Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-30 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Monday 30 November 2015, 11:12:57 wrote Dirk Müller: > Hi Adrian, > > > the current git master is the one with caused the armv7 failures, do > > you speak about that one? > > When we talk about why armv7 fails, then yes, thats because > https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/210 is not mer

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-30 Thread Dirk Müller
Hi Adrian, > the current git master is the one with caused the armv7 failures, do > you speak about that one? When we talk about why armv7 fails, then yes, thats because https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/210 is not merged in git master. Don't be confused by the "merged" state in github,

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-30 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Monday 30 November 2015, 09:35:10 wrote Dirk Müller: > Hi Adrian, > > > That was the version which caused the problems on arm 32bit > > with the the kernel/qemu startup > > Not really :-) the change fixed the problem. the issue was that > somebody ,while editing the build script, forgot to rem

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-30 Thread Dirk Müller
Hi, > Actually, I wonder if the rng stuff is really worth the effort > when the majority of our systems is not supporting it. passing through virtio-rng is definitely a good idea especially with the terrible openssl on SLE12 that requires several kilobytes of entropy for generating a trivial RSA

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-30 Thread Dirk Müller
Hi Adrian, > That was the version which caused the problems on arm 32bit > with the the kernel/qemu startup Not really :-) the change fixed the problem. the issue was that somebody ,while editing the build script, forgot to remove the reference to the -pci device and only added the -device virtio

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-30 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Monday 30 November 2015, 09:11:34 wrote Andreas Schwab: > Adrian Schröter writes: > > > On Saturday 28 November 2015, 18:29:36 wrote Dirk Müller: > >> In case you're wondering why all build workers on all architectures > >> are broken right now > > > > huh? at least x86_64 is working fine > >

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-30 Thread Andreas Schwab
Adrian Schröter writes: > On Saturday 28 November 2015, 18:29:36 wrote Dirk Müller: >> In case you're wondering why all build workers on all architectures >> are broken right now > > huh? at least x86_64 is working fine Probably because most of the x86-64 workers have no hwrng. Andreas. -- An

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-29 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Saturday 28 November 2015, 18:29:36 wrote Dirk Müller: > Hi Adrian, > > > [ 14s] qemu-system-arm: -device virtio-rng-pci,rng=rng0: No 'PCI' bus > > found for device 'virtio-rng-pci' > > I fixed that already a bit over a month ago. see > https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/210/ That n

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-28 Thread Dirk Müller
Hi Adrian, > [ 14s] qemu-system-arm: -device virtio-rng-pci,rng=rng0: No 'PCI' bus found > for device 'virtio-rng-pci' I fixed that already a bit over a month ago. see https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/210/ That needs to be deployed. In case you're wondering why all build workers on

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-27 Thread Alexander Graf
On 27.11.15 08:07, Adrian Schröter wrote: > On Friday 27 November 2015, 08:02:19 wrote Adrian Schröter: >> On Friday 27 November 2015, 07:58:47 wrote Adrian Schröter: >>> On Thursday 26 November 2015, 22:57:57 wrote Dirk Müller: Hi Adrian, > I have disabled for now kernel RNG suppor

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Friday 27 November 2015, 08:02:19 wrote Adrian Schröter: > On Friday 27 November 2015, 07:58:47 wrote Adrian Schröter: > > On Thursday 26 November 2015, 22:57:57 wrote Dirk Müller: > > > Hi Adrian, > > > > > > > I have disabled for now kernel RNG support in the build script for arm, > > > > but

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Friday 27 November 2015, 07:58:47 wrote Adrian Schröter: > On Thursday 26 November 2015, 22:57:57 wrote Dirk Müller: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > > I have disabled for now kernel RNG support in the build script for arm, > > > but we need to discuss if we want to have this in future (by having > > > p

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Thursday 26 November 2015, 22:57:57 wrote Dirk Müller: > Hi Adrian, > > > I have disabled for now kernel RNG support in the build script for arm, > > but we need to discuss if we want to have this in future (by having > > proper kernel and initrd support for it) or if we should disable it in >

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Dirk Müller
Hi Adrian, > I have disabled for now kernel RNG support in the build script for arm, > but we need to discuss if we want to have this in future (by having > proper kernel and initrd support for it) or if we should disable it in > general for arm. Not all ARMv7 workers have support hardware availa

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Andreas Schwab
Adrian Schröter writes: > armbuild13 (and most likely the others as well) did stubmble over the not > working hardware random generator support in the kernel. That should already be solved by . Does that not work? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SU

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Guillaume Gardet
Le 26/11/2015 11:48, Adrian Schröter a écrit : On Thursday 26 November 2015, 11:23:27 wrote Guillaume Gardet: Hi, Sorry for cross post (-arm and -buildservice) but not sure who should fix this problem. Some ARM v7 workers are broken. They start to boot and then fail. Thus, lots of packages

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Guillaume Gardet
Le 26/11/2015 11:53, Adrian Schröter a écrit : On Thursday 26 November 2015, 11:52:14 wrote Guillaume Gardet: Le 26/11/2015 11:23, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : Hi, Sorry for cross post (-arm and -buildservice) but not sure who should fix this problem. Some ARM v7 workers are broken. They sta

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Thursday 26 November 2015, 11:52:14 wrote Guillaume Gardet: > Le 26/11/2015 11:23, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Sorry for cross post (-arm and -buildservice) but not sure who should fix > > this problem. > > > > Some ARM v7 workers are broken. They start to boot and then fail. Thu

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Guillaume Gardet
Le 26/11/2015 11:23, Guillaume Gardet a écrit : Hi, Sorry for cross post (-arm and -buildservice) but not sure who should fix this problem. Some ARM v7 workers are broken. They start to boot and then fail. Thus, lots of packages go to building state but return quickly to scheduled state. arm

Re: [opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Adrian Schröter
On Thursday 26 November 2015, 11:23:27 wrote Guillaume Gardet: > Hi, > > Sorry for cross post (-arm and -buildservice) but not sure who should fix > this problem. > > Some ARM v7 workers are broken. They start to boot and then fail. Thus, lots > of packages go to building state but return quick

[opensuse-arm] Most ARM v7 workers are broken

2015-11-26 Thread Guillaume Gardet
Hi, Sorry for cross post (-arm and -buildservice) but not sure who should fix this problem. Some ARM v7 workers are broken. They start to boot and then fail. Thus, lots of packages go to building state but return quickly to scheduled state. armbuild numbers 13, 16, 17, 18 and 19 are failing w