John Andersen wrote:
So why can't you do that?
Perhaps because the Solaris learning curve is a slow one for me.
You might need to hard-code its "soon-to-be-external" nic with
an IP and make that single change when you promote it to router
status, but other than that I see no impediment to ha
On Monday 05 March 2007, Damon Register wrote:
> Making it a DHCP server wouldn't be too hard but I can't do that.
> I am preparing the Ultra 20 to be my home router instead of the Motorola
> box. Right now the Ultra 20 is on the inside of my home net and is set
> to get its address by DHCP becaus
On Sunday 04 March 2007 5:08 am, Anders Norrbring wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
> >> As James Parra said, use the IP addres of the machine instead of the
> >> computer's name. The error message you get even says to use the IP
> >> address.
> >>
> >> - James W
> >
> > sooo what to do with dynam
>
> Set up your Suse box to be the DHCP server an disable the service on your
> Motorola. It is easy to do in Yast and should solve your problems.
That would be nice but not practical.
If you only have a few computers in your home network, then it might be
easier just to assign all of your home
James D. Parra wrote:
Set up your Suse box to be the DHCP server an disable the service on your
Motorola. It is easy to do in Yast and should solve your problems.
That would be nice but not practical. The SuSE box is my sons PC which
is dual boot with Windows XP so it can't be relied on for se
On 2007-03-02 14:07, Paul Abrahams wrote:
>
>
> suillus:~ # mount.cifs //lactarius/dext-backup.mnt
> mount error: could not find target server. TCP name lactarius/ext-backup not
> found
> No ip address specified and hostname not found
>
> Yet I can see smb://lactarius/ext-backup from Konqueror.
>
>
> Your DHCP server will, more than likely, hand out the same IP address to
the
> same mac address of the workstation's nic.
I wish. My DHCP server at home is a Motorola voip terminal adapter
Set up your Suse box to be the DHCP server an disable the service on your
Motorola. It is easy to
James D. Parra wrote:
Your DHCP server will, more than likely, hand out the same IP address to the
same mac address of the workstation's nic.
I wish. My DHCP server at home is a Motorola voip terminal adapter.
I have a Macintosh with OXS and an Ultra 20 with Solaris 10, both using
DHCP. I fo
> Don't use dynamic addressing?
just because, eh?
wonderful...
Your DHCP server will, more than likely, hand out the same IP address to the
same mac address of the workstation's nic.
Also, edit your hosts file, /etc/hosts, with the name and IP address of the
'share' machine.
~James
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sooo what to do with dynamic ip addressing?
>
If you control the DHCP server, you could tell it to nail that machine
down to a specific IP. That's what I do with all of mine. I don't like
doing file sharing between dynamically-addressed machines; it seems like
askin
On Friday 02 March 2007 15:29, Paul Abrahams wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2007 5:23 pm, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > nslookup lactarius
> >
> > Perhaps just the hostname cannot be looked up using DNS?
>
> Yes, that's the immediate cause of the problem, but I don't know a simple
> cure for it since I'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Don't use dynamic addressing?
just because, eh?
wonderful...
Seriously, if you have to address with IP and not mapped names, then you
can write a couple of small scripts that reports the current IP to the
machine t
On Sunday 04 March 2007, Anders Norrbring wrote:
> Don't use dynamic addressing?
just because, eh?
wonderful...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
>
As James Parra said, use the IP addres of the machine instead of the
computer's name. The error message you get even says to use the IP
address.
- James W
sooo what to do with dynamic ip addressing?
Don't use dynamic addressing?
--
Anders Norrbring
Norrbring C
>
> As James Parra said, use the IP addres of the machine instead of the
> computer's name. The error message you get even says to use the IP
> address.
>
> - James W
sooo what to do with dynamic ip addressing?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Saturday 03 March 2007 00:12, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2007/03/02 15:07 (GMT-0500) Paul Abrahams apparently typed:
> > What is the current thinking on the smbfs/cifs fiasco in 10.2? Like many
> > other people, when I try to use smbmount I get the message:
>
> ...
>
> > There's lots of stuff post
On 2007/03/02 15:07 (GMT-0500) Paul Abrahams apparently typed:
> What is the current thinking on the smbfs/cifs fiasco in 10.2? Like many
> other people, when I try to use smbmount I get the message:
...
> There's lots of stuff posted about this problem in various places but no
> clear, agreed-
On Friday 02 March 2007 5:25 pm, I wrote:
> It's a fiasco because (a) I'm not the only one who's not been able to solve
> this, and (b) the original message about smbfs not being supported in the
> kernel is wildly misleading, especially if you've had it working in a
> previous SuSE version.
One
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:25:56PM -0500, Paul Abrahams wrote:
> this, and (b) the original message about smbfs not being supported in the
> kernel is wildly misleading, especially if you've had it working in a
> previous SuSE version.
The note about smbfs is probably correct:
$ gzip -cd /proc/
>
> nslookup lactarius
>
> Perhaps just the hostname cannot be looked up using DNS?
Yes, that's the immediate cause of the problem, but I don't know a simple
cure
for it since I'm using DHCP for the IP addresses of my local net. And it
shouldn't be a problem anyway since (a) it wasn't a problem
On Friday 02 March 2007 5:23 pm, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> nslookup lactarius
>
> Perhaps just the hostname cannot be looked up using DNS?
Yes, that's the immediate cause of the problem, but I don't know a simple cure
for it since I'm using DHCP for the IP addresses of my local net. And it
sh
On Friday 02 March 2007 4:33 pm, Matthew Stringer wrote:
> Paul Abrahams wrote:
> > smbmount worked just fine in previous releases. Some research told me
> > that I should be using cifs instead, and I got this (from a root shell):
> >
> > suillus:~ # mount.cifs //lactarius/ext-backup.mnt
> > moun
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:22:39PM -0500, Paul Abrahams wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2007 4:32 pm, James D. Parra wrote:
> >
> > Try the following;
> >
> > mount -t cifs -o username=yourusername,workgroup=yourdomain
> > //windowsbox/sharename /mnt/yourmountname
> >
> > You'll be prompted for a passw
On Friday 02 March 2007 4:32 pm, James D. Parra wrote:
>
> Try the following;
>
> mount -t cifs -o username=yourusername,workgroup=yourdomain
> //windowsbox/sharename /mnt/yourmountname
>
> You'll be prompted for a password.
Here's what I got:
suillus:~ # mount -t cifs -o
username=pwa,workgroup=
Paul Abrahams wrote:
What is the current thinking on the smbfs/cifs fiasco in 10.2? Like many
other people, when I try to use smbmount I get the message:
suillus:~ # smbmount //lactarius/ext-backup mnt
Password:
ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
Please refer to the smbmnt(8)
What is the current thinking on the smbfs/cifs fiasco in 10.2? Like many
other people, when I try to use smbmount I get the message:
suillus:~ # smbmount //lactarius/ext-backup mnt
Password:
ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
smbmnt fa
What is the current thinking on the smbfs/cifs fiasco in 10.2? Like many
other people, when I try to use smbmount I get the message:
suillus:~ # smbmount //lactarius/ext-backup mnt
Password:
ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
smbmnt fail
27 matches
Mail list logo
