Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2007-07-31 13:35:59 +0200, Petr Cerny wrote:
>> Johannes Meixner wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Jul 30 17:26 Juergen Weigert wrote (shortened):
The point in having /usr/share/doc/licenses is that this
establishes one single location where all licenses used in a
Hello,
On Jul 31 13:45 Marcus Rueckert wrote (shortened):
> i dont see an issue of having a documentation packaging around that
> carries all used licenses. as a comparison: should an RFC package only
> install the files, which contain infos about my installed services?
Don't mix up usual docume
On 2007-07-31 13:35:59 +0200, Petr Cerny wrote:
> Johannes Meixner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Jul 30 17:26 Juergen Weigert wrote (shortened):
> >> The point in having /usr/share/doc/licenses is that this establishes
> >> one single location where all licenses used in a product are visible.
> >
Johannes Meixner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 30 17:26 Juergen Weigert wrote (shortened):
>> The point in having /usr/share/doc/licenses is that this establishes
>> one single location where all licenses used in a product are visible.
>
> Might this cause confusion for some users when they find out
Hello,
On Jul 30 17:26 Juergen Weigert wrote (shortened):
> The point in having /usr/share/doc/licenses is that this establishes
> one single location where all licenses used in a product are visible.
Might this cause confusion for some users when they find out
that they have many special licens
On Jul 29, 07 00:28:32 +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
> I'd propose to put only licenses that are used at least by 10 packages
> in the licenses package. This solves several problems:
> - the non-existing space saving effect I mentioned above
> - the risk of having to keep old licenses (as mentione
Hello,
on Sonntag, 29. Juli 2007, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
> Christian Boltz wrote:
> > Hello,
> > ...
> > You mentioned an interesting point: Licenses used just for one
> > package. IMHO it's pointless to move them to the licenses package
> > because you can't save any space - you only can waste it if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
> ...
> You mentioned an interesting point: Licenses used just for one package.
> IMHO it's pointless to move them to the licenses package because you
> can't save any space - you only can waste it if the package with t
Hello,
on Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
> After our discussion with JSrain we decided to write to packages with
> just another issue about licenses.rpm.
>
> The current RPM content size (unpacked) is quite big
> du -sh /usr/share/doc/licenses/ -> 3.9 MB
>
> This package-size is a bi
Robert Schiele wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
>> We are asking for your opinion whether it even makes sense to invest
>> (waste) some time in this area ;)
>
> You should consider one big warning here: If you have only one license package
> you can just add l
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
> We are asking for your opinion whether it even makes sense to invest
> (waste) some time in this area ;)
You should consider one big warning here: If you have only one license package
you can just add licenses there and basically neve
Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2007-07-25 14:07:07 +0200, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
>> After our discussion with JSrain we decided to write to packages with
>> just another issue about licenses.rpm.
>>
>> The current RPM content size (unpacked) is quite big
>> du -sh /usr/share/doc/licenses/ -> 3.9 MB
>
>
On 2007-07-25 14:07:07 +0200, Lukas Ocilka wrote:
> After our discussion with JSrain we decided to write to packages with
> just another issue about licenses.rpm.
>
> The current RPM content size (unpacked) is quite big
> du -sh /usr/share/doc/licenses/ -> 3.9 MB
how much space do we save with no
Moin,
After our discussion with JSrain we decided to write to packages with
just another issue about licenses.rpm.
The current RPM content size (unpacked) is quite big
du -sh /usr/share/doc/licenses/ -> 3.9 MB
This package-size is a bit disputable when talking about saving-space ;)
Actually it i
14 matches
Mail list logo
