On Sunday 23 December 2007 17:40:58 Aaron Kulkis wrote:
[msg snipped]
I'm curious why there's almost a four-day delay between the writing of the
response and its receipt by the first MTA. Are you not connected 24/7, or do
you only periodically send queued messages?
From the messages headers:
<
Jim Cunning wrote:
On Sunday 23 December 2007 17:40:58 Aaron Kulkis wrote:
[msg snipped]
I'm curious why there's almost a four-day delay between the writing of the
response and its receipt by the first MTA. Are you not connected 24/7, or do
you only periodically send queued messages?
From
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-12-27 at 18:46 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
...
hotpop.com has been flaky lately.
sometimes it's taking 2-3 days to get messages off of
my machine to smtp.hotpop.com. :-/
Unfortunately, there's not much I can do about it,
other
Aaron Kulkis wrote:
>
>
> hotpop.com has been flaky lately.
>
> sometimes it's taking 2-3 days to get messages off of
> my machine to smtp.hotpop.com. :-/
>
> Unfortunately, there's not much I can do about it,
> other than switch to a pay service for POP access --
> which I will probably do within
James Knott wrote:
Aaron Kulkis wrote:
hotpop.com has been flaky lately.
sometimes it's taking 2-3 days to get messages off of
my machine to smtp.hotpop.com. :-/
Unfortunately, there's not much I can do about it,
other than switch to a pay service for POP access --
which I will probably do wi
Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2007-12-27 at 18:46 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
...
hotpop.com has been flaky lately.
sometimes it's taking 2-3 days to get messages off of
my machine to smtp.hotpop.com. :-/
Unfortunately, there's not much I ca
Aaron Kulkis wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
>> Aaron Kulkis wrote:
>>>
>>> hotpop.com has been flaky lately.
>>>
>>> sometimes it's taking 2-3 days to get messages off of
>>> my machine to smtp.hotpop.com. :-/
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, there's not much I can do about it,
>>> other than switch to a pay se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-28-07 09:33]:
> I hate web-mailwaiting...waiting...waiting for
> a stupid web-page to be built, transmitted and rendered
> just to read a text message is too annoying.
cool your knickers and get more informat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 09:21 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
You could use a gmail account.
I hate web-mailwaiting...waiting...waiting for
a stupid web-page to be built, transmitted and rendered
just to read a text message is too annoying.
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 10:10 -0500, James Knott wrote:
I wasn't referring to your messages. It can happen to anyone. For
example, yesterday I noticed replies on another mail list, but the
original that those messages replied to, didn't appear
On Friday 28 December 2007 05:47, James Knott wrote:
> ...
>
> What I find curious is when replyies to a post appear before the post
> does. I've seen some that were hours or even days later than the
> messages that replied to them. That's happened on this list and
> others.
Keep in mind that SM
James Knott wrote:
> I wasn't referring to your messages. It can happen to anyone. For
> example, yesterday I noticed replies on another mail list, but the
> original that those messages replied to, didn't appear until hours later.
>
It depends on a lot of factors: the routing involved, whose
Jerry Houston wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
>
>> I wasn't referring to your messages. It can happen to anyone. For
>> example, yesterday I noticed replies on another mail list, but the
>> original that those messages replied to, didn't appear until hours later.
>>
>>
>
> It depends on a lo
I hate web-mailwaiting...waiting...waiting for
a stupid web-page to be built, transmitted and rendered
just to read a text message is too annoying.
I have a yahoo account as "backup"
Pop details for Yahoo.com:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/ca/mail/pop/pop-03.html
Just remember to log in onc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-28-07 14:30]:
> >I hate web-mailwaiting...waiting...waiting for
> >a stupid web-page to be built, transmitted and rendered
> >just to read a text message is too annoying.
> >
> >I have a yahoo account as "backup"
>
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-28-07 09:33]:
I hate web-mailwaiting...waiting...waiting for
a stupid web-page to be built, transmitted and rendered
just to read a text message is too annoying.
cool your knickers
Aaron Kulkis wrote:
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> * Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-28-07 09:33]:
>>> I hate web-mailwaiting...waiting...waiting for
>>> a stupid web-page to be built, transmitted and rendered
>>> just to read a text mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-28-07 15:22]:
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >
> >cool your knickers and get more information before condemning. GMail
> >provides web, pop and imap and smtp services.
>
> Really.
>
> When did they add that?
pop
On Friday 28 December 2007 11:03, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
> ...
> >
> > cool your knickers and get more information before condemning.
> > GMail provides web, pop and imap and smtp services.
>
> Really?
Really.
> When did they add that?
1982?
RRS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Jerry Houston wrote:
Aaron Kulkis wrote:
I have a yahoo account as "backup" -- if I REALLY
need to send something out, IMMEDIATELY, and hotpop's
smtp is being flaky...then I use that. But a list
like this isn't worth the trouble of interacting with
it on yahoo or gmail or any other webmail serv
Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 09:21 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
You could use a gmail account.
I hate web-mailwaiting...waiting...waiting for
a stupid web-page to be built, transmitted and rendered
just to read a text message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-28-07 15:33]:
> On Friday 28 December 2007 11:03, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
> > When did they add that?
>
> 1982?
*Almost* Orwellian, -2 :^)
- --
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG #
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Friday 28 December 2007 11:03, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>>> cool your knickers and get more information before condemning.
>>> GMail provides web, pop and imap and smtp services.
>>>
>> Really?
>>
>
> Really.
>
>
>
>> When did they add tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-12-28 at 14:04 -0500, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Who said anything about webmail? It has pop, smtp, and recently I heard
also imap. And free as in beer.
Where have you been you don't know this? :-p
Last time I checked, it was still
Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Friday 28 December 2007 11:03, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
...
cool your knickers and get more information before condemning.
GMail provides web, pop and imap and smtp services.
Really?
Really.
When did they add that?
1982?
I know Google's a pretty advanced company,
On Friday 28 December 2007 12:49, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > On Friday 28 December 2007 11:03, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> cool your knickers and get more information before condemning.
> >>> GMail provides web, pop and imap and smtp services.
> >
> >> When did th
26 matches
Mail list logo
