Hi Operators!
I felt like OpenStack didn't have enough projects, so here's another one.
During the summit I feel like I'm repeatedly having the same conversations
with different groups about bespoke approaches to operational tasks, and
wrapping these in a project might be a way to promote
Hello there,
I am doubted to select which storage backend(sheepdog, Ceph or
GlusterFS) for my openstack production env. I am aware of each project
itself, but want to know what is the real difference between them when
used as glance, swift and cinder storage backend?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks
Earlier today Jay Pipes mentioned that he had some rsyslog config examples for
Doing Useful Things with openstack logs. This would be another useful place to
store such things.
Another thing worth tracking would be one off ops-task tooling. Those little
shell scripts we've all written to true
As far as monitoring is concerned, we've just had a session at the Ops summit -
etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-summit-ops-monitoring
Definitely lots of various initiatives regarding monitoring scripts/tools that
could benefit from being centralized.. at a quick glance:
-
This same thing came up at the mid-cycle Ops meet up at RAX in August. There
wasn't much action that came from it, but we did set up a new org in GitHub for
collecting this type of common stuff: https://github.com/osops
The ops tools session going on now ( http://sched.co/1nfHWk3 ;
I personally find Ceph to be the most mature project and more easily
scalable.
El 06/11/2014 13:40, Hossein Zabolzadeh zabolza...@gmail.com escribió:
Hello there,
I am doubted to select which storage backend(sheepdog, Ceph or
GlusterFS) for my openstack production env. I am aware of each
Thanks for your opinion. But I am looking for the real difference
between them...
- Which one is better support in openstack?
- Which one provides better unified storage backend for all openstack
storage controllers(cinder, swift and glance)?
On 11/6/14, Adrián Norte Fernández
Excerpts from Michael Chapman's message of 2014-11-06 12:20:52 +0100:
Hi Operators!
I felt like OpenStack didn't have enough projects, so here's another one.
During the summit I feel like I'm repeatedly having the same conversations
with different groups about bespoke approaches to
openstack-operators-requ...@lists.openstack.org wrote:
Hi Operators!
I felt like OpenStack didn't have enough projects, so here's another one.
During the summit I feel like I'm repeatedly having the same conversations
with different groups about bespoke approaches to operational tasks, and
Yes! I would like these things to live under a official openstack program
so there is a clear collaboration point. This should not be stack forge it
should be openstack and we should aim for incubation and recognition of
contributions.
On 06/11/2014 1:42 PM, David Moreau Simard dmsim...@iweb.com
And the video is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMLDCBPUnJo
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Li, Chengyuan cheng...@ebay.com wrote:
Hi,
Please get slides of our presentation “Seamless Migration from
Nova-network to Neutron in eBay Production” from below link. Thanks!
On 6 November 2014 13:01, Hossein Zabolzadeh zabolza...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your opinion. But I am looking for the real difference
between them...
- Which one is better support in openstack?
- Which one provides better unified storage backend for all openstack
storage
Thanks Jesse,
But about sheepdog, I saw a presenation of sheepdog and openstack
integration. In this presentation, it is claimed that sheepdog is
unified storage backend for swift, cinder and glance.
Check the attachment.
See:
13 matches
Mail list logo
