Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 09:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
>> > very annoying: Conflicts are only shown one at a time. You can not s
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I chose to install xmms with yast sw (beta8) - apparently xmms depends on
> > xmms-lib which is also installed. This is all very nice - except in earlier
> > versions of SL you would be informed of d
Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree to delay the discussion. But we should also discuss for SLES 10.
Please discuss this on the SLES beta lists - or open a bugreport for
that...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH,
On 22 Mar 2006 at 9:50, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
[...]
> > I'd like to discuss this and similar issues once we have 10.1 out, so
> > that we can plan on what to do for 10.2...
>
> I agree to delay the discussion. But we should also discuss for SLES 10.
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 20:57, houghi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:29:19PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
> > Although ,I Agree with your rant, and found this sudden move to
> > MONO (.NET) or whatever very bad,disappointing, and unnecessary
> > (specially in the middle of the distro deve
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 01:06, Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote:
> I have the problem that KsCD don't work anymore, beginning with SL10
> or change the motherboards to ICH5-8 KsCD is not working ?
In my experience, kscd has been broken since 9.3 (no "direct digital"
setting, "audio backend" dro
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 06:15:45AM -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 20:57, houghi wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:29:19PM -0400, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Although ,I Agree with your rant, and found this sudden move to
> > > MONO (.NET) or whatever very bad,disappoi
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 06:15:45AM -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> Can someone please explain how it makes sense to use a framework
> intended for writing code that runs on multiple operating systems
> (Mono) to write tools used specifically on Linux, and on a specific
> distro at that? I'm a die-
> > I chose to install xmms with yast sw (beta8) - apparently xmms depends on
> > xmms-lib which is also installed. This is all very nice - except in
> > earlier versions of SL you would be informed of dependencies before
> > they're installed - enabling you to change your mind - or at least know
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd suggest not to release 10.1 unless ready. The damage of a bad release
> will chase away a lot of people from SuSE, and from Linux in general.
>
> The current state seems "alpha" to me: It's not clear what the final
> features should be, and it's still full with bugs.
>
> It would be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 09:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> Andreas Vetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > I just tried to install as many packages as possible and found something
> >> > very annoyin
Fedora Core 5 is out and the first review is out, nice reviewfor
Linux-experts. Every Windows-user will think twice or trice :D:
http://lunapark6.com/?p=481
I hope SUSE won't have the same.
"There was enough glitches in the second install, that I can say if you have a
Nvidia card or a moth
On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:36, Azerion wrote:
> I hope SUSE won't have the same.
>
> "Something tells me Fedora could have gone through a longer test cycle to
> iron out these quirks,"
Well, most of the problems with 10.1 seem to be related to the packagemanager.
The upside of the packagema
13 matches
Mail list logo
