++
On 09/09/2011 03:07 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> To be clear, I too am hesitant to mute people. I do not want muting to
> be seen as a tool used to silence discussion or opinions. I only see it
> as useful as a potential way to organize the discussion to allow for
> more clarity.
>
> Sent from
To be clear, I too am hesitant to mute people. I do not want muting to be seen
as a tool used to silence discussion or opinions. I only see it as useful as a
potential way to organize the discussion to allow for more clarity.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Paul Voccio wrote:
John,
We were just discussing this problem the other day. I'm hesitant to mute
people, but the chaos is hard to follow. I often have to go back and read
the logs to study what people's opinions are. I would be interested in
trying some of your suggestions with the appropriate time for comments and
On 09/09/2011 11:05 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
> I have found the PPB meetings to be very disjointed and hard to
> follow. A classic example is from our last meeting where 3 votes were
> proposed and only 2 were voted on. At times we have several
> conversations going on at once. Sometimes we vote,
I have found the PPB meetings to be very disjointed and hard to follow. A
classic example is from our last meeting where 3 votes were proposed and only 2
were voted on. At times we have several conversations going on at once.
Sometimes we vote, someone continues the discussion, and then we revot
5 matches
Mail list logo
