I like this idea! It'll help me a lot! :)
I did see something weird in the code, though. The
ConversationManager.getInstance() method blasts the map of
conversations every time it's called (it creates a new one). This
code is called from multiple places, so it would seem like we're
losing
Would it be necessary (or at least nice :) to perhaps implement a
portlet-specific implementation of the conversation management, too?
Also, would you guys like me to submit some patches to help out? Is
there anything that you'd feel comfortable letting me tackle?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:04
think there is enough work left to
do ;)
LieGrue,
strub
--- James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com schrieb am Fr, 27.3.2009:
Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Betreff: Re: setting conversation at request startup
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Freitag
Do you have to parse it more than one time?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi;
It will used by the XML parser to parse the beans.xml files.
Gurkan
2009/4/14 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Hi!
Since WEBBEANS_XML_LOCATIONS in the
.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
schrieb am Di, 14.4.2009:
Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Betreff: Re: WEBBEANS_XML_LOCATIONS keeps connection
open
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Dienstag, 14. April 2009, 16:32
Do
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
I want to step back from the Expert Group. Question is now:
Does one of you want to be on that EG ? This community would
make most sense to have an active OWB committer being part
of the spec/EG.
I would be
are deep enough into OWB yet, but
personally would highly appreciate to see you as a committer
on OWB in the future :)
LieGrue,
strub
--- James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:
Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that we need two so why not you and Gurkan :) ?
Sorry, I followed this thread partly on my phone, so it was somewhat
tough to follow I guess. Do we need two?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Does not hurt. Originally we were two as well. Both from Shale
(James and I)
Well, it wouldn't hurt to have someone else on there that isn't a
JSFer. From what I understand Crazy Bob is interested in allowing
the use
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
to be honest, I never understood, why the DI layer needs to be part of
an JEE tied spec... There should be a flexible/extensible DI layer at SE.
Extensions for that could be added to JEE...
+1000! :) I really don't
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Bob originally was interested in having IOC for SE also. But from what I've
seen so far, he is imho one of those who requests that all the annotations
should go under javax.se.
To me this sounds more like 'oh this
IMHO, you should really generate a new release candidate (along with
tags). That's the way we do it in Commons.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok, I have re-uploaded the artifacts and svn tag. Locations are the same. New
svn tag is 777602.
have a look at it
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:05:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
IMHO, you should really
...
M2-rc2/plugins...
etc..
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 2:17:36 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2
well for us.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
And, new tags in SVN. Tags are cheap and it helps us to know what has
changed between rcs.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
If you keep reusing the same
In maven2 releases should have SNAPSHOT dependencies.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, you are right. We forget to update main pom while releasing M2
properties
openwebbeans.version1.0.0-incubating-M2/openwebbeans.version -- *This
must be
Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.comwrote:
It is a good idea and it could be an OWB extension. Could you create a Jira
for this?
But I think, firstly we have to adapt the last draft specification
requirements to our implementation :)
Thanks;
/Gurkan
2009/6/18 James Carman ja
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Gurkan
Erdogducgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, Terracotta provides distributed cache for multiple nodes. And
generally it is used for saving user sessions for fail-over scenarios. Does
wicket use it for clustering page data?
Yes, there is terracotta
I took care of it. I meant to do this the other day when it came in.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.comwrote:
Yes. +1
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent
no, that's a GREAT idea! :)
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a good idea.
2009/12/18 Sven Linstaedt sven.linsta...@googlemail.com
I also thought about migrating all JSF compile time depend classes from
webbeans-impl to webbeans-jsf for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12689498#action_12689498
]
James Carman commented on OWB-87:
-
When I try to ask the current conversation (obtained
21 matches
Mail list logo
