I think that change makes sense to change it to the way ww1.3 tags work
and that way we can also use localized messages for the labels too
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
I just noticed (actually, I’ve known it for a while, but now I need to
do something about it) that the UI tags all take plain strin
excellent, I have not even bothered looking at ognl docs, im sure theres
lots of other things ognl can do that I dont know about.
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
My bad, it should be:
http://www.ognl.org/2.6.3/Documentation/html/collectionConstruction.html
#mapConstruction
-Pat
-Original Messag
As I was trying to say, the reason to use the ConcurrentHashMap would be to
avoid unnecessary synchronization. Since the method is static many threads
might call it simultaneously, blocking eachother more than necessary.
Looking at the original code I guess the author (Pat?) was concerned about
per
After an action result forwarded to a jsp page, how can I get easily the
action url in the jsp page ?
Thank you for your help.
R.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Proj
Please create a Jira issue
-Original Message-
From: christoph sturm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] pico support
Hello people!
I am in the process of submitting webwork2 support to
pico/nanocontainer, and i w
Because Pico needs to build the objects... it can't just populate them
afterwards (a limitation with constructors)...
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dwelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] pico support
I'm cu
I'm curious... why are you writing your own ActionIvocation?
I would have expected that Pico integration would be through an
interceptor, much like XWork's own IoC support.
-Tim.
Quoting christoph sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello people!
>
> I am in the process of submitting webwork2 supp
Hello people!
I am in the process of submitting webwork2 support to
pico/nanocontainer, and i would need a little change to a xwork class.
I created a picoActionInvocation, and there I need access to the
request, and i get it through
req = (HttpServletRequest) extraContext.get(WebWorkStatics.H
Title: Message
I
wiki'd this in http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork+2+Internationalization
peace,
-cv
-Mensagem original-De: Drew McAuliffe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Enviada em: quinta-feira, 9 de outubro de
2003 14:58Para:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Assunto: RE: [OS-webwork]
single
Is there support for providing a resource key instead of a
text label, so that the label comes from a getText() call? If I'm understanding
your proposed change correctly, you could just say
Or does that work? Will "name.middle" in the
getText() call get picked up as a string?
If this do
Title: Message
Agreed. This is a huge help for me on a project that
migrated from Struts. I've got one big properties file, and now I can easily
shift it over to webwork. Thanks, webwork!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Patrick LightbodySent: Wednesday, Octo
Not to mention xpetstore.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Hani Suleiman
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Call for help
We all do!
Having said that, I think before testing our large app
Yeah, I think it's still up in the air... When we get 2.0 out and they
get their code done, we can certainly use it as a starting point...
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-
Title: Message
I don’t know about this… I
think something on the WebWork side can associate JS with the validations, but
the validator framework is in XWork.
I think the ExpressionValidators will have
to be ones where you catch that on the submit to the server… unless you
feel like rew
We all do!
Having said that, I think before testing our large applications with the
various arm-twisting they do unto webwork to get things just right, a good
starting point would be all the examples and tests that ww1 ships with
Mike Cannon-Brookes said:
>> Also, if anyone has some 1.3-based app
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
Also, if anyone has some 1.3-based applications that they can help me
test backwards compatibility in the near future (after this weekend when
I check in code and an upgrade doc), that would be greatly appreciated.
I have a very large 1.3-based application that I'd lov
My bad, it should be:
http://www.ognl.org/2.6.3/Documentation/html/collectionConstruction.html
#mapConstruction
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Francisco Hernandez
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
> Also, if anyone has some 1.3-based applications that they can help me
> test backwards compatibility in the near future (after this weekend when
> I check in code and an upgrade doc), that would be greatly appreciated.
I have a very large 1.3-based application that I'd love you to test
backwards
I just noticed (actually, I’ve known it for a while,
but now I need to do something about it) that the UI tags all take plain
strings for their labels and a few other attributes. In WebWork 1.3 all
attributes were parsed through the ValueStack and so I’m going to switch
this back to the ori
I have no idea :) I'll be happy to donate our stuff as soon as we get it
finished.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cameron Braid
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] UPDATED: hibernate/w
Title: Message
And then to make matters more complex it’d
be ideal if we could have the validation framework rules provide the _javascript_
– not too bad for simple ones but it gets much harder for the
ExpressionValidator.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Hey everyone,
Matt, Jason, Cameron, and I are very busy trying to close as many bugs
as possible these days in effort to get 2.0 out the door. However, there
are a few remaining issues that we're struggling with and we'd like to
get the community to help out.
* Documentation
* Backwards compati
Hi,
I have been tracking a bug through the webwork and OGNL code for a lot
longer than I should have. This has pointed out to me some places where
Exception handling could be greatly improved.
The error message reported was only:
"org.apache.jasper.JasperException"
with no other indication of
Right, but there's no need for an external lib, when you can just do:
Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap())
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Dick Zetterberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Bug catching
Matt,
How do we get to the webwork-extensions module you created?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [OS-webwork] Avalon Components w/ WebWork2
Just to clear up a
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] ScopeInterceptor
> can you write an example on how to use this interceptor?
Yes... I've got action having properties orderBy, l
Title: Message
Yeah..
I have done that.
There
are still a few things to tidy up before sharing the code.
I'll
get to it asap.
Cam
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason CarreiraSent: Friday, 10 October 2003 12:53
Title: RES: [OS-webwork] square brackets in field errors?
For now, I just dropped the controlheader.vm found in the JIRA comment, and everything's working fine :)
peace,
-cv
-Mensagem original-
De: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 9 de outubro de
Title: Message
I remember when we talked about this
before, you were looking for a way to get a list of the validations applied to
a field in the validation framework, and it wasn’t possible at the time…
This should be easy now.
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Braid
[mai
I'm working on updating the controlheader.vm to display all of the
errors... my Velocity skills are not that good, so I sent what I had to
Matt :-)
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
can you write an example on how to use this interceptor?
Michał Mosiewicz wrote:
Currently the only lifecycled thing is component. However I've found
components hard to fit in some cases.
Example: at first I created a paging component that would remember current
page parameters for a page. I thoug
Currently the only lifecycled thing is component. However I've found
components hard to fit in some cases.
Example: at first I created a paging component that would remember current
page parameters for a page. I thought that was quite nice, cause I could
create a generic puzzle to attach to differ
>
> Actually this code wouldn't fix anything. The difference is that this code
> is visibly not synchronized, while the previous code was unvisibly not
> synchronized.
>
> The point is that to make it working, both get and put must be in the same
> synchronized block. Otherwise you may just leave
- Original Message -
From: "Dick Zetterberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Bug catching contest...
>
> Can't you just fix this by using a ConcurrentHashMap or a
ConcurrentReaderHashMap from the EDU.oswego.c
Thank you matt, that is I am using, the evict() method. But Hibernate
silently flushes and may commit (if autocommit=true) the changes before a
session.find(..), so you have to set the session with a FlushMode=COMMIT to
prevent from this. Thus, you can evict() the object if you detects errors
from
Hi,
Is it possible that this is broken? Anyone seen this too? The setter on my
action class (takes primitive boolean) is always set to false, even if I
check the checkbox.
Thanks,
Mathias
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback
Fred Lamuette wrote:
I'm using almost the same pattern as you, I've created an interceptor that
loads the model in the action
(detection of the id paramter and extension of the ModelDriven interface to
add setModel(..) and getModelClass() method, thus I can load and store
easily my entity in my Mod
Okay.. Things like Avalon etc do seem kinda heavy to have in the core
WebWork.. Adding everything under the sun was one of the difficulties in
the Turbine framework.
Before I dive into writing my own Avalon container, does anyone have some
demo code they can share. And assuming it looks could,
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Rudin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 11:04 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] BeanUtil in WW 1.3
> Got a quick question regarding WW 1.3. I know that the BeanUtil
> class expects nested property references to use "/"
Can't you just fix this by using a ConcurrentHashMap or a ConcurrentReaderHashMap from
the EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent package for the expressions?
So the code would be something like:
public static Object compile(String expression) throws OgnlException {
Object o = null;
that doesnt work, but it would be cool if it did! :)
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
Why not just do this:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Drew McAuliffe
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] h
My many thanks to all the people that replied. I found a very nice way
to do this on the below article
http://www.ftponline.com/archives/premier/mgznarch/javapro/2001/01jan01/te0101/te0101.asp
It is quite generic and supports all browsers.
Thank you very much
sygram
John Patterson wrote:
42 matches
Mail list logo
