Welcome!
发件人: David Lyle [mailto:dkly...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2015年4月29日 6:58
收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List
主题: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Core Reviewer Update
I am pleased to announce the addition of Doug Fish, Rob Cresswell and Travis
Tripp to the Horizon Core Reviewer team.
Doug Fish
hi, hao,
First, thanks for your bug and patch, I thinks it's really a problem
we should fix. I forward your suggestions about the workaround with
Dan Smith and Joe Gordon.to get more feedback.
1.Raise exception to make to set vm status to error,and user can
re-perform a delete action to clean up
Again my apologies for the incorrect format - since I am still not
receiving the messages from this thread.
Please see my comments with the abstracts within (unfortunately not
necessarily in the correct order)
I think that the point here was that Doug mentioned that there was
communication
On 29 April 2015 at 20:48, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
I've long come to the conclusion that it is what it is: at the size
we're at, we can't expect every voter to be fully informed about all the
issues.
Better titles and a sort of TL;DR first
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
In summary, here is the proposed Liberty common schedule:
liberty-1: June 25th
liberty-2: July 30th
liberty-3: September 3rd
final release: October 15th
Let me know if you see issues with it, like crazy holidays somewhere
that would ruin
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Luo Gangyi wrote:
Yes, we can do as you said. But still a bit weird using database in unit tests
:)
As stated elsewhere they aren't really unit tests, they're just
tests. Those tests which rely on external services are being moved
to another directory:
It's used for
On 04/29/2015 12:33 PM, neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote:
Thanks Russell and Kyle for explaining. I think I get the picture
now, in particular of how these backend projects are mostly under
separate management, but at the same time subject to PTL oversight
and 'part of the wider Neutron
On 04/29/15 17:28, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Maish Saidel-Keesing's message of 2015-04-29 12:59:35 +0300:
Again my apologies for the incorrect format - since I am still not
receiving the messages from this thread.
Please see my comments with the abstracts within (unfortunately not
Hi everybody, does anybody besides Mellanox need this? If not and while
it's already solved issue for Mellanox itself - let's just close the bug as
won't fix for now.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Andrey Danin ada...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi, Sylwester,
Fuel-plugin-mellanox is in
Excerpts from Brant Knudson's message of 2015-04-29 09:17:08 -0500:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 04/29/2015 10:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/29/2015 09:29 AM, Filip Blaha wrote:
Hi Serg
I checked devstack log [1] and it seems that
tl;dr: Please do not approve any requirements changes to libraries in
stable branches.
We're in the process of figuring out how we want to deal with the
caps. Adding caps to the requirements of libraries introduces
challenges, so we're considering removing those and having applications
cap all
Hello,
If all is ok, let's move bug to 7.0 and fix it with netaddr as it was
proposed in comments to the ticket.
- Igor
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Nikolay Markov nmar...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi everybody, does anybody besides Mellanox need this? If not and while
it's already solved
Excerpts from Maish Saidel-Keesing's message of 2015-04-29 18:28:45 +0300:
On 04/29/15 17:28, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Taking as given that we should be open and communicate more, I would
like to ask a concrete question. It seems like there is a general
sense of concern about communication,
Thanks Russell and Kyle for explaining. I think I get the picture now, in
particular of how these backend projects are mostly under separate management,
but at the same time subject to PTL oversight and 'part of the wider Neutron
effort'.
May I drill down further on what is anticipated,
Trevor, yup, that's correct.
Adding new plugin version support is the new feature and there is no way to
backport it to stable/kilo branch (Kilo release).
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Trevor McKay tmc...@redhat.com wrote:
Kilo is closed to everything but critical bugs at this
On 2015-04-29 12:59:35 +0300 (+0300), Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
[...]
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-04-28 16:21:17 +:
/ On 2015-04-28 16:30:21 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote:
// [...]
// What's important to avoid is the blog postings being only reporting of
//
Hi folks!
A bit earlier than expected to to my PTO I'm announcing ironic-discoverd
1.1.0. Download it from PyPI: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ironic-discoverd
We've spent substantial amount of time polishing existing features and
fixing bugs. Highlights are:
* New config options for tuning
So, summarizing some chatter on #openstack-dev:
Action item for unblocking the gate job:
1. Remove the -U in the shell script that installs
thirdparty-requirements.txt in congress' repo.
If that's not enough:
2. make sure congress' stable/kilo
requirements.txt/test-requirements.txt is sync'ed
On 2015-04-29 11:48:36 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Maish Saidel-Keesing's message of 2015-04-29 18:28:45 +0300:
[...]
How about the fact that the definition of an ATC was changed [1] for a
free Summit pass? [2]
I could be wrong, but I don't think that was a TC
Thank you for the warm welcome, everyone!
I'm excited to be on the team and am really looking forward to everything
coming in Liberty!
-Travis
On 4/29/15, 6:16 AM, Ana Krivokapić akriv...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/29/2015 12:57 AM, David Lyle wrote:
I am pleased to announce the addition of
My take on the “where does it fit” yardstick:
Does it stand on its own and add value? Then consider it a standalone project,
*or* part of neutron if you and neutron agree that it fits.
Does it *require* neutron to be useful? Then consider having it under the
neutron umbrella/stadium/tent/yurt.
A good comment has been provided to
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177824/1 by saying that the reference
docs [1] are duplicate to the Nova devref section [2]
As I also think it is error-prone to keep two separate informations
about how Scheduler filters, I would like to discuss on how we
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 12:59 +0300, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
Again my apologies for the incorrect format - since I am still not
receiving the messages from this thread.
let me know if you want me to investigate this further.
Doug - evidently this is not working as it should. As Chris said
Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2015-04-29 18:45:54 +0100:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Taking as given that we should be open and communicate more, I would
like to ask a concrete question. It seems like there is a general
sense of concern about communication, but I
Perfect. thanks Ruslan.
-- dims
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov
rkamaldi...@mirantis.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
So, summarizing some chatter on #openstack-dev:
Action item for unblocking the gate job:
1. Remove
On 04/29/15 21:59, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 18:28 +0300, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
How about the fact that the definition of an ATC was changed [1] for a
free Summit pass? [2]
This was not a decision of the TC, it was a decision of the Foundation
staff. The definition
On 4/29/2015 2:08 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
A good comment has been provided to
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177824/1 by saying that the reference
docs [1] are duplicate to the Nova devref section [2]
As I also think it is error-prone to keep two separate informations
about how Scheduler
On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'd prefer to see the scheduler filter docs be maintained in the nova devref
where they are close to the source, versioned, and reviewed by the nova team
when there are scheduler filter changes or new filters
On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:34 PM, Adam Lawson alaw...@aqorn.com wrote:
Anyway, I find it curious that the TC is elected by those within the
developer community but TC candidates talk about representing the operator
community who are not allowed to vote. Operators meaning Admins, Architects,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Taking as given that we should be open and communicate more, I would
like to ask a concrete question. It seems like there is a general
sense of concern about communication, but I want to make sure it's
not related to ongoing discussions. Is there
So I started replying to Doug's email in a different thread but didn't want
to hi-jack that so I figured I'd present my question as a more general
question about how voting is handled for the TC.
Anyway, I find it curious that the TC is elected by those within the
developer community but TC
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Kamsali, RaghavendraChari (Artesyn)
raghavendrachari.kams...@artesyn.com wrote:
· Why devstack didn’t start services automatically when openstack
nodes reboots.
· How to re-create the devstack, suchthat whenever nodes reboot , it
‘ll configured
On 04/29/2015 01:25 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
My take on the “where does it fit” yardstick:
Does it stand on its own and add value? Then consider it a standalone
project, *or* part of neutron if you and neutron agree that it fits.
Does it *require* neutron to be useful? Then consider having
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 18:28 +0300, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
How about the fact that the definition of an ATC was changed [1] for a
free Summit pass? [2]
This was not a decision of the TC, it was a decision of the Foundation
staff. The definition of ATC has *not* changed, that's embedded in
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
So, summarizing some chatter on #openstack-dev:
Action item for unblocking the gate job:
1. Remove the -U in the shell script that installs
thirdparty-requirements.txt in congress' repo.
This patch to Congress
Excerpts from Adam Lawson's message of 2015-04-29 11:34:40 -0700:
So I started replying to Doug's email in a different thread but didn't want
to hi-jack that so I figured I'd present my question as a more general
question about how voting is handled for the TC.
Anyway, I find it curious that
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hello!
A couple of things I've been working on lately are project governance
issues as a TC member and also implementation of a new virtual
Yes. Installed version is 1.4.0 and from that log it seems that it was
caused by congress scripts
sudo pip install -U -r /opt/stack/new/congress/thirdparty-requirements.txt
Filip
On 04/29/2015 03:56 PM, Serg Melikyan wrote:
Sean, Filip,
Exact versions of installed libraries may be found
On 04/29/2015 09:29 AM, Filip Blaha wrote:
Hi Serg
I checked devstack log [1] and it seems that stevedore==1.4.0 was
installed due to congress
2015-04-29 11:12:16.120
Serg,
The congress stable/kilo requirements:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/congress/tree/requirements.txt?h=stable/kilo#n13
Do not match the global stable/kilo requirements:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/global-requirements.txt?h=stable/kilo#n123
So let's
I just looked at this run (linked in this message) -
http://logs.openstack.org/04/171504/6/check/gate-murano-congress-devstack-dsvm/3b2d7e1/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz
stevedore==1.3.0 is installed, never 1.4
The failure is completely unrelated to anything there -
Hi Serg
I checked devstack log [1] and it seems that stevedore==1.4.0 was
installed due to congress
2015-04-29 11:12:16.120
http://logs.openstack.org/61/178461/1/check/gate-murano-congress-devstack-dsvm/fa01b8f/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2015-04-29_11_12_16_120|
Successfully installed
sorry I sent wrong link
http://logs.openstack.org/61/178461/1/check/gate-murano-congress-devstack-dsvm/fa01b8f/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz
In this log is :
Successfully installed PyYAML-3.11 argparse-1.3.0 jsonpatch-1.9
jsonpointer-1.7 oslo.config-1.11.0 pyOpenSSL-0.15.1
Sean, Filip,
Exact versions of installed libraries may be found here:
http://logs.openstack.org/61/178461/1/check/gate-murano-congress-devstack-dsvm/fa01b8f/logs/pip-freeze.txt.gz
stevedore==1.4.0
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Filip Blaha filip.bl...@hp.com wrote:
sorry I sent wrong link
On 04/29/2015 10:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/29/2015 09:29 AM, Filip Blaha wrote:
Hi Serg
I checked devstack log [1] and it seems that stevedore==1.4.0 was
installed due to congress
2015-04-29 11:12:16.120
Excerpts from Maish Saidel-Keesing's message of 2015-04-29 12:59:35 +0300:
Again my apologies for the incorrect format - since I am still not
receiving the messages from this thread.
Please see my comments with the abstracts within (unfortunately not
necessarily in the correct order)
I
On 04/29/2015 10:17 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 04/29/2015 10:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/29/2015 09:29 AM, Filip Blaha wrote:
Hi Serg
I checked devstack log [1] and it
Thank you for your honest and forthright reply, Chris. I shall respond
inline.
On 04/28/2015 02:11 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Anita Kuno wrote:
At present, I am beginning to wonder to what degree you are being honest
with us? Is you intention to know the candidates or to
Hi Sean!
This package installed due keystonemiddleware just first time.
It was uninstalled later [1]
And installed again [2]
[1]
http://logs.openstack.org/61/178461/1/check/gate-murano-congress-devstack-dsvm/fa01b8f/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2015-04-29_11_04_07_855
[2]
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 04/29/2015 10:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/29/2015 09:29 AM, Filip Blaha wrote:
Hi Serg
I checked devstack log [1] and it seems that stevedore==1.4.0 was
installed due to congress
2015-04-29 11:12:16.120
Sean,
yes. It is installed multiple times but the last is congress which
installs 1.4.0. When devstack installed without congress there is no
such issue and heat works
Filip
On 04/29/2015 04:11 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/29/2015 10:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/29/2015 09:29 AM, Filip
On 04/29/2015 03:41 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'd prefer to see the scheduler filter docs be maintained in the
nova devref where they are close to the source, versioned, and
reviewed by the nova team when there are
On 2015-04-29 16:46:13 -0700 (-0700), Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
[...]
1) Project governance has moved to a big tent model [1]. The vast
majority of projects
Hi,
Nova cell has emerged for several release cycles, with the mission of
scalability. Now there are claims of Neutron cell. Maybe similar
Cinder/Ceilometer partition demands would appear in the future.
So I wander if cross-project Openstack partitioning would go into the
our sight in the near
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/29/2015 01:25 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
My take on the “where does it fit” yardstick:
Does it stand on its own and add value? Then consider it a standalone
project, *or* part of neutron if you and neutron agree that
Hi Ioy,
Sounds like an interesting topic, especially for the item c) :) Look
forward to this discussion at the summit
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:32 AM, loy wolfe loywo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Nova cell has emerged for several release cycles, with the mission of
scalability. Now there are
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, April 16th at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome to
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Yes, ml2 was created since each of the drivers used to be required to do
everything themselves and it was decided it would be far better for everyone
to share the common bits. Thats what ml2s about. Its not about
Hi,
At my point we need to fix it 6.1. As during whole lifecycle of 6.1 someone
may create own plugin for infiniband. If it's not required now, it may be
required later. Extending column in table should not be a big problem. If
we drop the feature, the documentation should be updated accordingly.
Hi, Loy,
+100. Really interesting topic.
Cascading[1] has holistic thinking on the question list, and one cross project
topic is just submitted yesterday:
a) Any other value for partitioning besides scalability? e.g. fault domain
isolation, heterogeneous integration...
Sure, each cascaded
Thanks for Lingxian!
2015-04-29 20:31 GMT+08:00 Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.com:
hi, hao,
First, thanks for your bug and patch, I thinks it's really a problem
we should fix. I forward your suggestions about the workaround with
Dan Smith and Joe Gordon.to get more feedback.
1.Raise
Hi all.
I'm interesting in L2 gateway project.
For a testing purpose I've installed a devstack in a VirtualBox
environment. My objective is to use L2 gateway to connect a virtual machine
in openstack with a virtual machine in Virtualbox.
I created a virtual gateway with neutron-l2gw
86 matches
Mail list logo
