Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [release][infra] Supporting rget in our release process

On 7/29/19 5:52 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, at 1:52 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, A colleague at Red Hat is working on an effort to record signatures of release artifacts. Essentially it's a way to help users verify release artifacts (or determine if they have been

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Continued discussion of Winterscale naming

On 08/21/2018 01:33 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: The Infra team has been brainstorming and collecting feedback in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-services-naming as to what actual name/domain the Winterscale effort will use. If you've not been following along, the earlier discussions can be

[OpenStack-Infra] Status update on puppetmaster/bridge cutover

Hey everybody! puppet is no longer being run from puppetmaster - it has been turned off, almost certainly for good. The puppetmaster server is still around while we finish transitioning, but bridge.openstack.org is now the new hotness. We tested running the new ansible base.yaml playbook

[OpenStack-Infra] replacing puppetmaster.o.o underway - interim procedures for hiera secrets

Hey all! (This really only concerns infra-root folks, so feel free to skip otherwise) As part of the update configuration management effort, we have spun up a new host to replace puppetmaster.openstack.org. It is called bridge.openstack.org. It's running Ubuntu Bionic and has Ansible 2.6

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] What's the future for git-review?

On 07/05/2018 02:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-07-05 17:34:59 +: On 2018-07-05 13:23:57 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] I wonder if it would be useful to move that step of determining the topic out to a hook, so that project-specific

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] What's the future for git-review?

On 07/05/2018 12:46 PM, Andrew Grimberg wrote: On 07/05/2018 09:13 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-07-05 09:03:44 -0700 (-0700), Andrew Grimberg wrote: On 07/04/2018 06:57 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] For that matter, setting the topic based on the local branch name could also get

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [shade] Get server public/private ip failed on VLAN environment

On 06/20/2018 11:16 PM, xudan (N) wrote: Hi all, I am from OPNFV community and working on Dovetail project. Hi! I have a question about shade getting server public ipv4 ip and private ipv4 ip with VLAN environment. The private ip I got is None and the public ip I got is not the floating

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul roadmap

On 11/21/2017 09:08 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:47:20PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, At the PTG we brainstormed a road map for Zuul once we completed the infra cutover. I think we're in a position now that we can get back to thinking about this, so I've (slightly)

[OpenStack-Infra] [zuul] Change publication interface to be directories on node, not executor

Hey everybody! I'd like to make a proposal for changing how we do logs/artifacts/docs collection based on the last few weeks/months of writing things- and of having to explain to people how to structure build and publish jobs over the last couple of weeks. tl;dr - I'd like to change the

[OpenStack-Infra] Zuul v3 Job migration - input needed

Heya, I started working on the Zuul Migration script - largely because we're starting to have more mappings of old job to new job than I can keep in my head and I wanted to be able to write them down as we make them. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:zuul-v3-migration I doesn't do much

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul v3: Giant pile of thoughts around zuul-web things

On 07/26/2017 03:28 PM, David Moreau Simard wrote: Hi, A bit out of my comfort zone for the content of your giant pile of thoughts, but I'll jump on this bit: We have a desire to add something that knows how to render the job-output.json in some nice ways. The next things on my plate for

[OpenStack-Infra] Zuul v3: Giant pile of thoughts around zuul-web things

Based on having written the puppet to support the apache proxying to both github/status pages and the console-streaming, I believe we should accelerate moving the functions from the old webapp to the new zuul-web. While the apache proxy layer keeps the moves from breaking our end-users, doing

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

On 06/27/2017 01:03 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 06/12/2017 03:17 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> writes: Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-06-09 13:11:00 -0700: Clark Boylan <cboy...@sapwetik.org> writes: I'm wary of this simply because it look

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

On 06/12/2017 03:17 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Clint Byrum writes: Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-06-09 13:11:00 -0700: Clark Boylan writes: I'm wary of this simply because it looks a lot like repeating OpenStack's (now failed) decision to

[OpenStack-Infra] [zuul] Priorities, backlog and awesome new future things

Hey all, We have an important balancing act going on right now, and we also have an increasing number of lovely humans playing in our playbox. (hello lovely people!) The balancing act is that we're in the final push of getting this bad boy rolled out, and we're having to keep a tight focus

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

erything now" :) This makes me think it might be useful to have a document with a list of backlog of "these are all good ideas that we all agree should be here, but also that we're purposely not doing today". I'll send a follow up email about that. On June 9, 2017 4:22 pm, Mo

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

On 06/09/2017 03:09 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 06/09/2017 02:35 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Fri, Jun 9, 2017, at 09:22 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey all! Tristan has recently pushed up some patches related to providing a Web Dashboard for Zuul. We have a web app for nodepool. We already have

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

On 06/09/2017 02:35 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Fri, Jun 9, 2017, at 09:22 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey all! Tristan has recently pushed up some patches related to providing a Web Dashboard for Zuul. We have a web app for nodepool. We already have the Github webhook receiver which is inbound

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

On 06/09/2017 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-06-09 11:22:03 -0500: Hey all! Tristan has recently pushed up some patches related to providing a Web Dashboard for Zuul. We have a web app for nodepool. We already have the Github webhook receiver which is

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

On 06/09/2017 11:41 AM, James E. Blair wrote: Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> writes: We should use aiohttp with no extra REST framework. Meaning: - aiohttp serving REST and websocket streaming in a scale-out tier - talking RPC to the scheduler over gear or zk - possible in-p

[OpenStack-Infra] On the subject of HTTP interfaces and Zuul

Hey all! Tristan has recently pushed up some patches related to providing a Web Dashboard for Zuul. We have a web app for nodepool. We already have the Github webhook receiver which is inbound http. There have been folks who have expressed interest in adding active-REST abilities for

[OpenStack-Infra] Scale Out Zuul Ingestors Spec

Hey all, I just pushed up a spec about an approach for Scale-out event ingestors for Zuul. https://review.openstack.org/471158 This is mostly based on having done a restart the other day, being irked that there was a user-facing impact of that, and then spending a Saturday brainstorming

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Nodepool v3 shim for talking to v2 zuul

On 01/13/2017 11:32 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, at 08:18 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> Part of the rollout plan for zuul v3 involves rolling out the new >> zookpeer-based nodepool launchers before we roll out zuul v3 itself. &

[OpenStack-Infra] Nodepool v3 shim for talking to v2 zuul

Hey all, Part of the rollout plan for zuul v3 involves rolling out the new zookpeer-based nodepool launchers before we roll out zuul v3 itself. We've mostly spoken about this in a hand-wavy mannr so far, but I think we may have a fairly simple answer of how to approach it - so I'd like to propose

[OpenStack-Infra] [shade] list_ and search_ and client vs. server-side filtering

Hey all, Jordan wrote a patch which has led to a fairly lengthy review message from me: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393884 It's beefy enough that it's worth raising for people who aren't necessarily following review notes. tl;dr ... * API compat trumps efficiency for the old methods. *

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [kolla] request deletion of EOL branches

On 03/26/2016 01:39 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, Requesting deletion of Kolla branches Kilo, Juno, and Icehouse. This was approved by the core reviewer team via vote [1] and the appropriate –eol tags have been applied to the mentioned branches. Please leave liberty and mitaka

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Borrowing OpenStack Infrastructure tools

On 03/06/2016 12:10 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: I am a big fan of Openstack CI. I used it when I was contributing to Solum project. Currently at work we have a requirement to find a CI solution. Since I know Openstack CI is comprehensive and stable, I thought I would re-use it. Why to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Shade]

On 02/21/2016 09:42 AM, David Cramer wrote: Hi there, We've encountered an edge case where Shade (via the os_server module in Ansible 2.0) fails because the call to v2.0/floatingips/{id} is not returning a status. We have tenants in different data centers. It is only in one of these that we

[OpenStack-Infra] Status of Puppet Apply

Hey all, We're in the home stretch and are pretty much ready to go except for getting some reviews on: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:puppet-apply+status:open,n,z I made an etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/magical-puppet-apply To track getting it rolled out. ** Current

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Questions with respect to packaging

On 04/29/2015 02:19 AM, Steve Kowalik wrote: On 29/04/15 04:41, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/28/2015 02:02 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Steve Kowalik wrote: [snip] * Decide if we host full upstream sources, or if we point at a remote site with tarballs

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] PuppetBoard

On 04/26/2015 08:08 PM, Spencer Krum wrote: Hi All, The primary maintainer of puppetboard is stepping aside: https://github.com/puppet-community/puppetboard/issues/132. We use puppetboard to display facts from machines and reports of puppet runs. We can expect to continue to have this need

[OpenStack-Infra] A proposal to use phabricator for issue tracking

As a follow up to my previous email about thinking about ceasing to use storyboard, I have done some work towards investigating using phabricator. phabricator came out of Facebook, but has been spun out completely and is now managed as an Open Source project. There is a company that has formed

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A proposal to use phabricator for issue tracking

On 04/03/2015 11:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 04/03/2015 11:00 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: As a follow up to my previous email about thinking about ceasing to use storyboard, I have done some work towards investigating using phabricator. phabricator came out of Facebook, but has been spun out

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A proposal to use phabricator for issue tracking

On 04/03/2015 12:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-04-03 11:54:00 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: [...] 2) is there an event stream of changes (either real time or rss) that can be consumed by said tools? Having the change stream would be really helpful. Which relates to a feature

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A proposal to use phabricator for issue tracking

On 04/03/2015 11:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: As a follow up to my previous email about thinking about ceasing to use storyboard, I have done some work towards investigating using phabricator. [...] For the record, I'll repost some of the analysis I did for mordred

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Better Corporate CLA management

On 03/23/2015 04:15 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Jimmy Mcarthur wrote: Hi all - The OpenStack Foundation has already worked up at least a portion of this solution by allowing one or more users with an OpenStackID to be set as a CCLA Admin for their

[OpenStack-Infra] Biting the bullet on issue tracking

Hi everybody, First, some background: A year and a half ago, Infra started down the road of of writing a replacement for the pieces of Launchpad that OpenStack continues to use. There were several reasons, but notable amongst them are: - Desire to use the forthcoming openstackid OpenID/Oauth as

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] We're going to make a cloud, it needs a name

On 03/05/2015 05:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: And the results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-W6R6K2T7/ It would appear that 'infra cloud' is far enough ahead of the others, including a wide margin in front of discuss further that I think we can declare it the winner of this very

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Thoughts on evolving Zuul

On 02/26/2015 05:41 PM, Zaro wrote: Thanks Jim. This makes a lot of sense and will hopefully make things simpler and more robust. Just a few questions: I am not Jim - but I'm going to answer anyway ... 1. It looks like zuul can request a specific set of nodes for a job. Do you envision

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Cross-Repo Dependencies in Zuul

On 02/10/2015 05:26 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: James, Awesome! Amazing! You guys rock!=) Thanks Boris! Just trying to keep up with all of the awesome developers we have out there! On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:26 AM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi, We have added support for

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Nominating Elizabeth K. Joseph for infra-core and root

On 01/30/2015 12:20 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure: contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with administrative access). Read all about it

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Stackforge projects: Manila Image Project and licensing considerations

On 01/14/2015 07:28 AM, Csaba Henk wrote: Hi, I hope I'm addressing the right list -- if not, please point me where it's appropriate. We (Manila developers) plan to start a new side-project that would be hosted on Stackforge. It's tentatively named Manila Image Project, although it would

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Chicken and Egg patches

Hi! We do not land such patches. We make sure that there is a sequence in which they can land. We have actually come to realize that this is a feature not a bug, as it is important for people doing CD. Monty On Nov 17, 2014 7:36 AM, Spencer Krum krum.spen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I help

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Chicken and Egg patches

I'm on my phone and will follow up when I am not. Tl;Dr,they have a valid use case we don't have upstream that bears thought On Nov 17, 2014 3:11 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Spencer Krum's message of 2014-11-17 02:36:20 -0800: Hi, I help run a clone of infra

[OpenStack-Infra] Snippets for infra manual

Hey all, In the infra-manual talk, we discussed the possibility of having a collection of tasks separate from roles where those are used, and talked about how we were going to maybe need to write some sphinx support. Turns out ... sphinx can already do this right now. If you have two files:

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Setting the bar higher for stackforge

On 09/15/2014 10:25 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote: From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:05 PM On 2014-09-15 16:47:13 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote: It's the Corporate CLA that's needed. The companies that want to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] mysqlconnector and pypi vs oracle

? On 12 July 2014 15:43, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: No. Same license. On Jul 11, 2014 10:23 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Wont the licence be a problem? On 12 Jul 2014 05:59, Angus Lees gusl...@gmail.com wrote: Id like to switch to using

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] mysqlconnector and pypi vs oracle

I have talked with Oracle about publishing this non external, but they were not immediately receptive. On Jul 10, 2014 10:55 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: You should probably bring this up on the main -dev mailing list. Not everyone involved in requirements management

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] .. OpenStack Summit in Paris

Hey! I expect pretty much all of us to be there. I very much look forward to spending time with you in person. I doubt we'll have an adjacent hackathon ... The summit itself is usually all we can handle. :) On Jun 27, 2014 8:03 AM, Antoine Musso has...@free.fr wrote: Le 27/06/2014 01:03,

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] opportunity for convergence with jjb, turbo-hipster and ansible

On 06/27/2014 09:04 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-06-27 14:40:44 +0200 (+0200), Antoine Musso wrote: [...] I was wondering whether yet another DSL could be build on top of JJB / Zuul. JJB would provide the templates, macro etc and Zuul the pipelines and templates. The new DSL would let

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Introducing Richard Jones

I'm going to molest you On Jun 22, 2014 7:23 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: Hey peoples, So, I've had a bit of a win and hired the primary author of pypi to work on OpenStack stuff for Rackspace Australia. His first day is today. I know we've had some pain with pypi in the

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Status of check-tempest-dsvm-f20 job

On 06/18/2014 03:10 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: We are working on Trusty honest (I just got nodepool to build our first Trusty images), and that solves this problem. There is a bigger underlying issue in that projects should not depend on things like mongodb versions which are not available on the

[OpenStack-Infra] opportunity for convergence with jjb, turbo-hipster and ansible

Hey all, I spoke to a few people about this on IRC, and I think it's just barely not crazy enough to commit it to email. Basically, I've been doing a little bit of hacking on ansible playbooks for some of the little sysadmin tasks we have which aren't really puppet-sensible. As part of that, I

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] moving Activity Board fully under openstack-ci

On 06/02/2014 06:32 PM, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 14:31 -0700, Stefano Maffulli wrote: Hello folks I wanted to get your thoughts on the idea to move the whole Bitergia grimoire engine, scripts, database, etc to the openstack common infrastructure. I'm sure

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zanata demo server

On 05/26/2014 05:48 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 05/26/2014 07:10 PM, Carlos Munoz wrote: Hi All, My name is Carlos Munoz and I am the team supervisor for the Zanata (zanata.org) team in Brisbane, Australia. After attending OpenStack summit in Atlanta a few weeks back, it was decided that a

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul - recheck no bug not working

It also looks like there may be an extra leading space in front of no bug On May 24, 2014 1:41 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph l...@princessleia.com wrote: On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:03 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote: Hi - With  Zuul 2.0.0.163,

[OpenStack-Infra] Uninstalling unused jenkins plugins

Hey all! I was just looking at Khai's patch to make sure the right jenkins plugins were installed on jenkins-dev - and it reminded me that we have a bunch of now-unused plugins installed - and that maybe we should uninstall them. Specifically: bazaar github-api github htmlpublisher

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul API

On 03/25/2014 08:25 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: Hi Miguel, My recommendation would be to create a draft blueprint or two around the larger changes so that you don't spend too much time on something to have it rejected. Specifically I'm unsure about how your strategy to change configuration

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] puppetboard is live

On 03/23/2014 08:26 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Thanks to nibalizer's work - http://puppetdb.openstack.org is now a thing. Several of our nodes were not reporting in - this was due to broken puppet - fixes for which have been merged already. So I think we can consider it already useful. A few

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] propose-translation-jobs failing since today

Yes. I think we should revert the pbr = 1.4 patch. On Mar 19, 2014 11:57 AM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: I see many propose-translation-jobs failing today that worked yesterday, for example: https://jenkins.openstack.org/job/cinder-propose-translation-update/lastBuild/console

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] propose-translation-jobs failing since today

On 03/19/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 03/19/2014 10:40 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 03/19/2014 05:07 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: Yes. I think we should revert the pbr = 1.4 patch. Ok - I looked further. The proposal slave still at apt-installed pip on it. We have an unmerged puppet

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Announcing a new infrastructure project, Vinz code review system.

On 03/17/2014 08:07 PM, Philip Schwartz wrote: On 3/17/14, 5:33 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Have you considered other open source efforts to build upon, like phabricator? That came up on IRC a few nights ago by Ryan Lane. And it seems like a lot of mileage could be gained from

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Announcing a new infrastructure project, Vinz code review system.

On 03/18/2014 06:55 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 03/18/2014 06:04 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Monty Taylor wrote: Which means, although I tend to have a side which agrees with Clint and Clark that replacing gerrit is a bit of a potential giant rathole - I also think that making a scalable thing

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka

I agree. Solly - in addition to potentially 'adopting' noVNC - or as a parallel train of thought ... As we started working on storyboard in infra, we've started using the bower tool for html/javascript packaging - and we have some ability to cache the output of that pretty easily. Would you

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka

Will do! On Mar 13, 2014 10:13 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: @Monty: having a packaging system sounds like a good idea.  Send us a pull request on github.com/kanaka/noVNC. Best Regards, Solly Ross - Original Message - From: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] JJB release?

On 03/12/2014 09:01 AM, James E. Blair wrote: Khai suggested it's time (or past time) for a JJB release. Antoine points out that before merging thread and pbr support might be a good time for a release too. I note that we just fixed python 2.6 support as well. So how about I tag:

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka

Honestly not being snarky here ... The reason is that github if quite flaky. We try very hard to never touch it in infra. And by try, I mean we NEVER clone from it live, and if we absoluely can't avoid it for some reason, we are clone into a cache dir. On Mar 11, 2014 4:28 PM, Dane Leblanc

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [Tripleo][CI] check-tripleo outage

I'd like to say I think this is excellent. Not that things broke ... But that a) we're consuming from infra but not dying and b) we're producing a vector of feedback on OpenStack that we did not have as a community before. On Feb 25, 2014 1:08 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] External testing account

We have a test repo, but also have a whole Dev gerrit ... Perhaps we should just make you a repo there? On Feb 7, 2014 4:17 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Infra tream, I've been working on a set of Puppet modules (and soon to be Ansible playbooks) for deploying a 3rd party

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: So, we're currently 70 deep in the gate, top of queue went in 40 hrs ago (probably closer to 50 or 60, but we only have enqueue time going back to the zuul restart). I have a couple of ideas about things we should do based on what I've seen in the gate

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] An idea to scale Zuul

+100 (apologies for top-post - laptop was stolen, limping along on Windows for a few days. Ew.) -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:52 PM To: James E. Blair Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org Subject:

[OpenStack-Infra] Laptop stolen, please disable my ssh keys

Hey guys! My laptop was stolen from a car in the middle of San Fran. I'm 99% sure it will be broken down and sold for parts as part of the drug trade, so I'm not ACTUALLY concerned with someone hacking information off of it. HOWEVER - better safe than sorry. So would someone in infra-core please

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Laptop stolen, please disable my ssh keys

That's great. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 11:53 AM To: Monty Taylor Cc: openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Laptop stolen, please disable my ssh keys [Cc'ing you so

[OpenStack-Infra] reviews for Wheel related work

Hey all! I'd like to get the wheel stuff done. The support is in pypi-mirror which we are now using, which means we have wheels in the mirror now. Now it's time to start using them. There are a series of related patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:wheels-in-mirror,n,z I

[OpenStack-Infra] taskflow requirements

There is a change up to add taskflow to the global requirements. I have no problem with this in principle, but it's one more that's in the set of things like pecan, wsme and friends that are in the set of things that Sean talked about in preemptively gate the universe. I'd like to not add it

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul packaging

I'd love to put it on stackforge or even in the infra namespace and get packages built and publish through the infra systems so that we can consume them ourselves easily. Antoine Musso has...@free.fr wrote: Le 01/11/13 01:45, Paul Belanger a écrit : snip I just merged you code into my repo,

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul packaging

Exactly Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Antoine Musso has...@free.fr wrote: Le 01/11/13 01:45, Paul Belanger a écrit : snip I just merged you code into my repo, thanks! \O/ Thank you! As for getting it into debian, I'd likely want to

[OpenStack-Infra] RFC: Be more aggressive in our control of pip in puppet

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51425/ It's marked WIP because it's TOTALLY untested. Probably doesn't even compile. I put it up to see what people thought of the general idea. Main things: - stop installing pip or setuptools from disto for the remainder of the time that we're using pip to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Log storage/serving

On 09/16/2013 07:22 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: So if zuul dictates where a log goes and we place the objects in swift with that path (change / patchset / pipeline / job / run) then zuul could also handle placing indexes as it should know which objects to expect. That said, if the path is

[OpenStack-Infra] Running databases in the cloud

Hey all! I've done a bit of investigation of cloud databases, and have put up a couple of changes to migrate databases we care about (gerrit, wiki, paste, etherpad) to be cloud databases. Basically this just comes down to passing in hostname to the puppet modules and not having puppet create the

[OpenStack-Infra] swift functional tests

Chmouel and I had a chat about running the swift functional tests today. As it stands now, they need a v1 swift, although chmouel is interested in running them against v2 as well. In any case, I proposed the following: Add a job that is triggered by swift commits for running functional tests.

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Talking is the first step.

On 04/24/2013 11:07 AM, Brian Lamar wrote: On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Brian Lamar brian.la...@rackspace.com So the question again becomes how can we get XenServer into the gate. Hi Lamar, I understand

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Talking is the first step.

, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/24/2013 11:07 AM, Brian Lamar wrote: On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Brian Lamar brian.la...@rackspace.com So the question again becomes how can we get XenServer into the gate. Hi Lamar, I