On Saturday 11 November 2006 11:14, Greg Wallace wrote:
Are you talking about on Windows machines? If so, it apparently is taking
over the .doc extension normally used by Word. I would suggest
re-assigning .doc to Word and using some different file extension for OO.
To do that, go into
On Saturday, November 11, 2006 @ 3:52 PM, John Anderson wrote:
snip
When you install you are given a choice to make OO the default
for certain extentions. You change these after the fact as well.
As usual its just an RTFM issue.
Open OO writer. Press F1 for help
Select Find tab. Key in
On Saturday 11 November 2006 20:44, Greg Wallace wrote:
On Saturday, November 11, 2006 @ 3:52 PM, John Anderson wrote:
snip
When you install you are given a choice to make OO the default
for certain extentions. You change these after the fact as well.
As usual its just an RTFM issue.
On Oct 23, 06 10:30:58 +0200, Andreas Hanke wrote:
Hi,
Jordi Massaguer i Pla schrieb:
It would be nice if Novell was writing somewhere where does trademarks are.
In order to write this down somewhere or publish a list of trademark
occurances, such a list would have to exist in the first
So no, having to purge the software from Novell trademarks is not a GPL
violation
It would be nice if Novell was writing somewhere where does trademarks are.
That way, it would be easier to make distros based on OpenSuSE, as OpenSuSE
is a too general purpose distro for many people. In my
Hi,
Jordi Massaguer i Pla schrieb:
It would be nice if Novell was writing somewhere where does trademarks are.
In order to write this down somewhere or publish a list of trademark
occurances, such a list would have to exist in the first place.
And I doubt something like that exists - not even
On 10/6/06, Marcel Mourguiart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/10/5, Jordi Massaguer i Pla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Novell is allowing to use his trademarks property only with suse linux
with out modifications. If you are doing modifications or want to
distribute another piece of software, then you
On Monday 23 October 2006 00:29, Peter Flodin wrote:
You do realise that for all GPL software you have explicit permission
from Novell, in writing, to copy and distribute verbatim copies.
Where do you see this?
If Novell has included their trademarks that does not restrict your
rights under
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:17:17PM -0400, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.1/inst-source/LICENSE.TXT
You may make and distribute outside Your Organization an unlimited
number of copies of the Software.
You may modify the Software, and
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:17:17PM -0400, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.1/inst-source/LICENSE.TXT
You may make and distribute outside Your Organization an unlimited
number of copies of the Software.
You may modify the Software, and
2006/10/5, Jordi Massaguer i Pla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:17:17PM -0400, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.1/inst-source/LICENSE.TXT
You may make and distribute outside Your Organization an unlimited
number of copies of
2006/10/5, Jordi Massaguer i Pla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From everywhere, Yast, susewatcher, openoffice, wallpapers, etc etc.
Is a trademark
Novell is allowing to use his trademarks property only with suse linux
with out modifications. If you are doing modifications or want to
distribute
Hi,
I have a doubt about whether is legal to redistribute the opensuse
openoffice packages, as it has opensuse logos on it. Can it be redistributed
wihtout modifications? Should the opensuse logos be removed before
redistributing it?
thanks,
jordi
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:55:23PM +0200, Jordi Massaguer i Pla wrote:
Hi,
I have a doubt about whether is legal to redistribute the opensuse
openoffice packages, as it has opensuse logos on it. Can it be redistributed
wihtout modifications? Should the opensuse logos be removed before
---
Jordi Massaguer Pla
openTrends Solucions i Sistemes
phone: +34 93 320 84 14
fax: +34 93 300 35 27
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Missatge original -
Assumpte: Re: [opensuse] redistributing opensuse openoffice package
De: Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Per: Jordi Massaguer i Pla [EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:36:07PM +0200, Jordi Massaguer i Pla wrote:
I do not think is the same question. That question is about using the
OpenSuSE in a presentation. Mine is to distribute OpenSuSE version of
OpenOffice with the OpenSuSE logo in. That is, not touching the rpm pacakge,
but
2006/10/4, Robert Schiele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:36:07PM +0200, Jordi Massaguer i Pla wrote:
I do not think is the same question. That question is about using the
OpenSuSE in a presentation. Mine is to distribute OpenSuSE version of
OpenOffice with the OpenSuSE logo in.
El mié, 30-11-2005 a las 16:38 +0100, Birgit Kellner escribió:
Hi,
the OO 2.0 beta version delivered with SuSE 9.3 had proper Gnome file
selector dialogues, but was otherwise buggy.
I then installed the official OO 2.0 release from the source code as
soon as it was available - gone were
Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 07:49 schrieb Clayton:
ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
Today i tried to install OpenOffice 2.0. I use the apt (Synaptic). I got
one warning about libs and i ignore. After installation i run KDE but
there were no screen. I heard a sound, mouse works but i got just a gray
Well, if you want to stay with fontconfig-2.3.91 you have to run fc-cache -f
after installing fonts, as there is some bug in fontconfig. Its symptom is
crashing every X application. As far as I know, OpenOffice 2.0 installs some
fonts, therefore you should run fc-cache afterwords.
Ahhh...
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:46, Clayton wrote:
Well, if you want to stay with fontconfig-2.3.91 you have to run fc-cache
-f after installing fonts, as there is some bug in fontconfig. Its
symptom is crashing every X application. As far as I know, OpenOffice 2.0
installs some fonts,
Adding workarounds usually leads to the fact that the bug never gets fixed,
so
we avoid this usually and better keep the bug visible.
fc-cache -f would also increase the runtime of SuSEconfig.fonts heavily.
Fair enough... that makes sense, but... then that makes me ask... why
was the
Hi!
Today i tried to install OpenOffice 2.0. I use the apt (Synaptic). I got one
warning about libs and i ignore. After installation i run KDE but there were
no screen. I heard a sound, mouse works but i got just a gray screen. Anybody
has a same problem? Is this official OpenOffice from SuSE?
ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
Today i tried to install OpenOffice 2.0. I use the apt (Synaptic). I got one
warning about libs and i ignore. After installation i run KDE but there were
no screen. I heard a sound, mouse works but i got just a gray screen. Anybody
has a same problem? Is this official
Is going to be a YOU upgrade for SUSE 10.0 ??
--
Marcel Mourguiart
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
Is going to be a YOU upgrade for SUSE 10.0 ??
Yes.
--
Dr. Martin Sommer Product Manager Consumer Products
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, D-90409 Nürnberg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Martin Sommer wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
Is going to be a YOU upgrade for SUSE 10.0 ??
Yes.
And probably for 9.3 as well.
--
Dr. Martin Sommer Product Manager Consumer Products
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, D-90409
On 20/10/05, Martin Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Martin Sommer wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
Is going to be a YOU upgrade for SUSE 10.0 ??
Yes.
And probably for 9.3 as well.
So that'll be tomorrow then ? :)
--
Photos :
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Marcus Cooper wrote:
On 20/10/05, Martin Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Martin Sommer wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
Is going to be a YOU upgrade for SUSE 10.0 ??
Yes.
And probably for 9.3 as well.
So
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Martin Sommer wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Marcus Cooper wrote:
On 20/10/05, Martin Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Martin Sommer wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
Is going to be a YOU upgrade
301 - 330 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
