Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][stable][ptl][infra] Strategic discussion regarding the future of documentation for EOL releases

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:10:49AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:20:24 +1000: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:05:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > That content will now live in the project trees. Perhaps part of marking > > > branches

Re: [openstack-dev] Tracing (all the places)

vin...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: Hello harlowja, I'm really happy to see that you are back in this `tracing` topic [and @boris-42 (too)]. We never left, haha, but ya, I can say (and probably boris would agree) that trying to get OSprofiler started and integrated somewhat 'burned' both of us

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - FFE for neutron-fwaas v2 requested

2017-08-04 12:05 GMT+09:00 Furukawa, Yushiro : > Hi PTL/all, > > So sorry for late request. As I discussed in driver's meeting, I would like > to > request an exception for 'Firewall as a Service v2' (neutron-fwaas) and > 'FWaaS v2 dashboard'

Re: [openstack-dev] VMWare Type Snapshot for Openstack 4.3

On 8/3/2017 3:16 PM, Tom Kennedy wrote: I see that this is implemented in nova(nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/server_snapshot.py) , but is not available in Horizon. I think you're looking at some forked code because that doesn't exist in upstream Nova:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:39:47AM +, witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in global > requirements. > > The current version in Pike (1.7.0) is not fully backward compatible. The > monasca exception

[openstack-dev] [neutron] - FFE for neutron-fwaas v2 requested

Hi PTL/all, So sorry for late request. As I discussed in driver's meeting, I would like to request an exception for 'Firewall as a Service v2' (neutron-fwaas) and 'FWaaS v2 dashboard' (neutron-fwaas-dashboard) for Pike. Following patches are ready for review. SPEC:

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

+1 Good job Aditi! Let's keep it up__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] remove Sripriya Seetharam from core reviewer team

Hi,   First,  thank Sripriya Seetharam for her great contribution to Tacker project. Howeverfor a long time, she cannot be reached via registered email and does not join the projectmeeting and has no review activities.   So I propose to remove Sripriya from tacker core reviewer team. And also

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]pike-3 released

Hello, Tricircle 3.4.0 (pike-3) released[1], it's time to do regression test and fix bugs, next milestone is pike-rc. [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/488904/ Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Hi Rajul, For the `agent idea`, I think it is very good. However, in OpenStack, that idea may be really hard for us. The reason is the same with what Boris think. For the sampling part, head-based sampling can be implemented in OSprofiler. For tail-based and adaptive sampling, it is another

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:07:54AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-08-03 15:03:59 +0200: > > > Actions > > --- > > > > Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a RC1 > > openstack/releases request during the week

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:26:12PM +, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) wrote: > > > On 8/1/17, 8:02 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

Bumping min version to 1.7.0 would not be a problem for Heat. There might be a few minutes breaking (to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490016) but won't affect much. 2017-08-04 2:20 GMT+08:00 Eric K : > As far as I can tell, bumping min version to 1.7.0 would

Re: [openstack-dev] Tracing (all the places)

Hello harlowja, I'm really happy to see that you are back in this `tracing` topic [and @boris-42 (too)]. Last week, we saw that Rajul proposed 02 new blueprint in OSprofiler [1] and [2]. Besides, some other blueprints are being implemented in OSprofiler such as overhead control [3] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo] FFE for python-paunch-1.5.0

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:41:21AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > Adding a subject ^^ > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > > > I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin) > [mailto:a.cha...@servionica.ru] > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 9:48 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [watcher]

[openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo] FFE for python-paunch-1.5.0

Adding a subject ^^ On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > > I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the upper > > constraints of the python-paunch library/tool in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 07:22:15PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > OK, I see. I was assuming we would just tie it to series name, and > that series name could be taken from the .gitreview file or something. > So the URL calculation would always be done locally, and we wouldn't > need any sort of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][FFE]Allow DVR for E/W while leaving N/S centralized Edit

Hi PTL/all, I would like to request an exception for inclusion of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1667877. This fix addresses providing option for the customers to configure a new agent-type for centralizing the floatingip in the absence of external network connectivity. The RFE:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][FFE] DVR support for Allowed_address_pair port that are bound to multiple ACTIVE VM ports

Hi PTL/all,I would like to request an exception for inclusion of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1583694for Pike. This fix contained two patches one for server side and the other for the agent side. The server side patch had already merged, but the agent side patch is yet to merge but

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:33:46PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update > the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. > > with uploading to tarballs, this will not work, As Jeremy pointed out this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-04 08:56:17 +1000: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:52AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo]

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the upper > constraints of the python-paunch library/tool in Pike. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490287/ > > TripleO recently switched from using paunch as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE for net-mtu-enh api extension requested

Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi PTL/all, > > I would like to request an exception for inclusion of net-mtu-enh API > extension (with

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - FFE for security-group logging requested

Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Furukawa, Yushiro < y.furukaw...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Hi Kevin(PTL)/all, > > I would like to request an exception for 'Logging feature' for Pike. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE for midonet v2 plugin removal

Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Takashi Yamamoto > wrote: > > hi, > > > > I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE for dns_domain for ports extension

Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Hi PTL/all > > I want to request an exception to include the dns_domain for ports > extension in the Pike

[openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo]

I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the upper constraints of the python-paunch library/tool in Pike. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490287/ TripleO recently switched from using paunch as a library via heat-agents to using the paunch CLI tool directly using ansible.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:52AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > > > Just to clarify:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][bifrost] Unable to Enroll Inventory

Thanks Mark for pointing me in the right direction! It turned out to be a permissions issue with the local Ansible installation. I started over with a new user (stack, passwordless sudo) and decided to use the bifrost's env-setup script, which I was not able to run unless prefaced with sudo.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Call for help with in-tree tempest scenario test failures

Thanks for those who stepped in (Armando and Slawek). We still have quite some failures that would benefit from initial log triage and fixes. If you feel like in this feature freeze time you have less things to do, helping with those scenario failures would be a good way to contribute to the

[openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Nomination

Hello! I would like to nominate myself as PTL for the Neutron project for the Queens cycle. I served as the Neutron PTL for the Pike cycle, have been a core reviewer since Kilo, and have been contributing since Havana. I have a few new goals I would like to focus on during the Queens cycle. *

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][packaging][deb] retiring Packaging Deb project

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:09:59AM -0400, Allison Randal wrote: > Hi all, > > The Debian OpenStack packagers are gathered at the annual Debian > developer event, and discussing the future of OpenStack packaging for > Debian. There's general agreement that we'd like to go ahead and package > Pike,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Hi Boris That is a point of concern. Can you please direct to any of those? Anyways, we don't have anything in place for OpenStack yet. Now, either we pick another tracing solution like Zipkin, Jaeger etc. which have their own limitations OR enhance OSProfiler. We pick the later as it's most

[openstack-dev] VMWare Type Snapshot for Openstack 4.3

All I would like to add an a new tab the the instance panel in Horizon that will allow me to manage VMWare type snapshots (take a snapshots, revert to a snapshot and delete a snapshot) .I see that this is implemented in nova(nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/server_snapshot.py) , but is

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Rajul, May I ask why you think so? Exposed by OSprofiler issues are going to be really hard to fix in current OpenStack architecture. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Rajul Kumar wrote: > Hi Boris > > Good to hear from you. > May I ask

[openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

Hi OpenStack developers, I was wondering what is the current status of the python-openstacksdk project. The Octavia team has posted some patches implementing our new Octavia v2 API [1] in the SDK, but we have not had any reviews. I have also asked some questions in #openstack-sdks with no

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Hi Boris Good to hear from you. May I ask why you think so? We do see some potential with OSProfiler for this and further objectives. Thanks Rajul On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Rajul, > > It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;) >

[openstack-dev] Tracing (all the places)

Since I think there was another thread out there around tracing I'd thought I'd send out a few others for folks that show tracing being added to multiple other popular project (interesting to read over the proposals and such). -

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Rajul, It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rajul Kumar wrote: > Hello everyone > > I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling > option for continuous tracing

[openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

Hello everyone I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling option for continuous tracing in OSProfiler. It would be really helpful to have some thoughts, ideas, comments on this from the community. Continuous tracing provides a good insight on how various transactions

[openstack-dev] [python-openstackclient][python-openstacksdk][neutron][nova] supporting resource extensions with our CLI

I think we have a gap in our OSC CLI for non-stadium plugin/driver projects (neutron plugin projects, nova driver projects) that implement RESTful resource API attribute extensions. For details, go directly to [1]. For a summary read on... For OpenStack APIs that support extensions (ex [2]),

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [docs] [training-guides] Moving from Hieroglyph for rendering slides

On 2017-08-03 16:18:31 + (+), Pančur, Matjaž wrote: [...] > We were leaning towards adopting a widely popular Reveal.js [2]. > On the downside, that probably also means that we will have to > convert slide material from RST to MD, as RST is not directly > supported. With a shrinking (Docs

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

As far as I can tell, bumping min version to 1.7.0 would not be a problem for Congress. Eric Kao On 8/3/17, 4:39 AM, "witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com" wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in >global requirements.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > ... > > b) I think that if we're going to refactor the Nova devref home page to be > a certain format, then we should really consider doing the same thing in > the other projects, because today they are all different

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] redo gate jobs only

Thanks a lot Jeremy and Andreas for the reference and the added context! On 8/3/17, 10:49 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >On 2017-08-03 08:15:36 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: >[...] >> "A patchset has to be approved to run tests in the gate pipeline. If the >> patchset

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] redo gate jobs only

On 2017-08-03 08:15:36 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: [...] > "A patchset has to be approved to run tests in the gate pipeline. If the > patchset has failed in the gate pipeline (it will have been approved to > get into the gate pipeline) a recheck will first run the check jobs and > if

[openstack-dev] [all] [ptg] Policy Sessions

One of the community goals for Queens is to move all policy into code and document it [0]. I'd like to make myself available to work with projects face-to-face if they need help at the PTG. In order to successfully plan that, we need to have an estimate of how many projects are interested in

[openstack-dev] [octavia] PTL nomination

My fellow OpenStack community, I would like to nominate myself for Octavia PTL for Queens. I am currently the PTL for the Pike release series and would like to continue helping our team provide network load balancing services for OpenStack. For those of you that do not know me, I work for

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

Greetings OpenStack community, Today's meeting started off with continued discussion about the Guided Review process that we are trying to create ahead of the Denver PTG, where we would like to incorporate such a process as part of our sessions. This has been crystallized into a document [0]

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Facilitating automation testing in TripleO UI

Hi TripleO devs, In our effort to make the TripleO UI code friendlier to automation testing[1], there is an open review[2] for which we seem to have some difficulty reaching the consensus on how best to proceed. There is already a discussion happening on the review itself, and I'd like to move it

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

Excerpts from witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com's message of 2017-08-03 16:07:45 +: > > -Original Message- > > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > > Sent: Donnerstag, 3. August 2017 15:45 > > To: openstack-dev > > Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

On 08/03/2017 04:50 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-03 16:16:12 +0200: Hi! On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Actions --- Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model

[openstack-dev] [Designate] PTL Nomination

Hi All, I would like to nominate myself as PTL for the Designate project for the Queens Cycle. I have been a developer on the project since Grizzly and served as PTL for the Mitaka, Newton and Ocata cycles. My main aim will be to build up contributors to the project, while keeping the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [training-guides] Moving from Hieroglyph for rendering slides

On Thursday, 3 August 2017 18:18:31 CEST Pančur, Matjaž wrote: > Hi all, > > Andreas filed a bug report [1] that can impact what will we use to render > slides for Upstream University and other training related slide material in > the future. We’ve already had many discussions at Training guides

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

On 8/1/17, 8:02 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: >On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 >>+: >> > This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the

[openstack-dev] [docs] [training-guides] Moving from Hieroglyph for rendering slides

Hi all, Andreas filed a bug report [1] that can impact what will we use to render slides for Upstream University and other training related slide material in the future. We’ve already had many discussions at Training guides meetings about moving to some other more actively maintained/developed

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 18:03, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-08-03 17:33:46 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: > [...] >> this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update >> the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. >> >> with uploading to tarballs,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, at 09:11 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > On 03.08.2017 00:57, Clark Boylan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. > > [...] > > > > If you have any concerns or feedback

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, at 03:04 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > hi Clark, > > Do you have any plans to update to 2.14 release which has a new polymer > based user interface? > We decided to not try and go straight to 2.14 because it requires newer java and introduces the notedb which is a fairly large

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

On 03.08.2017 00:57, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. > [...] > > If you have any concerns or feedback please let the Infra team know. > > Thank you, > Clark Does this maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

> -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 3. August 2017 15:45 > To: openstack-dev > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] > [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python- > monascaclient

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] To firewalld, or not to firewalld

Ferm DSL is nice and featureful. There's a pretty sophisticated debops ferm role at [1] allowing for pretty sophisticated rule definitions [2]. Structurally I think the most important thing is having the ability to define rules in layers based on host_vars, group_vars, etc. and have them blended

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 17:33:46 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: [...] > this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update > the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. > > with uploading to tarballs, this will not work, I think this is more about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 17:04, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][stable][ptl][infra] Strategic discussion regarding the future of documentation for EOL releases

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:20:24 +1000: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:05:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > That content will now live in the project trees. Perhaps part of marking > > branches in those repos EOL needs to include deleting the install tree > > from

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][tc] IMPORTANT upcoming change to technical elections

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2017-07-17 16:17:00 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> If you want to run or vote in upcoming elections for PTL and TC, >> make sure your Foundation Individual Membership is active and has at >> least one Email

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > > Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini change until the requirements > > > repo >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][packaging][deb] retiring Packaging Deb project

Excerpts from Allison Randal's message of 2017-08-03 10:09:59 -0400: > Hi all, > > The Debian OpenStack packagers are gathered at the annual Debian > developer event, and discussing the future of OpenStack packaging for > Debian. There's general agreement that we'd like to go ahead and package >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-03 16:16:12 +0200: > Hi! > > On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Welcome to our regular release countdown email! > > > > > > > > > Actions > > --- > > > > Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

On 08/03/2017 04:21 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/03/2017 06:13 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: I was thinking, the current "edit" in Horizon is delete-and-create, and it is there maybe just because flavor has many fields, user may want to have a new flavor but just modify one of the old flavor, so they

Re: [openstack-dev] [refstack][interop-wg] Non-candidacy for RefStack PTL

Dell - Internal Use - Confidential You've done a great job Catherine, thank you! dp From: Catherine Cuong Diep [mailto:cd...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 3:15 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org;

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

Hi! On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Actions --- Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a RC1 openstack/releases request during the week (X.0.0.0rc1), together with a stable/pike branch request.

[openstack-dev] [tc][packaging][deb] retiring Packaging Deb project

Hi all, The Debian OpenStack packagers are gathered at the annual Debian developer event, and discussing the future of OpenStack packaging for Debian. There's general agreement that we'd like to go ahead and package Pike, but also agreement that we'd like to move back to the Debian infrastructure

[openstack-dev] [QA] Queens PTL candidacy

Dear all, I’d like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the QA Program for the Queens cycle [0]. I served as PTL for QA during the Pike cycle, and I would be honoured to continue to do so in the next six months. After a few years working with the OpenStack community, I continue to find it an

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Queens PTL candidacy

Hi fellow kuryrs! I present my PTL candidacy for the Queens Cycle. We've done well in this past cycle getting close to our first release adding things like: - Kubernetes service support, - Token authentication support, - A lot of devstack improvements like multinode - pod-in-VM neutron trunk and

Re: [openstack-dev] [monasca] Stable branch for Pike

Excerpts from witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com's message of 2017-08-03 13:27:14 +: > Hello Monasca team, > > Following the Pike release schedule I would like to cut the stable branch for > Pike release early next week. We will use it to create the final release at > the end of August. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

Excerpts from witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com's message of 2017-08-03 11:39:47 +: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in global > requirements. > > The current version in Pike (1.7.0) is not fully backward compatible. The > monasca exception

[openstack-dev] [monasca] Stable branch for Pike

Hello Monasca team, Following the Pike release schedule I would like to cut the stable branch for Pike release early next week. We will use it to create the final release at the end of August. Please let me know of release-critical bugs which should be merged before. Cheers Witek

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-08-03 15:03:59 +0200: > Actions > --- > > Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a RC1 > openstack/releases request during the week (X.0.0.0rc1), together with a > stable/pike branch request. It should include

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Development Focus - Focus should be on the last Pike release-critical bugs, in order to produce the first Pike release candidates sometimes during the week. General Information --- We are at the point in the cycle

[openstack-dev] [magnum] spec for cluster federation

Hi. We've recently started looking at federating kubernetes clusters, using some of our internal Magnum clusters and others deployed in external clouds. With kubernetes 1.7 most of the functionality we need is already available. Looking forward we submitted a spec to integrate this into Magnum:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan] Queens PTL candidacy

Hi all, I would like to announce my candidacy for the Mogan PTL for the Queens cycle. Although Mogan is not an official project yet, we seek to complete the PTL election with everyone’s consensus like others. I have been the elected PTL since Mogan was an idea. I think that Mogan serves an

[openstack-dev] [elections][vitrage] Queens PTL candidacy

Hi All, I would like to announce my candidacy for the Vitrage PTL for the Queens release. I've been leading the Vitrage project development from the day it started, two years ago. During this time we have made a tremendous progress, and now we have a stable, well-known project that is running

[openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

Hello everyone, I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in global requirements. The current version in Pike (1.7.0) is not fully backward compatible. The monasca exception classes were replaced with keystoneauth exceptions, which affects heat and watcher projects if

[openstack-dev] [charms] ptl for queens

Hi All I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the OpenStack Charms project for the Queens development cycle. We've made some good progress during the Pike cycle in terms of improving documentation, with a new deployment guide in the works which should make things much easier for new

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Apply for exception to having Storwize cinder Tiramisu replication patch reviewed and merged

Hi Sean   Thanks a lot for your response.  And we will make it in Q release. Regards Xiao Qin Li Cloud Storage Solutions DevelopmentIBM China Systems & Technology Laboratory in ShanghaiEmail: lix...@cn.ibm.comTel: 86-21-609289553/F, Building 10, 399 Keyuan Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

On 08/03/2017 06:13 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > I was thinking, the current "edit" in Horizon is delete-and-create, and > it is there maybe just because > flavor has many fields, user may want to have a new flavor but just > modify one of the old flavor, so > they don't want to manually copy all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

I was thinking, the current "edit" in Horizon is delete-and-create, and it is there maybe just because flavor has many fields, user may want to have a new flavor but just modify one of the old flavor, so they don't want to manually copy all other fields. And it is the automatic delete action that

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

+1 -- Vincent FRANCOISE {P} R Engineer Network & Security {T} +33 (0) 2 56 35 88 53 {W} www.b-com.com From: ? ? (Alexander Chadin) Sent: 02 August 2017 14:47 To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

hi Clark, Do you have any plans to update to 2.14 release which has a new polymer based user interface? 2017-08-03 1:57 GMT+03:00 Clark Boylan : > Hello, > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

On 08/02/2017 10:12 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi All, > > Horizon provided the feature to allow user edit existing flavors, no > matter it is currently used by any instances or not. While Nova doesn't > provide this kind of ability, Horizon achieved this by deleting the old > flavor first and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On 08/02/2017 08:53 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-08-03 01:02:59 +0900: >>> 2017-08-03 0:52 GMT+09:00 Doug Hellmann : Excerpts from Stephen

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On 08/02/2017 03:32 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> My gut response is to say that if the example uses nova-manage or >> one of the nova service executables, then that makes sense to leave >> in the nova tree, but otherwise

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

+1__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] Recall: [Cinder] string freeze exception for VMAX driver

Walsh, Helen would like to recall the message, "[openstack-dev] [Cinder] string freeze exception for VMAX driver". __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] string freeze exception for VMAX driver

To whom it may concern, I would like to request a string freeze exception for 2 patches that are on the merge queue for Pike. 1. VMAX driver - align VMAX QOS settings with front end (CI Passed) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484885/7/cinder/volume/drivers/dell_emc/vmax/rest.py line

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

Yes tony I was intended to refer to the official procedure for the self-nomination period, which would be 5 buiz days. Thx for the offer to help with the civs poll :) On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Zhipeng

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Team, > > Even though Cyborg is not an official project yet, however with an ultimate > goal of becoming one it is necessary to conduct our project governance with > compliance of OpenStack community general requirements/culture.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > More on the election procedure, if there are more than one candidate, we > will use http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/ to conduct our election. If there is > only one candidate, then no election will be held the candidate will be >

  1   2   >