Hi,
has somebody found a way around bug 304318? I really need the option to
mount nfs shares as an ordinary user.
Thanks!
FMF
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernhard Walle wrote:
* Frank-Michael Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-30 12:44]:
Is there someone who does not experience this bug with Beta2? If not, I
should raise it to Blocker.
Please don't. As Christoph pointed out in the last status mail, GNOME
will be updated anyway before
Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
Alexey Eremenko escribió:
Hi Susers !
Ubuntu team have just developed an excellent technology, that existed
in Windows for many years before.
and that exists in SUSE since many many years.
type
sax.sh -a in the command line and get your messed up
Is there someone who does not experience this bug with Beta2? If not, I
should raise it to Blocker.
FMF
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernhard Walle wrote:
* Frank-Michael Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-30 12:44]:
Is there someone who does not experience this bug with Beta2? If not, I
should raise it to Blocker.
Please don't. As Christoph pointed out in the last status mail, GNOME
will be updated anyway before
Christian Morales Vega wrote:
On Thursday 30 August 2007 10:09:44 Alexey Eremenko wrote:
Hi Susers !
Ubuntu team have just developed an excellent technology, that existed
in Windows for many years before.
More specifically, the ability to recover from Graphics Adapter
misconfigurations.
Sid Boyce wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2007/08/29 04:25 (GMT+0100) Sid Boyce apparently typed:
I had a failing IDE HD as /dev/sda, so I installed 10.3 on a new
SATA drive /dev/sdb and was booting from it until I removed
/dev/sda. The SATA drive is now /dev/sda, but it won't boot, just
the
Jim Pye wrote:
http://en.opensuse.org/Development_Version#Downloads
There is a line hidden in the table called Checksums :)
Even trying to refind them I had abot 4 clicks :(
J
I am sorry, but I am still not able to find the md5sum for e.g.:
openSUSE-10.3-Beta2-DVD-i386-iso
Any idea
Seems it will be the first time, I won't be able to participate in an
(open)SUSE beta test. My test computer has the ASUS M2N-MX motherboard.
The noapic boot parameter needed for 32bit kernels isn't the biggest
problem, the nVidia Corporation MCP61 Ethernet (rev a2) interface
(perfectly supported
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:49:15AM +0200, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:30:48AM +0200, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Seems it will be the first time, I won't be able to participate in an
(open)SUSE beta test. My test
Klaus Kaempf wrote:
* Frank-Michael Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Aug 10. 2007 08:49]:
Nope, since there is too much trouble to supply all the information to
Bugzilla from a box that is not connected to the internet.
But you do have a machine with internet connection since you were
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:30:48AM +0200, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Seems it will be the first time, I won't be able to participate in an
(open)SUSE beta test. My test computer has the ASUS M2N-MX motherboard.
The noapic boot parameter needed for 32bit kernels isn't
I'd just like to share my excitement how fast the
openSUSE-10.2-GM-DVD-i386.iso download went this morning.
The corresponding x86_64 torrent is pretty fast, too, quite an
improvement from last release.
Congratulations!
FMF
-
Kenneth Schneider schrieb:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 20:32 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:38:55PM -0500, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
Since upgrading to the latest kernel, 2.6.18.2-33 I can no longer run my
CXO programs I.E. Quicken. I get the following error when
Retrieving kernel-default...
Delta-RPM ./rpm/i586/kernel-default-2.6.18.2-23_31.i586.delta.rpm
wird heruntergeladen OK
Delta-RPM wird angewendet:
/var/adm/mount/AP_0x000d/rpm/i586/kernel-default-2.6.18.2-23_31.i586.delta.rpm
OK
Installation von
Andreas Hanke schrieb:
Frank-Michael Fischer schrieb:
Extracting ... failed ... deleted!
impact32.exe
(http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/corefonts/impact32.exe):
Anybody any idea why this happens?
Yes, it happens because this code failed:
cabextract
Andreas Jaeger schrieb:
We just released a new kernel package that contains the latest fixes
via online update for 10.2.
Please install it on your systems and report if you have any new
problems.
The major changes since the RC1 kernel are:
* a couple of fixes in the SATA area
* Disabling
Andreas Hanke schrieb:
Frank-Michael Fischer schrieb:
And it's unlikely that
cabextract stops working for a while and comes back again etc.
Hm, with the information that is currently available it almost looks
like exactly that.
This is the script:
http://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse
Anybody an idea why (unlike with xfs or reiserfs) I could not manage to
make an ext3 filesystem with external journal.
After mkfs.ext3 -b 4096 -O /dev/sda5 /dev/hda7 I get: Unvollständige
Dateisystem-Option gesetzt: /dev/sda5
And after mke2fs -b 4096 -n -j -J device=/dev/hda7 /dev/sda5 I end up
Anders Johansson schrieb:
I think you misunderstand the manpage. It should literally be journal_dev,
that shouldn't be replaced with a device name.
If you want to have the journal on hda7, the command should be
mkfs.ext3 -b 4096 -O journal_dev /dev/hda7
Anders Johansson schrieb:
I think you misunderstand the manpage. It should literally be journal_dev,
that shouldn't be replaced with a device name.
If you want to have the journal on hda7, the command should be
mkfs.ext3 -b 4096 -O journal_dev /dev/hda7
Interesting: now after external
Robert Schiele schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at all,
it
doesn't seem to matter much
That depends on your point of view. From a user's point of view this is
really
Anders Johansson schrieb:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:01, Robert Schiele wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at
all, it doesn't seem to matter much
That depends on your
Marcus Meissner schrieb:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 08:32:51PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
opensuseupdater shows me no updates. What am I doing wrong?
There are no new updates for RC1 yet.
I've just installed another 11 updates, like an hour ago.
FMF
Marcus Meissner schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 08:32:51PM +0100, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
opensuseupdater shows me no updates. What am I doing wrong?
There are no new updates for RC1 yet.
2 now:
-
Marcus Meissner schrieb:
Started libzypp 3rd test update about one hour ago. Now it's hanging for
a while at 99% - updating software - finishing...
What are we testing here? The bandwidth of the update server?
I used yast online update to test. If you used ZMD/zen-updater and it
Keith Goggin schrieb:
Hi,
1.I've added http://mirror.pacific.net.au/linux/suse/update/10.2/ to
opensuseupdater in both 10.2b2 and 10.2RC1.
In 10.2b2 opensuseupdater shows 7 patches available.
In 10.2RC1 opensuseupdater shows none?
2.What happened to the dummy
Marcel Hilzinger schrieb:
I just saw, that YaST estimates Installlation time to be 45 minutes. This
seems too long (from DVD). Older versions installed within 30 minutes or
below. Installation seems faster than 45 min, however.
Wrong estimation?
Nope, as long as you plan to have the /
from /var/log/boot.omsg after a 10.2 RC1 boot:
4ext2: module not supported by Novell, setting U taint flag.
1. Is there a module from Novell handling ext2 file systems at all? If
so: is it patented? ;-)
2. If not what is Novell's problem with ext2 file systems? In older
machines e.g it can make
Andreas Jaeger schrieb:
Is there any reason this torrent is at a standstill? Literally? I've had
it running for 15 minutes and not a byte has arrived yet.
What's up? Or down?
Too many downloads? No idea - Marcus, can you check?
Andreas
There are just no seeds up yet. Without
Maybe someone can help me out of some of my bad feelings I am having
around putting config data into XML files. One of the striking
advantages (and used in day-to-day work almost daily) of linux versus
windows was the use of plain text files for basically anything
concerning system or application
Heiko Helmle wrote:
Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Might sound a bit emotional, but the parse-metadata problem turns 10.1
into a virtually unusable desktop for my customers (and me) really. In
certain server setups it might be acceptable that the system needs up to
30 minutes after reboot
Peter Czanik wrote:
Hello,
Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:08:02AM +0200, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Might sound a bit emotional, but the parse-metadata problem turns
10.1
into a virtually unusable desktop for my customers (and me) really. In
certain server setups
Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:08:02AM +0200, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Might sound a bit emotional, but the parse-metadata problem turns 10.1
into a virtually unusable desktop for my customers (and me) really. In
certain server setups it might be acceptable
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Frank-Michael,
have you done an update from a previous beta/RC on these machines?
What's the output of:
* rug sl
* rug ca
Andreas
No updates, just installations from scratch. There is no rug anymore on
my machines so I couldn't tell you the output of these
jdd wrote:
Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Might sound a bit emotional, but the parse-metadata problem turns 10.1
into a virtually unusable desktop for my customers (and me) really. In
certain server setups it might be acceptable that the system needs up to
30 minutes after reboot before giving
jdd wrote:
Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
It blocks my three 10.1 systems always at bootup and never for less than
20 minutes. These are all installations from scratch.
note that thousand of SUSE Linux 10.1 users _don't_ have this problem.
so may be you could try to understant what goes wrong
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Frank-Michael,
have you done an update from a previous beta/RC on these machines?
What's the output of:
* rug sl
* rug ca
Andreas
linux:~ # rug sl
# | Status | Type | Name | URI
jdd wrote:
this don't mean you do anything wrong, only something that not any
people do. identifying this could be of great help like the rug test
you where asked to do.
and all this helps fixing the bug.
done
FMF
-
To
jdd wrote:
jdd wrote:
I will try the lanch on start and see is this slows the starting)
no slowing down at all...
almost instant result for:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ rug sl
# | État | Type | Nom| URI
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Frank-Michael,
have you done an update from a previous beta/RC on these machines?
What's the output of:
* rug sl
* rug ca
Andreas
Now this is interesting: After reinstalling rug, running rug sl rug
ca and rebooting the system, bug 177758 does not show anymore.
jdd wrote:
Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
My first rug sl command took about 8 mins to complete. The next one
was lightening fast.
is this true through reboots? that is, is that the first run of the
session or the first run at all that is long?
in the first case, something goes wrong
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 10:17 +0200, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Problem is: during beta test I have been busy reporting and detailling
other bugs so I did not participate in the zen buddism here.
Real problem is that during beta testing there were no [EMAIL
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Frank-Michael Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The reason why I am assuming it's libzypp's fault is: when I filed the
bug it was for the Zen component, then Nat Budin changed the component
to libzypp and connected this bug with bug 176301. This bug I am
jdd wrote:
Henne Vogelsang wrote:
(...)
This is bad but not unfixable.
I really like this kind of post.
thanks
jdd
Henne was just quoting Sean Connery in Entrapment. ;-)
FMF
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ulrich Windl wrote:
On 23 May 2006 at 14:09, jdd wrote:
If I follow well the thread it seems this is a meta-data
download problem.
If it's a download problem, why would the CPU be at 100%?
Regards,
Thanks for your support! I started to get confused already.
FMF
jdd wrote:
and I know the problem. I have to share video files from
Linux and Windows and such files can be up to 12Gb, so FAT32
is not a solution :-)
jdd
http://www.fs-driver.org http://www.fs-driver.orggives a near perfect
and stable solution I am using on two video production systems
For a test I am looking for the supplementary KDE update_for_9.0. It has
been taken off the mirrors everywhere. Does someone still have a copy on
some accessible FTP server I could download?
Thanks in advance!
FMF
-
To
Hartmut Meyer wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a recommendation for a PCMCIA WLAN card.
+ supported out of the box (also with upcoming 10.1 release)
+ 54MBit or better if possible
Greetings from Stuhr
hartmut
My Netgear WG511 works just fine out of the box. And it comes for €25 only.
Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) wrote:
About the bug I posted bellow:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=160804
It has been closed with the following comment:
[Andreas Jaeger]: We will not add it to our media, it will be available
via ftp only.
Can I have a why on that? I can't see
Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) wrote:
About the bug I posted bellow:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=160804
It has been closed with the following comment:
[Andreas Jaeger]: We will not add it to our media, it will be available
via ftp only.
Can I have a why on that? I can't see
There are a couple of non-documented shortcomings in this package I
would like you all inform about:
1. NetworkManager at its present state cannot deal with WLAN card using
the prism54 chip. The corresponding bug 148210 has been marked FIXED
without submitting or communicating a fix. Workaround:
Amongst others I have reported bug 148210. It got marked as fixed (no
fix provided, so I cannot verify the fix). I find not only this strange
but also there are comments missing like #46, #48 and #49. Moreover
there is no entry in which milestone it got fixed.
Does someone now if this common
Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Anyone any idea how to get around bug 158958?
Thanks!
FMF
Found my workaround: since Beta 8 (for the first time ever) I need
noapic both for installation and the rescue system. The installed
system works fine without this parameter.
FMF
David Wright wrote:
Just a word of warning regarding the new default partition sizes suggested by
YaST. I have a 10GB root partition on my laptop and just went to install IBM
Rational Software Architect. The install files take up around 2.5GB of space
and the installed program itself takes
houghi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:49:58PM +0100, Frank-Michael Fischer wrote:
Let's assume users have got a DVD burning device. Then the default setup
of a SUSE 10.1 installation puts intermediate burning files into /tmp.
I have a DVD burner, 10GB space and no problems
Anyone any idea how to get around bug 158958?
Thanks!
FMF
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ulrich Windl wrote:
Is there some guarantee that Zenworks is free from patent claims (from
Novell)?
The issue here is not just patent claims, the whole license situation around
ZENworks is a bit foggy, since it comes NOT under a GPL but under an LGPL
license. Which is legally
S Glasoe wrote:
It doesn't really matter if people like FMF (former MD of
Gartner Group) will help kill some Linux-distro's in marketplace.
However, if he touches SUSE Linux or things that depends on it, people
like me (Azerion, noob beta-tester that should not be doing that) will
help kill
Martin Schlander wrote:
I believe this to be true, but I can't get my Linksys (bcm4306 chipset, using
ndiswrapper) to connect using (k)networkmanager - if I choose traditional
method via ifup in yast nic module it connects fine (For testing purposes I'm
using no encryption and dhcp - should
Edward Dunagin wrote:
NOT have this file: NetworkManager or knetworkmanager.
am i missing something?
Peace.ed
To be exact: knetworkmanager hasn't been part of SUSE distros before 10.1
FMF
-
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Well, reading the changelog it does support ndiswrapper already.
Ciao, Marcus
The problem is getting more complicated: Following my tests,
NetworkManager works somehow with ndiswrapper (somehow, as Network
Manager supports only DHCP setups), but the ndiswrapper
Does anybody whether and when
ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source
will work as an Installation Source for YaST2 Software Management again?
FMF
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Seems, the ndiswrapper module is not part of the OSS distribution anymore.
This is based on some basic misunderstanding, I believe.
Quoting my comment in Bugzilla:
This is from SourceForge.net:
Ndis driver wrapper for the Linux kernel
Project Admins: kiszka, pgiri, pof
Operating System: Linux
Hi, as the NetworkManager package is not capable of supporting my
prism54 card (bug 148210), does someone now whether there are plans for
supporting ndiswrapper through NetworkManager? If not, the market for
10.1 will shrink substantially, as at least most notebooks come with
wlan cards requiring
General Version Freeze is with Beta1,
Andreas
I can't help it, but when will the Version Freeze of the package manager
then happen? With 10.2 RC1? ;-)
FMF
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
We have received bugreports that our current installer does not handle
the FACTORY ftp tree correctly and installs packages for other
platforms. [Bug 151933 and Bug 151954]
I suggest to not use the tree for now,
Andreas
Shall we be informed asap, please, when the
Does anyone have an idea, why my installation of the opensuse-factory
via FTP fails both ways, when going via internet or from my local rsync
mirror? When going local FTP, installation complains there are no
packages groups available after choosing Gnome or KDE. When going
internet the
68 matches
Mail list logo
