-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all:
I update/upgrade my system with smart.
Now I have this glibc version:
glibc-2.4.90-13
and if I try upgrade it smart not found anything to do it.
Well,I see the directory
Chema Ollés schrieb:
Well,I see the directory
http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586/
where there are the file glibc-2.4.90-20.i586.rpm and my question is:
why smart doesn't detect this ?
Because it uses the metadata, not the actual content of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Hanke escribió:
Chema Ollés schrieb:
Well,I see the directory
http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/i586/
where there are the file glibc-2.4.90-20.i586.rpm and my question is:
why smart doesn't
Am Friday 29 September 2006 18:16 schrieb Warren Stockton:
I noticed that factory includes the 1.6RC version of koffice for i586 but
the x86_64 koffice version is still 1.5.2
Is there a problem with the x86_64 builds or was this intentional?
There is a problem ...
You can look at
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:05:06PM +0200, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 03:28:04PM +0200, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:46:18AM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
No, we don't raise the release number with every rebuild at the moment.
So, now is your chance
Christian Boltz wrote
http://suse-linux-faq.koehntopp.de/q/q-suse100-su_path.html (german)
Short answer: set ALWAYS_SET_PATH=yes in /etc/default/su
Thanks a lot :-))
--
Dipl.-Inform. Frank Steiner Web: http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~steiner/
Lehrstuhl f. BioinformatikMail:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, sice nobody could answer this for more than 5 months now it seems that
there is nobody here that has a clue about this bug.
Sorry, if this got lost.
Just wanted to inform you that YaST cannot handle this situation correctly and
decides on update
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote
My cdrom drive is /dev/hdc. Modify the snippet below to fit your
needs and insert it into .ivman/IvmConfigConditions.xml:
ivm:Match name=hal.block.device value=/dev/hdc
ivm:Condition name=EjectPressed exec=/usr/bin/halmount -u
'$hal.block.device$'
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:30:30AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, sice nobody could answer this for more than 5 months now it seems that
there is nobody here that has a clue about this bug.
Sorry, if this got lost.
Just wanted to inform you
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:30:30AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, sice nobody could answer this for more than 5 months now it seems that
there is nobody here that has a clue about this bug.
Sorry, if
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you don't. You updated the db package (which is definitely part of the
That's a bug ;-(
This is what I am saying for years now but received only really stupid answers
in response to
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you don't. You updated the db package (which is definitely part of the
That's a bug ;-(
This is what I am saying for years now but
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:29:40PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I was a bit short: The problem is especially with release products.
Your release today -9 and in a month -20 - with just one change. This
confused a lot of customers and partners, they asked for the other 10
changes...
You must
On Oct 02, 06 11:26:08 +0200, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you don't. You updated the db package (which is definitely part of
the
That's a bug ;-(
Sorry, my fault. I skipped a few
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 12:29 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you don't. You updated the db package (which is definitely part of
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Funny thing happened. When you speak of the devil, I end up sending a
mail to Clayton instead of the list.
Ironic.
It's like rin, on you wedding day...
- Original post
Clayton wrote:
5. A very small number know about the
needed tsalagi (cherokee) keymap not provided in X, how to add? create?
Anyone already have one?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My little brother switched to OpenSUSE today!
Reasons:
* Didn't have to plop out alot of money on Microsoft Office (and OOo
looks ugly in XP)
* His iPod just works.. iTunes crashes all the time on his PC
* His digital camera just works
* Printer
His camera worked? Been meaning to ask- I have 10.1 running on an older
laptop (PIII/600) and the camera doesn't register when I plug it in. I
know the usb connection works, since 10.1 sees the usb thumb drive when
I plug it in. I take it, there must be a tweek that I overlooked
If you use the camera as a mass-storage device, it should work out of the box,
like any pendrive or USB hard drive.
El Martes, 3 de Octubre de 2006 06:45, John escribió:
His camera worked? Been meaning to ask- I have 10.1 running on an older
laptop (PIII/600) and the camera doesn't register
I just added a source for updates, mirrored locally and I've run
createrepo on the dir.
So, I added it in the config like this:
url_suse=file:/iscsi/Archives/SuSE/inst_source/10.1
url_updates=file:/iscsi/Archives/SuSE/inst_source/10.1_up
add_sources=suse updates
So, then I tried to do a
Am Montag, 2. Oktober 2006 10:08 schrieb Anders Norrbring:
[...]
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2006-08/msg00021.html
Detlef
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:10:56PM +0300, Cougar wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Another highly annoying thing is that if I build a package with y2pmbuild,
it
contains rights for the user 'compiler' which of course doesn't exist on any
system.
So, the result
Detlef Reichelt skrev:
Am Montag, 2. Oktober 2006 10:08 schrieb Anders Norrbring:
[...]
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2006-08/msg00021.html
So... Now it's all set.. I've mirrored fresh, I ran createrepo on it,
and then create_package_descr as last step.
Build environment
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 17:41 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Andreas Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Andreas Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
what will be the Gnome and KDE path in openSUSE 10.2?
KDE will stay as is - the GNOME team likes to move
25 matches
Mail list logo