On 02/18/2015 02:31 AM, Marc Koderer wrote:
Hello everyone,
We already got good feedback on my sandbox test review. So I would like
to move forward.
With review [1] we will get a stackforge repo called „telcowg-usecases“.
Submitting a usecase will then follow the process of OpenStack developmen
Hello everyone,
We already got good feedback on my sandbox test review. So I would like
to move forward.
With review [1] we will get a stackforge repo called „telcowg-usecases“.
Submitting a usecase will then follow the process of OpenStack development (see
[2]).
The is one thing currently open
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Belanger"
> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:25 AM, George Shuklin
> wrote:
> > On 02/06/2015 04:12 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >>>
> >>> From: "George Shuklin"
> >>> To: ope
On 2/6/15 12:09 PM, "Tim Bell" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Belanger [mailto:paul.belan...@polybeacon.com]
>> Sent: 06 February 2015 18:52
>> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [Telco][
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Belanger [mailto:paul.belan...@polybeacon.com]
> Sent: 06 February 2015 18:52
> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [Telco][NFV][infra] Review process of
> TelcoWG use cases
>
> On Fri,
On 02/06/2015 07:52 PM, Paul Belanger wrote:
I think it not really possible. If you talking about 'openstack' as
'Openstack developers', may be. But for operators all telco stuff is just
completely foreign. I do not understand what they doing and I don't need
them for my job. Sorry.
Interesti
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:25 AM, George Shuklin
wrote:
> On 02/06/2015 04:12 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>>
>>> From: "George Shuklin"
>>> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>>>
>>> Sorry guys. I think most of the ops here have no idea what you talking
>>>
On 02/06/2015 04:12 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "George Shuklin"
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Sorry guys. I think most of the ops here have no idea what you talking
about. Telcos is telcos, ops is ops. Different worlds, different
problems, differen
- Original Message -
> From: "George Shuklin"
> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>
> Sorry guys. I think most of the ops here have no idea what you talking
> about. Telcos is telcos, ops is ops. Different worlds, different
> problems, different terminology.
Hi George,
The tel
On 2015-02-06 12:11:40 +0100 (+0100), Marc Koderer wrote:
[...]
> Therefore I uploaded one of them (Session Border Controller) to
> the Gerrit system into the sandbox repo:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152940/1
[...]
This looks a lot like the beginnings of a specification which has
im
Sorry guys. I think most of the ops here have no idea what you talking
about. Telcos is telcos, ops is ops. Different worlds, different
problems, different terminology.
On 02/06/2015 01:11 PM, Marc Koderer wrote:
Hello everyone,
we are currently facing the issue that we don’t know how to proc
Hello everyone,
we are currently facing the issue that we don’t know how to proceed with
our telco WG use cases. There are many of them already defined but the
reviews via Etherpad doesn’t seem to work.
I suggest to do a review on them with the usual OpenStack tooling.
Therefore I uploaded one of
12 matches
Mail list logo
