Blogged, added news on dev.java.net, and added news on
opensymphony.com... It's real!
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 10:53 PM
> To: WebWork
> Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 Released
&g
Congratulations on the release! I appreciate all the work you guys
have put into WebWork/XWork, and I look forward to what's coming next.
Anoop
On Feb 8, 2004, at 10:52 PM, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the release of WebWork 2.0. You can download it
at:
https://webwork.dev.
I'm dreaming, right?
- Original Message -
From:
Patrick
Lightbody
To: WebWork
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 10:52
PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0
Released
I'm pleased to announce the release of WebWork 2.0. You can
download
I'm pleased to announce the release of WebWork 2.0. You can download it
at:
https://webwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/693/2886/webwork-2.0.zip
XWork 1.0 has also been released and is available at:
https://xwork.dev.java.net/files/documents/709/2885/xwork-1.0.zip
Thank you to everyone who pro
Are you referencing the Jasper reports servlet in your web.xml? If so,
remove that.
Mathias
-Original Message-
From: Lars Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 19 november 2003 16:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
> Oh hang
Ok, thanks. I'll test and make sure it works.
Lars Fischer wrote:
Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't
working. It should work fine in 1.4!
It should ...
The first report was about WW 2.0 but I just tested 1.4 with WebLogic 8.1
(see below).
This is based on d
> Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't
> working. It should work fine in 1.4!
It should ...
The first report was about WW 2.0 but I just tested 1.4 with WebLogic 8.1
(see below).
This is based on deploying the provided 'webwork.war'.
java.lang.NoClassDefFound
: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Can you file issues for these? They all work on Orion.
Lars Fischer wrote:
> Joseph,
>
> it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
>
> weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag
> library u
Oh hang on, this looks like it's a 2.0 issue, that jasperreports isn't
working. It should work fine in 1.4!
Lars Fischer wrote:
Joseph,
it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library
uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The
Can you file issues for these? They all work on Orion.
Lars Fischer wrote:
Joseph,
it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library
uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class
'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag'
2003 15:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
>
>
> Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue
> myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as
> mine.
>
> On Wed, 1
Joseph,
it's the problem where somone already provided a patch:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspException: (line 1): Error in using tag library
uri='webwork' prefix='ww': The Tag class
'com.opensymphony.webwork.views.jsp.URLTag' has no setter method corresponding to TLD
declared attribute 'page', (JSP
1
I mailed a fixed taglib.tld to the mailing list earlier. Use it and it'll
work.
/Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 19 november 2003 15:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0 beta2/RC Released
Lars, WHAT abou
Lars, WHAT about the taglib.tld doesn't work? I filed one JIRA issue
myself today about it, but I have no idea if your issue was the same as
mine.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lars Fischer wrote:
> I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic
> (taglib.tld).
> Maybe the final
I'm not pleased to announce that this version does not work with WebLogic
(taglib.tld).
Maybe the final release deserves a test with this unimportant server
(unimportant for OpenSymphony developers).
> I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is
> finally out. This release
whatever happened to your plan for writing some documentation every day
for one month? :)
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is
finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a
final release that we hope will take place
I'm pleased to announce that the long-delayed WebWork 2.0 beta 2 is
finally out. This release can be considered a release candidate for a
final release that we hope will take place in the next week. I'm
currently uploading the zip file and I realize that the distro doesn't
include the source for th
I'd love to help out too
Regards,
-Andre Mermegas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Carreira
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Ok, so here's an id
Title: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
hi all,
I would be very interested in contributing to this,
as i am using webworks and hibernate to make a blog-like tool already
:-)
(it is only in the prototyping stage for now, but i
would rather contribute than make a parallel effort
Jason Carreira wrote:
Undying praise and gratitude? :-)
I tried that one, but my co-workers didn't fall for it :-) They just saw
the enourmous mountain of support email I'd have to deal with -> less
time for actual work.
/Rickard
---
This sf
> -Original Message-
> From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ironically, we're actually having a little trouble seeing
> what benefits
> it would give us, which is why we haven't released it (along
> with time
> constraints).
>
> /Rickard
Undying praise and gratitude?
> Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app:
>
> Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's
> RSSLibJ.
+1
Let's do it with keeping internationalization in mind (ie. possibly having
views and especially content available in multiple languages :)
And working e
>> Is your AOP Framework availible for public use ?
>
> Nope.
So your AOP framework is not an option here. Let's stick with Hibernate.
> we're actually having a little trouble seeing what
> benefits it would give us, which is why we haven't
> released it
Probably none. What advantage would it g
Cameron Braid wrote:
Rickard,
Is your AOP Framework availible for public use ?
Nope. I built it when we started on the CMS/portal SiteVision that we're
developing, but it has not yet been released for public use yet.
Ironically, we're actually having a little trouble seeing what benefits
it
Title: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Don't know how much value there would be in this nor what proportion of Webwork users would use velocity for presentation, but thought it might be an idea to demonstrate both jsp and velocity in this example app, or was this planned a
Rickard,
Is your AOP Framework availible for public use ?
..Cam..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rickard Öberg
Sent: Tuesday, 25 February 2003 6:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Jason Carreira wrote:
Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app:
Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's
RSSLibJ.
Roller is annoying me because of
a) performance and crashing issues, and
b) Support for PostgreSql is poor
:-)
Thoughts? Volunteers? Of cour
2003 11:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> What is "Roller"?
>
> Look like I am the only person who doesn't know this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --- Andrew Lombardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ernate, webwork, osaccess and any
> other
> >>opensymphony projects that would help.
> >>
> >>- Original Message -
> >>From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Sent: Monday, Fe
rnandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
this would definetely be a good thing, maybe it could use
sitemesh, hibernate, webwork, osaccess and any other
opensymphony projects that would help.
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of
> > Jason Carreira
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jason Carreira
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
>
> Definitely Sitemesh and OSCache...
gt; Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
>
>
> this would definetely be a good thing, maybe it could use
> sitemesh, hibernate, webwork, osaccess and any other
> opensymphony projects that would help.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason
, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app:
Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's
RSSLibJ.
Roller is annoying me because of
a) performance and crashing issues, and
b) Support
(Also a reply to Jason's email)
OK, both is fine with me :)
-Pat
> > Should this be bundled with WebWork 2.0? Probably not I'd guess...
> >
> > If not, should this be an OpenSymphony project? What is the primary
> goal
> > of the project: demonstrate WebWork 2.0 OR be a good webblogger?
>
> Ho
> Should this be bundled with WebWork 2.0? Probably not I'd guess...
>
> If not, should this be an OpenSymphony project? What is the primary
goal
> of the project: demonstrate WebWork 2.0 OR be a good webblogger?
Hopefully, it could be both. I think what will make it a good
demonstration is the
t
shouldn't get too difficult to jump into.
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
>
>
> The only questi
+1.
I'll contribute something if this gets off the ground.
Scott
Jason Carreira wrote:
Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app:
Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's
RSSLibJ.
Roller is annoying me because of
a) performance and crashing issues, and
b
t Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0 example app
> +1.
>
> I'll contribute something if this gets off the ground.
>
> Scott
>
> Jason Carreira wrote:
&g
Ok, so here's an idea for the Webwork2.0 sample app:
Let's do Roller, only better, using Webwork 2.0, Hibernate, and Joe's
RSSLibJ.
Roller is annoying me because of
a) performance and crashing issues, and
b) Support for PostgreSql is poor
:-)
Thoughts? Volunteers? Of course I'm volunteering..
on Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:09 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >
> > I'm one of those again
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Ottinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the
> mailing list previously (see
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3757306
> regarding your question on JELLY dependency!) ev
Inline...
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Kelvin Tan wrote:
> See inline reply.
>
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:01:12 -0500 (EST), Joseph Ottinger said:
> >I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the
> >mailing list previously (see
> >http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=375730
See inline reply.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 05:01:12 -0500 (EST), Joseph Ottinger said:
>I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the
>mailing list previously (see
>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3757306
>regarding your question on JELLY dependency!) every depende
I'm one of those against extra dependencies. As I said in the mailing list
previously (see
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3757306 regarding
your question on JELLY dependency!) every dependency adds extra
complexity. Formproc, in particular, means adding configuration to an
ex
Are we being a little paranoid about not introducing "another dependency"? (can
one be too paranoid about this? :-)
What is the real concern here? That we're potentially introducing an additional
point of instability, that we're increasing the download size of the framework,
that we're creating un
I did some work on some docs. Here's the beginnings... Please feel free
to add :-)
Title: Xwork Documentation
XWork
Introduction
What is Xwork?
Xwork is a generic command pattern framework.
Xwork 1.0 Mission Statement:
The Purpose: To create a generic, reusa
and I'd be happy to
help you if you want to do that. Which framework were you thinking of?
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelvin Tan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
&g
undle, like the messages from Webwork 1.x did, and Xwork 1.0
and WW 2.0 are (currently).
> -Original Message-
> From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
>
>
ry 13, 2003 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be
building your own validator? or will an existing one be used?
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
to put in
>localized and parameterized messages, we're sticking with our own.
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
>>Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: opensymphony-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-web
-
> From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
>
>
> i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be
> building your own validator?
I was under the impression that you can only use oscache with jsp but we plan
to use velocity only.
Regards,
Low
--- Francois Beauregard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer
> >> combination of tools.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Mike
code too ;-)
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Patrick Lightbody
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life. We shoul
i havent kept up with all the emails but will you guys be building your own
validator? or will an existing one be used?
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: RE: [O
re?
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
>
>
> Actually, I think Joe may be right for once in his life
Also, webwork is missing decorator/textfield.vm. Here's a stub that I
put in that doesn't quite work as no decorator object is defined in the
VelocityContext.
${decorator.Label}
Hrm ... on second thought. Is it easier if I put this through Jira? I
figured you might
nt: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: OFFTOPIC: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
> Do you guys bundle the Hibernate package in your web-app, or do you
> deploy it to the app server standalone? I am confused why their
> examples show Hibernate deployed to jBoss as a service, yet all th
Do you guys bundle the Hibernate package in your web-app, or do you
deploy it to the app server standalone? I am confused why their
examples show Hibernate deployed to jBoss as a service, yet all the
configuration files reference app-specific classpaths and mapping files.
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:25 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
> I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if
> someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint).
>
> Patrick and I were talking about releasing
re in 2.0. Just
make a simple Test action with a getFoo() method and then put $foo in your
.vm file and you're set.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:58 PM
Subje
Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:16 AM
> To: OS-Webwork
> Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
>
>
> All,
>
> We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new
> CRM product. I'm bias towards webwork and rea
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Jason Carreira wrote:
> I guess that depends on how much help we get :-) It would be good if
> someone besides Patrick and I were to work on things (hint hint).
>
> Patrick and I were talking about releasing a first Alpha of XW1.0 /
> WW2.0. What features from WW1.x need to be
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 2.0
>
>
> Low,
>
> I don't know about anyone else's dates, but I
knowing about them. Low - I can send you my code if you'd like to see a
"real-world" implementation, it's used for a public *.org website.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February
>> And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer
>> combination of tools.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mike
Add OSCache and you simply fly !!!
Francois
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you
> What sort of design pattern would you recommend for using/glue the four
> library
> together ? Or may be all this can be use in a very loose couple manner and it
> just fall in place nicely ? I think I've heard many time that the combination
> of the four tool together are great but haven't come
What sort of design pattern would you recommend for using/glue the four library
together ? Or may be all this can be use in a very loose couple manner and it
just fall in place nicely ? I think I've heard many time that the combination
of the four tool together are great but haven't come across an
Low,
I don't know about anyone else's dates, but I'm giving a presentation on
WebWork 2 at The Server Side's Symposium in mid June, so it will be stable,
tested and released by then ;)
And as for WW + Velocity + Hibernate + SiteMesh, yes that is a killer
combination of tools.
Cheers,
Mike
On 13
All,
We are currently evaluting the framework to use for our new CRM product. I'm
bias towards webwork and really like many of the features plan for webwork 2.0
( I've been using webwork and are not entirely happy with the current version
).
So, my concern now is the schedule of webwork 2.0 and w
I don't plan on using it, so as long as it doesn't mess up the core +1
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDisp
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
I found a possible way around this, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea or
not :)
What if the FilterDispatcher never actually makes a call to
filterChain.doFilter()? This would get around the "duplicate view request"
problem outlined below, but would require that the fil
-
From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? [Small problem]
> Found one small problem with this approach (and it may just be that using
> th
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0
> framework/config more rigid and to remove the
> ResultInterceptor stuff and specifically hard code the
> ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ the ser
-
From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher?
> Patrick Lightbody wrote:
>
> > What do you think? Rickard, would this work for
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher?
> Patrick Lightbody wrote:
>
> > What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone else,
would
> > this work for YOU? ;)
>
> Works f
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone else, would
this work for YOU? ;)
Works for me! :-)
/Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senselogic
Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com
---
Th
I've got a very rough "FilterDispatcher" in WebWork sandbox (2.0). If works
like this:
if you request "/success.jsp", it'll look up to see if "/success.jsp" is
used as a result of any action. The logic is:
- first try the "success" result
- then try the "input" result
- then try any result if the
78 matches
Mail list logo
