Em Sex, 2006-03-17 às 21:31 +0100, Tobias Burnus escreveu:
> Next question: If one calls rug update, does it make sense that rug
> first downloads all files and then installs them?
I don't see much sense in installing each package right after the file
has been downloaded.
Consider (big fake ex
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Andreas Klein wrote:
>
> > > > anyone seeing instabilities with the beta8 kernel?
> > > > I have two machine not eve
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, houghi wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:18:12PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> > And most machine bought today with a dual-layer burner built in will tend
> > to
> > have >150GB hard disks - laptops being an exception, the DL burnered laptop
> > has only 80GB of disk space.
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Andreas Klein wrote:
anyone seeing instabilities with the beta8 kernel?
I have two machine not even responding to ping.
One is a dual opteron, the other one is a virtual machin
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 16:50 schrieb houghi:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:18:12PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
>
> > I'm logging into the Wiki as I write this, I'll start on writing a page
> > for this... (I did a search and didn't find an existing one)
> >
> > I propose something like:
> >
> >
Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Andreas Klein wrote:
>
>> anyone seeing instabilities with the beta8 kernel?
>> I have two machine not even responding to ping.
>> One is a dual opteron, the other one is a virtual machine in vmware.
>> Both run 24x7 wi
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:18:12PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> And most machine bought today with a dual-layer burner built in will tend to
> have >150GB hard disks - laptops being an exception, the DL burnered laptop
> has only 80GB of disk space...
Not all systems that will run SUSE are the m
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:19:47PM +0100, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
> It doesn't help that YOU can work with a 10GB "/" partition, not even
> that I can work with 8GB. My suggestion: whenever hwinfo says there is a
> DVD burner in the system the default suggestion should be a separate
> 10GB "/t
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 04:09:47PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> The proposed max of 20GB might help
> some people with larger drives and larger needs, and has been said, it is
> dynamic, so it won't grab 20GB on a 30GB driver, and it is just a suggestion.
Again I understand that it is dynamic. Y
houghi wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:49:58PM +0100, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
>
>> Let's assume users have got a DVD burning device. Then the default setup
>> of a SUSE 10.1 installation puts intermediate burning files into /tmp.
>>
>
> I have a DVD burner, 10GB space and no proble
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 16:06 schrieb houghi:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:49:58PM +0100, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
> > Let's assume users have got a DVD burning device. Then the default setup
> > of a SUSE 10.1 installation puts intermediate burning files into /tmp.
>
> I have a DVD burner, 1
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 15:30 schrieb houghi:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:57:39AM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> > With a fairly typical developer install, with Gnome and KDE loaded on my
> > laptop, that crashed through the 10GB barrier that YaST suggests at
> > install time. If I'd thought that
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:49:58PM +0100, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
> Let's assume users have got a DVD burning device. Then the default setup
> of a SUSE 10.1 installation puts intermediate burning files into /tmp.
I have a DVD burner, 10GB space and no problems.
> Which is normally a directo
David Wright wrote:
> Just a word of warning regarding the new default partition sizes suggested by
> YaST. I have a 10GB root partition on my laptop and just went to install IBM
> Rational Software Architect. The install files take up around 2.5GB of space
> and the installed program itself tak
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:57:39AM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> With a fairly typical developer install, with Gnome and KDE loaded on my
> laptop, that crashed through the 10GB barrier that YaST suggests at install
> time. If I'd thought that I might need such a big app and had made allowances
>
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Andreas Klein wrote:
anyone seeing instabilities with the beta8 kernel?
I have two machine not even responding to ping.
One is a dual opteron, the other one is a virtual machine in vmware.
Both run 24x7 with all previous betas without crashing.
I see spontaneous reboo
Hello,
anyone seeing instabilities with the beta8 kernel?
I have two machine not even responding to ping.
One is a dual opteron, the other one is a virtual machine in vmware.
Both run 24x7 with all previous betas without crashing.
Bye,
--
Andreas Klein
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 18 March 2006 10:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST
>>
>> This is not yet a known bug - file it with component "libzypp",
>>
>> Andreas
>
> I've added Factory (mirrors.ker
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 11:15 schrieb Martin Schlander:
> On Saturday 18 March 2006 10:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST
> >
> > This is not yet a known bug - file it with component "libzypp",
> >
> > Andreas
>
> I've added Fact
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 10:45 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
> David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With Beta 6 I could see the Factory repository, even if I couldn't
> > download much (about every third package seemed to be missing when I went
> > to do updates :-( ), but with Beta 8, I can't a
On Saturday 18 March 2006 10:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository. I've tried rug and YaST
>
> This is not yet a known bug - file it with component "libzypp",
>
> Andreas
I've added Factory (mirrors.kernel.org) to yast installation sources seemed to
work fi
David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With Beta 6 I could see the Factory repository, even if I couldn't download
> much (about every third package seemed to be missing when I went to do
> updates :-( ), but with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository.
>
> I've tried rug and YaST, but w
Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Tobias Burnus schrieb:
>>> On Friday 17 March 2006 18:14, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>>
So, with zen-updater (which should be configured out of the box
correctly - and that's a bug already), go to configure and add
e.g. factory
With Beta 6 I could see the Factory repository, even if I couldn't download
much (about every third package seemed to be missing when I went to do
updates :-( ), but with Beta 8, I can't add the factory repository.
I've tried rug and YaST, but with opensuse.org, gwdg.de and uni-heidelberg.de
I
Am Freitag, 17. März 2006 23:24 schrieb Hans Witvliet:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 13:09 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Just a word of warning regarding the new default partition sizes
> > > suggested by YaST. I have a 10GB root partition on my laptop an
Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
> Anyone any idea how to get around bug 158958?
>
> Thanks!
>
> FMF
>
Found my workaround: since Beta 8 (for the first time ever) I need
"noapic" both for installation and the rescue system. The installed
system works fine without this parameter.
FMF
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
