On 31 May 2006 at 15:49, houghi wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:01:40AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Is it really asked too much for a user to know how to install software?:
Apparently. Even installing software that is on CD 1 can be a chalange. At
this moment the Linux users are changing
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:23:23AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
I'm afraid that too much effort is put into making the last two categories of
users happy, while in fact those are exactly the kind of users who won't be
happy
with Linux. They want the possibility to ruin their installation
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:04:59PM +0200, houghi wrote:
I tried till now only Schiele and that one did not work. As soon as I
I looked into this and most likely identified the problem. If you like then
try again now. It will still complain that it is not signed but I suppose it
to work now.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed that Fedora seems to have switched to using Logical Volumes
for installing on the hard disk since FC4. I personally am using LVM
myself for a very long time and must say I am very fond of it. It
provides much more flexibility than using
Lenz Grimmer wrote:
I'd like to propose that SUSE Linux considers switching to this scheme
for new installations by default, too - I now filed this as an
enhancement request in Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180762
if you can garanty that one hard drive failure won't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
jdd wrote:
if you can garanty that one hard drive failure won't make me lose all my
data, I'ok (I have several HD, of course, each with part of my system)
In what respect would that be different from a hard disk failure with
regular
Lenz Grimmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
jdd wrote:
if you can garanty that one hard drive failure won't make me lose all my
data, I'ok (I have several HD, of course, each with part of my system)
In what respect would that be different from a hard disk
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:08:02PM +0200, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed that Fedora seems to have switched to using Logical Volumes
for installing on the hard disk since FC4. I personally am using LVM
myself for a very long time and must
Hi,
Lenz Grimmer wrote:
I noticed that Fedora seems to have switched to using Logical Volumes
for installing on the hard disk since FC4. I personally am using LVM
myself for a very long time and must say I am very fond of it. It
provides much more flexibility than using plain partitions,
Hi,
I'd like to know if / propose that the following bugs are candidates for
inclusion in the package management update:
- Option to disable missing signature complaints is not persistent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175845
Not because of its severity - it's actually labelled as
Pascal Bleser wrote:
jdd wrote:
...
AFAIK, if LVM uses 4 disks and one of them fails, the hole file system
is lost. With the usual system only the file system on the faulty disk
is lost.
That's quite oversimplified, but it's more or less correct, as with
RAID 0 (striping).
On the other
Andreas Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'd like to know if / propose that the following bugs are candidates for
inclusion in the package management update:
- Option to disable missing signature complaints is not persistent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175845
It will
On 1 Jun 2006 at 15:08, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed that Fedora seems to have switched to using Logical Volumes
for installing on the hard disk since FC4. I personally am using LVM
myself for a very long time and must say I am very
jdd wrote:
given modern disks are large, is it possible to have LVM strictly
assigned at one disk, or separate LVM to each disk?
Of course.
sharing a partition between several disks don't seems so nice to me
(when not strictly necessary), but when a drive fails, anyway all it's
content is
Ulrich Windl wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 at 15:08, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
[...]Logical Volumes[...]
I'd like to propose that SUSE Linux considers switching to this scheme
for new installations by default, too - I now filed this as an
enhancement request in Bugzilla:
15 matches
Mail list logo
