Hi all
can anybody please take a look on my PR[1]?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189564/
Thanks Limor
-Original Message-
From: BORTMAN, Limor (Limor) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 2:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re
Hi,
The current maintainer of suds in Debian sent bug reports against all
packages depending on it. We would like to get rid of suds completely.
See:
https://bugs.debian.org/788080
https://bugs.debian.org/788081
https://bugs.debian.org/788083
https://bugs.debian.org/788085
https://bugs.debian.or
Hi,
Shouldn't we move to use mock instead ? If mox3 is supported and active,
why would we recommend to use mock ?
Jordan
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Davanum Srinivas
wrote:
> Oslo folks, everyone,
>
> mox3 needs to be maintained since some of our projects use it and we
> have it in our gl
I've just done another run of abandons as a pre-cursor to the spec
review day this Friday. I'd suggest if you have a spec which has been
sitting with unresolved review comments for a fair while taking a look
at those before Friday would be a good idea.
Cheers,
Michael
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:10
Jay Pipes wrote:
> [...]
> = Packaging tags should be release-specific, or they will be wrong =
>
> For these packaging tags, the release must be part of the tag itself,
> otherwise the information it denotes would be indeterminate.
>
> As an example, suppose you have a tag that looks like this:
There's only one cinder driver using it (nimble storage), and it seems to
be using only very basic features. There are half a dozen suds forks on
pipi, or there's pisimplesoap that the debian maintainer recommends. None
of the above are currently packaged for Ubuntu that I can see, so can
anybody i
Hi,
Le 10/06/2015 22:17, Davanum Srinivas a écrit :
Oslo folks, everyone,
mox3 needs to be maintained since some of our projects use it and we
have it in our global requirements.
Here's the proposal from Doug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190330/
Why not only creating a project on Githu
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Neil and others,
>
> I was thinking about introducing libvirt-network as a new vif type to
> nova. It can be used when Neutron prepares a libvirt network for
> attaching guests.
>
> Would you see any general concerns
Salvatore, thanks for the info, will try to review as soon as possible. Hope we
get consistent implementation.
From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:51 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
On 06/02/2015 01:39 PM, Alexandre Levine wrote:
> Thank you Nikola.
>
> We'll be adding the required tickets and will follow your reviews,
> however the person working primarily on this subject (Feodor Tersin) is
> out for his vacation for a couple of weeks so some of our responses
> might be dela
Ian, Neil, thanks for your input!
> There may be a set of races you need to deal with, too - what happens
if
> > Nova starts a VM attached to a Neutron network binding that has yet
to
> > be set up? Neutron doesn't (well, technically, shouldn't be
expected
> > to) do things instantaneously on a c
no worries... can't speak for that Dolph fellow though :)
i think it's good to understand/learn different testing/benchmarking
strategies.
cheers,
gord
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:34:57 +1200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [openstack-de
Hi Stackers,
I know that I can add metadata information (Key - Value parameters) to a VM
through 'nova boot' command.
But, I didn't find the facility through Harizon pages. Does anybody know
whether the feature is available through Openstack Dashboard?
Please let me know.
Regards,
Srikanth.
___
Hi, all.
I create a vm and it's neutron port's mac address is "fa:16:3e:3f:02:ff". I see
"fa:16:3e:3f:02:ff" inside vm when I run "ifconfig eth0". Why does vm's tap
device's mac address is "fe:16:3e:3f:02:ff"? Why different between neutron
port's mac address and tap device's mac address? Does li
Yes, that's the official position - "Avoid mox, use mock, worst case
use mox3 for existing"
-- dims
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jordan Pittier
wrote:
> Hi,
> Shouldn't we move to use mock instead ? If mox3 is supported and active, why
> would we recommend to use mock ?
>
> Jordan
>
> On Wed
Victor,
Monty had a github repo, that's where we are starting from. The idea
is to rely on our day to day tools here in the openstack ecosystem to
maintain the project. If one of the original authors shows up, we'll
see what we can do. Given that the code is Apache License 2.0, we are
ok to pick t
Thomas,
oslo.vmware (master) moved to suds-jurko for both python2 and python3.
we deleted references in nova and other places directly to suds and
rely on transitively loading the suds-jurko specified from
oslo.vmware. cinder (master) has a reference to suds-jurko as well.
-- dims
On Thu, Jun 11
+1
On 6/10/15, 10:11 PM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote:
>Folks,
>
>As the Neutron L3 Lieutenant [1] under the PTL, Kyle, I'd like to
>propose Brian Haley as a member of the Neutron L3 core reviewer team.
>Brian has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing expertise
>particularly in IPv6, iptables,
On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> As discussed in the Liberty Design Summit "Moving apps to Python 3"
> cross-project workshop, the way forward in the near future is to
> switch to the pure-python PyMySQL library as a default.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-cross-pr
Hi,
We have merged the spec that describes the priorities for the Liberty
release, as discussed at the summit:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/priorities/liberty-priorities.html
The tracking of spec and code reviews for these is happening in the
usual etherpad:
https://etherpad.op
On 6 June 2015 at 11:16, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:47:31AM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So in the interests of filling up your inbox yet further...
>>
>> We have lots of etherpads from the summit:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Liberty/Ether
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 09:30 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> It seems the main reason for your new proposal is to deal with
> the fact that on migration, you need to specify a different
> NIC name in the XML. This is not particularly difficult - Nova
> already has code for dealing with pdating t
On 11/06/15 10:47, changzhi wrote:
Hi, all.
I create a vm and it's neutron port's mac address is
"fa:16:3e:3f:02:ff". I see "fa:16:3e:3f:02:ff" inside vm when I run
"ifconfig eth0". Why does vm's tap device's mac address is
"fe:16:3e:3f:02:ff"? Why different between neutron port's mac address
and
Yesterday we landed the infrastructure for Grenade external plugins -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185050/
The first user of this is the Heat project, with a patch that's nearly
ready to land (still sorting out an issue because heat's cli commands
aren't console entry points) - https://review.
> On Thursday, 11 June 2015, 12:00:46, Neil Jerram
> wrote:
> > On 11/06/15 10:47, changzhi wrote:
>> Hi, all.
>> I create a vm and it's neutron port's mac address is
>> "fa:16:3e:3f:02:ff". I see "fa:16:3e:3f:02:ff" inside
> vm when I run
>> "ifconfig eth0". Why does vm's tap device's mac a
+1 for the thread, I would also like to hear from Mirantis on this.
The Fork on fuel/puppet has been actively seen patching and
consolidation.It seems like parallel effort why not merge it.
regards
/sanjay
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before reading this e-m
Following feedback for increasing working group participation from
Vancouver summit[1] and discussions in the weekly meetings[2], we have
decided to move the Wednesday working group meeting times and reduce their
frequency. The Monday Office Hours meetings will remain unchanged.
The options for mo
Hi Carl et al.,
I see from [1] that L3 routed network segments are on the Neutron L3
subteam's roadmap for Liberty, and I wanted to say that I'm very
interested in this work, and - if there isn't someone else already -
happy to take the lead on making it happen.
I'm aware already of several
On 06/11/2015 01:16 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
But again - where in OpenStack does this matter the slightest?
Precisely. I can't think of a single case where we are iterating over
anywhere near the number of dictionary items that we would see any
impact whatsoever.
Best,
-jay
__
Greetings,
I'm reaching out to our puppet community looking for help on creating
Zaqar's puppet manifests. We've started doing lots of work to help the
community adopt Zaqar and it'd be a shame to get at the end of the
road without having OPs friendly deployment tools.
I tried to work on this my
On 06/11/2015 09:02 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 01:16 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> But again - where in OpenStack does this matter the slightest?
>
> Precisely. I can't think of a single case where we are iterating over
> anywhere near the number of dictionary items that we would see any
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Yesterday we landed the infrastructure for Grenade external plugins -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185050/
>
> The first user of this is the Heat project, with a patch that's nearly
> ready to land (still sorting out an issue because heat
Hello,
Is it possible to have named parameters on rule's left side, for example:
1. predeploy_modify(eid,oid,"add_property",5, name="image", value=pvalue)
:- Glancev2:images(name=pvalue,...)
2. predeploy_modify(eid,oid,"add_object", 10, type="monitoring",
port=8190, path="/aa
Hi, I know that neutron port's mac address was generated by neutron.conf and
default value is "fa:16:3e" which from base_mac configuration. I don't know how
the tap device's mac address generates and why tap device mac address was
"fe:16:3e:xxx". I think that tap device mac address was generated
Hey,
On 06/11/2015 09:29 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm reaching out to our puppet community looking for help on creating
> Zaqar's puppet manifests. We've started doing lots of work to help the
> community adopt Zaqar and it'd be a shame to get at the end of the
> road without ha
Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'm reaching out to our puppet community looking for help on creating
Zaqar's puppet manifests. We've started doing lots of work to help the
community adopt Zaqar and it'd be a shame to get at the end of the
road without having OPs friendly deployment tools.
I t
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:54:54PM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 09:30 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > It seems the main reason for your new proposal is to deal with
> > the fact that on migration, you need to specify a different
> > NIC name in the XML. This is no
On 11/06/15 09:38, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Sean Dague mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yesterday we landed the infrastructure for Grenade external plugins -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185050/
The first user of this is the Heat project, with a patch t
Hi Folks,
As we have discussed in the last Keystone meeting, we created an etherpad
with the alternatives to solve this problem:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/reseller-project-token
We have also decided to take a vote to choose the best option in the next
Keystone Meeting (#openstack-meeting -
On 6/10/15 11:48 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
tl;dr *.iteritems() is faster and more memory efficient than .items()
in python2*
Using xrange() in python2 instead of range() because it's more memory
efficient and consistent between python 2 and 3...
# xrange() + .items()
python -m timeit -n 20
Hi Radek,
1. You can't use column references on any table except those created by a
datasource, mainly because Congress doesn't know the name of the columns
for those tables. We've kicked around the idea of letting policy-writers
declare the column names of any table, but it's trickier than it so
On 11/06/15 06:53 -0700, Richard Raseley wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'm reaching out to our puppet community looking for help on creating
Zaqar's puppet manifests. We've started doing lots of work to help the
community adopt Zaqar and it'd be a shame to get at the end of the
road w
> it is just me, or are these differences pretty negligible considering
> this is the "1 million item dictionary", which in itself is a unicorn
> in openstack code or really most code anywhere?
>
> as was stated before, if we have million-item dictionaries floating
> around, that code has prob
Hi Emilien,
I can see why you might be unhappy with Fuel's actions with regards to
the OpenStack Puppet modules. You could make this argument about many
components in Fuel. The heart of the matter is that we bundle the
upstream OpenStack Puppet modules with all the other modules,
developed both up
As one of the Lieutenants [1] for the API and DB areas under the PTL, I would
like to propose Ann Kamyshnikova as a member of the Neutron API and DB core
reviewer team.
Ann has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing expertise particularly
in database matters. She has also worked with and
On 2015-06-11 07:51:55 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote:
[...]
> I still stand by my opinion (as voiced in Vancouver) that for such
> one-off things (that contributors are not likely to repeat over
> and over again) it might make sense to have -infra simply *do*
> them[3].
[...]
To reiterate my
On 6/5/2015 4:47 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
Hi,
So in the interests of filling up your inbox yet further...
We have lots of etherpads from the summit:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Liberty/Etherpads#Nova
I have extracted all the action items here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/
Hi,
Le 10/06/2015 02:15, Robert Collins a écrit :
python2.7 -m timeit -s 'd=dict(enumerate(range(100)))' 'for i in
d.items(): pass'
10 loops, best of 3: 76.6 msec per loop
python2.7 -m timeit -s 'd=dict(enumerate(range(100)))' 'for i in
d.iteritems(): pass'
100 loops, best of 3: 22.6
I could use some help with setting up git-review in a slightly unfriendly
firewall situation.
I'm trying to set up git-review on my CentOS7 VM, and our firewall blocks the
non-standard ssh port. I'm following the instructions at
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#accessing-
+1 to Ann !
On 6/11/15 10:34 AM, Henry Gessau wrote:
As one of the Lieutenants [1] for the API and DB areas under the PTL, I would
like to propose Ann Kamyshnikova as a member of the Neutron API and DB core
reviewer team.
Ann has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing expertise partic
In our environment we're using SOCKS proxy to bypass firewall. Maybe it's an
option for you? I just execute tsocks git-review instead of plain git-review
and it seem to work.
I've just tried solution you've mentioned and it doesn't help in my case.
> -Original Message-
> From: KARR, DAV
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-06-11 05:58:44 -0400:
> Victor,
>
> Monty had a github repo, that's where we are starting from. The idea
> is to rely on our day to day tools here in the openstack ecosystem to
> maintain the project. If one of the original authors shows up,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:02:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:54:54PM +0200, Andreas Scheuring wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 09:30 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > > It seems the main reason for your new proposal is to deal with
> > > the fact that on
Hi Tim,
Thanks for clarifications.
Ad 4) I saw dictionary for key-name tuples in action-execution API
Ad 5) It is backup plan ☺ to have sufficient number of columns in the
predeploy_modification table, so it won’t be readable, but it will work. My
original intention is to use named paramete
Daniel, thanks a lot for your input! Please see my novel below ;)
> I could have sworn I've previously reviewed patches which dealt with
> NIC device naming changes across migration, but I can't find them
> now. Did you ever submit patches which tried to fix this, or am I
> perhaps thinking of som
Sean had a really good point when he mentioned that the Developers know
what need to be enforced, and I think this is why he suggested that the
base policy implementation be in Python code, not the policy JSON DSL.
The main thrust of the dynamic policy has been to get the role-to-api
assignmen
Emilien Macchi writes:
> On my side, I can take care of 1/ make sure the repo is on Stackforge
> (for start, then it will move under OpenStack namespace once done) 2/
> help in unit/functional testing (rspec, beaker).
If the PuppetOpenStack project will be adopting this, then we can just
go ahea
hi,
for those interested, we have a doodle up for possible dates to host a midcycle
meetup: doodle.com/64b5x9q4kkmxx4eq
some conditions to assume:
- it will be 3-4 days
- possible host sites include but are not limited to: dublin, berlin, paris, or
montreal
please vote ASAP so we can plan appr
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> As one of the Lieutenants [1] for the API and DB areas under the PTL, I
> would
> like to propose Ann Kamyshnikova as a member of the Neutron API and DB core
> reviewer team.
>
> Ann has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing experti
Maybe this helps (taken from [1])
"Actually there is one way that the MAC address of the tap device
affects
proper operation of guest networking - if you happen to set the tap
device's MAC identical to the MAC used by the guest, you will get errors
from the kernel similar to this:
kernel: vnet
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, 18:09 KARR, DAVID wrote:
I could use some help with setting up git-review in a slightly unfriendly
firewall situation.
I'm trying to set up git-review on my CentOS7 VM, and our firewall blocks
the non-standard ssh port. I'm following the instructions at
http://docs.opensta
Dear Cinder team,
Sorry if this message appears duplicated to you. I'd like to kindly
request re-integration of Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Cinder driver to 2
branches: master and stable/kilo:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/178319
The iSCSI CI has been working stably since 6/8, and the patchset is
Neil,
I'm very glad to here of your interest. I have been talking with Kyle
Mestery about the rfe you mention [1] since the day he filed it. It
relates to a blueprint that I have been trying to get traction on [2]
in various forms for a while [*].
The rfe talks about attaching VMs directly to t
+1!
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> As one of the Lieutenants [1] for the API and DB areas under the PTL, I would
> like to propose Ann Kamyshnikova as a member of the Neutron API and DB core
> reviewer team.
>
> Ann has been a long time contributor in Neutron showing exper
It is not. :/
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Srikanth Kumar Lingala [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 2:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [openstack-dev] Adding metadata to VM through Horizon
Hi Stackers,
I know that I can add
Thanks for replying.
% git review -vs
2015-06-11 09:30:38.396076 Running: git log --color=never --oneline HEAD^1..HEAD
2015-06-11 09:30:38.399021 Running: git remote
2015-06-11 09:30:38.401033 Running: git config --get gitreview.username
No remote set, testing
ssh://[email protected]:29
Hi can anyone provide a link to today's irc meeting logs?
Looking at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ I cannot see a
Neutron_Service_Chaining_meeting directory
Are the logs being stored in
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/ ?
If so the logs for today's meeting
On 5 June 2015 at 10:50, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 4 June 2015 at 12:54, John Garbutt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a regular Nova project meeting with alternating times, as
>> described here:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova
>>
>> I will lean towards no change of the times, given we
The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure:
contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability
on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with
administrative access). Read all about it here:
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/proj
Few more places which can trigger inconsistent behaviour.
-
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/kilo/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/services.py#L44
-
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/kilo/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/hypervisors.py#L98
-
https://github.com/openst
James E. Blair wrote:
If the PuppetOpenStack project will be adopting this, then we can just
go ahead and start it in openstack/. You can create the project-config
change that way, and then adjust the list of repos in the governance
repository later (prior TC approval is not needed for trivial r
I wasn’t on your list, but I’m thinking positive thoughts, that rhyme with
“+1”. Ann’s db reviews are always extremely helpful.
doug
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
>
> +1!
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>> As one of the Lieutenants [1] for the
+1
On 11 June 2015 at 09:27, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> +1!
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> > As one of the Lieutenants [1] for the API and DB areas under the PTL, I
> would
> > like to propose Ann Kamyshnikova as a member of the Neutron API and DB
> core
> > reviewer team
Replying to openstack-dev ML, which is where this question belongs.
On 06/11/2015 11:10 AM, Silvia Fichera wrote:
Hi all,
I have to add a table to Nova DB (I will populated it statically by now).
I found this post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19424901/how-to-add-a-table-in-nova-database-o
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 11 June 2015 at 17:16, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>
> > This test conflates setup and execution. Better like my example,
> ...
>
> Just had it pointed out to me that I've let my inner asshole out again
> - sorry. I'm going to step away fr
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 16:42 +, KARR, DAVID wrote:
> Concerning the question ‘Do you have "gerrit" remote already
> configured?’, I guess I’d have to say I don’t know. I’ve followed
> instructions for setting up my pub key, but I’m not sure exactly what
> is entailed in “gerrit remote”.
The "gi
On 6/11/15 1:39 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Robert Collins
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 11 June 2015 at 17:16, Robert Collins
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> This test conflates setup and execution. Better like my examp
On 06/11/15 at 01:17pm, Jay Pipes wrote:
Replying to openstack-dev ML, which is where this question belongs.
On 06/11/2015 11:10 AM, Silvia Fichera wrote:
Hi all,
I have to add a table to Nova DB (I will populated it statically by now).
I found this post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1942
We are excited to announce the release of:
automaton 0.2.0: Friendly state machines for python.
This release is part of the liberty release series.
With source available at:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/automaton
For more details, please see the git log history below and:
h
Do you know if you have SSH access to the outside world through the
firewall?
Did you setup a proxy? I setup 'corkscrew' under Ubuntu. After installing,
created a .ssh/config file with:
Host review.openstack.org
ProxyCommand corkscrew 80 %h %p
The proxy host is one that allows HTTP/HTTPS to
+1 : .items()
Why can't we just add six.iteritems calls case by case basis (if that
happens)? Regex substitutions for a library call don't make sense to me
on such a massive scale.
On 6/11/15 11:00 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 10/06/2015 02:15, Robert Collins a écrit :
>> python2.7 -m t
Sean,
See
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sfc_project/2015/sfc_project.2015-06-11-17.01.log.html
- Louis
From: Mooney, Sean K [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:46 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [
Hello all!
As the Lieutenant of the built-in control plane[1], I would like YAMAMOTO
Takashi to be a member of the control plane core reviewer team.
He has been extensively reviewing the entire codebase[2] and his feedback
on patches related to the reference implementation has been very useful.
T
+1
- Original Message -
> Hello all!
>
> As the Lieutenant of the built-in control plane[1], I would like YAMAMOTO
> Takashi to be a member of the control plane core reviewer team.
>
> He has been extensively reviewing the entire codebase[2] and his feedback on
> patches related to the r
+1
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Assaf Muller wrote:
> +1
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hello all!
> >
> > As the Lieutenant of the built-in control plane[1], I would like YAMAMOTO
> > Takashi to be a member of the control plane core reviewer team.
> >
> > He has been extensively revie
On 06/11/2015 01:46 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
I am firmly in the "let's use items()" camp. A 100 ms difference for
a totally not-real-world case of a dictionary 1M items in size is no
kind of rationale for the Openstack project - if someone has a
dictionary that's 1M objects in size, or even 100K,
On 06/03/2015 04:39 AM, Rui Chen wrote:
Hi all:
We have the instance action and action event for most of the
instance operations,
exclude: live-migration. In the current master code, when we do
live-migration, the
instance action is recorded, but the action event for live-migration is
lost
Top posting as this is more a response to the whole thread.
My take aways from the most excellent discussion:
* There is some benefit to iteritems in python2 when you need it.
* OpenStack does not seem to need it
- Except in places that are operating on tens of thousands of large
objects co
Hi Yuji,
This is very similar to the flow classifier which has been proposed in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177946.
Since quite some people have reviewed and given comments on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177946 and the latest version has incorporated
those comments, I would suggest t
Hi,
Currently, the Subnets in Neutron and Nova-Network only support one gateway.
For provider networks in large data centers, quite often, the architecture is
such a way that multiple gateways are configured per subnet. These multiple
gateways are typically spread across backplanes so that the p
On 06/11/15 at 02:47pm, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 06/03/2015 04:39 AM, Rui Chen wrote:
Hi all:
We have the instance action and action event for most of the
instance operations,
exclude: live-migration. In the current master code, when we do
live-migration, the
instance action is recorded, but th
Hi,
Currently, the Subnets in Neutron and Nova-Network only support one
gateway. For provider networks in large data centers, quite often, the
architecture is such a way that multiple gateways are configured per
subnet. These multiple gateways are typically spread across backplanes so
that the prod
Le 11/06/2015 18:52, Vilobh Meshram a écrit :
Few more places which can trigger inconsistent behaviour.
-
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/kilo/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/services.py#L44
-
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/kilo/nova/api/openstack/compute/co
Hi,
We introduced functional testing a few time ago with rspec-beaker.
All of our modules have tests and are supposed to work today.
As we don't want regression and maintain our modules stability and
testability, we might want to make vote beaker jobs:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190778/
It
Andrew Laski wrote:
There are many reasons a deployer may want to live-migrate instances
around: capacity planning, security patching, noisy neighbors, host
maintenance, etc... and I just don't think the user needs to know or
care that it has taken place.
They might care, insofar as live migrat
+1
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> As the Lieutenant of the built-in control plane[1], I would like YAMAMOTO
> Takashi to be a member of the control plane core reviewer team.
>
> He has been extensively reviewing the entire codebase[2] and his feedback on
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin L. Mitchell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:46 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for help getting git-review to
> work over https
>
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 16:42 +000
On 6/11/15 2:45 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 01:46 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>> I am firmly in the "let's use items()" camp. A 100 ms difference for
>> a totally not-real-world case of a dictionary 1M items in size is no
>> kind of rationale for the Openstack project - if someone has a
>>
I don’t know if ssh is general is blocked. I’ve been hearing about Corkscrew.
I guess I’ll try installing it on my CentOS7 VM. Does anyone know if this page
is accurate: http://www.confignotes.com/2013/10/corkscrew/ ?
From: Paul Michali [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015
On 2015-06-11 19:53:25 + (+), KARR, DAVID wrote:
> Ok, the output from "git remote -v" is this:
> --
> originhttps://github.com/openstack/horizon.git (fetch)
> originhttps://github.com/openstack/horizon.git (push)
> ---
>
> So there's obviously nothi
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
