I am also very interested to have a full SE version of open web beans.any one here has checked Spring RCP ? Spring has a full stack competing with Java EE stack. they have also a solution for RCP and Fat Clients, an SE version of JSR 299 can attract lots of Spring developers, the EE dependent one will not be much interesting to them.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > > > Bob originally was interested in having IOC for SE also. But from what > I've seen so far, he is imho one of those who requests that all the > annotations should go under javax.se. > > > > To me this sounds more like 'oh this thing can't beat guice, so it should > be for EJB only which we do not use anyway' ... > > So, why write a spec that's loosely based on Guice (a lot of concepts > look similar; along with Seam) when it can't be used in place of it? > That seems silly. We should strive for the best all-around IoC > paradigm for Java, regardless of where it's running. It should have > hooks for different scopes (similar to Guice and Spring and HiveMind, > etc) > -- Arash Rajaeeyan
