Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ANN] LuCI - Lua Configuration Interface

2008-07-15 Thread Steven Barth
Hello wlanmac, at first thank you for your feedback. will it be difficult to remove overall or will the LuCI code be mixed up with non-GUI scripts? It's just a separate set of packages: not more, not less. As for LuCI, I would like to know more about why Lua and hence LuCI? You say It's not

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ARM Kernel crash

2008-07-15 Thread John Crispin
activate CONFIG_KALLSYMS and then paste the oops dump pls wlanmac wrote: Hi all, I have a problem with a program crashing an ARM kernel - and crashing it hard. The program uses the Tun/Tap driver, but I'm not certain that is the issue. I haven't seen this behavior on any other

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ANN] LuCI - Lua Configuration Interface

2008-07-15 Thread Steven Barth
Yeah, sounds like many scripting languages... except shell ;-) Agreed, there is always some distribution specific glue needed. I'm leaning toward a 'meta configuration' (in XML) which can be edited, verified, and translated into distro specific configurations. Ah I see you added another

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ANN] LuCI - Lua Configuration Interface

2008-07-15 Thread Mike Baker
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:38:24PM +0200, wlanmac wrote: But if you are using the Gargoyle approach - that is not bad but simply a different approach - you have to mess up with Shell and learn JavaScript or in your case *yourFrontendLanguage*. True. But, I'd argue that JavaScript

[OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread Steven Van Ingelgem
Hi, What packages are minimally needed to make an OpenWRT run? In kamikaze there was a minimum release, but in the current SVN version it doesn't look that way anymore? The packages getting compiled are: - base-files - bridge-utils - broadcom-diag - wireless-tools - nvram - broadcom-wl -

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread Jan Willies
Steven Van Ingelgem wrote: What packages are minimally needed to make an OpenWRT run? In kamikaze there was a minimum release, but in the current SVN version it doesn't look that way anymore? - bridge-utils - wireless-tools - broadcom-wl - dnsmasq - dropbear - iptables ^- not strictly

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ANN] LuCI - Lua Configuration Interface

2008-07-15 Thread wlanmac
Sorry, but in some respects I look at all these web interfaces and just cringe; the webif was never meant to be a lifelong ambition, it should only be a very thin layer between uci and the browser. All of the schema and validation, as well as the i18n should actually be handled on the uci

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add dynamic MMC-over-SPI-GPIO driver

2008-07-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 14 July 2008 22:54:41 Andrew Morton wrote: +static int gpiommc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + static int instance; + struct gpiommc_device *d = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct spi_gpio_platform_data pdata; + int err = -ENOMEM; + + d-spi_pdev =

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add dynamic MMC-over-SPI-GPIO driver

2008-07-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 07:06:49 Ben Nizette wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 21:09 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: This driver provides a sysfs interface to dynamically create and destroy GPIO-based MMC/SD card interfaces. So an MMC or SD card can be connected to generic GPIO pins and be

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add SPI over GPIO driver

2008-07-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 07:30:51 Ben Nizette wrote: Looks good overall. I'm not sure that it need pretend to be hotpluggable though Because the hardware _is_ hotpluggable. (i.e. the board info can be hardwired so there's no need for the board setup callback). I'm not sure why we should

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread Mike Baker
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:21:06PM +0200, Steven Van Ingelgem wrote: The once in italic I believe I can remove, but can someone please confirm this because I don't want to brick another modem ;-) If you start a fresh build and leave the package selection at defaults you'll get only slightly

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add dynamic MMC-over-SPI-GPIO driver

2008-07-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 02:07:57 RHS Linux User wrote: Hi All, I wonder if this MMC driver can be extended to support 2 MMC devices? It does support an infinite amount of devices. See the initscript for adding another one. -- Greetings Michael.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread RB
For reference, bricked is a term I use when there is absolutely nothing that can be done to recover a router -- it should not be applied to cases of nihilistic ignorance or apathy. I think most of us here refer to that as a system that isn't even recoverable via serial terminal - the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread Steven Van Ingelgem
Well, The default SVN build is 1.9M in size. IIRC the micro build of whiterussion was like 1.3M, so I wonder what I need to remove to get it back to that size. BTW? Does anyone know if there is already an OS driver available for the WRT54GL modems (I'm speaking about the Broadcom wireless). I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread RB
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Steven Van Ingelgem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What packages are minimally needed to make an OpenWRT run? The below list is, for all intents and purposes, the minimal list. Notes below on removal. The packages getting compiled are: - base-files - bridge-utils

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread Felix Fietkau
RB wrote: - broadcom-diag Removable if you don't care whether the LEDs work; may break other core scripts in base-files that depend on what it provides, though. Don't. Failsafe relies on it. - dropbear Not necessary if SSH isn't a concern (I rather think it is). I believe you want SSH,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Minimal build of OpenWRT

2008-07-15 Thread RB
The default SVN build is 1.9M in size. IIRC the micro build of whiterussion was like 1.3M, so I wonder what I need to remove to get it back to that size. Whiterussian's build process was completely different, and I don't see much attention being paid to the systems with under 2MB of flash any

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:04 -0400, Eric Bishop wrote: It is ironic that the LuCI team decided to make an announcement regarding their project today. I have also been working on a new (open source) web interface for Kamikaze called Gargoyle, and am now releasing the first beta version, which

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-15 Thread Eric Bishop
Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:04 -0400, Eric Bishop wrote: It is ironic that the LuCI team decided to make an announcement regarding their project today. I have also been working on a new (open source) web interface for Kamikaze called Gargoyle, and am now releasing the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add dynamic MMC-over-SPI-GPIO driver

2008-07-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 14 July 2008 21:09:18 Michael Buesch wrote: This driver provides a sysfs interface to dynamically create and destroy GPIO-based MMC/SD card interfaces. So an MMC or SD card can be connected to generic GPIO pins and be configured dynamically from userspace. Ok, I had requests in