I honesty do not remember all I remember is that it runs on Linux hosts and
does a directory scan of either /opt or maybe it was /var/www.
When I looked at the NVTs in that group they all were looking for older
software then what we were using on Centos 6 so I disabled the entire group.
Louis
Just out of the curiosity, which NVT was that?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 06:40:03AM -0400, Louis Bohm wrote:
>
> I have only once encountered a case where the endpoint even noticed the scan.
> And that in itself was a total fluke that I was even alerted to it. One of
> the NVT checks actually c
Hi,
On 26.04.2018 11:16, Thijs Stuurman wrote:
> (I always have the feeling my Nessus scanner performs the same tests
way faster and with a lot less CPU stress)
to have some sort of comparable numbers / data here you would need to
enable CGI Scanning and Throughout Tests in Nessus if not already
I am trying to change the settings for a user to show more than 10 rows per
page (not to be confused with setting max rows per page)
After digging out the UUID of the user I am doing the following:
omp --xml='Rows Per
Page10'
unfortunately when I am getting the I see that the value is
reset t
My master has 8vCPUs and 8GB RAM and I am always pushing it to the max. My
concurrent NVTs is set to 5 while my concurrent hosts is set to 20. When I say
I regularly push it to the max I mean I see loads on the host between 10 and 30
for a few hours at a time.
My slaves are setup with similar
Hi Peter
You will need to adjust the concurrent NVTs parameter to best suit your
client machines, but with the extra CPU on the server, you can scan more
targets concurrently, so the whole scan will complete quicker.
So, set the "Maximum concurrently executed NVTs per host" to a nice low
figure t
I don't think the SSD or RAM will do much, it's the concurrent threads that
will help.
Somehow my OpenVAS machines use quite a bit of CPU per NVT test which makes me
limit my 4 core slaves to 2 tasks at once.
Not all tasks are the same of course, when there is no web service running the
amount o
Am 25.04.2018 um 22:16 schrieb Peter Collins:
> I'm currently scanning on a 4-core vm with 4gm ram, in Virtualbox on a
> laptop, within OSSIM. Traffic average during a scan is about 4kB/s
> (kiloBYTES). Network pipe is not the bottleneck. It can provide 20mb/s
> (megaBITS) easily. If I get a 12-co
