Randall R Schulz wrote:
Face it, all these bandwidth arguments, when applied to email lists,
are utterly false.
the bandwith in question is that of 56k modem owners...
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Am Sonntag, 9. September 2007 03:02:18 schrieb Randall R Schulz:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:53, Kai Ponte wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:46, Doug McGarrett wrote:
Isn't this enough, already? What a waste of bandwidth!
--doug
Yeah, I agree.
The limited bandwidth we
may those people use webmail
On 9/9/07, Michael Skiba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. September 2007 03:02:18 schrieb Randall R Schulz:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:53, Kai Ponte wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:46, Doug McGarrett wrote:
Isn't this enough, already?
Am Sonntag, 9. September 2007 14:07:55 schrieb Druid:
may those people use webmail
you disqualified yourself for getting an answer :)
Everyone else feel free to ask the same question ;)
Greetings
Michael
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
* Michael Skiba [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-09-07 08:54]:
you disqualified yourself for getting an answer :)
s/answer/breathing/
Everyone else feel free to ask the same question ;)
:^)
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo
I'd like to remind everybody of our mailing list netiquette:
http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_mailing_list_netiquette
The goal of openSUSE is to create the best Linux distribution and to
spread Linux. If you do not want to work together in a team and instead
keep insulting each other, do it
Druid wrote:
There are no moderators of this list.
In case you are not sure, Ill take some time to explain. There is a
guy, who knows the root password for the server in which the mailing
list software, and probably the smtp server for this domain is
installed. And this guy, having the powers
I agree, and I also read hundreds of e-mails every day.
==John ffitch
Chuck == Chuck Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chuck I'm an old geezer but have not yet gotten so decrepit that I cannot
Chuck remember the essence of threads in which I participate. I want
Chuck replies posted at the
Druid wrote:
So in other words, your thesis (that this list has an active
moderator) is disproved by reality.
So long, and thank you for playing. We have some nice parting gifts...
whatever makes your little heart happy, my dear
You've been instructed to fuck off already.
Are you going
Am Samstag, 8. September 2007 08:41:01 schrieb Aaron Kulkis:
Fuck you too, you conceited asshole.
Again, read the root password etc etc etc. If the guy with the root
password was giving a damn about that, he would be doing something.
Since he is not doing a thing, and since you are not the
You are a super grade A #1 asshole.
Bye Marcio,
plonk
--
Pretty sure its better than be an idiot heh
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oh please, children behave like grown ups or go in the sandbox to play. This
ain't nice to read anymore
anymore? Oh, you mean now it aint funny anymore? hahahahah
Act mature: There are people who recognize a discussion is senseless and
there are? where?
(And no, I don't want a reply on
On 9/8/07, Aaron Kulkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Druid wrote:
So in other words, your thesis (that this list has an active
moderator) is disproved by reality.
So long, and thank you for playing. We have some nice parting gifts...
whatever makes your little heart happy, my dear
Yeah, becayse repeating you are an asshole in the internet will make
your life much less sad than it is right. Wow, lets repeat and if I
repeat a lot people will stop thinking Im a kid that shouldnt have
internet access without the supervision of an adult.
may your mom see you posting stuff like
The fall back position when running out of intelligence is usually
insults and profanity.
--
(o:]*HUGGLES*[:o)
Billie Walsh
The three best words in the English Language:
I LOVE YOU
Pass them on!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 08 September 2007 15:27, Billie Walsh wrote:
The fall back position when running out of intelligence is usually
insults and profanity.
I just think it's hilarious that these two are going at each other
instead of the rest of us. Isn't it amazing how they were attracted to
each
Billie Walsh wrote:
The fall back position when running out of intelligence is usually
insults and profanity.
Or sometimes, it's the most effective way of conveying extreme
irritation and disgust.
Learn the difference.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Mike wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 15:27, Billie Walsh wrote:
The fall back position when running out of intelligence is usually
insults and profanity.
I just think it's hilarious that these two are going at each other
instead of the rest of us. Isn't it amazing how they were
Don't worry, he won't be bothering this or any list quite shortly.
You are just retarded. I mean, you should be in a mental health
institution or something...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/8/07, Aaron Kulkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Billie Walsh wrote:
The fall back position when running out of intelligence is usually
insults and profanity.
Or sometimes, it's the most effective way of conveying extreme
irritation and disgust.
Learn the difference.
Does your mom
Billie Walsh wrote:
(nothing interesting)
very long thread. amusing to jump in from time to time. do you mean to
continue until christmas?
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Druid wrote:
There is no moderator, you twit.
there is
Shut up, you arrogant, stuck-up pompous asshole.
Some people on this list (and others) say I'm rude...
but it's ONLY towards jerks such as yourself.
They mean dumb, ok? Dumb, not rude.
Marcio
---
Druid
Prescient
--
Druid wrote:
Yeah, becayse repeating you are an asshole in the internet will make
your life much less sad than it is right. Wow, lets repeat and if I
repeat a lot people will stop thinking Im a kid that shouldnt have
internet access without the supervision of an adult.
may your mom see you
Hi Aaron,
Your isp and your mom will finally hear from you. Time for you at
adsl-76-226-66-120.dsl.sfldmi.sbcglobal.net [76.226.66.120] to finally
get busy.
Have a good time
Fun you know how to use cron, but next time set a fake account. You
spam like a little kiddy girl.
Marcio
---
Druid
On
oh, seems the BCCed message didnt make it. Dont worry, Ill make it
available here:
Here it goes. Read it, its fun.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Abuse report of spam coming from
adsl-76-226-66-120.dsl.sfldmi.sbcglobal.net
Hi, abuse
On Saturday 08 September 2007 11:42, jdd wrote:
Billie Walsh wrote:
(nothing interesting)
very long thread. amusing to jump in from time to time. do you mean to
continue until christmas?
I hope they at least get to some exciting subjects like hacker beer, wet
t-shirts and gerbils.
--
kai
Druid wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Your isp and your mom will finally hear from you. Time for you at
adsl-76-226-66-120.dsl.sfldmi.sbcglobal.net [76.226.66.120] to finally
get busy.
what spam?
Have a good time
Fun you know how to use cron, but next time set a fake account. You
spam like a little
heh, funny your mom hasnt donated you to the circus. You could be
doing a good clown number
Maybe its still in time
On 9/8/07, Aaron Kulkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Druid wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Your isp and your mom will finally hear from you. Time for you at
Druid wrote:
Yeah, becayse repeating you are an asshole in the internet will make
your life much less sad than it is right. Wow, lets repeat and if I
repeat a lot people will stop thinking Im a kid that shouldnt have
internet access without the supervision of an adult.
may your mom see you
Druid wrote:
Don't worry, he won't be bothering this or any list quite shortly.
You are just retarded. I mean, you should be in a mental health
institution or something...
Spot the projection
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henne? Would you, please?
On 9/8/07, Aaron Kulkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Druid wrote:
Yeah, becayse repeating you are an asshole in the internet will make
your life much less sad than it is right. Wow, lets repeat and if I
repeat a lot people will stop thinking Im a kid that shouldnt
Druid wrote:
On 9/8/07, Aaron Kulkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Druid wrote:
So in other words, your thesis (that this list has an active
moderator) is disproved by reality.
So long, and thank you for playing. We have some nice parting gifts...
whatever makes your little heart happy, my dear
Druid wrote:
Don't worry, he won't be bothering this or any list quite shortly.
You are just retarded. I mean, you should be in a mental health
institution or something...
The beatings will now commence and continue until my morale improves.
And if you come back ill-behaved, the complexity
The time you have cluttering the list is coming to a close.
You were warned.
s scared here...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 08 September 2007 18:48, Kai Ponte wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 11:42, jdd wrote:
Billie Walsh wrote:
(nothing interesting)
very long thread. amusing to jump in from time to time. do you mean to
continue until christmas?
I hope they at least get to some exciting
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:46, Doug McGarrett wrote:
Isn't this enough, already? What a waste of bandwidth!
--doug
Yeah, I agree.
The limited bandwidth we have would be better served ensuring that all the
pr0n, youtube and ebaumsworld videos get downloaded along with making sure
Kai Ponte wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:46, Doug McGarrett wrote:
Isn't this enough, already? What a waste of bandwidth!
--doug
Yeah, I agree.
The limited bandwidth we have would be better served ensuring that all the
pr0n, youtube and ebaumsworld videos get downloaded
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:53, Kai Ponte wrote:
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:46, Doug McGarrett wrote:
Isn't this enough, already? What a waste of bandwidth!
--doug
Yeah, I agree.
The limited bandwidth we have
Limited bandwidth? Surely you jest. Even if every person with an
cops blaming top posts
* Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-06-07 11:25]:
I view the list's messages individually in kmail, not as a newsgroup
and not with a threaded view. It matters not to me if someone top
posts, bottom posts or inserts comments in the included text.
your choice
In fairness
It's so sad that your sons no longer have any individuality... :(
Note the top post!
(AND the dripping sarcasm...)
I've been around for awhile and have participated in several discussion
lists like this one. In most of them, the topic of top-posting vs
bottom-posting comes up sooner or
On 2007/09/07 10:01 (GMT-0700) Chuck Davis apparently typed:
I'm an old geezer but have not yet gotten so decrepit that I cannot
remember the essence of threads in which I participate. I want
replies posted at the top so that I can a) find them easily and b)
don't have to wast time scrolling
Felix Miata wrote:
You won't get it from this old geezer. I see hundreds of posts from dozens of
mailing lists each day. There's no way I'm going to remember the context of
some random reply, so I nearly always have to read some quoted
material before the reply can have contextual meaning.
I'm an old geezer but have not yet gotten so decrepit that I cannot
remember the essence of threads in which I participate. I want
replies posted at the top so that I can a) find them easily and b)
don't have to wast time scrolling down. Now, if I've forgotten the
essence of the thread I can
What you two think or want is completely irrelevant, for 2 reasons:
1) You are not the moderators of the list
2) The moderator couldnt care less about that topic, it seems
But its good you guys send those passionate emails telling what you
guys think and stuff, so you can let go with your
Sloan wrote:
What I don't like is having to wade down through the tedious history of
a huge series of postings (all of which I've read several times before)
just to see a one-line answer buried at the very bottom.
this is also a very bad action by the poster
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Davis wrote:
I'm an old geezer but have not yet gotten so decrepit that I cannot
remember the essence of threads in which I participate. I want
snip
This is getting a little out of hand ...
This is really to some extent a matter of common
On 9/7/07, Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
You won't get it from this old geezer. I see hundreds of posts from dozens
of mailing lists each day. There's no way I'm going to remember the context
of some random reply, so I nearly always have to read some quoted
material
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-09-07 at 14:07 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
You might want to experiment with gmail. It takes all quoted text and
hides it behind a hypertext that says - Show quoted text - most of
the time.
This has the side effect that when
Stevens wrote:
Eberhard, and others:
I view the list's messages individually in kmail, not as a newsgroup
and not with a threaded view. It matters not to me if someone top
posts, bottom posts or inserts comments in the included text.
In fairness to those who make the mistake of top posting,
Am Freitag, 7. September 2007 19:33:54 schrieb Druid:
PS: I top posted and bottom posted this reply so everybody will feel
all warm and fuzzy
Unfortunately I just read it after I read the whole Top-Posting - where I had
to wonder. So it didn't really help, sorry.
Just for the record I didn't
Carlos E. R. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-09-07 at 14:07 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
You might want to experiment with gmail. It takes all quoted text and
hides it behind a hypertext that says - Show quoted text - most of
the time.
This has the side
Greg Freemyer wrote:
On 9/7/07, Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
You won't get it from this old geezer. I see hundreds of posts from dozens of
mailing lists each day. There's no way I'm going to remember the context of
some random reply, so I nearly always have to read some
There is no moderator, you twit.
there is
Shut up, you arrogant, stuck-up pompous asshole.
Some people on this list (and others) say I'm rude...
but it's ONLY towards jerks such as yourself.
They mean dumb, ok? Dumb, not rude.
Marcio
---
Druid
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Am Freitag, 7. September 2007 22:46:22 schrieb Aaron Kulkis:
Bottom posting without removing extra quotes is, IMO, somewhat worse than
top posting.
Indeed, for a couple of years, I once did that deliberately
with ALL messages to soc.singles, just because the majority
of the participants on
Michael Skiba wrote:
Am Freitag, 7. September 2007 22:46:22 schrieb Aaron Kulkis:
Bottom posting without removing extra quotes is, IMO, somewhat worse than
top posting.
Indeed, for a couple of years, I once did that deliberately
with ALL messages to soc.singles, just because the majority
of
Really?
Then why wasn't my previous post moderated out?
Who knows? Maybe you will receive an email soon...
You are a living proof that we shouldnt let kids post in the list heh
Marcio
---
druid
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Druid wrote:
[Druid's assertion that the list is moderated (deleted by Druid)]
Really?
Then why wasn't my previous post moderated out?
Who knows? Maybe you will receive an email soon...
You are a living proof that we shouldnt let kids post in the list heh
So in other words, your thesis
So in other words, your thesis (that this list has an active
moderator) is disproved by reality.
So long, and thank you for playing. We have some nice parting gifts...
whatever makes your little heart happy, my dear
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
And next time you are in need of attention, just call your mom.
Remember: she has an obligation of hearing your pathetic bla bla bla.
We dont.
On 9/7/07, Aaron Kulkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Druid wrote:
[Druid's assertion that the list is moderated (deleted by Druid)]
Really?
Then
Druid wrote:
There is no moderator, you twit.
there is
Then why wasn't my previous posting moderated out?
Shut up, you arrogant, stuck-up pompous asshole.
Some people on this list (and others) say I'm rude...
but it's ONLY towards jerks such as yourself.
They mean dumb, ok? Dumb,
On 9/7/07, Aaron Kulkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Druid wrote:
There is no moderator, you twit.
there is
Then why wasn't my previous posting moderated out?
Dunno, maybe the guy is sleeping or something. Some people have life.
That said, there are far too many idiots in the planet, dont
M Harris wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2007 10:21, Stevens wrote:
I don't give a rip one way or the other
If you post in a flame war regarding top-posting, are those postings then
therefore hot postings or post toasties... or are they just toasted posts?
Inquiring minds want
On Friday 07 September 2007 17:59, steve wrote:
...
good one.
I cant believe there is no monthly charge for the list, its almost
as amusing as Comedy Central.
Eh? You must not be watching The Daily Show. Jon Stewart et. cie. are a
over-the-top hilarious. And it's real humor, not like
On Friday 07 September 2007 10:49, jdd wrote:
Sloan wrote:
What I don't like is having to wade down through the tedious history of
a huge series of postings (all of which I've read several times before)
just to see a one-line answer buried at the very bottom.
this is also a very bad
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Druid wrote:-
What you two think or want is completely irrelevant, for 2 reasons:
Well, not quite irrelevant. It may be to you, but it isn't to them.
1) You are not the moderators of the list
There are no moderators of this list.
2) The moderator couldnt care less about
There are no moderators of this list.
In case you are not sure, Ill take some time to explain. There is a
guy, who knows the root password for the server in which the mailing
list software, and probably the smtp server for this domain is
installed. And this guy, having the powers to change
On Friday 07 September 2007 22:11, Druid wrote:
There are no moderators of this list.
In case you are not sure, Ill take some time to explain. There is a
guy, who knows the root password for the server in which the mailing
list software, and probably the smtp server for this domain is
This is to demonstrate, that I know how to top post ;-))
The issue with top posts is this:
I am reading this list as a newsgroup and use a threaded view of the
messages that arrive to overview any given issue.
Now, when someone uses top-posting, it is very hard for me, to properly
follow the
Eberhard Roloff wrote:
This is to demonstrate, that I know how to top post ;-))
The issue with top posts is this:
I am reading this list as a newsgroup and use a threaded view of the
messages that arrive to overview any given issue.
Now, when someone uses top-posting, it is very hard for
Eberhard, and others:
I view the list's messages individually in kmail, not as a newsgroup
and not with a threaded view. It matters not to me if someone top
posts, bottom posts or inserts comments in the included text.
In fairness to those who make the mistake of top posting, many
email clients
* Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-06-07 11:25]:
I view the list's messages individually in kmail, not as a newsgroup
and not with a threaded view. It matters not to me if someone top
posts, bottom posts or inserts comments in the included text.
your choice
In fairness to those who make the
Stevens wrote:
Eberhard, and others:
I view the list's messages individually in kmail, not as a newsgroup
and not with a threaded view. It matters not to me if someone top
posts, bottom posts or inserts comments in the included text.
the matter is not really top or bottom posting, it's what
On Thursday 06 September 2007 10:21, Stevens wrote:
I don't give a rip one way or the other
If you post in a flame war regarding top-posting, are those postings then
therefore hot postings or post toasties... or are they just toasted posts?
Inquiring minds want to know... which is all
73 matches
Mail list logo
