But my question is if they are accessible via the ww2 velocity
directives or the $ui marker. From what I've seen of the source code,
that's not the case. Here's the latest I have on the code on the
JSPTagAdapter's "getTag" method:
if (c == null) {
try {
c =
Clas
The BeanTag, URLTag, and ActionTag are all present in WW2 and have been
for a while...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonas Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Velocity support for non-ui tags?
>
The issue beneath is just about these things that are in 1.3 but not in
2.0 yet. Things like bean, action, url and so on.
But the priority is only minor on that issue, so how long will it take
to fix, one may wonder... ;-)
Regards
Jonas
Pat Lightbody wrote:
What kind of replacements? Stuff like
Matt Ho wrote:
Jonas Eriksson wrote:
Great!
Now I have some questions :-)
What IF the velocity template is accessed directly, how can one know,
in the template, if this is happening?
Do you mean how can one tell the difference between:
#parse( "/my/template.vm" )
and
#tag( Component
what if we take one of the existing ww1 tutorials, articles, etc and
convert them to ww2 as a starting point?
Jason Carreira wrote:
Hey,
A while back some people said they were working on getting started
tutorials. Any status on those? If you have them, even in unfinished
states, you could put the
Title: Message
I have
implemented the Freemarker integration in my sandbox. I just need to
a) write some unit tests and
b) check it in :)
I am
new at writing Mock based unit tests, though I am getting
there.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Yeah.. You do need to use response.encodeUrl or
response.encodeRedirectURL, which was implemented with my latest update.
Just let me know if there are any further problems.
Cameron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Carreira
Sent: Wedn
What was
the final decision on this and has the freemarker stuff been submitted?
I can't find it in cvs ;)
rick
Good news!
> -Original Message-
> From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] losing session token when using
> ServletRedirectResult
>
>
> hmm, looks like I was testing this thing o
hmm, looks like I was testing this thing out incorrectly, everything
looks to be in working order. :)
Francisco Hernandez wrote:
currently using ServletRedirectResult doesnt pass the jsessionid token
to the next request so im losing the session, I think it should be
passed on, what do you guys
Oops, yeah. ChainingInterceptor. Don't be embarassed. This stuff wasn't
documented at all... Another big hole to fill in :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernard Choi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
Just saw it.
Anyway, I worked around it for the time being... should have waited for your
reply... :-(
I knew I was doing something wrong. *grin* Just didn't know what.
I was expecting it to work like webwork 1.x , where IIRC, chained actions
propogated the errors as well automatically. Both act
Title: Message
You're
using the beta, correct? The problem is the workflow built into ActionSupport in
the beta (this has been moved into the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor in CVS). When
you have an error in your fieldErrors or actionErrors it will return "input"
without executing your doExecute
Did you see my blog about the problems you were having? You should
really enable anonymous comments, because I couldn't comment there
without a LiveJournal username...
http://freeroller.net/comment.do?method=edit&entryid=c076b0b5f75b2af900f
76041b57109a6
It's about the problem you had with chaini
I'd like to volunteer.
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Chat+Application
Will continue to flesh it out tonite.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:19 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Getting started tutor
I think he's talking about using the tag without the framework or
Ognl... Maybe I'm wrong...
> -Original Message-
> From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] re. UI tags as standalone comp
I think you have to tell it to encode the URL... Someone stop me if I'm
off track :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] losing session token when using
> Se
Title: Message
Well, I took your advice and created an action for
my page. However, now, when the page is displayed in input mode it returns
the list correctly, however, when it is an error then it says that it is
returning an empty set.
Any ideas why this is happening?
Thanks,
Chris
> That would be much appreciated!
I'll get this in by the end of today.
> We have to get this running on our Weblogic 6.1 SP4 system; I
> have a good idea of what the problem is. Weblogic 6.1 is not
> quite compliant with the Servlet 2.3 specification; the fix is easy.
>
> I'd be glad to run
That would be much appreciated!
> -Original Message-
> From: Smith, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-281) WW2
> problem w/ WLS 6.1
>
>
> Jason,
>
> We have to get thi
I know very little about sessions when cookies aren't enabled -- but I
thought the app server did all that magic?
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:43 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] losing session tok
For the tabbed pane tag, if it was in 1.3 we need to get it in 2.0.
As for having the UI tags "work" when not inside of an action request -- I
believe this works or at least used to. I made a special point of allowing
this to take place so that users could point to /foo.jsp without having to
creat
What kind of replacements? Stuff like if/then/else and iterator are built in
to velocity natively. Any tag that was in 1.3 should be in 2.0 unless a VERY
good reason is given -- so everyone, please be sure to open issues if you
see something that was in 1.3 and isn't in 2.0 yet.
-Pat
- Origin
Yeah, the maven build files are secondary to the ant build files and have
traditionally bene used only for generating the site. I'll talk with Matt
today to see how we can avoid this problem.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Armond Avanes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Jason and I talked last night, and rather than introduce a new tag, we're
just going to add an "executeResult" attribute to ww:action that defaults to
false. If for some reason we see more attributes and behaviors being added
to ww:action, we'll go ahead and break them out in to different tags (a l
Jason,
We have to get this running on our Weblogic 6.1 SP4 system; I have a
good idea of what the problem is. Weblogic 6.1 is not quite compliant
with the Servlet 2.3 specification; the fix is easy.
I'd be glad to run w/ this one if you're busy.
Scott Smith
Technical Specialist II
TSG HLIS E-Co
I got it, but haven't had time to look yet. I'll take a look tonight.
> -Original Message-
> From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
>
>
>
> Jason, guys ...
>
Jason, guys ...
I've posted my files ... have you received? (any idea?)
I'm quite sure that the SET and GET methods are right (case, letter, everything in
place) .. the
types are OK ...
Is anyone else using the XWork validation framework with success? Plase I'm
stucked :)
thanks
+ S
Hey,
A while back some people said they were working on getting started
tutorials. Any status on those? If you have them, even in unfinished
states, you could put them up on the Wiki and let everyone add to it.
Sometimes all it takes is a start and structure for people to add to.
Jason
--
Jason
That sound like a bug.
> -Original Message-
> From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] losing session token when using
> ServletRedirectResult
>
>
> currently using ServletRedirectRe
currently using ServletRedirectResult doesnt pass the jsessionid token
to the next request so im losing the session, I think it should be
passed on, what do you guys think? shall I file this as a bug? feature
request?
---
This sf.net ema
Hi,
I'll package it up and post it for download tommorow for those of you that
can't run it via WebStart. (I am working from home right now, so I don't
have the possibility to do it today)
Jon...
- Original Message -
From: "Samuel Mota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Got it. So for documentation purposes, the default fallback scenario is
a component manager at Request scope falls back to Session. Session
falls back to Application?
Request --> Session --> Application
And fallback basically provides a means for the ComponentManager class
to search for an enable
Hummm ...
I have no access to any JWS application, could you pack and allow us to download your
editor by http
?
thanks
+ Samuel G. Mota
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ 55 (11) 4417 7093
+ Business Application Dpt.
+ Netset Serviços em Tecnologia
+ a Hypercom Company
+ http://www.hypercom.com
---
Title: Message
Hi,
As anyone tried to use the xwork.xml editor
yet? Over the weekend, I fixed 2 small bugs in the saving of the
file:
1) Comments were not being saved, so any comments
you had in your xwork.xml file would be discarded after editing.
2) The Doctype node was not being wri
The Include tag also executes an action and uses its mapped view doesn't it?
I ported it from ww1 to ww2 a while ago and loaded it into Jira but it still
hasn't made it into cvs.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, Septembe
OK. Is there a use case for this? I don't believe that the fallback
property is getting used anywhere currently.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Carreira
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 12:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
