RE: [OS-webwork] Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread bbernard
Thanks Jason, that clear things up :) > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:49 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is component.xml compulsory? > > > > > > Hi Pat, > > > > Mmm ...

Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread Heng Sin Low
May be you can share the source and the porting experience on the WIKI ? thanks. --- Thomas Escobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernard and I had a similar weekend - I'm porting a WW > 1.0 app to WW/Xwork (for fun, not production), ran > into the same null pointer and resolved it the same > way (

RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread Rick Salsa
> > The other issue I ran into was the absence of many of > > the WW 1.0 JSP tags - url, action and bean in > > particular. The roadmap makes no mention of these and > > I couldn't find details in the archives so I'll just > > ask: what are the status of these tags - deprecated, > > not yet implem

Re: [OS-webwork] webwork include question

2003-03-17 Thread Patrick Lightbody
We do a very similar thing... but with the ww:action tag. Why not use that? -Pat - Original Message - From: "Morten Wilken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 2:37 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] webwork include question > hi all, > im writing an applicati

Re: [OS-webwork] webwork and weblogic 7 sp 1

2003-03-17 Thread Scott Farquhar
I'm not sure about SP1, but I know for sure that Webwork & sitemesh both work on SP2 (as JIRA runs there). Cheers, Scott Butt, Dudley wrote: Hi Just a quick question, will webwork function on Weblogic 7 NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for t

[OS-webwork] webwork include question

2003-03-17 Thread Morten Wilken
hi all, im writing an application using a pattern where all pages are wrapped in actions, and a page can contain components, which are also actions, so i call stuff.action, which processes the input and have a success.jsp page which uses to include another action (ie a calendar.action) now my pro

RE: [OS-webwork] webwork and weblogic 7 sp 1

2003-03-17 Thread Jason Carreira
Not sure. We use it on WLS 6.1 and we will be upgrading to 8.1 in a few months. > -Original Message- > From: Butt, Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:43 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [OS-webwork] webwork and weblogic 7 sp 1 > > > Hi > > Just a

[OS-webwork] webwork and weblogic 7 sp 1

2003-03-17 Thread Butt, Dudley
Hi Just a quick question, will webwork function on Weblogic 7 NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, copy or other use of, or taking of any action in re

Re: [OS-webwork] Re: Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread Patrick Lightbody
> Bernard and I had a similar weekend - I'm porting a WW > 1.0 app to WW/Xwork (for fun, not production), ran > into the same null pointer and resolved it the same > way (root components in otherwise empty > components.xml). I'll pull my ServletContextListener > as the real solution. Thanks! Als

RE: [OS-webwork] Re: Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread Jason Carreira
See below... > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Escobar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Is component.xml compulsory? > > > Bernard and I had a similar weekend - I'm porting a WW > 1.0 app to WW/Xwork

[OS-webwork] Re: Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread Thomas Escobar
Bernard and I had a similar weekend - I'm porting a WW 1.0 app to WW/Xwork (for fun, not production), ran into the same null pointer and resolved it the same way (root components in otherwise empty components.xml). I'll pull my ServletContextListener as the real solution. Thanks! However, the re

Re: [OS-webwork] newbie to webwork, but used struts before

2003-03-17 Thread Matt Ho
I would please like to know from you guys out there, if anyone has used struts then moved over to using webwork. I would like to know if it is a feasible option, and what the pro's and con's of each are. I have read the FAQ on the comparison between struts and webwork, but i would like to hear fr

RE: [OS-webwork] newbie to webwork, but used struts before

2003-03-17 Thread Butt, Dudley
many thanx, your comments are greatly appreciated. Considering that I'm already familiar with Struts, I will then most probably go with it. I agree, they're all pretty similair and I'm not about to spend a lot of time evaluating each ones pro's and con's. Thank you once again.! -Original Mes

RE: [OS-webwork] newbie to webwork, but used struts before

2003-03-17 Thread Aapo Laakkonen
> I would please like to know from you guys out there, > if anyone has used struts then moved over to using > webwork. I have. I first used Struts in it's beta and first 1.0 release. Then moved to WebWork and then to Maverick. They all are basically the same. WebWork is a little bit more straight

[OS-webwork] newbie to webwork, but used struts before

2003-03-17 Thread Butt, Dudley
Hi, I would please like to know from you guys out there, if anyone has used struts then moved over to using webwork. I would like to know if it is a feasible option, and what the pro's and con's of each are. I have read the FAQ on the comparison between struts and webwork, but i would like to he

RE: [OS-webwork] Getting closer! But first..

2003-03-17 Thread Jason Carreira
I also need to doc a little more. Two further configuration changes I wanted to make were: 1) Enable multiple configuration files using something like: config1.xml config2.xml This shouldn't break existing code, since this will just be an added set of elements in the file and will be XML

RE: [OS-webwork] Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread Jason Carreira
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Is component.xml compulsory? > > > Hi Pat, > > Mmm . this class > com.opensymphony.webwork.lifecycle.Application

Re: [OS-webwork] Is component.xml compulsory?

2003-03-17 Thread bbernard
Hi Pat, Mmm . this class com.opensymphony.webwork.lifecycle.ApplicationLifecycleListener has loadConfiguration() which explicitly call for "components.xml" -- public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent event) { Servl

[OS-webwork] SimpleCounter sample no longer work

2003-03-17 Thread bbernard
Hi all, I just did a fresh cvs checkout for xwork and ww2, after they moved out of sandbox. Rebuilding the ww samples, now that SimpleCounter example is no longer work on tomcat 4.1.18 Tomcat complaining about JasperException while trying to load success.jsp (at line 23, the use of JSTL "out"