Sorry about the double post. My email client screwed up.
Gregg Bolinger
On 15 Jan 2004 at 17:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a stupid question. I have been reading through a
couple of tutorials and examples trying to get the gist of WW2. I
realize that WW2 is really decoupled from
just added this to the FAQ:
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/comments/Webwork2+FAQ
anytime someone asks a question i've seen asked before im going to add
entries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a stupid question. I have been reading through a
couple of tutorials and examples trying to get the
You can use ActionContext.getContext().getSession() to get a Map that
wraps the HttpSession and allows you to get/set to the Session.
For the HttpServletRequest, you can use
ServletActionContext.getRequest() (which is the same as
(HttpServletRequest)
ActionContext.getContext().get(WebWorkStatics.
Hey Greg,
Generally we try to avoid promoting access to those things directly
(setters and ActionContext.getSession() should suffice 99% of the time),
but you can get them via ServletActionContext.getXxx().
-Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
This may be a stupid question. I have been reading through a
couple of tutorials and examples trying to get the gist of WW2. I
realize that WW2 is really decoupled from J2EE but I am curious
as to how I can gain access to Sessions and HttpServletRequests
and the like. For example, saving a U
Title: Message
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Using+webwork-default.xml
shows
the 2 default stacks, but I hear you... Can you please create a Jira issue (and
assign to me if you can) applying to version 2.0 for this? I'll try to do it
tonight.
-Original Message-From: Matth
Java Open Source Programming : with XDoclet, JUnit, WebWork, Hibernate
(Java Open Source Library)
by Joseph Walnes (Author), Ara Abrahamian (Author), Mike Cannon-Brookes
(Author), Patrick A. Lightbody (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0471463620/104-3401764-391
1955
> -O
I am a moderator at www.javaranch.com and we have been
discussing creating a section for Open Source Projects with a
specific Forum for each project. Basically we would create a single
forum called Webwork. The catch is that you would need to
provide a link and specify Javaranch as the "Offic
Just because we talk about XWork documentation and
I have no permission to edit CVS file. Someone please fix a tiny error in the
docs\dependencies.html. There is an external link to http://jakarta.apache.com/commons/logging.html
I guess it has to be http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging.
Is there currently any books dedicated to Webwork. Preferrabley
Webwork2 even though I know it isn't final just yet.
Thanks
--
Gregg Bolinger
www.embeddedthought.com
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on
That's good to know Matthew. I am a moderator at Javaranch.com
and I am hoping to promote some more Webwork discussion.
Right now we have a forum called STRUTS and other frameworks.
In fact, this prompts me to send a message to the Webwork
developers.
Gregg Bolinger
On 15 Jan 2004 at 1
re: I have been using STRUTS and really like WebWork.
I am in the same boat. There are so many things "less tedious" in webwork.
Overall, during I do less file-switching(and mental switching) per action in my ide/development environment.
i.e.
--my actions look simpler.
-- I am no editin
Is there documentation regarding "recommended" intercept stacks?
There is a blub about what they all are, but not a lot about how their order is important.
Perhaps a little more "emphasis" could be put into -->
i.e. How does one setup up their interceptors if they want field value errors to
agreed, having a local copy is much better
Tracy Snell wrote:
It's nice to have documentation local. I'm frequently developing
somewhere without net access. The more docs I have local the better.
On Jan 15, 2004, at 2:27 PM, Kris Thompson wrote:
Why not just add a link to the one on TSS. I'm
Thanks Jason. I'll see where this gets me. ;)
Gregg Bolinger
On 15 Jan 2004 at 15:24, Jason Carreira wrote:
Either tld will work, if you put the webwork.tld in your WEB-INF... This
is useful because some IDE's will give you nice JSP editing features if
it can find the TLD there...
The webwor
Either tld will work, if you put the webwork.tld in your WEB-INF... This
is useful because some IDE's will give you nice JSP editing features if
it can find the TLD there...
The webwork-default.xml is in the webwork2 jar file... That way you
don't have to worry about setting it up yourself.
Jaso
That's great! I was expecting an answer like "in a year". Cool. I
am excited. I have been using STRUTS and really like WebWork.
I never touched Webwork 1.x. Figured I would just jump on board
with 2. Thanks for the info.
Gregg Bolinger
On 15 Jan 2004 at 15:17, Jason Carreira wrote:
It
Title: Message
These
should work the same as WW1 iteration stuff...
-Original Message-From: Mathias Berg
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08,
2004 2:46 AMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[OS-webwork] About ww:iterator tag
Thank you Patrick. Heh, i
It's due in the next week or so... We have 8 issues still open to fix or
move to 2.1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork2
>
>
> I was just wondering
It seems there are some descrepencies in the example app that
ships with Webwork2 Beta2 and the Quickstart guide on the WIKI.
The most obvious is of course the taglib used. The example uses
an actual webwork.tld file where the Quick Start uses the webwork2
JAR file.
I was just wondering whic
It's nice to have documentation local. I'm frequently developing
somewhere without net access. The more docs I have local the better.
On Jan 15, 2004, at 2:27 PM, Kris Thompson wrote:
Why not just add a link to the one on TSS. I'm OK with it.
--
I was just wondering if there is a estimated time of release for
WebWork2 Final. Also, are you going from Beta2 to another Beta,
RC1, or straight to Final.
Thanks.
--
Gregg Bolinger
www.embeddedthought.com
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored
Why not just add a link to the one on TSS. I'm OK with it.
Kris Thompson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Francisco Hernandez
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XWork 1.0 Release Immin
Whoa, that one is old and out of date so please don't use it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wayland Chan
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] URL to MVC framework comparison?
Sorry, I f
My understanding is that this is just the sort of thing that the template
system was designed for. You're supposed to develop a new set of templates,
put them under a different directory, and I think specify a theme in the
template tags. The theme points the template mechanism to the new directory,
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Feature+comparison+matrix+with+other+MVC+frameworks
On Thursday 15 January 2004 15:59, Wayland Chan wrote:
> I have seen it in the past but can't seem to find it.
>
> Does anyone have the link to that matrix that compares all the various web
> mvc frameworks a
Sorry, I found it by searching TSS.
FYI
http://waferproject.org/index.html
> I have seen it in the past but can't seem to find it.
>
> Does anyone have the link to that matrix that compares all the various web mvc
> frameworks
> available?
>
> Trying to dissuade someone from using Tapestry
I have seen it in the past but can't seem to find it.
Does anyone have the link to that matrix that compares all the various web mvc
frameworks available?
Trying to dissuade someone from using Tapestry here.
thanks
Ciao!
Wayland Chan
email: wchanATtrekspaceDOTcom
---
Just commited the updated docs from the wiki.
All docs should be included. If anything is missing, just give me a
note.
cheers,
Rainer
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 01:00, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
> All good questions... in fact, those are the hardest parts of making a
> release, so if anyone wants to h
29 matches
Mail list logo
