with Seam) when it can't be used in place of it?
That seems silly. We should strive for the best all-around IoC
paradigm for Java, regardless of where it's running. It should have
hooks for different scopes (similar to Guice and Spring and HiveMind,
etc)
--
Arash Rajaeeyan
/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Arash Rajaeeyan
.
putting objects in JNDI directory is not neccessary, but a a place for them
on JNDI tree, (when program is deployed in EE) may be very usefull.
Regards
Arash Rajaeeyan
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Arash!
Currently the spec imho only says
Hi Arash;
We will just apply the specification requirements.
Thanks;
/Gurkan
From: Arash Rajaeeyan arash.rajaee...@gmail.com
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:28:03 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Created
: Gurkan Erdogdu
The term WebBeans has completely removed from the final PR spec and also
the xml config files name has changed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
--
Arash Rajaeeyan
