Just wondering if most people are using Suse 10 OSS RC1 or the 9.3
stable... I would like to try out / review 10, but wanted to see if
there are still some "big" issues unresolved before wiping out my
system... Any recommendations?
--
At the risk of sounding like a total Suse noob (I'm a long time
Gentooer) but what is "Beta 4" and where do I get that from?
Walt Frampus wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 20:26 -0400, Michael K Dolan Jr wrote:
Just wondering if most people are using Suse 10 OSS RC1 or the 9
But, just b/c OpenSuse is built on OSS shouldn't mean it has to be
difficult to install/interoperate with non-OSS software or so is my
opinion. Gentoo is good at creating a seamless link in portage. I guess
what it comes down to is that most users are going to install things
like mp3 librar
Is the torrent down? I can't seem to access it on ftp.suse.com...
Too many downloaders?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, I just wiped out my Dell 8200 to go back and try Suse 10.0. It's
been a while since I've used Suse (7.0...) and I'm used to my Gentoo
portage (#emerge packagename), I've read that I can setup Suse with
debian's apt-get. Where can I set my repository to get the latest
packages? I'm used to r
Berni, all software has a copyright owner, that owner then licenses the
software... under the GPL... that doesn't mean there is not a copyright
owner. What's your problem/issue? Where does it say you cannot
redistribute? The Suse OSS version is all freely distributable. The GM
version includes
Where did you get this license text from? Is this off the OSS distro or
GM? What's the file location where I can view it?
Jonas Helgi Palsson wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 15:28, houghi wrote:
That is what I read. You read something else and choose to leave. I wish
you all the best w
equirement that restricts you.
Does the OSS distro have this license requirement/text? I'm running 10.0
GM and can't tell if this is also on the OSS...
Carl Hartung wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 10:41, Michael K. Dolan Jr. wrote:
Where did you get this license text from? Is t
Is there an "official" OpenSuse web forum (like forums.gentoo.org)?
Looking at the forums listed here, it doesn't appear to be an official
OpenSuse forum...
http://www.opensuse.org/Communicate#Web_Forums
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Guys, LOGOS AND TRADEMARKS (Trademark Law) cannot be GPL'd (Copyright
Law). They will always be owned by an entity and under Trademark law,
that owner MUST enforce compliance or else they loose their rights to
the trademark. (See all the Australian / use of Linux press articles,
Linus' explanat
We seem to be in sync Anders... I beat you by 1 minute though :)
Anders Johansson wrote:
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 00:22, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
I don't found nothing in the GPL licence that indicate that the logos and
trademark doesn't apply:
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
I would say that it was good for Berni to raise the issue: he firmly
believes there's a legal issue for him. We've all responded and provided
fairly prudent input and advice. It's tough to just say "contact someone
at Novell" b/c who do you contact? I honestly don't see Novell giving
Berni lega
Hey everyone, take some time out to participate in the OSDL Linux
Desktop Survey
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/dtl/survey/start.shtml
Marcel, absolutely not true. I'm an attorney in the U.S. I'm just
catching up on email so maybe someone else already said this...
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 23:23 -0300, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
> 2005/10/11, houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
>
> By the way according to US laws a trademark need to be
+0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Peter Flodin wrote:
> > On 12/10/05, Michael K. Dolan Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is there an "official" OpenSuse web forum (like forums.gentoo.org)?
> >
> &
Why not "federate" forums... synchronize user bases, threads and start
from there. If you post in one, it's replicated everywhere. That will
bring everyone in...
Regardless as with any community that has formed a large, growing base
opensuse.org needs to have an official forum. I however would
+1
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 19:09 -0400, Alexander Antoniades wrote:
> The participation link still doesn't answer where decisions regarding
> the future of OpenSuse are made and how people can influence their
> outcome.
>
> I realize there are probably private mailing lists and such where
> overal
+1
+1
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:11 +0100, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2005 13:25, James Ogley wrote:
> > Well, I'd certainly be in favour of a couple of key community members
> > being part of the Core Team. I think given that the 'brand', all
> > marketing issues, trademarks
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 13:14 +, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
> d) The communication via wiki or a forum is not very efficient for
>development purpose (it's great for the end-user because he can
>find lots of information there). Mailing lists are much better
>for a development community
Couple comments:
1)This note:
Novell shall run an openSUSE web forum as a beta-test now.
This Novell-forum relies on commercial software, which was
inadequate in previous releases.
I do truly hope Novell/openSUSE team plan to choose an open source stack to
host this forum. The code is fre
If I could inject some bias, take a look at http://forums.gentoo.org
Look at the stats:
http://forums.gentoo.org/statistics.php
Gentoo's forum is huge, very active, and almost any answer can be found
instantly b/c all of the coversations are indexed and reachable via
Google search.
Gent
Pascal Bleser wrote:
But that's exactly the ruling in Germany in the Heise case.
They run forums. They have to moderate everything because even having a link to
illegal software
(even in a comment from anyone) is considering Heise to be responsible for it.
It's utterly stupid but that's the co
Peter Flodin wrote:
I will just state again, that people who talk about gateways etc
between mailing lists and the web forum, haven't got full
comprehension of what a successful web forum is about.
There is no reason that an openSUSE web forum will not rival any of
the above in terms of usage.
It is possible to integrate mailing lists and forums... this is not a
binary choice. That way an email to the list shows up under the thread
subject in the forum and vice-versa (a post on the forum shoots out to
the list...)
I see no reason not to at least mirror these mailing list discussions
Yes, but what about SUSE authenticating to a Windows Server using Active
Directory services?
There are many ways to do this ... a few:
http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/Authenticating-Linux-Active-Directory.html
http://www.zdnetasia.com/insight/network/0,39044847,390819
Sören Wengerowsky wrote:
hi,
i've the following problem with my SuSE 10:
- after reboot, _always_ the Master and the PCM -channel is
muted. Despite using kmix with the "restore Settings-feature".
check to see if "alsactl restore" is running at boot in rc
Most of that information was captureable when you downloaded opensuse
a bit paranoid eh? If you're so paranoid, you 1) never should have
connected to your ISP b/c they already captured more info about you than
OpenSUSE's servers, 2) never should have emailed your concern here - do
you know
27 matches
Mail list logo
